An investigation of thrust, depth and the impedance cardiogram as measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation efficacy in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

Ventricular fibrillation waveform properties influenced by thoracic impedance guided chest compressions in a porcine model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Quantitative measures extracted from ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform reflect the metabolic state of the myocardium and are associated with survival outcome. The quality of delivered chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are also linked with survival. The aim of this research is to explore the viability and effectiveness of a thoracic impedance (TI) based chest compression (CC) guidance system to control CC depth within individual subjects and influence VF waveform properties.

METHODS

This porcine investigation includes an analysis of two protocols. CC were delivered in 2 min episodes at a constant rate of 110 CC min-1. Subject-specific CC depth was controlled using a TI-thresholding system where CC were performed according to the amplitude (ZRMS, 0.125 to 1.250 Ω) of a band-passed TI signal (ZCC). Protocol A was a retrospective analysis of a 12-porcine study to characterise the response of two VF waveform metrics: amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) and mean slope (MS), to varying CC quality. Protocol B was a prospective 12-porcine study to determine if changes in VF waveform metrics, due to CC quality, were associated with defibrillation outcome.

RESULTS

Protocol A: A directly proportional relationship was observed between ZRMS and CC depth applied within each subject (r = 0.90; p <0.001). A positive relationship was observed between ZRMS and both AMSA (p <0.001) and MS (p <0.001), where greater TI thresholds were associated with greater waveform metrics.

PROTOCOL B

MS was associated with return of circulation following defibrillation (odds ratio = 2.657; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

TI-thresholding was an effective way to control CC depth within-subjects. Compressions applied according to higher TI thresholds evoked an increase in AMSA and MS. The response in MS due to deeper CC resulted in a greater incidence of ROSC compared to shallow chest compressions.

Pediatric defibrillation shocks alone do not cause heart damage in a porcine model

•

AEDs utilize specific low energy pediatric modes to reduce myocardial damage.

•

This study applied various shocks in sinus rhythm without cardiac instrumentation.

•

Isolated clinically relevant shock sequences do not result in myocardial damage.

•

Typical variations in pediatric shocks did not affect safety and efficacy.

•

These results may inform future pediatric resuscitation guidelines.

Aim

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) use various shock protocols with different characteristics when deployed in pediatric mode. The aim of this study is to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of different AED pediatric protocols using novel experimental approaches.

Methods

Two defibrillation protocols (A and B) were assessed across two studies: Protocol A: escalating (50–75–90 J) defibrillation waveform with higher voltage, shorter duration and equal phase durations. Protocol B; non-escalating (50–50–50 J) defibrillation waveform with lower voltage, longer duration and unequal phase durations.

Experiment 1: Isolated shock damage was assessed following shocks to 12 anesthetized pigs. Animals were randomized into two groups, receiving three shocks from Protocol A (50–75–90 J) or B (50–50–50 J). Cardiac function, cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and histopathology were analyzed. Experiment 2: Defibrillation safety and efficacy were assessed through shock success, ROSC, ST-segment deviation and contractility following 16 randomized shocks from protocol A or B delivered to 10 anesthetized pigs in VF.

Results

Experiment 1: No clinically meaningful difference in cTnI, CPK, ST-segment deviation, ejection fraction or histopathological damage was observed following defibrillation with either protocol. No difference was observed between protocols at any timepoint. Experiment 2: all defibrillation types demonstrated shock success and ROSC ≥ 97.5%. Post-ROSC contractility was similar between protocols.

Conclusions

There is no evidence that administration of clinically relevant shock sequences, without experimental confounders, result in significant myocardial damage in this model of pediatric resuscitation. Typical variations in AED pediatric mode settings do not affect defibrillation safety and efficacy.