First do no harm: Echocardiography during cardiac arrest may increase pulse check duration

U SO CARE-The Impact of Cardiac Ultrasound during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial

BACKGROUND

Actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS); however, data on POCUS during CPR are sparse and conflicting. This randomized trial investigated the effects of POCUS during CPR on team performance and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine residents performed CPR with or without available POCUS in simulated cardiac arrests. The primary endpoint was hands-on time. Data analysis was performed using video recordings.

RESULTS

Hands-on time was 89% (87-91) in the POCUS and 92% (89-94) in the control group (difference 3, 95% CI for difference 2-4, p < 0.001). POCUS teams had delayed defibrillator attachments (33 vs. 26 sec, p = 0.017) and first rhythm analysis (74 vs. 52 sec, p = 0.001). Available POCUS was used in 71%. Of the POCUS teams, 3 stated a POCUS-derived diagnosis, with 49 being correct and 42 followed by a correct treatment decision. Four teams made a wrong diagnosis and two made an inappropriate treatment decision.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS during CPR resulted in lower hands-on times and delayed rhythm analysis. Correct POCUS diagnoses occurred in 52%, correct treatment decisions in 44%, and inappropriate treatment decisions in 2%. Training on POCUS during CPR should focus on diagnostic accuracy and maintenance of high-quality CPR.

Point-of-care ultrasound in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: A prospective survey study

PURPOSE

The ultrasound applications, examination facilities and methods used by otolaryngology and head and neck surgeons may vary and be different. This study was conducted to assess the methods used for head-and-neck point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS).

METHODS

This prospective survey study was conducted from 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2019. The surgeons of otolaryngology and head neck surgery who used POCUS in their daily practice were recruited for analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 30 male and 14 female surgeons who used neck POCUS were recruited. Thirty-nine (89%) surgeons placed patients in a supine position with the head toward the operator. Forty (91%) surgeons performed US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), and 35 (80%) surgeons did not use local anesthesia during US-FNA. Thirty-nine (88%) surgeons used the long-axis method to harvest the specimen, and forty-one (93%) used a free-hand method. Most surgeons (25, 57%) used 22G needles for US-FNA, and 29 (66%) used 18G for US-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB). For the cost analysis, reimbursements for US-related procedures were relatively cheaper than those for computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

CONCLUSION

POCUS can be performed by otolaryngology and head and neck specialists with a wide scope of applications and in a cost-effective manner.

Emerging and Future Technologies in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Care

The care for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is evolving and will be influenced by future and emerging technologies that will play a role in the systems of care for these patients. Recent advances in extracorporeal life support and point-of-care ultrasound imaging, both in-hospital and out-of-hospital, may offer a therapeutic solution in some systems for patients with refractory or recurrent cardiac arrest. Drones capable of delivering automated external defibrillators to the scene of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, advances in digital and mobile technologies to notify and leverage bystander response, and wearable life detection technologies may improve survival.