Impact of prehospital airway interventions on outcome in cardiac arrest following drowning: A study from the CARES Surveillance Group

Association of pre-hospital tracheal intubation with outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by drowning comparing to supraglottic airway device: A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by drowning who were treated with either endotracheal intubation (ETI) or a supraglottic airway (SGA) device.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes of patients with OHCA by drowning according to airway management using a Japanese nationwide population-based registry (All-Japan Utstein Registry). Adult patients with OHCA treated in 2014-2020 with advanced airway management (ETI or SGA) were included. Patients who received ETI during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were matched with those treated with SGA based on propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio with a 0.2 calliper width. The outcome measures were the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival at one month, and favourable neurological outcomes defined as a Cerebral Performance Category Scale score of 1 or 2.

RESULTS

Of the 11,703 eligible patients, 4,467 (38.2%) and 7,236 (61.8%) underwent ETI and SGA, respectively. A total of 3,566 patients in each cohort were matched. The ROSC rate was higher in those treated with ETI versus SGA (207/3,566 [5.8%] versus 167/3,566 [4.7%], respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.55). There was no intergroup difference in one-month survival or favourable neurological outcome (32/3566 [0.90%] versus 34/3566 [0.95%]; odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; and 9/3566 [0.25%] versus 8/3566 [0.22%]; odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.43-2.92), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity score-matched study of adult OHCA by drowning, ETI compared to SGA was associated with ROSC but not associated with survival and favourable neurological outcomes at one month.

2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation engages in a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid science. Draft Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations are posted online throughout the year, and this annual summary provides more concise versions of the final Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations from all task forces for the year. Topics addressed by systematic reviews this year include resuscitation of cardiac arrest from drowning, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults and children, calcium during cardiac arrest, double sequential defibrillation, neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest for adults and children, maintaining normal temperature after preterm birth, heart rate monitoring methods for diagnostics in neonates, detection of exhaled carbon dioxide in neonates, family presence during resuscitation of adults, and a stepwise approach to resuscitation skills training. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research. Additional topics are addressed with scoping reviews and evidence updates.

2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation engages in a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid science. Draft Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations are posted online throughout the year, and this annual summary provides more concise versions of the final Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations from all task forces for the year. Topics addressed by systematic reviews this year include resuscitation of cardiac arrest from drowning, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults and children, calcium during cardiac arrest, double sequential defibrillation, neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest for adults and children, maintaining normal temperature after preterm birth, heart rate monitoring methods for diagnostics in neonates, detection of exhaled carbon dioxide in neonates, family presence during resuscitation of adults, and a stepwise approach to resuscitation skills training. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research. Additional topics are addressed with scoping reviews and evidence updates.

A systematic review of interventions for resuscitation following drowning

Objectives

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, in collaboration with drowning researchers from around the world, aimed to review the evidence addressing seven key resuscitation interventions: 1) immediate versus delayed resuscitation; (2) compression first versus ventilation first strategy; (3) compression-only CPR versus standard CPR (compressions and ventilations); (4) ventilation with and without equipment; (5) oxygen administration prior to hospital arrival; (6) automated external defibrillation first versus cardiopulmonary resuscitation first strategy; (7) public access defibrillation programmes.

Methods

The review included studies relating to adults and children who had sustained a cardiac arrest following drowning with control groups and reported patient outcomes. Searches were run from database inception through to April 2023. The following databases were searched Ovid MEDLINE, Pre-Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. The findings are reported as a narrative synthesis.

Results

Three studies were included for two of the seven interventions (2,451 patients). No randomised controlled trials were identified. A retrospective observational study reported in-water resuscitation with rescue breaths improved patient outcomes compared to delayed resuscitation on land (n = 46 patients, very low certainty of evidence). The two observational studies (n = 2,405 patients), comparing compression-only with standard resuscitation, reported no difference for most outcomes. A statistically higher rate of survival to hospital discharge was reported for the standard resuscitation group in one of these studies (29.7% versus 18.1%, adjusted odds ratio 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.01-2.36) (very low certainty of evidence).

Conclusion

The key finding of this systematic review is the paucity of evidence, with control groups, to inform treatment guidelines for resuscitation in drowning.

Drowning in the United States: Patient and Scene Characteristics using the novel CARES Drowning Variables

INTRODUCTION

Drowning results in more than 360,000 deaths annually, making it the 3rd leading cause of unintentional injury death worldwide. Prior studies examining drowning internationally have reviewed factors surrounding drowning however in the U.S. limited data exists. This study evaluated the novel drowning elements collected in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) during the first 2 years of data collection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the CARES database identified cases of drowning etiology for the two years 2020 and 2021. Demographics and incident characteristics were collected. Characteristics included items such as body of water, precipitating event, and who extracted patients. Survival to hospital discharge and neurological outcomes were compared between groups based on who initiated CPR using Pearson's Chi-Squared tests.

RESULTS

Among 1,767 drowning cases, 69.7% were male, 47.1% white and 11.9% survived to hospital discharge. Body of water was often natural body (36.2%) or swimming pool (25.9%) and bystanders removed the patient in 42.7% of incidents. Swimming was the most common activity at time of submersion (18.6%) however in 50.2% of cases, activity was unknown or missing. When compared to EMS/First Responder initiating CPR, odds of neurologically favorable survival were significantly higher in the Bystander initiated CPR group (OR=2.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-4.01).

CONCLUSION

In this national cohort of drowning patients in cardiac arrest, the novel CARES drowning elements provide additional detail of epidemiological factors. Bystander CPR was associated with improved neurological outcomes. Future studies utilizing the drowning elements can inform injury prevention strategies.