Experience and satisfaction with a multidisciplinary care unit for patients with psoriasis an psoriatic arthritis

Inter-relationships between cardiovascular, renal and metabolic diseases: Underlying evidence and implications for integrated interdisciplinary care and management

Cardiovascular, renal and metabolic (CaReMe) diseases are individually among the leading global causes of death, and each is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. However, as these conditions commonly coexist in the same patient, the individual risk of mortality and morbidity is further compounded, leading to a considerable healthcare burden. A number of pathophysiological pathways are common to diseases of the CaReMe spectrum, including neurohormonal dysfunction, visceral adiposity and insulin resistance, oxidative stress and systemic inflammation. Because of the shared pathology and common co-occurrence of the CaReMe diseases, the value of managing these conditions holistically is increasingly being realized. A number of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches have been shown to offer simultaneous metabolic, cardioprotective and renoprotective benefits, leading to improved patient outcomes across the CaReMe spectrum. In addition, increasing value is being placed on interdisciplinary team-based and coordinated care models built on greater integration between specialties to increase the rate of early diagnosis and adherence to practice guidelines, and improve clinical outcomes. This interdisciplinary approach also facilitates integration between primary and specialty care, improving the patient experience, optimizing resources, and leading to efficiencies and cost savings. As the burden of CaReMe diseases continues to increase, implementation of innovative and integrated care delivery models will be essential to achieve effective and efficient chronic disease management and to ensure that patients benefit from the best care available across all three disciplines.

A multidisciplinary dermatology-gastroenterology-rheumatology (DER.RE.GA) unit for the care of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: analysis of the first 5 years from the dermatologist's perspective

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) constitute a heterogenous group of chronic and highly disabling conditions. The clinical challenges they often pose led to formation of numerous dermo-rheumatological interdisciplinary units around the world, which are reported to benefit their patients in various ways. The present paper describes our experience with a multidisciplinary dermatology-rheumatology-gastroenterology unit DERREGA at the IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo of Pavia over a period of 5 years of its activity (2017-2022). A digital database was created, containing the medical records of 146 patients referred to the dermatology unit only by rheumatologists or gastroenterologists belonging to the multidisciplinary unit DERREGA. Then, aspects such as demographics, initial basis of referral and final diagnosis among the patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified as either gastroenterological or rheumatological, and then categorized according to the specific basis of referral. Most of the gastroenterological patients (97%) were affected by inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Rheumatological patients were divided in three subgroups, including patients referred with vasculitis, arthropathies (undifferentiated arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and other arthritis) and other rheumatological diseases. Then, final diagnoses were evaluated in each group. Almost a third of IBD patients received a diagnosis of paradoxical psoriasis. Dermatological examination allowed diagnosis of minimal psoriasis based on Caspar criteria in over 70% of the patients admitted with undifferentiated arthritis. A multidisciplinary approach is suggested to provide more effective management of IMIDs and, specifically, from a dermatological perspective, allows for the diagnosis of minimal manifestations of psoriasis in patients with a provisional diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis.

Multidisciplinary Rheuma–Derma Clinics: 5 Years of Experience at the San Marco Hospital in Catania

Introduction

Early psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnosis is critical to prescribe timely treatment to prevent the irreversible joint damage and the many other problems that patients with PsA experience. This retrospective study aimed to highlight the benefits of a Rheuma–Derma Clinic focused on the early diagnosis and prompt treatment of PsA with a shared approach among Italian psoriasis patients. Diagnosing PsA early is the main goal to reduce joint damage and disability in the patients affected. Studies describing the results of rheuma–derma clinics aimed to reach this goal emerged in the last decade. This study presents limitations and advantages typical of retrospective designs.

Methods

A Rheuma–Derma Clinic was created in 2017 at the Rheumatology Department of the Hospital Policlinico Gaspare Rodolico of the University of Catania in San Marco, Italy. This study compared the number of patients under disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment 5 years before and after the joint clinic was created. A rheumatologist and dermatologist simultaneously assessed patients with psoriasis and/or PsA to obtain a rapid multidisciplinary diagnostic approach and a shared therapeutic strategy. In addition, demographic, clinical, and clinimetrics data were collected.

Results

The number of patients with PsA receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs increased 47% (from 255 to 374 patients) before and after the joint clinic was implemented. Likewise, those receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs increased by 47% (from 367 to 539) as well. Additionally, for all the clinimetrics evaluated (DAS28, HAQ, BASDAI, DAPSA, PASI, PGA), there was an improvement over the 12 months under the Rheuma–Derma Clinic care. The measures that improved the most were DAPSA, PGA, PASI, and BASDAI.

Conclusion

The implementation of the Rheuma–Derma Clinic was associated with an increase in the number of patients diagnosed, the number of patients with PsA receiving DMARD treatments, and improvements in clinimetrics among the study participants.

Psoriatic arthritis needs to be detected early to treat it correctly and for its consequences in patients with psoriasis to be prevented. This study was carried out to find out if shared clinics where rheumatologists and dermatologists care for patients together helped to control psoriatic arthritis better and improve the life of the patients affected by it. The shared clinic was created in 2017 at the Rheumatology Department of the Hospital Policlinico Gaspare Rodolico of the University of Catania in San Marco, Italy. The study collected information about the number of patients diagnosed with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, the number of patients receiving treatments, and the results of quality of life and other standard tests. During the time that the joint clinic was in place, the number of patients receiving treatments specific for diseases such as psoriatic arthritis increased from 622 (before the clinic was started) to 913. The patients treated in this clinic also had improvements in their quality of life and other aspects. This study found that a clinic where rheumatologists and dermatologists work together to care for patients can increase the number of patients treated with drugs that are specific for their disease and improve their overall health.

Contemporary treatment patterns in plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting about 2% of the general population. Although there are many treatment options, and new medications have been introduced, the disease is considered not curable, and it may seriously affect patients’ quality of life.

Aim

The authors present contemporary treatment patterns used by dermatologists in Poland to manage plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, particularly regarding systemic treatment. The authors also aimed to analyse how these treatment patterns are influenced by the guidelines of the Polish Dermatological Society.

Material and methods

The author’s questionnaire, consisting of 13 questions was used. It included demographic and professional characteristics of questioned dermatologists, as well as the assessment of the attitudes towards management of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Results

A total of 132 dermatologists completed the questionnaire. Most of the specialists worked in out-patient clinics and private practices. The most commonly used topicals for psoriasis included: glucocorticosteroids, a combination of glucocorticosteroid and vitamin D analogue and salicylic acid. Regarding the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, most of the specialists declared using systemic therapy and a combination of systemic therapy and phototherapy. The majority of the respondents were particularly concerned with possible side effects or difficulties in qualifying and monitoring the patients, and less frequently on the cost of the therapy.

Conclusions

Observations suggest that 60% of physicians have some reservation to initiate systemic treatment in outpatient clinics, and they admit that they lack additional training. On the other hand, it seems also that the organization of systemic treatment in psoriasis may generate these difficulties and thus necessitate additional effort. Another factor could be the budget – not only regarding healthcare professionals, but also the patient, sometimes financing various investigations from private resources.

A 12-point recommendation framework to support advancement of the multidisciplinary care of psoriatic arthritis: A call to action

OBJECTIVE

Making a differential diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is not straightforward. This is partly because of its heterogeneous presentation and partly because many patients with PsA are initially diagnosed with psoriasis and treated in primary care or by dermatologists, with referral to rheumatologists being delayed. Once diagnosed, optimal disease control requires frequent specialist monitoring, adjustment or switching of therapies, and management of comorbidities and concomitant diseases, as well as attention to patients' overall well-being. Given the breadth of expertise that diagnosis and management of PsA requires, we sought to define a collaborative, structured framework that supports the optimisation of multidisciplinary care for patients with PsA in Europe.

METHODS

An expert panel comprising four rheumatologists, three dermatologists, two specialist nurses and one psychologist-from Spain, the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Germany, France and Italy-met face-to-face to take part in a modified Delphi exercise.

RESULTS

The result of this exercise is a set of recommendations that are based on combining published evidence with the panel's extensive clinical experience. Recommendations can be implemented in a number of ways, but the central call-to-action of this framework is the need for improved collaboration between dermatologists (or primary care physicians) and rheumatologists. This could occur in a variety of different formats: standard referral pathways, multidisciplinary physician meetings to discuss patient cases, or 'one stop', combined clinics.

CONCLUSION

We anticipate that when the majority of patients with PsA receive regular multidisciplinary care, improved patient outcomes will follow, although robust research is needed to explore this assumption.

Towards a combined pediatric rheumatology-dermatology clinic: One-year experience

OBJECTIVE:

Dermatological findings may be the sole complaints of diseases in pediatric rheumatology practice. Evaluating patients with a multi-disciplinary approach may facilitate access to an accurate diagnosis. Herein, we reported our one-year experience in collaborative pediatric rheumatology-dermatology.

METHODS:

Patients were initially evaluated separately in pediatric rheumatology-dermatology outpatient clinics. Subsequently, once a week, the final diagnoses of patients with suspected skin rash were collaboratively discussed by two pediatric rheumatologists and a dermatologist.

RESULTS:

A hundred and one patients were included in this study. Of these 101 patients, 65 attended to dermatology outpatient clinic initially, while the remaining 36 applied to the pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinic. The most common mucocutaneous finding was squamous lesions in 30 patients, followed by erythematous lesions in 28 and mucosal ulcers in 14. Finally, 69 patients were diagnosed with a rheumatic disease while 32 had differential diagnoses apart from rheumatic diseases.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with rheumatologic diseases frequently present with only mucocutaneous findings. Thus, a detailed examination of the mucosa, skin and its attachments is of paramount importance in rheumatology practice. We suggest that a close interaction between pediatric rheumatology-dermatology and the formation of consensus clinics are going to assist clinicians in making easier and accurate diagnoses.

Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis

Multidisciplinary (MD) care is essential in the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is one of the main pillars of disease management and patient care. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness and benefits of this strategy in SpA is scarce. In this review we discuss the three types of MD care models: (i) combined clinics (MD units), including ‘face to face’, ‘parallel’ and ‘circuit approach’ clinics; (ii) MD team meetings; (iii) group consultations. The most frequently used model in SpA studies has been the ‘parallel’ combined clinic and usually encompasses a rheumatologist and another specialist, most commonly a dermatologist or a gastroenterologist, that work in tandem according to predefined referral criteria and treatment algorithms. MD working seems to improve the care of patients with SpA by a better identification and diagnosis of the disease, an earlier and more comprehensive treatment approach, and better outcomes for patients in terms of disease activity, physical function, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, challenges remain. Data on effectiveness and feasibility are scarce and are mostly derived from studies with design issues and often without a unidisciplinary care comparator arm. Although patient centricity is one of the core values of patient care and MD setting in SpA, the patient often does not play an active role in most of the MD settings studied or in common clinical practice. Further efforts should be made so that MD care reflects patients’ expectations and needs. Overcoming these limits will help to implement successfully SpA MD care in daily clinical practice and subsequently to achieve a higher quality of care for our patients.

Multidisciplinary Management of Psoriatic Arthritis: The Benefits of a Comprehensive Approach

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a lifelong disease associated with extra-articular manifestations and several comorbidities, as well as reduced quality of life and psychosocial burden. Diagnostic delay is associated with poorer outcomes, while a short delay between symptom onset and diagnosis is linked with preservation of function. Overcoming the barriers to early diagnosis of PsA is often difficult to achieve in the absence of well-characterized disease markers and/or a definitive screening procedure. Once a diagnosis is made, approaches to care may differ between countries, but a treat-to-target approach can be advocated, with constant patient follow-up visits and specialist monitoring and treatment of comorbidities. Adequately addressing all aspects of care can help to drive patient-centered care and encourage better adherence. Given the mounting number of therapeutic options and the complexity of management of PsA, the disease can be optimally treated by a multidisciplinary approach, and a collaborative approach between rheumatologists and dermatologists can be advocated. The need for multidisciplinary management is reinforced by consensus among experts. Patient satisfaction has emerged as a central indicator of quality, and patient-centered care must remain a central goal for the care of patients with PsA. Definition of a minimum set of standards for care will help to achieve the goal of multidisciplinary care for patients with PsA. Optimal care of PsA and greater collaboration among clinicians should always be encouraged so that patients can receive the best possible quality of care.Funding: Pfizer Italy.

Satisfaction and discontent of Polish patients with biological therapy of rheumatic diseases: results of a multi-center questionnaire study

Objectives

Biologics are medications widely applied in the management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The drugs were found to be effective but their application is associated with some disadvantages. Medication with biologics is relatively expensive, and in Poland, it is carried out in specialized centers. The study was designed to evaluate various aspects of satisfaction and dissatisfaction of Polish patients treated with biologics.

Material and methods

An anonymous questionnaire was distributed in 23 Polish rheumatological centers involved in the treatment; 1212 returned questionnaires were used for analysis. Responses were received from 606 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 427 with ankylosing spondylitis, 117 psoriatic arthritis, and 62 adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (in whom administration of the drugs had been introduced before they were 18 years old). The investigated group constituted about one-fifth of all rheumatic patients on biologics in Poland.

Results

A beneficial or very beneficial influence of the medication on the state of physical health was found mostly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (51.3 and 30.5%) and ankylosing spondylitis (51.0 and 36.8%). Family life was improved by the treatment especially in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (40.7 and 35.6% beneficial and very beneficial, respectively), sleep quality and sexual life mostly in those with ankylosing spondylitis (beneficial/very beneficial influence 41.5/38.4, and 38.7/23.9, respectively). There was a rather small influence of biological treatment on the financial situation of the patients. In general, satisfaction with the treatment was evaluated as positive or very positive in 88% of all investigated patients.

In a significant part of the patients, transportation to the medical center was considered as a disadvantage of the treatment. About one-third of the patients considered laboratory and imaging tests to be done before initiation of the medication as a difficulty, and for about 40% waiting time for qualification for the medication was a significant disadvantage. The route of drug administration was without importance for 4/5 of the patients.

Conclusions

Summing up, the results were similar in the patients suffering from various diseases although those with psoriatic arthritis felt the highest satisfaction (possibly due to the positive aesthetic effect), and those with ankylosing spondylitis had significant improvement in sexual life (probably due to younger age). Relatively low satisfaction was found in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. There was a small influence of medication on financial status of the patients. Application of biologics has few disadvantages and most of them are associated with the organization of health services (waiting time for the tests, transportation to the medical centers).