Características y evolución de una cohorte de niños con síndrome PFAPA en la Comunidad de Madrid

PFAPA Syndrome: Clinical, Laboratory and Therapeutic Features in a Single-Centre Cohort

Objective

The aim of this study is to describe a group of Romanian children with periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome.

Materials

This consisted of 39 children diagnosed with PFAPA syndrome according to Thomas’ criteria (eight patients with an age at diagnosis <1 year and 31 patients with an age at diagnosis >1 year).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the patients with PFAPA syndrome was focused on clinical features, laboratory findings and therapeutic methods. Comparison between the two groups divided by age at onset was also investigated.

Results

Median age at onset was 1.58 years, and median age at diagnosis was 2.97 years. The mean interval between episodes was 35.5 days and the mean duration per febrile episode was 4.1 days. The median diagnosis delay was 2.42 years. The patients presented pharyngitis (100%), adenitis (94.8%) and aphthous lesions (66.7%). The frequency of febrile attacks was higher in children with an age at diagnosis under 1 year (p = 0.0287). Younger age was associated with the presence of aphthae. The mean value of C-reactive protein (CRP) was 7.9mg/dl and the mean value of leucocytes was 14,839/mm³. In 95% of patients given oral corticosteroids, remission of symptoms was reported within 24 h. In three patients, tonsillectomy was performed with complete remission of the disease.

Conclusion

We present a cohort of children with PFAPA syndrome, with clinical and laboratory features similar to those described in the literature. Febrile attacks had a higher incidence in children with younger age at the onset of the disease. The patients had a favorable response to corticosteroids.

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome: A review

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most common periodic fever condition in children, with most cases appearing by the age of 5. Although PFAPA is generally a self-limited condition, it can have a major impact on a child's quality of life, as well as that of their family. Recent research has continued to shed light on the genetic and immunologic factors that play a role in the pathogenesis of PFAPA. There also exists significant heterogeneity in treatment strategies, and progress has been made to develop evidence-based management strategies and establish a standard of care. This review will outline current knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of PFAPA, as well as treatment strategies and our clinical experience.

Why and How Should We Treat Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, and Cervical Adenitis (PFAPA) Syndrome?

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is characterized by recurrent fever flares accompanied by symptoms and signs forming the disease acronym and alternating with asymptomatic periods. Despite the disease having a generally favorable outcome, with spontaneous remission after a few years, it does have a major impact on the quality of life of the child and his or her relatives. Beside symptomatic medications during fever flares, the most used treatment consists of a single dose of corticosteroids at flare onset to interrupt the attack; fever resolves usually within a few hours, but often with a shorter interval between the attacks. For these patients, colchicine has been shown to decrease the frequency of the flares. Other medications were also reported in case series of patients with PFAPA syndrome. These include the interleukin-1 blocker anakinra to treat flares, cimetidine (which showed no convincing effect), and other drugs with anecdotal use. The pediatrician faces a difficult question: should they wait for spontaneous disease resolution and only treat the flares medically, or should they propose tonsillectomy that may induce remission? Due to the lack of strong evidence, the answer will vary on an individual basis, depending on the impact on the patient's quality of life. The choice of the best therapeutic strategy will be based on the response to the flare-based therapy and on disease severity (quality of life, school performances); long-term data on the remission rate under the different therapeutic strategies are currently missing. More randomized controlled studies are needed to help the treating physician to choose the best therapy, as well as real-life long-term data to evaluate the long-term outcome of children with PFAPA syndrome.

Tonsillectomy for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome (PFAPA)

BACKGROUND

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is a rare clinical syndrome of unknown cause usually identified in children. Tonsillectomy is considered a potential treatment option for this syndrome. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2010 and previously updated in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of tonsillectomy (with or without adenoidectomy) compared with non-surgical treatment in the management of children with PFAPA.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2019, Issue 4); PubMed; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 15 October 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing tonsillectomy (with or without adenoidectomy) with non-surgical treatment in children with PFAPA.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were the proportion of children whose symptoms have completely resolved and complications of surgery (haemorrhage and number of days of postoperative pain). Secondary outcomes were: number of episodes of fever and the associated symptoms; severity of episodes; use of corticosteroids; absence or time off school; quality of life. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Two trials were included with a total of 67 children randomised (65 analysed); we judged both to be at low risk of bias. One trial of 39 participants recruited children with PFAPA syndrome diagnosed according to rigid, standard criteria. The trial compared adenotonsillectomy to watchful waiting and followed up patients for 18 months. A smaller trial of 28 children applied less stringent criteria for diagnosing PFAPA and probably also included participants with alternative types of recurrent pharyngitis. This trial compared tonsillectomy alone to no treatment and followed up patients for six months. Combining the trial results suggests that patients with PFAPA likely experience less fever and less severe episodes after surgery compared to those receiving no surgery. The risk ratio (RR) for immediate resolution of symptoms after surgery that persisted until the end of follow-up was 4.38 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 30.11); number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) = 2, calculated based on an estimate that 156 in 1000 untreated children have a resolution) (moderate-certainty evidence). Both trials reported that there were no complications of surgery. However, the numbers of patients randomly allocated to surgery (19 and 14 patients respectively) were too small to detect potentially important complications such as haemorrhage. Surgery probably results in a large overall reduction in the average number of episodes over the total length of follow-up (rate ratio 0.08, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.13), reducing the average frequency of PFAPA episodes from one every two months to slightly less than one every two years (moderate-certainty evidence). Surgery also likely reduces severity, as indicated by the length of PFAPA symptoms during these episodes. One study reported that the average number of days per PFAPA episode was 1.7 days after receiving surgery, compared to 3.5 days in the control group (moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that the proportion of patients requiring corticosteroids was also lower in the surgery group compared to those receiving no surgery (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.92) (low-certainty evidence). Other outcomes such as absence from school and quality of life were not measured or reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the effectiveness of tonsillectomy in children with PFAPA syndrome is derived from two small randomised controlled trials. These trials reported significant beneficial effects of surgery compared to no surgery on immediate and complete symptom resolution (NNTB = 2) and a substantial reduction in the frequency and severity (length of episode) of any further symptoms experienced. However, the evidence is of moderate certainty (further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate) due to the relatively small sample sizes of the studies and some concerns about the applicability of the results. Therefore, the parents and carers of children with PFAPA syndrome must weigh the risks and consequences of surgery against the alternative of using medications. It is well established that children with PFAPA syndrome recover spontaneously and medication can be administered to try and reduce the severity of individual episodes. It is uncertain whether adenoidectomy combined with tonsillectomy adds any additional benefit to tonsillectomy alone.

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome: main features and an algorithm for clinical practice

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is a recurrent fever syndrome of early childhood with increasing number of adult-onset cases. Although it is a self-limited disease, it may negatively affect the quality of life. The aim of this review is to present a detailed analysis of PFAPA syndrome and an algorithm for diagnosis, therapeutic options, and evaluation of outcome. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases. The main topics covered are the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, etiopathogenesis, genetics, management, disease course and prognosis, disease in adults, unsolved issues, and unmet needs in PFAPA. The diagnosis of PFAPA is mainly based on clinical classification criteria. The most relevant hypothesis for pathogenesis is that dysregulated immune system in a genetically predisposed individual responds to a yet unidentified trigger in an exaggerated way. The pedigree analyses suggest a genetic background for the disease with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. For management, single-dose corticosteroids during attacks and tonsillectomy remain the most effective therapies, while colchicine is a promising option to decrease attack frequency. There remain unsolved issues in PFAPA such as the exact etiopathogenesis and genetic background, the reason why the inflammation is restricted to the oropharyngeal lymphoid tissue, reasons for clock-work regularity of attacks, and self-limited disease course. There is need for a valid diagnostic criteria set with a high performance for both children and adults and consensus on management of PFAPA.