[The serotonin syndrome: An updated literature review]

Recognition and Management of Serotonin Toxidrome in the Emergency Department-Case Based Review

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a clinical toxidrome with high variability in clinical practice. It develops due to increased serotonin levels in the central nervous system. With an underestimated frequency, SS can develop following an overdose, a therapeutic dose increase, or drug to drug interaction of at least one serotonergic agent. It can present with autonomic signs, neuromuscular changes and an altered mental status. However, history and clinical examination are key features to formulate the diagnosis. Treatment options consist of supportive measures, discontinuation of the offending agent and certain therapeutic agents previously reported to improve outcomes. Physicians have limited experience with SS, partially due to the lack of its identification in clinical practice. Therefore, we have integrated, in a narrative review, the case of a young male with SS following an atypical antipsychotic overdose superimposed on chronic treatment with agents previously known to produce SS.

New Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors and Their Anesthetic and Analgesic Considerations

Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) inhibit the presynaptic neuronal uptake of serotonin and norepinephrine and prolong the effects of the monoamines in the synaptic cleft within the central nervous system, leading to increased postsynaptic receptor activation and neuronal activities. Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors can have multiple clinical indications, including as the first-line agents for the management of depression and anxiety, and as analgesics in the treatment of chronic pain. The effects of reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine and serotonin are often dose-dependent and agent-dependent. There are five FDA-approved serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran and sibutramine) currently being marketed in the United States. As the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the incidence and prevalence of anxiety and depression across the country, there are significantly increased prescriptions of these medications perioperatively. Thus, anesthesiologists are more likely than ever to have patients administered with these agents and scheduled for elective or emergency surgical procedures. A thorough understanding of these commonly prescribed serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and their interactions with commonly utilized anesthetic agents is paramount. There are two potentially increased risks related to the continuation of SNRIs through the perioperative period: intraoperative bleeding and serotonin syndrome. SNRIs have some off-label uses, more new indications, and ever-increasing new applications in perioperative practice. This article aims to review the commonly prescribed serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and the current clinical evidence regarding their considerations in perioperative anesthesia and analgesia.

[Treatments for depression in consultation-liaison psychiatry: From theory to practice]

Treatments for depression include an adapted lifestyle, physical activity, psychotherapies, antidepressant and mood stabilizing drugs, neuromodulation, chronotherapy, spa treatments. Drug treatments used for major depressive episode are antidepressants and mood stabilizers. For a mild episode, psychotherapy is indicated. It should be combined with an antidepressant (serotonin reuptake inhibitor) for moderate and severe episodes. Suicide risk assessment is essential throughout the depressive episode. It is recommended to monitor at the start of antidepressant treatment for suicidal behavior, a change in mood suggesting an underlying bipolar disorder. The effectiveness of the treatment is evaluated after 4 to 8 weeks. The total duration of antidepressant treatment for an EDC is between 6 months and 1 year after remission, in order to prevent relapses. The use of liaison psychiatry, a real healthcare system within the general hospital, is strongly recommended for better screening and treatment of depression, thus reducing the length of hospital stays, improving the prognosis of depression. The aim of this article is to provide clinicians with a summary of validated data on the efficacy/tolerance of treatment for depression, and to suggest practical action to be taken on the main daily clinical situations: treating comorbid conditions, taking into account interactions drugs, manage the serotonin syndrome, lead to withdrawal from antidepressants, manage treatment in the elderly.

Impact of vascular risk factors on clinical outcome in elderly patients with depression receiving electroconvulsive therapy

BACKGROUND

Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective, safe, and well-tolerated antidepressant treatment for late-life depression (LLD), there is large variability in response rates across individuals. We hypothesized that these variations would be in part explained by the level of vascular risk in this population. We therefore compared response rates to ECT in patients with LLD presenting with or without vascular risk factors (VRF).

METHODS

52 patients with LLD (age > 55) who received a course of ECT were separated into 2 groups according to the presence of VRF (n = 20) or not (n = 32). Framingham score (10-year risk for developing a coronary heart disease) was calculated for each patient. Our primary outcome was the number of responders to ECT in each group (defined as at least 50% decrease of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score following ECT course). Scores at the self-rated Beck Depression Inventory are also reported.

RESULTS

Patients with VRF presented significant lower response rates to ECT (12 out of 20; 60%) than patients without VRF (30 out of 32; 94%; p = 0.004). A negative correlation was found between Framingham score and changes in depression scores pre/post ECT (r = -0.42; p = 0.0039).

LIMITATIONS

Our study was limited by sample size and retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LLD and VRF showed lower response rates to ECT than those without VRF. The more the VRF increased, the less the antidepressant effect of ECT was observed. Results are discussed in light of the role of apathy in clinical response to ECT.

Pharmacokinetic properties of tramadol and M1 metabolite in Northeast Brazilian donkeys (Equus asinus)

There is currently little information available on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the analgesic opioid tramadol when used in the veterinary medicine of domestic species. In this study, we aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its active metabolite M1 following intravenous administration of 2 (T2) and 4 (T4) mg/kg to Northeast Brazilian donkeys. Tramadol and M1 plasma levels were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. We found that plasma levels of tramadol and M1 were higher than those reported as clinically meaningful in humans for at least 3 hr. However, the pharmacokinetic parameter calculation corrected by dose analysis identified no proportional increase with dose for the AUC of tramadol (T2: 2,663 ± 1,827 vs. T4: 2,964 ± 1,038 ng*h/ml) and M1 (T2: 378 ± 237 vs. T4: 345 ± 142 ng*h/ml). This finding appears to be attributable to a significant increase in clearance and a reduction in the terminal half-life of tramadol. The frequency of adverse effects observed at the higher dose indicates that 2 mg/kg administered intravenously would be suitable for donkeys. Clinical studies are required to determine the implications of these observations regarding the pharmacodynamic response to tramadol in Northeast Brazilian donkeys.