EPICO 3.0. Antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients

Antifungal stewardship in solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antifungal stewardship (AFS) has emerged as an important component of quality in managing invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and cost-benefit calculations suggest regular training in AFS is well worth the effort.

METHODS

This review will discuss the most common IFIs in solid organ transplantation (SOT)-recipients, how to diagnose them, and current recommendations for antifungal treatment and prophylaxis before demonstrating key takeaway points of AFS in this high-risk population.

RESULTS

Effective AFS starts before a patient is admitted for SOT, through education and regular interactions of the interdisciplinary clinical team involved in patient management, considering local factors such as epidemiological data and knowledge of diagnostic options including local turnaround times. Understanding the spectrum of antifungal agents, their efficacy and safety profiles, and pharmacokinetics, as well as duration of therapy is hereby essential. The most frequent IFIs in SOT recipients are caused by Candida species, followed by Aspergillus species, both with increasing resistance rates. Diagnosis of IFI can be challenging due to unspecific clinical presentation and difficult interpretation of microbiological findings and biomarkers. Prophylactic strategies, such as those for invasive aspergillosis in lung transplantation or invasive candidiasis (IC) in certain liver transplant settings, as well as the selection of the appropriate therapeutic agents require detailed knowledge on the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antifungals.

CONCLUSIONS

Here in this review, we address what constitutes good AFS in this heterogeneous field of solid organ transplant recipients.

Incidence and outcomes of invasive fungal infection among solid organ transplant recipients: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The long-term probability of post-transplant IFI is poorly understood.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada, to determine the incidence rate; 1-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative probabilities of IFI; and post-IFI all-cause mortality in SOT recipients from 2002 to 2016. We also determined post-IFI, death-censored renal allograft failure.

RESULTS

We included 9326 SOT recipients (median follow-up: 5.35 years). Overall, the incidence of IFI was 8.3 per 1000 person-years. The 1-year cumulative probability of IFI was 7.4% for lung, 5.4% for heart, 1.8% for liver, 1.2% for kidney-pancreas, and 1.1% for kidney-only allograft recipients. Lung transplant recipients had the highest incidence rate and 10-year probability of IFI: 43.0 per 1000 person-years and 26.4%, respectively. The 1-year all-cause mortality rate after IFI was 34.3%. IFI significantly increased the risk of mortality in SOT recipients over the entire follow-up period (hazard ratio: 6.50, 95% CI: 5.69-7.42). The 1-year probability of death-censored renal allograft failure after IFI was 9.8%.

CONCLUSION

Long-term cumulative probability of IFI varies widely among SOT recipients. Lung transplantation was associated with the highest incidence of IFI with considerable 1-year all-cause mortality.

A Rare Case of Pulmonary Coinfection by Lichtheimia ramosa and Aspergillus fumigatus in a Patient With Delayed Graft Function After Renal Transplantation

Pulmonary coinfection with Mucor and Aspergillus species has not been reported in organ transplant recipients. Here, we report a rare case of pulmonary coinfection with invasive fungal species in a renal transplant recipient with delayed graft function. The patient was first treated with a regime containing voriconazole, but the infection only worsened. Then, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid culture and internal transcribed spacer region sequencing were performed, and simultaneous pulmonary infection by Lichtheimia ramosa and Aspergillus fumigatus was clearly diagnosed. Susceptibility testing determined that the fungi were sensitive to amphotericin B and posaconazole. Therefore, a therapeutic regime containing posaconazole and amphotericin B liposome, which are less toxic to the kidney, was planned and resulted in resolution of the infectious symptoms. The present case demonstrates the importance of identifying fungal pathogens early and definitively, determining the effective anti-fungal medications, and administering the properly planned therapeutic regime in a timely manner to treat cases of coinfection in transplant recipients.