Rivard M, Morin M, Rochefort C, Morin D, Mello C. Barriers and facilitators to accessibility, continuity, validity, flexibility, and provider-family relationship along the diagnostic pathway in developmental disabilities.
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2023;
139:104570. [PMID:
37423052 DOI:
10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104570]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Parents of children with developmental disabilities must navigate a complex network to obtain a diagnosis and interventions for their child. However, their subjective experience of this journey has yet to be analyzed through the lens of a theorical framework that could support research, organizational program evaluation, and facilitate providers' reflection on how to enhance families' diagnostic services trajectory.
AIMS
This study sought to examine the diagnostic journey as experienced by 77 parents whose children were recently diagnosed with developmental disabilities (e.g., autism, intellectual disability) in the metropolitan area of Montréal, Québec (Canada).
METHODS AND PROCEDURES
A mixed qualitative content analysis approach was used to describe their perspective on barriers and facilitators in reference to the five dimensions of the Evaluation of the Trajectory Autism for Parents (ETAP) model (Rivard et al., 2020): accessibility, continuity, validity, flexibility, and provider-family relationship.
OUTCOMES AND RESULTS
The barriers and facilitators related to systemic factors identified by parents were consistent with the five dimensions outlined by the ETAP model. However, beyond these characteristics of the service delivery system, parents additionally identified their own, personal facilitators CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study supports the relevance of the ETAP framework to understanding the experience of families seeking a diagnosis. It also reinforces the potential contributions of this model to organize extant and future research as well as structure program evaluation and improvements.
Collapse