Comparison of volume- and pressure-limited NPPV at night: a prospective randomized cross-over trial

[S3 Guideline: Treating Chronic Respiratory Failure with Non-invasive Ventilation]

The S3 guideline on non-invasive ventilation as a treatment for chronic respiratory failure was published on the website of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) in July 2024. It offers comprehensive recommendations for the treatment of chronic respiratory failure in various underlying conditions, such as COPD, thoraco-restrictive diseases, obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, and neuromuscular diseases. An important innovation is the separation of the previous S2k guideline dating back to 2017, which included both invasive and non-invasive ventilation therapy. Due to increased scientific evidence and a significant rise in the number of affected patients, these distinct forms of therapy are now addressed separately in two different guidelines.The aim of the guideline is to improve the treatment of patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency using non-invasive ventilation and to make the indications and therapy recommendations accessible to all involved in the treatment process. It is based on the latest scientific evidence and replaces the previous guideline. This revised guideline provides detailed recommendations on the application of non-invasive ventilation, ventilation settings, and the subsequent follow-up of treatment.In addition to the updated evidence, important new features of this S3 guideline include new recommendations on patient care and numerous detailed treatment pathways that make the guideline more user-friendly. Furthermore, a completely revised section is dedicated to ethical issues and offers recommendations for end-of-life care. This guideline is an important tool for physicians and other healthcare professionals to optimize the care of patients with chronic respiratory failure. This version of the guideline is valid for three years, until July 2027.

A prospective observation study of the dynamic monitoring of transcutaneous arterial blood oxygen saturation and carbon dioxide during bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Because bronchoscopy is an invasive procedure, sedatives and analgesics are commonly administered, which may suppress the patient's spontaneous breathing and can lead to hypoventilation and hypoxemia. Few reports exist on the dynamic monitoring of oxygenation and ventilation during bronchoscopy. This study aimed to prospectively monitor and evaluate oxygenation and ventilation during bronchoscopy using transcutaneous arterial blood oxygen saturation and carbon dioxide.

METHODS

We included patients who required pathological diagnosis using fluoroscopic bronchoscopy at our hospital between March 2021 and April 2022. Midazolam was intravenously administered to all patients as a sedative during bronchoscopy, and fentanyl was administered in addition to midazolam when necessary. A transcutaneous blood gas monitor was used to measure dynamic changes, including arterial blood partial pressure of carbon dioxide (tcPCO2), transcutaneous arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), pulse rate, and perfusion index during bronchoscopy. Quantitative data of tcPCO2 and SpO2 were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (min-max), while the quantitative data of midazolam plus fentanyl and midazolam alone were compared. Similarly, data on sex, smoking history, and body mass index were compared. Subgroup comparisons of the difference (Δ value) between baseline tcPCO2 at the beginning of bronchoscopy and the maximum value of tcPCO2 during the examination were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 117 included cases, consecutive measurements were performed in 113 cases, with a success rate of 96.6%. Transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in 100 cases, whereas transbronchial lung cryobiopsy was performed in 17 cases. Midazolam and fentanyl were used as anesthetics during bronchoscopy in 46 cases, whereas midazolam alone was used in 67 cases. The median Δ value in the midazolam plus fentanyl and midazolam alone groups was 8.10 and 4.00 mmHg, respectively, indicating a significant difference of p < 0.005. The mean ± standard deviation of tcPCO2 in the midazolam plus fentanyl and midazolam alone groups was 44.8 ± 7.83 and 40.6 ± 4.10 mmHg, respectively. The SpO2 in the midazolam plus fentanyl and midazolam alone groups was 94.4 ± 3.37 and 96.2 ± 2.61%, respectively, with a larger SD and greater variability in the midazolam plus fentanyl group.

CONCLUSION

A transcutaneous blood gas monitor is non-invasive and can easily measure the dynamic transition of CO2. Furthermore, tcPCO2 can be used to evaluate the ventilatory status during bronchoscopy easily. A transcutaneous blood gas monitor may be useful to observe regarding respiratory depression during bronchoscopy, particularly when analgesics are used.

Nasal versus oronasal masks for home non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic hypercapnia: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal interface for the delivery of home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to treat chronic respiratory failure has not yet been determined. The aim of this individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis was to compare the effect of nasal and oronasal masks on treatment efficacy and adherence in patients with COPD and obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS).

METHODS

We searched Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 1 month's duration, published between January 1994 and April 2019, that assessed NIV efficacy in patients with OHS and COPD. The main outcomes were diurnal PaCO₂, PaO₂ and NIV adherence (PROSPERO CRD42019132398).

FINDINGS

Of 1576 articles identified, 34 RCTs met the inclusion criteria and IPD were obtained for 18. Ten RCTs were excluded because only one type of mask was used, or mask data were missing. Data from 8 RCTs, including 290 IPD, underwent meta-analysis. Oronasal masks were used in 86% of cases. There were no differences between oronasal and nasal masks for PaCO₂ (0.61 mm Hg (95% CI -2.15 to 3.38); p=0.68), PaO₂ (-0.00 mm Hg (95% CI -4.59 to 4.58); p=1) or NIV adherence (0·29 hour/day (95% CI -0.74 to 1.32); p=0.58). There was no interaction between the underlying pathology and the effect of mask type on any outcome.

INTERPRETATION

Oronasal masks are the most used interface for the delivery of home NIV in patients with OHS and COPD; however, there is no difference in the efficacy or tolerance of oronasal or nasal masks.

Oronasal versus Nasal Masks for Non-Invasive Ventilation in COPD: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Purpose

The impact of oronasal and nasal masks on the quality of nocturnal non-invasive ventilation (NIV) needs to be clarified. This trial was designed to compare the impact of oronasal and nasal masks on the objective quality and subjective acceptance of nocturnal NIV in COPD-patients.

Patients and Methods

In a randomized crossover trial, 30 COPD-patients with well-established high-intensity NIV (mean inspiratory/expiratory positive airway pressure 26±3/5±1 cmH₂O, mean respiratory back-up rate 17±1/min) were ventilated for two consecutive nights on oronasal and nasal masks, respectively.

Results

Full polysomnography, nocturnal blood gas measurements, and subjective assessments were performed. There was a tendency towards improved sleep efficiency (primary outcome) when an oronasal mask was worn (+9.9%; 95% CI:-0.2%-20.0%; P=0.054). Sleep stages 3/4 were favored by the oronasal mask (+12.7%; 95% CI: 6.0%-19.3%; P=<0.001). Subjective assessments were comparable with the exception of items related to leakage (P<0.05 in favor of nasal masks). The mean transcutaneous PCO₂ value for oronasal masks (47.7±7.4 mmHg) was comparable to that of nasal masks (48.9±6.6 mmHg) (P=0.11). There was considerable diversity amongst individual patients in terms of sleep quality and gas exchange following mask exchange. Subjective mask preference was not associated with sleep quality, but with nocturnal dyspnea. Over 40% of patients subsequently switched to the mask that they were not previously accustomed to.

Conclusion

In general, oronasal and nasal masks are each similarly capable of successfully delivering NIV in COPD-patients. However, the individual response to different interfaces is extremely heterogeneous, while subjective mask preference is independent from objective measures, but associated with dyspnea.

Trial Registration

German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00007741).

THE DETECTION AND ESTIMATION OF THE AIR LEAKAGE IN NONINVASIVE VENTILaTION: PLATFORM STUDY

Although noninvasive ventilation has been increasingly used in clinics and homes to treat respiratory diseases, the problem of air leaks should not be neglected because they may affect the performance of the ventilation and even pose a threat to life. The detection and estimation of the leakage are required to implement auto-compensation, which is important in the development of intelligent ventilation. In this study, the methods of detection and estimation of the leakage were established and validated. Ventilation experiments were performed based on the established experimental platform. The air flow and pressure were detected at different locations of the airway to determine the relationship between the leakage and the other variables. The leakage was estimated using linear predictor models. The curves describing the relationships among pressure, flow and volume changed regularly with the leakage. For pressure-controlled ventilation, the leakage could be estimated by the detected peak flow and by the ventilation volume of one breathing cycle. The methods for the leakage estimation were validated. Volume-controlled ventilation was also studied. Although the leakage could be estimated using the detected peak pressure, the limitation of volume-controlled ventilation was obvious for noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Leaks could be detected and estimated using a linear predictor model via the flow/pressure curve. The use of this model is a potential method for the auto-compensation of noninvasive ventilation.

Novel modes of non-invasive ventilation in chronic respiratory failure: a narrative review

Home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is central in the management of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure and is associated with improvements in clinically relevant outcomes. Home NIV typically involves delivery of fixed positive inspiratory and expiratory airway pressures. These pressures do not reflect physiological changes to respiratory mechanics and airway calibre during sleep, which may impact on physiological efficacy, subsequent clinical outcomes, and therapy adherence. Novel ventilator modes have been designed in an attempt to address these issues. Volume-assured pressure support modes aim to automatically adjust inspiratory pressure to achieve a pre-set target tidal volume. The addition of auto-titrating expiratory pressure to maintain upper airway calibre is designed for patients at risk of upper airway collapse, such as obese patients and those with obstructive sleep apnoea complicating their hypercapnic failure. Heterogeneity in setup protocols, patient selection and trial design limit firm conclusions to be drawn on the clinical efficacy of these modes. However, there are data to suggest that compared to fixed-pressure NIV, volume-assured modes may improve nocturnal carbon dioxide, sleep quality and ventilator adherence in select patients. The use of the forced oscillation technique to identify expiratory flow limitation and adjust expiratory pressure to eliminate it is the most recent addition to these advanced modes and is yet to be assessed in formal clinical trials.

Effects of volume-assured pressure support noninvasive ventilation in stable COPD with chronic respiratory failure: Meta-analysis and literature review

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving long-term home noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may slow down the progression to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), however, the problem with respiratory instability during sleep diminished was persisted, which may reduce the effectiveness of NIV and the patient's quality of life. A novel NIV mode with volume-assured pressure support (VAPS) has been gradually applied to improve sleep quality in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of VAPS in stable COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure.

METHODS

We performed an electronic literature search for RCTs from January 2008 to October 2018. Studies investigating the effects of VAPS in stable COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure were conducted, and the following primary outcomes were reviewed: effectiveness of ventilation, sleep quality, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Five studies with 150 subjects were identified. While questionnaire scores showed significant improvements in the VAPS mode, no significant difference was found in the effectiveness of ventilation (pH, MD = 0.01 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.27]; PaCO₂, MD = 1.25 [95% CI -1.45 to 3.95, P = 0.37]; PaO₂, MD = 3.14 [95% CI -0.76 to 7.05, P = 0.11]; mSaO₂, MD = 0.23 [95% CI -1.22 to 1.67, P = 0.76]; mPtcCO₂, MD = 3.03 [95% CI -6.06 to- 0.60, P = 0.10]). The VAPS mode did not seem to ameliorate sleep quality and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The VAPS mode had similar efficacy as the pressure-support (PS) mode. However, VAPS could significantly improve the patients' subjective feelings.

European Respiratory Society guidelines on long-term home non-invasive ventilation for management of COPD

Background

While the role of acute non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to improve outcome in acute life-threatening hypercapnic respiratory failure in COPD, the evidence of clinical efficacy of long-term home NIV (LTH-NIV) for management of COPD is less. This document provides evidence-based recommendations for the clinical application of LTH-NIV in chronic hypercapnic COPD patients.

Materials and methods

The European Respiratory Society task force committee was composed of clinicians, methodologists and experts in the field of LTH-NIV. The committee developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading, Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. The GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations. A number of topics were addressed under a narrative format which provides a useful context for clinicians and patients.

Results

The task force committee delivered conditional recommendations for four actionable PICO (target population-intervention-comparator-outcome) questions, 1) suggesting for the use of LTH-NIV in stable hypercapnic COPD; 2) suggesting for the use of LTH-NIV in COPD patients following a COPD exacerbation requiring acute NIV 3) suggesting for the use of NIV settings targeting a reduction in carbon dioxide and 4) suggesting for using fixed pressure support as first choice ventilator mode.

Conclusions

Managing hypercapnia may be an important intervention for improving the health outcome of COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. The task force conditionally supports the application of LTH-NIV to improve health outcome by targeting a reduction in carbon dioxide in COPD patients with persistent hypercapnic respiratory failure. These recommendations should be applied in clinical practice by practitioners that routinely care for chronic hypercapnic COPD patients.

Comparing the effects and compliance between volume-assured and pressure support non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic respiratory failure

INTRODUCTION

Standard bi-level non-invasive ventilation with fixed-level pressure support (PS) delivery may not maintain ventilation during the changes in pulmonary mechanics that occur throughout day and night, so average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) modes that target a preset volume by adjustment of PS may be effective.

OBJECTIVE

Our meta-analysis wants to compare AVAPS and pressure support non-invasive ventilation (PS-NIV) regarding arterial blood gases (ABGs), sleep efficiency and compliance.

METHOD

Relevant publications indexed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIPI were identified. Appropriate articles identified from the reference lists of the above searches were also reviewed. We included randomized controlled trials involved the use of AVAPS and PS-NIV ventilation for chronic respiratory failure. Each included study weighted mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² value ≤ 50% were considered as no statistical heterogeneity and used fixed effects model. Otherwise, a random effects model was used.

RESULTS

Eight trials were eligible. No significant difference was observed between AVAPS and PS-NIV groups to compare PaCO₂ (OR -0.97, CI-2.54-0.61, P = 0.23) and PaO₂ (OR -1.81, CI-4.29-0.67, P = 0.15) in ABGs. There was no significant difference between the two groups with sleep efficiency (OR -3.31, CI-7.58-0.95, P = 0.13) and visual analog scale (OR 0.32, CI-6.97-7.61, P = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence shows there is no significant difference in clinical outcomes when comparing AVAPS and PS-NIV used for chronic respiratory failure patients.

Long-term volume-targeted pressure-controlled ventilation: sense or nonsense?

The technology underlying the development of novel ventilatory modes for long-term noninvasive ventilation of patients with chronic hypercapnia is continuously evolving. Volume-targeted pressure-controlled ventilation is a hybrid ventilation mode designed to combine the advantages of conventional ventilation modes, while avoiding their drawbacks. However, manufacturers have created different names and have patented algorithms and set-up variables, which can result in confusion for physicians and respiratory therapists. In addition, clear evidence for the superiority of this novel mode has not yet been established. These factors have most likely hindered more widespread use of this mode in clinical practice. The current review presents the rationale, working principles, characteristics and set-up recommendations associated with volume-targeted modes. In addition, it summarises the clinical and laboratory studies that have challenged this mode.

Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Neuromuscular Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges

Normal sleep-related rapid eye movement sleep atonia, reduced lung volumes, reduced chemosensitivity, and impaired airway dilator activity become significant vulnerabilities in the setting of neuromuscular disease. In that context, the compounding effects of respiratory muscle weakness and disease-specific features that promote upper airway collapse or cause dilated cardiomyopathy contribute to various sleep-disordered breathing events. The reduction in lung volumes with neuromuscular disease is further compromised by sleep and the supine position, exaggerating the tendency for upper airway collapse and desaturation with sleep-disordered breathing events. The most commonly identified events are diaphragmatic/pseudo-central, due to a decrease in the rib cage contribution to the tidal volume during phasic rapid eye movement sleep. Obstructive and central sleep apneas are also common. Noninvasive ventilation can improve survival and quality of sleep but should be used with caution in the context of dilated cardiomyopathy or significant bulbar symptoms. Noninvasive ventilation can also trigger sleep-disordered breathing events, including ineffective triggering, autotriggering, central sleep apnea, and glottic closure, which compromise the potential benefits of the intervention by increasing arousals, reducing adherence, and impairing sleep architecture. Polysomnography plays an important diagnostic and therapeutic role by correctly categorizing sleep-disordered events, identifying sleep-disordered breathing triggered by noninvasive ventilation, and improving noninvasive ventilation settings. Optimal management may require dedicated hypoventilation protocols and a technical staff well versed in the identification and troubleshooting of respiratory events.

[Non-invasive and invasive out of hospital ventilation in chronic respiratory failure : Consensus report of the working group on ventilation and intensive care medicine of the Austrian Society of Pneumology]

The current consensus report was compiled under the patronage of the Austrian Society of Pneumology (Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie, ÖGP) with the intention of providing practical guidelines for out-of-hospital ventilation that are in accordance with specific Austrian framework parameters and legal foundations. The guidelines are oriented toward a 2004 consensus ÖGP recommendation concerning the setup of long-term ventilated patients and the 2010 German Respiratory Society S2 guidelines on noninvasive and invasive ventilation of chronic respiratory insufficiency, adapted to national experiences and updated according to recent literature. In 11 chapters, the initiation, adjustment, and monitoring of out-of-hospital ventilation is described, as is the technical equipment and airway access. Additionally, the different indications-such as chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, thoracic restrictive and neuromuscular diseases, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, and pediatric diseases-are discussed. Furthermore, the respiratory physiotherapy of adults and children on invasive and noninvasive long-term ventilation is addressed in detail.

The cost-effectiveness of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation in patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic progressive lung disease characterised by non-reversible airflow obstruction. Exacerbations are a key cause of morbidity and mortality and place a considerable burden on health-care systems. While there is evidence that patients benefit from non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in hospital during an acute exacerbation, evidence supporting home use for more stable COPD patients is limited. In the U.K., domiciliary NIV is considered on health economic grounds in patients after three hospital admissions for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of domiciliary NIV by systematic review and economic evaluation.

DATA SOURCES

Bibliographic databases, conference proceedings and ongoing trial registries up to September 2014.

METHODS

Standard systematic review methods were used for identifying relevant clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness studies assessing NIV compared with usual care or comparing different types of NIV. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane guidelines and relevant economic checklists. Results for primary effectiveness outcomes (mortality, hospitalisations, exacerbations and quality of life) were presented, where possible, in forest plots. A speculative Markov decision model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of domiciliary NIV with usual care from a UK perspective for post-hospital and more stable populations separately.

RESULTS

Thirty-one controlled effectiveness studies were identified, which report a variety of outcomes. For stable patients, a modest volume of evidence found no benefit from domiciliary NIV for survival and some non-significant beneficial trends for hospitalisations and quality of life. For post-hospital patients, no benefit from NIV could be shown in terms of survival (from randomised controlled trials) and findings for hospital admissions were inconsistent and based on limited evidence. No conclusions could be drawn regarding potential benefit from different types of NIV. No cost-effectiveness studies of domiciliary NIV were identified. Economic modelling suggested that NIV may be cost-effective in a stable population at a threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £28,162), but this is associated with uncertainty. In the case of the post-hospital population, results for three separate base cases ranged from usual care dominating to NIV being cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than £10,000 per QALY gained. All estimates were sensitive to effectiveness estimates, length of benefit from NIV (currently unknown) and some costs. Modelling suggested that reductions in the rate of hospital admissions per patient per year of 24% and 15% in the stable and post-hospital populations, respectively, are required for NIV to be cost-effective.

LIMITATIONS

Evidence on key clinical outcomes remains limited, particularly quality-of-life and long-term (> 2 years) effects. Economic modelling should be viewed as speculative because of uncertainty around effect estimates, baseline risks, length of benefit of NIV and limited quality-of-life/utility data.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness of domiciliary NIV remains uncertain and the findings in this report are sensitive to emergent data. Further evidence is required to identify patients most likely to benefit from domiciliary NIV and to establish optimum time points for starting NIV and equipment settings.

FUTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

The results from this report will need to be re-examined in the light of any new trial results, particularly in terms of reducing the uncertainty in the economic model. Any new randomised controlled trials should consider including a sham non-invasive ventilation arm and/or a higher- and lower-pressure arm. Individual participant data analyses may help to determine whether or not there are any patient characteristics or equipment settings that are predictive of a benefit of NIV and to establish optimum time points for starting (and potentially discounting) NIV.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012003286.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Advances and New Approaches to Managing Sleep-Disordered Breathing Related to Chronic Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease affecting about 20 million US adults. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) problems are frequent and poorly characterized for patients with COPD. Both the well-known success of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in the acute COPD exacerbation in the hospital setting and that NIV is the cornerstone of chronic therapy for SDBs have urged the attention of the medical community to determine the impact of NIV on chronic COPD management with and without coexisting SDBs. Early observational studies showed decreased long-term survival rates on patients with COPD with concomitant chronic hypercapnia when compared with normocapnic patients.

The use of volume-assured pressure support noninvasive ventilation in acute and chronic respiratory failure: a practical guide and literature review

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is an important tool in the management of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Traditionally, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) have been the most commonly utilized modes for these purposes. Newer hybrid modes of NPPV, such as average volume-assured pressure support (VAPS), combine the properties of both volume- and pressure-controlled NPPV and represent another tool in the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Evidence demonstrating the superiority of VAPS over BPAP is sparse, but there have been studies that have demonstrated comparable efficacy between the two modes. The use of VAPS in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure has shown better clearance of CO2 compared to BPAP, due to its property of delivering a more assured tidal volume. This, however, did not lead to a decrease in hospital-days or improved mortality, relative to BPAP. The studies evaluating VAPS for chronic respiratory failure involve small sample sizes but have shown some promise. The benefits noted with VAPS, however, did not translate into increased survival, decreased hospitalizations or improved quality of life compared to BPAP. The limited evidence available suggests that VAPS is equally effective in treating acute and chronic respiratory failure compared to BPAP. Overall, the evidence to suggest superiority of one mode over the other is lacking. There is a need for larger studies before firm conclusions can be made.

Volume assured versus pressure preset non-invasive ventilation for compensated ventilatory failure in COPD

BACKGROUND

The addition of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to standard therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with compensated ventilatory failure (CVF) is reported to have beneficial effects. Compliance with NIV is an important factor. Volume assured NIV (va-NIV) may improve compliance and ventilation during sleep by automatically titrating ventilatory pressures.

METHODS

A prospective single centre, randomised, parallel group trial comparing va-NIV and pressure preset NIV (pp-NIV) in COPD patients with CVF naïve to domiciliary NIV was performed (ISCRTN91892415). The primary outcomes were arterial blood gases, mean overnight oximetry (mSpO2) and compliance after three months. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary function, exercise capacity and health-related quality of life assessment.

RESULTS

Forty patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The va-NIV median target minute ventilation was 8.4 L/min and pp-NIV median inspiratory pressure was 28 cmH2O. There were no significant differences between groups in primary or secondary outcomes after three months. Mean (SD) PaO2 8.7 (1.7) versus 7.9 (1.7) kPa (p = 0.19), PaCO2 6.7 (0.5) versus 7.3 (1.1) kPa (p = 0.1), mSpO2 89.7 (4.2) versus 89.8 (3.9) % (p = 0.95), compliance 5.0 (3.1) versus 4.7 (3.2) hours (p = 0.8) in va-NIV versus pp-NIV respectively. Patients allocated va-NIV spent fewer days in hospital initiating therapy 3.3 (1.6) versus 5.2 (2.8) (p = 0.02). Both groups showed significant improvements in PaCO2 and mSpO2 after three months treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Domiciliary va-NIV and pp-NIV have similar effects on physiological outcomes in COPD patients with CVF and both are well tolerated.

Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation for cardio-respiratory disorders in adults

Following the classic 'iron lung' non-invasive negative pressure ventilator, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), particularly used 'nocturnally' has developed a broad role in both the acute hospital setting and domiciliary long-term use for many cardio-respiratory disorders associated with acute and chronic ventilatory failure. This role is based in part upon the perceived relative ease of application and discontinuation of NIPPV, ability to avoid intubation or tracheostomy and their associated morbidities and availability of increasingly portable pressure and volume cycled NIPPV devices. Nevertheless, the many methodologies necessary for optimal NIPPV use are often underappreciated by health care workers and patients alike. This review focuses on the rationale, practice, and future directions for 'nocturnal' use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (nNIV) in cardio-respiratory disorders in adults which are commonly associated with sleep-related apnea, hypoventilation and hypoxemia: congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), cystic fibrosis (CF) and neuromuscular disorders.

A randomised crossover trial comparing volume assured and pressure preset noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic COPD

Recent randomised controlled trials suggest non-invasive ventilation may offer benefit in the long-term management of ventilatory failure in stable COPD. The best mode of ventilation is unknown and newer volume assured modes may offer advantages by optimising ventilation overnight when treatment is delivered. This study compares volume assured with pressure preset non-invasive ventilation. Randomised crossover trial including twenty five subjects previously established on long-term non-invasive ventilation to manage COPD with chronic ventilatory failure. Two 8-week treatment periods of volume assured and pressure preset non-invasive ventilation. The primary outcomes were daytime arterial blood gas tensions and mean nocturnal oxygen saturation. Secondary outcomes included lung function, exercise capacity, mean nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide, health status and compliance. No significant differences were seen in primary or secondary outcomes following 8 weeks of treatment when comparing volume assured and pressure preset ventilation. Primary outcomes assessed: mean (standard deviation) PaO(2) 7.8 (1.2) vs 8.1(1) kPa, PaCO(2) 6.7 (1.1) vs 6.3 (1.2) kPa and mean nocturnal oxygenation 90 (4) vs 91 (3)% volume assured versus pressure preset, respectively. Volume assured and pressure preset non-invasive ventilation appear equally effective in the long-term management of ventilatory failure associated with stable COPD.

Transcutaneous monitoring as a replacement for arterial PCO(2) monitoring during nocturnal non-invasive ventilation

BACKGROUND

Continuous, non-invasive assessment of alveolar ventilation achieved by transcutaneous PCO(2) (PtcCO(2)) monitoring is clearly superior to intermittent, invasive blood gas analyses in patients receiving nocturnal non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), but the reliability and accuracy of PtcCO(2)-monitoring is still disputed. The present study was aimed at investigating the capability of modern PtcCO(2)-monitoring to reliably assess alveolar ventilation during nocturnal NPPV.

METHODS

Capillary blood gas measurements (11pm, 2am, 5am and 7am) and 8 h of continuous PtcCO(2)-monitoring using three of the latest generation devices (SenTec Digital Monitor, Radiometer TCM4-TINA and Radiometer TOSCA500) were performed during polysomnography-proven sleep studies in 24 patients receiving NPPV (15 with COPD, 9 with restrictive disorders).

RESULTS

The technical calibration drift for SenTec DM, TCM4-TINA and TOSCA500 was 0.1, -0.4 and -0.5 mmHg/h, respectively. Bland-Altman method comparison of PaCO(2)/drift-uncorrected PtcCO(2) revealed a mean bias (limits of agreement) of 1.0 (-4.7 to 6.7), -1.5 (-15.6 to 12.5) and 0.8 (-6.8 to 8.3) mmHg, respectively. Continuous overnight PtcCO(2)-monitoring detected variations in alveolar ventilation, with median ranges of 12.3 (10.7-14.5) mmHg for SenTec DM, 14.5 (12.5-17.0) mmHg for TCM4-TINA and 11.5 (11.0-13.0) mmHg for TOSCA500 (RM-ANOVA, p < 0.001). The four capillary PaCO(2) values ranged by a median of 6.3 (4.7-9.7) mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern PtcCO(2)-monitoring is reliable, accurate and robust. Since PtcCO(2)-monitoring is also non-invasive, does not disrupt sleep quality and provides a more complete picture of alveolar ventilation than intermittent capillary PaCO(2), PtcCO(2)-monitoring should become the preferred technique for assessing alveolar ventilation during nocturnal NPPV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00000433 at http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/default.aspx.

Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring during initiation of noninvasive ventilation

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy of transcutaneous Pco2 (Ptcco2) measurements for monitoring alveolar ventilation in patients requiring noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV).

METHODS

In a prospective study on method agreement pairs of Paco2 and Ptcco2 (SenTec Digital Monitor; SenTec AG; Therwil, Switzerland), measurements were performed every 10 min during the establishment of NPPV over a 4-h period in 10 patients (8 patients with COPD) presenting with acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, thus providing 250 pairs of measurement.

RESULTS

Mean (+/- SD) Paco2 decreased from 67.2 +/- 11.9 mm Hg (Ptcco2, 65.5 +/- 13.9 mm Hg) to 54.6 +/- 8.8 mm Hg (Ptcco2, 47.8 +/- 8.8 mm Hg), and mean pH increased from 7.36 +/- 0.03 to 7.44 +/- 0.04. Following Ptcco2 assessment, Ptcco2 in the ensuing 2-min period was the strongest predictor for Paco2 compared to Ptcco2 in the ensuing 5-min period and to real-time measurements. Ptcco2 was highly correlated with Paco2 (r = 0.916; p < 0.001), as determined by linear regression analysis. The mean difference between Paco2 and Ptcco2 was 4.6 mm Hg, and the limits of agreement (bias +/- 1.96 SDs) ranged from -3.9 to 13.2 mm Hg, following the Bland and Altman analysis. Retrospective drift correction produced an even higher correlation (r = 0.956; p < 0.001) with lower limits of agreement (-1.7 to 7.5 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS

Ptcco2 measurements provide a sensitive, continuous, and noninvasive method for monitoring alveolar ventilation in patients who are receiving short-term NPPV therapy. Drift correction of Ptcco2 measurements improves the accuracy of Ptcco2 monitoring compared to the "gold standard" Paco2 assessment. A lag time of approximately 2 min is present for reliable Ptcco2 values compared to Paco2 values. However, individual variance between Paco2 and Ptcco2 cannot be excluded.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/zks/live/uklregister/Oeffentlich.html Identifier:UKF001271.

Non-invasive positive ventilation in the treatment of sleep-related breathing disorders

This chapter addresses the use of long-term non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) (to the exclusion of continuous positive airway pressure) in the different clinical settings in which it is currently proposed: principally in diseases responsible for hypoventilation characterized by elevated PaCO(2). Nasal masks are predominantly used, followed by nasal pillow and facial masks. Mouthpieces are essentially indicated in case daytime ventilation is needed. Many clinicians currently prefer pressure-preset ventilator in assist mode as the first choice for the majority of the patients with the view of offering better synchronization. Nevertheless, assist-control mode with volume-preset ventilator is also efficient. The settings of the ventilator must insure adequate ventilation assessed by continuous nocturnal records of at least oxygen saturation of haemoglobin-measured by pulse oximetry. The main categories of relevant diseases include different types of neuromuscular disorders, chest-wall deformities and even lung diseases. Depending on the underlying diseases and on individual cases, two schematic situations may be individualized. Either intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) is continuously mandatory to avoid death in the case of complete or quasi-complete paralysis or is used every day for several hours, typically during sleep, producing enough improvement to allow free time during the daylight in spontaneous breathing while hypoventilation and related symptoms are improved. In case of complete or quasi-complete need of mechanical assistance, a tracheostomy may become an alternative to non-invasive access. In neuromuscular diseases, in kyphosis and in sequela of tuberculosis patients, NIPPV always significantly increases survival. Conversely, no data support a positive effect on survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Mode of Mechanical Ventilation: Volume Controlled Mode

The primary goal of ventilator support is the maintenance of adequate, but not necessarily normal, gas exchange, which must be achieved with minimal lung injury and the lowest possible degree of hemodynamic impairment, while avoiding injury to distant organs such as the brain. Modes of MV are described by the relationships between the various types of breaths and by the variables that can occur during the inspiratory phase of ventilation. There are two basic modes of ventilation: ventilation limited by a pressure target and ventilation limited to the delivery of a specified volume.

Flow-dependent resistance of nasal masks used for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

Endotracheal tube resistance is known to be flow-dependent and this understanding has improved the application of invasive ventilation. However, similar physiological studies on the interface between patients and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) have not been performed. Therefore, this study was aimed at investigating the resistance of nasal masks used for NPPV.

METHODOLOGY

The flow-dependent pressure drop of the small (S), medium-small (MS) and medium (M) Contour Nasal Mask (Respironics Inc., Murrysville, PA, USA) was measured with and without a connecting tube (length 18 cm, internal diameter 1.5 cm) in a laboratory study. The resistance was calculated by Rohrer's equation using the standard least-squares-fit technique. The present study explicitly differentiated between the resistance of the nasal mask alone when measured against atmosphere and the additional resistance caused by the nasal mask when airtightly fitted to a model head (interaction with the face).

RESULTS

Higher flow rates resulted in a non-linearly increasing pressure drop across the interface. This flow-dependent resistance of the S/MS/M mask was comparably low when not interacting with the face, but increased when interacting with the face. This flow-dependent resistance of the mask was several-fold higher when adding the connection tube and tended to be higher during expiration.

CONCLUSION

There is a non-linear flow-dependent pressure drop across the nasal mask which is low and independent of its size, but increases when interacting with the face. The connecting tube is the major determinant of the resistance originating from facial appliances used for NPPV.

Average volume-assured pressure support in obesity hypoventilation: A randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) has been introduced as a new additional mode for a bilevel pressure ventilation (BPV) device (BiPAP; Respironics; Murrysville, PA), but studies on the physiologic and clinical effects have not yet been performed. There is a particular need to better define the most efficient ventilatory treatment modality for patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS).

METHODS

In OHS patients who did not respond to therapy with continuous positive airway pressure, the effects of BPV with the spontaneous/timed (S/T) ventilation mode with and without AVAPS over 6 weeks on ventilation pattern, gas exchange, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessed by the severe respiratory insufficiency questionnaire (SRI) were prospectively investigated in a randomized crossover trial.

RESULTS

Ten patients (mean [+/- SD] age, 53.5 +/- 11.7 years; mean body mass index, 41.6 +/- 12.1 kg/m2; mean FEV1/FVC ratio, 79.4 +/- 6.5%; mean transcutaneous P(CO2) [PtcCO2], 58 +/- 12 mm Hg) were studied. PtcCO2 nonsignificantly decreased during nocturnal BPV-S/T by -5.6 +/- 11.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.7 to 3.4 mm Hg; p = 0.188), but significantly decreased during BPV-S/T-AVAPS by -12.6 +/- 12.2 mm Hg (95% CI, -22.0 to -3.2 mm Hg; p = 0.015). Pneumotachographic measurements revealed a higher individual variance of peak inspiratory pressure (p < 0.001) and a trend for lower leak volumes but also for higher tidal volumes during BPV-S/T-AVAPS. The SRI summary scale score improved from 63 +/- 15 to 78 +/- 14 during BPV-S/T (p = 0.004) and to 76 +/- 16 during BPV-S/T-AVAPS (p = 0.014). Sleep quality and oxygen saturation also comparably improved following BPV-S/T and BPV-S/T-AVAPS.

CONCLUSION

BPV-S/T substantially improved oxygenation, sleep quality, and HRQL in patients with OHS. AVAPS provided additional benefits on ventilation quality, thus resulting in a more efficient decrease of PtcCO2. However, this did not provide further clinical benefits regarding sleep quality and HRQL.

Randomised crossover study of pressure and volume non-invasive ventilation in chest wall deformity

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive ventilation is an established treatment for chronic respiratory failure due to chest wall deformity. There are few data available to inform the choice between volume and pressure ventilators. The aim of this study was to compare pressure and volume targeted ventilation in terms of diurnal arterial blood gas tensions, lung volumes, hypercapnic ventilatory responses, sleep quality, and effect on daytime function and health status when ventilators were carefully set to provide the same minute ventilation.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with chest wall deformity underwent a 4 week single blind randomised crossover study using the Breas PV403 ventilator in either pressure or volume mode with assessments made at the end of each 4 week period.

RESULTS

Minute ventilation at night was less than that set during the day with greater leakage for both modes of ventilation. There was more leakage with pressure than volume ventilation (13.8 (1.9) v 5.9 (1.0) l/min, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in sleep quality, daytime arterial blood gas tensions, lung mechanics, ventilatory drive, health status or daytime functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that pressure and volume ventilation are equivalent in terms of the effect on nocturnal and daytime physiology, and resulting daytime function and health status.