Pulmonary capillary blood volume response to exercise is diminished in mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Beyond Spirometry: Linking Wasted Ventilation to Exertional Dyspnea in the Initial Stages of COPD

Exertional dyspnea, a key complaint of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ultimately reflects an increased inspiratory neural drive to breathe. In non-hypoxemic patients with largely preserved lung mechanics - as those in the initial stages of the disease - the heightened inspiratory neural drive is strongly associated with an exaggerated ventilatory response to metabolic demand. Several lines of evidence indicate that the so-called excess ventilation (high ventilation-CO2 output relationship) primarily reflects poor gas exchange efficiency, namely increased physiological dead space. Pulmonary function tests estimating the extension of the wasted ventilation and selected cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables can, therefore, shed unique light on the genesis of patients' out-of-proportion dyspnea. After a succinct overview of the basis of gas exchange efficiency in health and inefficiency in COPD, we discuss how wasted ventilation translates into exertional dyspnea in individual patients. We then outline what is currently known about the structural basis of wasted ventilation in "minor/trivial" COPD vis-à-vis the contribution of emphysema versus a potential impairment in lung perfusion across non-emphysematous lung. After summarizing some unanswered questions on the field, we propose that functional imaging be amalgamated with pulmonary function tests beyond spirometry to improve our understanding of this deeply neglected cause of exertional dyspnea. Advances in the field will depend on our ability to develop robust platforms for deeply phenotyping (structurally and functionally), the dyspneic patients showing unordinary high wasted ventilation despite relatively preserved FEV1.

Effects of sildenafil on gas exchange, ventilatory, and sensory responses to exercise in subjects with mild-to-moderate COPD: A randomized cross-over trial

Excess exercise ventilation (high ventilation (V̇E)/carbon dioxide output (V̇CO2)) contributes significantly to dyspnea and exercise intolerance since the earlier stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A selective pulmonary vasodilator (inhaled nitric oxide) has shown to increase exercise tolerance secondary to lower V̇E/V̇CO2 and dyspnea in this patient population. We aimed to assess whether a clinically more practical option - oral sildenafil - would be associated with similar beneficial effects. In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, twenty-four patients with mild-to-moderate COPD completed, on different days, two incremental cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) one hour after sildenafil or placebo. Eleven healthy participants performed a CPET in a non-interventional visit for comparative purposes with patients when receiving placebo. Patients (FEV1= 69.4 ± 13.5 % predicted) showed higher ventilatory demands (V̇E/V̇CO2), worse pulmonary gas exchange, and higher dyspnea during exercise compared to controls (FEV1= 98.3 ±11.6 % predicted). Contrary to our expectations, however, sildenafil (50 mg; N= 15) did not change exertional V̇E/V̇CO2, dead space/tidal volume ratio, operating lung volumes, dyspnea, or exercise tolerance compared to placebo (P>0.05). Due to the lack of significant beneficial effects, nine additional patients were trialed with a higher dose (100 mg). Similarly, active intervention was not associated with positive physiological or sensory effects. In conclusion, acute oral sildenafil (50 or 100 mg) failed to improve gas exchange efficiency or excess exercise ventilation in patients with predominantly moderate COPD. The current study does not endorse a therapeutic role for sildenafil to mitigate exertional dyspnea in this specific patient subpopulation. Clinical trial registry: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4qhkf4 Web of Science Researcher ID: O-7665-2019.

Pulmonary Vascular Structure and Function Are Related to Exercise Capacity in Health and COPD

BACKGROUND

Although it is generally accepted that aerobic exercise training does not change lung structure or function, some work suggests that greater pulmonary vascular structure and function is associated with higher exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption [Vo2peak]).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there a cross-sectional association between the pulmonary vasculature and Vo2peak? We hypothesized that those with higher CT blood vessel volumes and capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco) would have higher Vo2peak, independent of airflow limitation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants from the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study were categorized as follows: never smokers with normal spirometry (n = 263), ever smokers with normal spirometry (n = 407), and COPD: individuals with spirometric airflow obstruction (n = 334). Total vessel volume (TVV), volume for vessels < 5 mm2 in cross-sectional area (BV5), and volume for vessels between 5 and 10 mm2 in cross-sectional area (BV5-10) were generated from CT scans and used as indices of pulmonary vascular structure. Dlco was used as an index of pulmonary microvascular function. Vo2peak was evaluated via incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

RESULTS

General linear regression models revealed that even after controlling for FEV1, emphysema severity, and body morphology, Dlco, TVV, BV5, and BV5-10, were independently associated with Vo2peak. Interaction effects were observed between COPD and TVV, BV5, and BV5-10, indicating a weaker association between pulmonary vascular volumes and Vo2peak in COPD.

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that pulmonary vascular structure and Dlco are independently associated with Vo2peak, regardless of severity of airflow limitation and emphysema, suggesting that these associations are not limited to COPD.

Pulmonary blood volume measured by 82Rb-PET in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective cohort study

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary vascular dysfunction and destruction are observable before the onset of detectable emphysema, but it is unknown whether this is associated with central hypovolemia. We investigated if patients with COPD have reduced pulmonary blood volume (PBV) evaluated by 82Rb-positron emission tomography (PET) at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperemia. This single-center retrospective cohort study assessed 6,301 82Rb-PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) examinations performed over a 6-yr period. We compared 77 patients with COPD with 44 healthy kidney donors (controls). Cardiac output ([Formula: see text]) and mean 82Rb bolus transit time (MBTT) were used to calculate PBV. [Formula: see text] was similar at rest (COPD: 3,649 ± 120 mL vs. control: 3,891 ± 160 mL, P = 0.368) but lower in patients with COPD compared with controls during adenosine infusion (COPD: 5,432 ± 124 mL vs. control: 6,185 ± 161 mL, P < 0.050). MBTT was shorter in patients with COPD compared with controls at rest (COPD: 8.7 ± 0.28 s vs. control: 11.4 ± 0.37 s, P < 0.001) and during adenosine infusion (COPD: 9.2 ± 0.28 s vs. control: 10.2 ± 0.37 s, P < 0.014). PBV was lower in patients with COPD, even after adjustment for body surface area, sex, and age at rest [COPD: 530 (29) mL vs. 708 (38) mL, P < 0.001] and during adenosine infusion [COPD: 826 (29) mL vs. 1,044 (38) mL, P < 0.001]. In conclusion, patients with COPD show evidence of central hypovolemia, but it remains to be determined whether this has any diagnostic or prognostic impact.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present study demonstrated that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibit central hypovolemia compared with healthy controls. Pulmonary blood volume may thus be a relevant physiological and/or clinical outcome measure in future COPD studies.

Pulmonary diffusing capacity to nitric oxide and carbon monoxide during exercise and in the supine position: a test-retest reliability study

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question in this study? How reliable is the combined measurement of the pulmonary diffusing capacity to carbon monoxide and nitric oxide (DLCO/NO ) during exercise and in the resting supine position, respectively? What is the main finding and its importance? The DLCO/NO technique is reliable with a very low day-to-day variability both during exercise and in the resting supine position, and may thus provide a useful physiological outcome that reflects the alveolar-capillary reserve in humans.

ABSTRACT

DLCO/NO , the combined single-breath measurement of the diffusing capacity to carbon monoxide (DLCO ) and nitric oxide (DLNO ) measured either during exercise or in the resting supine position may be a useful physiological measure of alveolar-capillary reserve. In the present study, we investigated the between-day test-retest reliability of DLCO/NO -based metrics. Twenty healthy volunteers (10 males, 10 females; mean age 25 (SD 2) years) were randomized to repeated DLCO/NO measurements during upright rest followed by either exercise (n = 11) or resting in the supine position (n = 9). The measurements were repeated within 7 days. The smallest real difference (SRD), defined as the 95% confidence limit of the standard error of measurement (SEM), the coefficient of variance (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess test-retest reliability. SRD for DLNO was higher during upright rest (5.4 (95% CI: 4.1, 7.5) mmol/(min kPa)) than during exercise (2.7 (95% CI: 2.0, 3.9) mmol/(min kPa)) and in the supine position (3.0 (95% CI: 2.1, 4.8) mmol/(min kPa)). SRD for DLCOc was similar between conditions. CV values for DLNO were slightly lower than for DLCOc both during exercise (1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.7) vs. 3.8 (95% CI: 3.2, 4.3)%) and in the supine position (2.2 (95% CI: 1.8, 2.5) vs. 4.8 (95% CI: 3.8, 5.4)%). DLNO increased by 12.3 (95% CI: 11.1, 13.4) and DLCOc by 3.3 (95% CI: 2.9, 3.7) mmol/(min kPa) from upright rest to exercise. The DLCO/NO technique provides reliable indices of alveolar-capillary reserve, both during exercise and in the supine position.

Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 is not related to cardiopulmonary impairment; a cross-sectional study of persistently dyspneic COVID-19, non-dyspneic COVID-19 and controls

Background: Up to 53% of individuals who had mild COVID-19 experience symptoms for >3-month following infection (Long-CoV). Dyspnea is reported in 60% of Long-CoV cases and may be secondary to impaired exercise capacity (VO2peak) as a result of pulmonary, pulmonary vascular, or cardiac insult. This study examined whether cardiopulmonary mechanisms could explain exertional dyspnea in Long-CoV. Methods: A cross-sectional study of participants with Long-CoV (n = 28, age 40 ± 11 years, 214 ± 85 days post-infection) and age- sex- and body mass index-matched COVID-19 naïve controls (Con, n = 24, age 41 ± 12 years) and participants fully recovered from COVID-19 (ns-CoV, n = 14, age 37 ± 9 years, 198 ± 89 days post-infection) was conducted. Participants self-reported symptoms and baseline dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council, mMRC, dyspnea grade), then underwent a comprehensive pulmonary function test, cardiopulmonary exercise test, exercise pulmonary diffusing capacity measurement, and rest and exercise echocardiography. Results: VO2peak, pulmonary function and cardiac/pulmonary vascular parameters were not impaired in Long- or ns-CoV compared to normative values (VO2peak: 106 ± 25 and 107 ± 25%predicted, respectively) and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise were otherwise normal. When Long-CoV were stratified by clinical dyspnea severity (mMRC = 0 vs mMRC≥1), there were no between-group differences in VO2peak. During submaximal exercise, dyspnea and ventilation were increased in the mMRC≥1 group, despite normal operating lung volumes, arterial saturation, diffusing capacity and indicators of pulmonary vascular pressures. Interpretation: Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 was not associated with overt cardiopulmonary impairment or exercise intolerance. Interventions focusing on dyspnea management may be appropriate for Long-CoV patients who report dyspnea without cardiopulmonary impairment.

Impaired Ventilatory Efficiency, Dyspnea and Exercise Intolerance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results from the CanCOLD Study

RATIONALE

Impaired exercise ventilatory efficiency (high ventilatory requirements for CO2 [V̇E/V̇CO2]) provides an indication of pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVES

To determine: 1) the association between high V̇E/V̇CO2 and clinical outcomes (dyspnea and exercise capacity) and its relationship to lung function and structural radiographic abnormalities; and 2) its prevalence in a large population-based cohort.

METHODS

Participants were recruited randomly from the population and underwent clinical evaluation, pulmonary function, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and chest computed tomography (CT). Impaired exercise ventilatory efficiency was defined by a nadir V̇E/V̇CO2 above the upper limit of normal (V̇E/V̇CO2>ULN), using population-based normative values.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Participants included 445 never-smokers, 381 ever-smokers without airflow obstruction, 224 with GOLD 1 COPD, and 200 with GOLD 2-4 COPD. Participants with V̇E/V̇CO2>ULN were more likely to have activity-related dyspnea (Medical Research Council dyspnea scale≥2, odds ratio=1.77[1.31-2.39]) and abnormally low peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak<LLN, odds ratio=4.58[3.06-6.86]). The carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO) had a stronger correlation with nadir V̇E/V̇CO2 (r=-0.38, p<0.001) than other relevant lung function and CT metrics. The prevalence of V̇E/V̇CO2>ULN was 24% in COPD (similar in GOLD 1 and 2-4), which was greater than in never-smokers (13%) and ever-smokers (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

V̇E/V̇CO2>ULN was associated with greater dyspnea and low VO2peak and was present in 24% of all participants with COPD, regardless of GOLD stage. The results show the importance of recognizing impaired exercise ventilatory efficiency as a potential contributor to dyspnea and exercise limitation, even in mild COPD.

The physiology and pathophysiology of exercise hyperpnea

In health, the near-eucapnic, highly efficient hyperpnea during mild-to-moderate intensity exercise is driven by three obligatory contributions, namely, feedforward central command from supra-medullary locomotor centers, feedback from limb muscle afferents, and respiratory CO₂ exchange (V̇CO₂). Inhibiting each of these stimuli during exercise elicits a reduction in hyperpnea even in the continuing presence of the other major stimuli. However, the relative contribution of each stimulus to the hyperpnea remains unknown as does the means by which V̇CO2 is sensed. Mediation of the hyperventilatory response to exercise in health is attributed to the multiple feedback and feedforward stimuli resulting from muscle fatigue. In patients with COPD, diaphragm EMG amplitude and its relation to ventilatory output are used to decipher mechanisms underlying the patients' abnormal ventilatory responses, dynamic lung hyperinflation and dyspnea during exercise. Key contributions to these exercise-limiting responses across the spectrum of COPD severity include high dead space ventilation, an excessive neural drive to breathe and highly fatigable limb muscles, together with mechanical constraints on ventilation. Major controversies concerning control of exercise hyperpnea are discussed along with the need for innovative research to uncover the link of metabolism to breathing in health and disease.

Exertional ventilation/carbon dioxide output relationship in COPD: from physiological mechanisms to clinical applications

There is well established evidence that the minute ventilation (V′_E)/carbon dioxide output (V′_CO2) relationship is relevant to a number of patient-related outcomes in COPD. In most circumstances, an increased V′_E/V′_CO2 reflects an enlarged physiological dead space (“wasted” ventilation), although alveolar hyperventilation (largely due to increased chemosensitivity) may play an adjunct role, particularly in patients with coexistent cardiovascular disease. The V′_E/V′_CO2 nadir, in particular, has been found to be an important predictor of dyspnoea and poor exercise tolerance, even in patients with largely preserved forced expiratory volume in 1 s. As the disease progresses, a high nadir might help to unravel the cause of disproportionate breathlessness. When analysed in association with measurements of dynamic inspiratory constraints, a high V′_E/V′_CO2 is valuable to ascertain a role for the “lungs” in limiting dyspnoeic patients. Regardless of disease severity, cardiocirculatory (heart failure and pulmonary hypertension) and respiratory (lung fibrosis) comorbidities can further increase V′_E/V′_CO2. A high V′_E/V′_CO2 is a predictor of poor outcome in lung resection surgery, adding value to resting lung hyperinflation in predicting all-cause and respiratory mortality across the spectrum of disease severity. Considering its potential usefulness, the V′_E/V′_CO2 should be valued in the clinical management of patients with COPD.

The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production relationship is relevant to a number of patient-related outcomes in COPD. Minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production, therefore, should be valued in the clinical management of these patients.https://bit.ly/3df2upH

Mechanisms of Exertional Dyspnea in Patients with Mild COPD and a Low Resting DLCO

Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lower resting diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL_CO) often report troublesome dyspnea during exercise although the mechanisms are not clear. We postulated that in such individuals, exertional dyspnea is linked to relatively high inspiratory neural drive (IND) due, in part, to the effects of reduced ventilatory efficiency. This cross-sectional study included 28 patients with GOLD I COPD stratified into two groups with (n = 15) and without (n = 13) DL_CO less than the lower limit of normal (<LLN; Global Lung Function Initiative criteria) and 16 healthy controls. We compared dyspnea (Borg scale), IND (by diaphragm electromyography), ventilatory equivalent for CO₂ (V̇_E/V̇CO₂), and respiratory mechanics during incremental cycle exercise in the three groups. Spirometry and resting lung volumes were similar between COPD groups. During exercise, dyspnea, IND and V̇_E/V̇CO₂ were higher at equivalent work rates (WR) in the DL_CO<LLN group compared with the other two groups (all p < 0.05). In patients with DL_CO<LLN, severe respiratory mechanical constraints, indicated by end-inspiratory lung volume of approximately 90% of total lung capacity, occurred at a lower WR than the other two groups (p < 0.05). The dyspnea/IND relationship was similar across groups; therefore, the increased dyspnea at a standardized WR in the low DL_CO<LLN group reflected the higher corresponding IND. Higher dyspnea ratings in patients with mild COPD and DL_CO<LLN were associated with higher IND and V̇_E/V̇CO₂ at a given work rate. Higher ventilatory requirements in the DL_CO<LLN group accelerated dynamic mechanical abnormalities earlier in exercise, further increasing IND and dyspnea.

Reduced exercise tolerance in mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The contribution of combined abnormalities of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide and ventilatory efficiency

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The combination of both reduced resting diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL_CO ) and ventilatory efficiency (increased ventilatory requirement for CO₂ clearance [V˙_E /V˙CO₂ ]) has been linked to exertional dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The current study examined if low resting DL_CO and higher exercise ventilatory requirements were associated with earlier critical dynamic mechanical constraints, dyspnoea and exercise limitation in patients with mild COPD.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we compared V˙_E /V˙CO₂ , dynamic inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), dyspnoea and exercise capacity in groups of patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 1 COPD with (1) a resting DL_CO at or greater than the lower limit of normal (≥LLN; Global Lung Function Initiative reference equations [n = 44]) or (2) below the <LLN (n = 33), and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 81).

RESULTS

Spirometry and resting lung volumes were similar in the two COPD groups. During exercise, V˙_E /V˙CO₂ (nadir and slope) was consistently higher in the DL_CO  < LLN compared with the other groups (all p < 0.05). The DL_CO  < LLN group had lower IRV and greater dyspnoea intensity at standardized submaximal work rates and lower peak work rate and oxygen uptake than the other two groups (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Reduced exercise capacity in patients with DL_CO  < LLN was related to higher ventilatory requirements, a faster rate of decline in dynamic IRV and greater dyspnoea during exercise. These simple measurements should be considered for the clinical evaluation of unexplained exercise intolerance in individuals with ostensibly mild COPD.

Inhaled nitric oxide improves ventilatory efficiency and exercise capacity in patients with mild COPD: A randomized-control cross-over trial

KEY POINTS

Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an elevated ventilatory equivalent to CO₂ production ( V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 ) during exercise, secondary to increased dead space ventilation. The reason for the increased dead space is unclear, although pulmonary microvascular dysfunction and the corresponding capillary hypoperfusion is a potential mechanism. Despite emerging evidence that mild COPD is associated with pulmonary microvascular dysfunction, limited research has focused on experimentally modulating the pulmonary microvasculature during exercise in mild COPD. The present study sought to examine the effect of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator, on V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 , dyspnoea and exercise capacity in patients with mild COPD. Experimental iNO increased peak oxygen uptake in mild COPD, secondary to reduced V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 and dyspnoea. This is the first study to demonstrate that experimental manipulation of the pulmonary circulation alone, can positively impact dyspnoea and exercise capacity in mild COPD.

ABSTRACT

Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an exaggerated ventilatory response to exercise, contributing to dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. Previous research in mild COPD has demonstrated an elevated ventilatory equivalent to CO₂ production ( V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 ) during exercise, secondary to increased dead space ventilation. The reason for the increased dead space is unclear, although pulmonary microvascular dysfunction and the corresponding capillary hypoperfusion is a potential mechanism. The present study tested the hypothesis that inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator, would lower V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 and dyspnoea, and improve exercise capacity in patients with mild COPD. In this multigroup randomized-control cross-over study, 15 patients with mild COPD (FEV₁  =  89 ± 11% predicted) and 15 healthy controls completed symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests while breathing normoxic gas or 40 ppm iNO. Compared with placebo, iNO significantly increased peak oxygen uptake (1.80 ± 0.14 vs. 1.53 ± 0.10 L·min^-1 , P < 0.001) in COPD, whereas no effect was observed in controls. At an equivalent work rate of 60 W, iNO reduced V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 by 3.8 ± 4.2 units (P = 0.002) and dyspnoea by 1.1 ± 1.2 Borg units (P < 0.001) in COPD, whereas no effect was observed in controls. Operating lung volumes and oxygen saturation were unaffected by iNO in both groups. iNO increased peak oxygen uptake in COPD, secondary to reduced V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 and dyspnoea. These data suggest that mild COPD patients demonstrate pulmonary microvascular dysfunction that contributes to increased V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 , dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. This is the first study to demonstrate that experimental manipulation of the pulmonary circulation alone, can positively impact dyspnoea and exercise capacity in mild COPD.

Never-smokers with occupational COPD have better exercise capacities and ventilatory efficiency than matched smokers with COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in never-smokers exposed to organic dusts is still poorly characterized. Therapeutic strategies in COPD are only evaluated in smoking-related COPD. Understanding how never-smokers with COPD behave during exercise is an important prerequisite for optimal management. The objective of this study was to compare physiological parameters measured during exercise between never-smokers with COPD exposed to organic dusts and patients with smoking-related COPD matched for age, sex, and severity of airway obstruction. Healthy control subjects were also studied. Dyspnea (Borg scale), exercise tolerance, and ventilatory constraints were assessed during incremental cycle cardiopulmonary exercise testing in COPD patients at mild to moderate stages [22 exposed to organic dusts: postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC) z score -2.44 ± 0.72 and FEV₁ z score -1.45 ± 0.78; 22 with smoking-related COPD: FEV₁/FVC z score -2.45 ± 0.61 and FEV₁ z score -1.43 ± 0.69] and 44 healthy control subjects (including 22 never-smokers). Despite the occurrence of similar significant dynamic hyperinflation, never-smoker COPD patients exposed to organic dusts had lower dyspnea ratings than those with smoking-related COPD. They also had better ventilatory efficiency, higher peak oxygen consumption and peak power output than smoking-related COPD patients, all these parameters being similar to control subjects. Differences in exercise capacity between the two COPD groups were mainly driven by better ventilatory efficiency stemming from preserved diffusion capacity. Never-smokers exposed to organic dusts with mild to moderate COPD have better exercise capacities, better ventilatory efficiency, and better diffusion capacity than matched patients with smoking-related COPD.NEW & NOTEWORTHY It is unknown whether or not never-smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) behave like their smoking counterparts during exercise. This is the first study showing that never-smokers with mild to moderate COPD [defined by a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC) < lower limit of normal] have preserved exercise capacities. They also have lower exertional dyspnea than patients with smoking-related COPD. This suggests that the two COPD groups should not be managed in the same way.

Dyspnea and Exercise Limitation in Mild COPD: The Value of CPET

The majority of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have mild airflow limitation as determined by simple spirometry. Although small airway dysfunction is the hallmark of COPD, many studies attest to complex heterogeneous physiological impairments beyond increased airway resistance. These impairments are related to inflammation of lung parenchyma and its microvasculature, which is obscured by simple spirometry. Recent studies using advanced radiological imaging have highlighted significant structural abnormalities in smokers with relatively preserved spirometry. These important studies have generated considerable interest and have reinforced the pressing need to better understand the physiological consequences of various morphological abnormalities, and their impact on the clinical outcomes and natural history of COPD. The overarching objective of this review is to provide a concise overview of the importance and utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in clinical and research settings. CPET uniquely allows evaluation of integrated abnormalities of the respiratory, cardio-circulatory, metabolic, peripheral muscle and neurosensory systems during increases in physiologic stress. This brief review examines the results of recent studies in mild COPD that have uncovered consistent derangements in pulmonary gas exchange and development of “restrictive” dynamic mechanics that together contribute to exercise intolerance. We examine the evidence that compensatory increases in inspiratory neural drive from respiratory control centers are required during exercise in mild COPD to maintain ventilation commensurate with increasing metabolic demand. The ultimate clinical consequences of this high inspiratory neural drive are earlier onset of critical respiratory mechanical constraints and increased perceived respiratory discomfort at relatively low exercise intensities.

The supine position improves but does not normalize the blunted pulmonary capillary blood volume response to exercise in mild COPD

Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) demonstrate resting pulmonary vascular dysfunction as well as a blunted pulmonary diffusing capacity (DLCO) and pulmonary capillary blood volume (V_C) response to exercise. The transition from the upright to supine position increases central blood volume and perfusion pressure, which may overcome microvascular dysfunction in an otherwise intact alveolar-capillary interface. The present study examined whether the supine position normalized DLCO and V_C responses to exercise in mild COPD. Sixteen mild COPD participants and 13 age-, gender-, and height-matched controls completed DLCO maneuvers at rest and during exercise in the upright and supine position. The multiple FIO2-DLCO method was used to determine DLCO, V_C, and membrane diffusion capacity (D_M). All three variables were adjusted for alveolar volume (DLCOAdj, V_CAdj, and D_MAdj). The supine position reduced alveolar volume similarly in both groups, but oxygen consumption and cardiac output were unaffected. DLCOAdj, D_MAdj, and V_CAdj were all lower in COPD. These same variables all increased with upright and supine exercise in both groups. DLCOAdj was unaffected by the supine position. V_CAdj increased in the supine position similarly in both groups. D_MAdj was reduced in the supine position in both groups. While the supine position increased exercise V_CAdj in COPD, the increase was of similar magnitude to healthy controls; therefore, exercise V_C remained blunted in COPD. The persistent reduction in exercise DLCO and V_C when supine suggests that pulmonary vascular destruction is a contributing factor to the blunted DLCO and V_C response to exercise in mild COPD.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease demonstrate a combination of reversible pulmonary microvascular dysfunction and irreversible pulmonary microvascular destruction.

Low resting diffusion capacity, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The mechanisms linking reduced diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DlCO) to dyspnea and exercise intolerance across the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continuum are poorly understood. COPD progression generally involves both DlCO decline and worsening respiratory mechanics, and their relative contribution to dyspnea has not been determined. In a retrospective analysis of 300 COPD patients who completed symptom-limited incremental cardiopulmonary exercise tests, we tested the association between peak oxygen-uptake (V̇o2), DlCO, and other resting physiological measures. Then, we stratified the sample into tertiles of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and inspiratory capacity (IC) and compared dyspnea ratings, pulmonary gas exchange, and respiratory mechanics during exercise in groups with normal and low DlCO [i.e., <lower limit of normal (LLN)] using Global Lung Function Initiative reference values. DlCO was associated with peak V̇o2 ( P = 0.006), peak work-rate ( P = 0.005), and dyspnea/V̇o2 slope ( P < 0.001) after adjustment for other independent variables (airway obstruction and hyperinflation). Within FEV1 and IC tertiles, peak V̇o2 and work rate were lower ( P < 0.05) in low versus normal DlCO groups. Across all tertiles, low DlCO groups had higher dyspnea ratings, greater ventilatory inefficiency and arterial oxygen desaturation, and showed greater mechanical volume constraints at a lower ventilation during exercise than the normal DlCO group (all P < 0.05). After accounting for baseline resting respiratory mechanical abnormalities, DlCO<LLN was consistently associated with greater dyspnea and poorer exercise performance compared with preserved DlCO. The higher dyspnea ratings and earlier exercise termination in low DlCO groups were linked to significantly greater pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, higher ventilatory demand, and associated accelerated dynamic mechanical constraints.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study demonstrated that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DlCO) less than the lower limit of normal had greater pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, which resulted in higher ventilatory demand and greater dynamic mechanical constraints at lower ventilation during exercise. This, in turn, led to greater exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance compared with patients with normal DlCO.