Effect of antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplant in the peri and post-operative period

Lung Transplant Outcomes for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Are We Improving?

BACKGROUND

After implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in 2005, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) emerged as the most common indication for lung transplantation (LT) in the United States. The age and comorbidity of patients undergoing LT have since increased, and the indications for LT have evolved. However, limited data have been used to analyze more recent outcomes among the IPF population.

METHODS

This study analyzed LTs for the primary indication of IPF by using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. An eras-based analysis was performed, comparing patient characteristics, survival, and related outcomes during 2005 to 2009 (era 1) and 2010 to 2014 (era 2) with χ2, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The study compared 1-year survival from 2005 to 2020 and survival at milestones ranging from 1 month to 5 years. Two adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were conducted: 5-year survival by era and 1-year survival annually from 2010 to 2020.

RESULTS

From era 1 (n = 1818) to era 2 (n = 3227), the median age of LT recipients increased from 61 to 63 years (P < .001). The percentage of patients in the intensive care unit before LT climbed from 7.7% to 12.1% (P < .001), and the percentage of patients with diabetes grew from 17.9% to 19.4% (P = .003). Despite increased severity of illness, 5-year survival increased from 51.9% in era 1 to 55.2% in era 2 (P = .02). Adjusted modeling indicated that LT during era 2 featured a 17% hazard reduction compared with era 1 (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival is improving for patients undergoing LT for IPF, despite the challenges of transplant recipients with progressively higher risk profiles.

Effect of antifibrotic agents on postoperative complications after lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Antifibrotic agents (AFAs) are now standard-of-care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Concerns have arisen about the safety of these drugs in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx).

METHODS

We performed a multi-centre, nationwide, retrospective, observational study of French IPF patients undergoing LTx between 2011 and 2018 to determine whether maintaining AFAs in the peri-operative period leads to increased bronchial anastomoses issues, delay in skin healing and haemorrhagic complications. We compared the incidence of post-operative complications and the survival of patients according to AFA exposure.

RESULTS

Among 205 patients who underwent LTx for IPF during the study period, 58 (28%) had received AFAs within 4 weeks before LTx (AFA group): pirfenidone in 37 (18.0%) and nintedanib in 21 (10.2%). The median duration of AFA treatment before LTx was 13.8 (5.6-24) months. The AFA and control groups did not significantly differ in airway, bleeding or skin healing complications (p = 0.91, p = 0.12 and p = 0.70, respectively). Primary graft dysfunction was less frequent in the AFA than control group (26% vs. 43%, p = 0.02), and the 90-day mortality was lower (7% vs. 18%, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

AFA therapy did not increase airway, bleeding or wound post-operative complications after LTx and could be associated with reduced rates of primary graft dysfunction and 90-day mortality.

YAP/TAZ: Molecular pathway and disease therapy

The Yes-associated protein and its transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (YAP/TAZ) are two homologous transcriptional coactivators that lie at the center of a key regulatory network of Hippo, Wnt, GPCR, estrogen, mechanical, and metabolism signaling. YAP/TAZ influences the expressions of downstream genes and proteins as well as enzyme activity in metabolic cycles, cell proliferation, inflammatory factor expression, and the transdifferentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. YAP/TAZ can also be regulated through epigenetic regulation and posttranslational modifications. Consequently, the regulatory function of these mechanisms implicates YAP/TAZ in the pathogenesis of metabolism-related diseases, atherosclerosis, fibrosis, and the delicate equilibrium between cancer progression and organ regeneration. As such, there arises a pressing need for thorough investigation of YAP/TAZ in clinical settings. In this paper, we aim to elucidate the signaling pathways that regulate YAP/TAZ and explore the mechanisms of YAP/TAZ-induce diseases and their potential therapeutic interventions. Furthermore, we summarize the current clinical studies investigating treatments targeting YAP/TAZ. We also address the limitations of existing research on YAP/TAZ and propose future directions for research. In conclusion, this review aims to provide fresh insights into the signaling mediated by YAP/TAZ and identify potential therapeutic targets to present innovative solutions to overcome the challenges associated with YAP/TAZ.

Impact of Antifibrotic Treatment on Postoperative Complications in Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases Undergoing Lung Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Antifibrotic treatment has been approved for reducing disease progression in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). As a result of increased bleeding risk, some experts suggest cessation of antifibrotics prior to lung transplantation (LT). However, extensive knowledge regarding the impact of antifibrotic treatment on postoperative complications remains unclear. We performed a comprehensive search of several databases from their inception through to 30 September 2021. Original studies were included in the final analysis if they compared postoperative complications, including surgical wound dehiscence, anastomosis complication, bleeding complications, and primary graft dysfunction, between those with and without antifibrotic treatment undergoing LT. Of 563 retrieved studies, 6 studies were included in the final analysis. A total of 543 ILD patients completing LT were included, with 161 patients continuing antifibrotic treatment up to the time of LT and 382 without prior treatment. Antifibrotic treatment was not significantly associated with surgical wound dehiscence (RR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.31-3.60; I² = 0%), anastomotic complications (RR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.37-2.12; I² = 31%), bleeding complications (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.33-1.76; I² = 0%), or primary graft dysfunction (RR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59-1.29; I² = 0%). Finally, continuing antifibrotic treatment prior to LT was not significantly associated with decreased 1-year mortality (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.41-1.58; I² = 0%). Our study suggests a similar risk of postoperative complications in ILD patients undergoing LT who received antifibrotic treatment compared to those not on antifibrotic therapy.

Antifibrotics and lung transplantation: A Spanish multicentre case-controlled study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antifibrotic drugs are the standard treatments for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study aims to assess the safety of antifibrotic treatment in IPF patients undergoing lung transplantation.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of IPF who received a lung transplant between January 2015 and June 2019 at four Spanish hospitals specialized in lung transplantation were retrospectively recruited. Cases were defined as patients receiving antifibrotic treatments at time of transplant. Each case was matched with a control who did not receive antifibrotic treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were included in the study cohort (103 cases and 61 controls). There were no statistically significant differences between the cases and controls in any of the items studied related to transplantation except the time until the appearance of chest wall dehiscence: although there were no differences in the incidence of wall dehiscence in either group (12.3% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.318), the patients on antifibrotic drugs experienced it earlier (21 days [IQR = 12.5-41.5] vs. 63 days [IQR = 46.75-152.25]; p = 0.012). There were no differences in overall post-transplant survival between the two groups (p = 0.698) or in conditional survival at 30 days, 90 days, 3 years or 5 years. However, 1 year survival was significantly greater among controls (80.6% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

There was evidence that chest wall dehiscences appeared earlier post-transplant in patients using antifibrotics, even though this factor did not significantly impact survival.