Blood heparin-binding protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as indicators of the severity and prognosis of community-acquired pneumonia

Utility of pneumonia severity assessment tools for mortality prediction in healthcare-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Accurate prognostic tools for mortality in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) are needed to provide appropriate medical care, but the efficacy for mortality prediction of tools like PSI, A-DROP, I-ROAD, and CURB-65, widely used for predicting mortality in community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia cases, remains controversial. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Cochrane Library (trials), and Ichushi web database (accessed on August 22, 2022). We identified articles evaluating either PSI, A-DROP, I-ROAD, or CURB-65 and the mortality outcome in patients with HCAP, and calculated the pooled sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary area under the curves (AUCs) for mortality prediction. Additionally, the differences in predicting prognosis among these four assessment tools were evaluated using overall AUCs pooled from AUC values reported in included studies. Eventually, 21 articles were included and these quality assessments were evaluated by QUADAS-2. Using a cut-off value of moderate in patients with HCAP, the range of pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were found to be 0.91-0.97, 0.15-0.44, 1.14-1.66, 0.18-0.33, and 3.86-9.32, respectively. Upon using a cut-off value of severe in those patients, the range of pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.63-0.70, 0.54-0.66, 1.50-2.03, 0.47-0.58, and 2.66-4.32, respectively. Overall AUCs were 0.70 (0.68-0.72), 0.70 (0.63-0.76), 0.68 (0.64-0.73), and 0.67 (0.63-0.71), respectively, for PSI, A-DROP, I-ROAD, and CURB-65 (p = 0.66). In conclusion, these severity assessment tools do not have enough ability to predict mortality in HCAP patients. Furthermore, there are no significant differences in predictive performance among these four severity assessment tools.

Prognostic Value of Neutrophils-to-Lymphocytes Ratio and Platelets-to-Lymphocytes Ratio in Sepsis Patients With Lymphopenia

Background

Inflammation plays a critical role in sepsis. The integration of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelets-to-lymphocytes ratio (PLR) from multiple cell types offers a novel approach to rapidly assess inflammation status. However, the predictive role of NLR and PLR in sepsis with lymphopenia remains uncertain.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to explore the prognostic value of NLR and PLR in sepsis patients with lymphopenia.

Design and methods

In this observational retrospective study, we included 172 sepsis patients with lymphopenia and collected clinical characteristics for analysis. Through binary logistic regression analysis, we identified independent factors. Receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC) and areas under the curves (AUC) were employed to assess the ability to predict hospital mortality risk.

Results

Our results showed a total hospital mortality rate of 53.49%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that NLR (OR = 1.11, P < .001) and PLR (OR = 1.01, P = .003) were independent predictors associated with hospital mortality in sepsis patients with lymphopenia. The AUCs of NLR and PLR were 0.750 (95% CI: 0.634-0.788, P < .001) and 0.662 (95% CI: 0.580-0.743, P < .001), respectively. Notably, an optimal cut-off value of 18.93 for NLR displayed a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 63.0% in discriminating hospital mortality in sepsis patients with lymphopenia, while the optimal cut-off value for PLR was 377.50, with a sensitivity of 67.5% and specificity of 64.1%.

Conclusion

NLR and PLR serve as independent predictors of hospital mortality in sepsis patients with lymphopenia.

Diagnostic value of plasma heparin-binding protein and the heparin-binding protein-to-albumin ratio in patients with community-acquired Pneumonia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting to the emergency department with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are characterized by advanced age, comorbidities, critical illness and less-than-typical symptoms, posing a diagnostic challenge. Plasma heparin-binding protein (HBP) and the heparin-binding protein-to-albumin ratio (HBP/Alb) have not been adequately studied in the early diagnosis of CAP. This study assessed the diagnostic value of plasma HBP, HBP/Alb, and conventional inflammatory markers in emergency department patients with CAP.

METHODS

We enrolled 103 patients with CAP, retrospectively analyzed the patients' clinical data, and divided the CAP patients into antibiotic (n = 79) and non-antibiotic (n = 24) groups based on whether antibiotics were administered prior to blood sampling and laboratory tests. The control group was comprised of 52 non-infected patients admitted during the same period. Within 24 h of admission, plasma HBP, serum procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and HBP/Alb levels were collected separately and compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the diagnostic value of each indicator for CAP patients. Utilizing the Kappa test, the consistency of each indicator used to evaluate CAP and clinical diagnosis was analyzed. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlation between plasma HBP and clinical indicators of CAP patients.

RESULTS

Plasma HBP, serum PCT, WBC, NLR and HBP/Alb were all elevated in the CAP group in comparison to the control group (P < 0.001). Plasma HBP, serum PCT, WBC, NLR and HBP/Alb levels did not differ statistically between antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups (P > 0.05). Plasma HBP and HBP/Alb had the highest diagnostic accuracy for CAP, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.931 and 0.938 (P < 0.0001), and the best cut-off values were 35.40 ng/mL and 0.87, respectively. In evaluating the consistency between CAP and clinical diagnosis, the Kappa values for HBP, PCT, WBC, NLR and HBP/Alb were 0.749, 0.465, 0.439, 0.566 and 0.773, respectively. Spearman correlation analysis showed that plasma HBP was positively correlated with serum PCT, WBC, NLR and HBP/Alb in CAP patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma HBP and HBP/Alb have a high clinical diagnostic value for CAP and can be used as good and reliable novel inflammatory markers in the emergency department for the early diagnosis of CAP patients.