Frequency and characterization of CTEPH and CTEPD according to the mPAP threshold > 20 mm Hg: Retrospective analysis from data of a prospective PE aftercare program

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and the 2022 definition of pulmonary hypertension

Parameters of cardiopulmonary exercise testing significantly discriminate between healthy subjects and patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), also according to the new 2022 definition of pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure mPAP > 20 mmHg). The cut-offs indicating on PH were peakVO2 ≤ 16.7 mL/min/kg (Youden-Index YI = 0.79), petCO2@AT ≤ 34 mmHg (YI = 0.67), and VE/VCO2@AT ≤ 30 (YI = 0.76).

The Early Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Up to 1% of the world population and 10% of all persons over age 65 suffer from pulmonary hypertension (PH). The latency from the first symptom to the diagnosis is more than one year on average, and more than three years in 20% of patients. 40% seek help from more than four different physicians until their condition is finally diagnosed.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search on pulmonary hypertension.

RESULTS

The most common causes of pulmonary hypertension are left heart diseases and lung diseases. Its cardinal symptom is exertional dyspnea that worsens as the disease progresses. Additional symptoms of right heart failure are seen in advanced stages. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are rare, difficult to diagnose, and of particular clinical relevance because specific treatments are available. For this reason, strategies for the early detection of PAH and CTEPH have been developed. The clinical suspicion of PH arises in a patient who has nonspecific symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, and an abnormal (NT-pro-)BNP concentration. Once the suspicion of PH has been confirmed by echocardiography and, if necessary, differential-diagnostic evaluation with a cardiopulmonary stress test, and after the exclusion of a primary left heart disease or lung disease, the patient should be referred to a PH center for further diagnostic assessment, classification, and treatment.

CONCLUSION

If both the (NT-pro-)BNP and the ECG are normal, PH is unlikely. Knowledge of the characteristic clinical manifestations and test results of PH is needed so that patients can be properly selected for referral to specialists and experts in PH.

[Diagnostic Algorithm and Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension]

The new guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension include a new diagnostic algorithm and provide specific recommendations for the required diagnostic procedures, including screening methods. These recommendations are commented on by national experts under the auspices of the DACH. These comments provide additional decision support and background information, serving as a further guide for the complex diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.

[Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension]

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare disease, but an important late sequela after acute pulmonary embolism. Therefore, follow-up after at least three months of sufficient anticoagulation is recommended. Patients with suspected CTEPH should be referred to specialized CTEPH centers for further evaluation and treatment.Three treatment modalities are available: pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and pulmonary hypertension-targeted drugs. The indication for surgery depends mainly on the localization of the pulmonary arterial obstructions. Severe comorbidities as well as advanced age need individual evaluation, but do not present strict exclusion criteria. Multimodal treatments are common practice in inoperable CTEPH. However, treatment decision making in an experienced multidisciplinary team is mandatory.

[Pulmonary hypertension - The new ESC guideline]

The current guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) contain several important new aspects. The definition of PH is changed to a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of >20mmHg in combination with PVR threshold value of >2 Wood units to a define a precapillary component. The clinical classification of PH still distinguishes 5 main groups. The diagnostic algorithm begins with the evaluation of dyspnea in primary care and early referral of patients with suspected PAH (group I), CTEPH (group IV) or severe PH of other groups.Initial treatment planning in PAH is guided by complex risk assessment in 3 risk levels, follow-up assessment is performed using 3 parameters (WHO-FC, NT-proBNP, and 6MWD) with 4 risk levels or individually in patients with comorbidities.For low or intermediate risk patients, initial combination therapy with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor and an endothelin receptor antagonist is recommended. In high-risk patients, initial triple combination therapy with additional prostacyclin analogues should be considered.Diagnosis and treatment of CTEPH including pulmonary endarterectomy, medical therapy and pulmonary balloon angioplasty should be carried out in CTEPH centers.Patients with severe PH (PVR >5WE) due to PH group II, III or V should be referred to the PH center for study inclusion or individual therapy.

[Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension]

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is an important late complication of acute pulmonary embolism, in which the thrombi transform into fibrous tissue, become integrated into the vessel wall, and lead to chronic obstructions. CTEPD is differentiated into cases without pulmonary hypertension (PH), characterized by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure up to 20 mmHg and a form with PH. Then, it is still referred to as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).When there is suspicion of CTEPH, initial diagnostic tests should include echocardiography and ventilation/perfusion scan to detect perfusion defects. Subsequently, referral to a CTEPH center is recommended, where further imaging diagnostics and right heart catheterization are performed to determine the appropriate treatment.Currently, three treatment modalities are available. The treatment of choice is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). For non-operable patients or patients with residual PH after PEA, PH-targeted medical therapy, and the interventional procedure of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are available. Increasingly, PEA, BPA, and pharmacological therapy are combined in multimodal concepts.Patients require post-treatment follow-up, preferably at (CTE)PH centers. These centers are required to perform a minimum number of PEA surgeries (50/year) and BPA interventions (100/year).

Updates in the diagnosis and management of chronic thromboembolic disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) is distinct from chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and is defined by dyspnea on exertion after acute pulmonary embolism with the presence of residual perfusion defects and absence of resting pulmonary hypertension. Here, we review clinical features and diagnostic criteria for CTED and summarize treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

The optimal management for CTED is unclear as the long-term outcomes of conservative vs. invasive treatment for this disease have not been reported. There are a few studies evaluating outcomes of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in CTED, concluding that these procedures are safe and effective in select patients. However, these trials are small nonrandomized observational studies, reporting outcomes only up to 1 year after the intervention. Conservative management of CTED with observation, pulmonary hypertension-targeted therapy, or cardiopulmonary rehabilitation has not been studied. It is unknown whether these treatments are as effective or superior to pulmonary thromboendarterectomy or BPA in CTED.

SUMMARY

The management of CTED is individualized and based on symptoms and exercise limitations. Early referral of patients with CTED to a specialized CTEPH center is recommended to determine if watchful waiting, BPA, or pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is most beneficial.

Prevalence of long-term right ventricular dysfunction after acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is associated with adverse outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, there are no studies describing the long-term, full-spectrum right ventricular parameters on morphology, pressure and function at certain follow-up time points after PE onset. More exploration of right ventricular function would provide useful clues for long-term management of patients with PE.

Methods

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we completed a literature search in Pubmed, EMBASE and WebofScience (from Jan 1st, 1998 to April 20th, 2023). Studies of patients with acute PE followed-up longer than 3 months with right ventricle assessment and written in English-language were included. Right ventricular function was assessed by either echocardiography or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). The primary outcome was structural and functional parameters of the right ventricle, and the secondary outcomes were functional assessments [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification and 6-min walk test distance (6 MWD)], at each follow-up time points. Random effect meta-analyses were performed using R software (PROSPERO: CRD42023433332).

Findings

A total of 33 studies (3920 patients) were included in the final analysis. The 3-month, 6-month and 1-year prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) was 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.48, I2 = 96%], 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.36, I2 = 93%) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.48, I2 = 94%), respectively. Pooled tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right ventricular to left ventricular diameter (RV/LV) ratio and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) at 1-year was 21.80 mm (95% CI 20.08-23.52, I2 = 93%), 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.81, I2 = 92%) and 27.33 mmHg (95% CI 18.88-35.78) (I2 = 96%), respectively. The proportion of NYHA III-IV was 0.06 (95% CI 0.0-0.12) and the pooled 6 MWD was 462.98 m (95% CI 447.55-478.41) over 1 year. Patients treated with thrombolysis had lower prevalence of RVD (1-year 0.17 and 0.07 in systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis, respectively) than those treated with anticoagulation therapy alone (1-year 0.24) but the pooled risk ratio (RR) was not statistically significant.

Interpretation

Although the conclusion of this study may be limited by its high heterogeneity from varied study designs, inclusion criteria and definition of RVD of each study, our findings suggested that persistent RVD and functional impairment were of considerable high prevalence during long-term follow-up after acute PE. Treatment strategy may influence the prevalence of long-term RVD.

Funding

This study is supported by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021-I2M-1-061). The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0905600). National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-NHLHCRF-LX-01-02-03). CAMS Institute of Respiratory Medicine Grant for Young Scholars (2023-ZF-8).