Avancées en chirurgie trachéale : a-t-on enfin trouvé le substitut idéal à la trachée ?

Tracheal replacement with aortic grafts: Bench to clinical practice

Tracheal reconstruction following extensive resection for malignant or benign lesions remains a major challenge in thoracic surgery. Numerous studies have attempted to identify the optimal tracheal replacement with different biological or prosthetic materials, such as various homologous and autologous tissues, with no encouraging outcomes. Recently, a few clinical studies reported attaining favorable outcomes using in vitro or stem cell-based airway engineering and also with tracheal allograft implantation following heterotopic revascularization. However, none of the relevant studies offered a standardized technology for airway replacement. In 1997, a novel approach to airway reconstruction was proposed, which involved using aortic grafts as the biological matrix. Studies on animal models reported achieving in-vivo cartilage and epithelial regeneration using this approach. These encouraging results inspired the subsequent application of cryopreserved aortic allografts in humans for the first time. Cryopreserved aortic allografts offered further advantages, such as easy availability in tissue banks and no requirement for immunosuppressive treatments. Currently, stented aortic matrix-based airway replacement has emerged as a standard approach, and its effectiveness was also verified in the recently reported TRITON-01 study. In this context, the present review aims to summarize the current status of the application of aortic grafts in tracheal replacement, including the latest advancements in experimental and clinical practice.

Retrospective study of outcomes after extended resection for tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma is a rare, slow-growing malignancy with a considerable propensity for local extension that may require complex airway resection to achieve tumor-free margins. The objective of this study was to assess whether our experience supports complex airway resection for tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma at our institution between 1970 and 2019 were included retrospectively and classified as having had complex or standard resection. Complex surgery included total tracheal replacement, associated esophageal resection, pneumonectomy, total laryngectomy with tracheal resection, and carinal resection. Standard surgery included tracheal resection, bronchoplastic resection, lobectomy, and bilobectomy. We obtained data from medical records, referring physicians, patients, relatives, and public death records.

RESULTS

Of 59 included patients, 38 had complex and 21 had standard surgery. All 4 (6.8%) patients who died postoperatively had undergone complex surgery. Postoperative morbidity was 32.2% overall and was significantly higher after complex surgery (P = .043). Overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 81.5% and 60.2%, with no significant differences between groups (P = .31). By univariate analysis, T4 tumor and microscopically detectable tumor in the operative specimen margins and gross tumor in the operative specimen margins were associated with poorer survival (P < .05). In the subgroup with microscopically detectable tumor resection, survival was significantly better with adjuvant radiotherapy (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Complex resection for extended tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma may achieve local control and satisfying long-term survival. However, this demanding procedure is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Because adjuvant radiotherapy improved outcomes after resection resulting in microscopically detectable tumor in the operative specimen margins, expected outcomes after resection with no detectable tumor in the margins must be compared to those after resection resulting in microscopically detectable tumor in the margins plus radiotherapy, according to the operative risk.

Airway transplantation: a challenge for regenerative medicine

After more than 50 years of research, airway transplantation remains a major challenge in the fields of thoracic surgery and regenerative medicine. Five principal types of tracheobronchial substitutes, including synthetic prostheses, bioprostheses, allografts, autografts and bioengineered conduits have been evaluated experimentally in numerous studies. However, none of these works have provided a standardized technique for the replacement of the airways. More recently, few clinical attempts have offered encouraging results with ex vivo or stem cell-based engineered airways and tracheal allografts implanted after heterotopic revascularization. In 1997, we proposed a novel approach: the use of aortic grafts as a biological matrix for extensive airway reconstruction. In vivo regeneration of epithelium and cartilage were demonstrated in animal models. This led to the first human applications using cryopreserved aortic allografts that present key advantages because they are available in tissue banks and do not require immunosuppressive therapy. Favorable results obtained in pioneering cases have to be confirmed in larger series of patients with extensive tracheobronchial diseases.

Tracheobronchial bio-engineering: biotechnology fulfilling unmet medical needs

The development of substitutes for the human trachea or its bronchial tree represents a niche application in the rapidly advancing scientific field of Regenerative Medicine. Despite a comparatively small research foundation in the field of tracheo-bronchial bioengineering, four different approaches have already been translated into clinical settings and applied in patients. This can be attributed to the lack of established treatment options for a small group of patients with extensive major airway disease. In this review, the clinical background and tissue-specific basics of tracheo-bronchial bioengineering will be evaluated. Focusing on the clinical applications of bioengineered tracheal tissues, a "top-down" or "bedside-to-bench" analysis is performed in order to guide future basic and clinical research activities for airway bioengineering.