[The French translation and cultural adaptation of the SRI questionnaire. A questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory failure and domiciliary ventilation]

An exposed/unexposed cohort study assessing the effectiveness, the safety and the survival of patients established on home non-invasive ventilation after 80 years old

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the use of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the elderly. We aimed to assess if the effectiveness of long-term NIV of patients ≥ 80 years (older) was not greatly inferior to that of patients < 75 years (younger).

METHODS

This retrospective exposed/unexposed cohort study included all patients established on long-term NIV treated at Rouen University Hospital between 2017 and 2019. Follow-up data were collected at the first visit following NIV initiation. The primary outcome was daytime PaCO2 with a non-inferiority margin of 50% of the improvement of PaCO2 for older patients compared to younger patients.

RESULTS

We included 55 older patients and 88 younger patients. After adjustment on the baseline PaCO2, the mean daytime PaCO2 was reduced by 0.95 (95% CI: 0.67; 1.23) kPa in older patients compared to1.03 (95% CI: 0.81; 1.24) kPa in younger patients for a ratio of improvements estimated at 0.95/1.03 = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.59; 1.27, one-sided p = 0.007 for non-inferiority to 0.50). Median (interquartile range) daily use was 6 (4; 8.1) hours in older versus 7.3 (5; 8.4) hours in younger patients. No significant differences were seen in the quality of sleep and NIV safety. The 24-months survival was 63.6% in older and 87.2% in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

effectiveness and safety seemed acceptable in older patients, with a life expectancy long enough to expect a mid-term benefit, suggesting that initiation of long-term NIV should not be refused only based on age. Prospective studies are needed.

Validation of the Arabic Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire

Background/objectives

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) in patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency requiring Home Mechanical Ventilation (HMV) requires a valid measurement tool. The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire, originally developed in German, has been translated into different languages and tested in different contexts, but has so far not been in use in Arabic-speaking populations. The objective of this study is to validate the Arabic version of the SRI questionnaire in a sample of Arabic-speaking patients from Lebanon.

Methods

Following forward/backward translations, the finalized Arabic version was administered to 149 patients (53 males–96 females, age 69.80 ± 10 years) receiving HMV. Patients were recruited from outpatient clinics and visited at home. The Arabic SRI and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered, in addition to questions on sociodemographics and medical history. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to explore dimensionality; internal consistency reliability of the unidimensional scale and its subscales was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. External nomological validity was examined by assessing the correlation between the SRI and SF-36 scores.

Results

The 49-item Arabic SRI scale showed a high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha for the total scale was 0.897 and ranged between 0.73 and 0.87 for all subscales). Correlations between the SF-36-Mental Health Component MHC and SF-36-Physical Health Component with SRI-Summary Scale were 0.57 and 0.66, respectively, with higher correlations observed between the SF-36 and specific sub-scales such as the Physical Functioning and the Social Functioning subscales [r = 0.81 and r = 0.74 (P < 0.01), respectively].

Conclusion and recommendations

The Arabic SRI is a reliable and valid tool for assessing HRQL in patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency receiving home mechanical ventilation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01644-x.

Defining successful non-invasive ventilation initiation: Data from a real-life cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

When home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is initiated, five goals need to be achieved: a daily use >4 h/day, an improvement in gas exchange, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and sleep quality without side effects. Our aim was to assess how frequently these five goals were reached and the factors predictive of achievement.

METHODS

We conducted a monocentric cohort study that included patients electively established on home NIV over 2 years. HRQL was assessed at baseline and follow-up by the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire. Adequate initiation was defined as the achievement of at least three of five goals and successful initiation as the achievement of all.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and fifty patients were included at baseline. NIV was initiated for: obesity hypoventilation syndrome (n = 95; 38%), neuromuscular disease (n = 70; 28%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 66; 26%) and chest wall disease (n = 19; 8%). At follow-up, measures of all five goals were available in 141 (56%) patients. NIV initiation was adequate for 96 (68%) patients and successful for 12 (9%) patients. In multivariate analysis, a tidal volume ≥ 7.8 ml/kg of ideal body weight was associated with an increased likelihood of adequate NIV initiation (hazard ratio: 5.765 [95% CI:1.824-18.223], p = 0.006]. Improvement in daytime partial arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO₂ ) was not correlated to improvement in HRQL or sleep quality. Severe to very severe NIV-related side effects occurred in 114 (47%) patients and were associated with higher daytime PaCO₂ (6.35 ± 1.08 vs. 5.92 ± 0.79 kPa, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Successful home NIV initiation is rarely achieved in real life. HRQL and NIV tolerance should be assessed to improve patient-centred outcomes.

Development and validation of a simple tool for the assessment of home noninvasive ventilation: the S3-NIV questionnaire

Patient-centred outcomes are significantly modified by long-term home noninvasive ventilation (NIV), but a short, self-administered, specific tool for routine clinical assessment is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the S3-NIV questionnaire, a short questionnaire to measure respiratorysymptoms,sleep quality and NIV-relatedside effects.

Patients with stable disease who were under long-term home NIV were recruited from three outpatient NIV services. Questionnaire development consisted of a selection of core items for analysis, followed by item reduction, validation and test–retest reliability.

338 patients completed a 22-item questionnaire. 11 items were removed because of non-scalability (n=2), redundancy (n=8) and lack of fit (n=1). The final version of the S3-NIV questionnaire consisted of 11 items covering two dimensions: “respiratory symptoms” (Cronbach's α=0.84) and “sleep & NIV-related side effects” (Cronbach's α=0.77). Convergent validity was high between the “respiratory symptoms” subscale of the S3-NIV questionnaire and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (rho= −0.76, p<0.001), and between the “sleep & NIV-related side effects” subscale and the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire (rho=0.51, p<0.001). The S3-NIV questionnaire had good test­–retest reliability after 4 weeks (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.72).

The S3-NIV questionnaire is a short, valid and repeatable self-completed tool for the routine clinical assessment of patients undergoing home NIV.

Chinese version of the severe respiratory insufficiency questionnaire for patients with COPD receiving long-term oxygen therapy

Purpose

Patients with advanced-stage COPD often experience severe hypoxemia. Treatment with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) may relieve patients' symptoms and increase survival. As COPD is incurable, improving patients' health-related quality of life is important. The Chinese version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI) is valid for patients with hypercapnic COPD undergoing noninvasive positive airway pressure ventilation at home. However, the reliability and validity of the Chinese SRI for patients with COPD undergoing LTOT have not been investigated.

Patients and methods

We analyzed reliability using Cronbach's α coefficient. Construct validity was assessed with principal, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was evaluated through the correlation between SRI domains and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) domains. Content validity was assessed by calculating the correlation between each SRI item score and the total score for the relevant domain.

Results

In total, 161 patients participated in this study. The Cronbach's α coefficient for all SRI domains was >0.7, except for the attendant symptoms and sleep domain. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit for each domain, but the factors extracted from each domain were correlated. SRI and CRQ domains correlated well with respect to similar aspects of health-related quality of life, indicating good concurrent validity. Content validity was indirectly shown by a good correlation between each item score and the total score of the relevant domain.

Conclusion

The Chinese version of the SRI has a good reliability and validity for patients with COPD undergoing LTOT in China.

Health-related quality of life measurement in patients with chronic respiratory failure

The improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an important goal in managing patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF) receiving long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) and/or domiciliary noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Two condition-specific HRQL questionnaires have been developed to specifically assess these patients: the Maugeri Respiratory Failure Questionnaire (MRF) and the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI). The MRF is more advantageous in its ease of completion; conversely, the SRI measures diversified health impairments more multi-dimensionally and discriminatively with greater balance, especially in patients receiving NIV. The SRI is available in many different languages as a result of back-translation and validation processes, and is widely validated for various disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restrictive thoracic disorders, neuromuscular disorders, and obesity hypoventilation syndrome, among others. Dyspnea and psychological status were the main determinants for both questionnaires, while the MRF tended to place more emphasis on activity limitations than SRI. In comparison to existing generic questionnaires such as the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form (SF-36) and disease-specific questionnaires such as the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ), both the MRF and the SRI have been shown to be valid and reliable, and have better discriminatory, evaluative, and predictive features than other questionnaires. Thus, in assessing the HRQL of patients with CRF using LTOT and/or NIV, we might consider avoiding the use of the SF-36 or even the SGRQ or CRQ alone and consider using the CRF-specific SRI and MRF in addition to existing generic and/or disease-specific questionnaires.

[The Confusion Assessment Method: Transcultural adaptation of a French version]

INTRODUCTION

The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a validated key tool in clinical practice and research programs to diagnose delirium and assess its severity. There is no validated French version of the CAM training manual and coding guide (Inouye SK). The aim of this study was to establish a consensual French version of the CAM and its manual.

METHODS

Cross-cultural adaptation to achieve equivalence between the original version and a French adapted version of the CAM manual.

RESULTS

A rigorous process was conducted including control of cultural adequacy of the tool's components, double forward and back translations, reconciliation, expert committee review (including bilingual translators with different nationalities, a linguist, highly qualified clinicians, methodologists) and pretesting. A consensual French version of the CAM was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the CAM French version in daily clinical practice will enable optimal diagnosis of delirium diagnosis and enhance communication between health professionals in French speaking countries. Validity and psychometric properties are being tested in a French multicenter cohort, opening up new perspectives for improved quality of care and research programs in French speaking countries.

The Chinese version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire for patients with chronic hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

OBJECTIVES

The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire is the best assessment tool for health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). This study aimed to translate the SRI Questionnaire into Chinese and to validate it.

DESIGN

Prospective validation study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 149 participants with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving NIPPV completed the study.

METHODS

The SRI questionnaire was translated into Chinese using translation and back-translation. Reliability was gauged using Cronbach's α coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess construct validity. Content validity was confirmed by evaluating the relationship between the score of each item and the total score of the relevant subscale.

RESULTS

Cronbach's α coefficients for each subscale and summary scale were above 0.7. Using EFA, one factor was extracted from the anxiety and summary scales and two factors were extracted from the remaining six subscales. Based on the EFA results, subsequent CFA revealed a good model fit for each subscale, but the extracted factors of each subscale were correlated. Content validity was confirmed by the good relationship between the score of each item and the total score of the relevant subscale.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the SRI questionnaire is valid and reliable for patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD receiving NIPPV in China.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02499718.

Medium-term cost-effectiveness of an automated non-invasive ventilation outpatient set-up versus a standard fixed level non-invasive ventilation inpatient set-up in obese patients with chronic respiratory failure: a protocol description

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is an escalating issue, with an accompanying increase in referrals of patients with obesity-related respiratory failure. Currently, these patients are electively admitted to hospital for initiation of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), but it is unknown whether outpatient initiation is as effective as inpatient set-up. We hypothesise that outpatient set-up using an autotitrating NIV device will be more cost-effective than a nurse-led inpatient titration and set-up.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will undertake a multinational, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to receive the usual inpatient set-up, which will include nurse-led initiation of NIV or outpatient set-up with an automated NIV device. They will be stratified according to the trial site, gender and previous use of NIV or continuous positive airway pressure. Assuming a 10% dropout rate, a total sample of 82 patients will be required. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated using standard treatment costs and health service utilisation as well as health-related quality of life measures (severe respiratory insufficiency (SRI) and EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D)). A change in the SRI questionnaire will be based on the analysis of covariance adjusting for the baseline measurements between the two arms of patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Westminster National Research Ethics Committee (11/LO/0414) and is the trial registered on the UKCRN portfolio. The trial is planned to start in January 2015 with publication of the trial results in 2017.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN 51420481.