[Therapeutic adherence in asthma in France: A general review]

[Severe adult asthma and treatment adherence: Results of the FASE-CPHG study]

INTRODUCTION

Data on severe asthma in France are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to asthma treatments and its determinants in a population of severe asthmatics.

METHODS

From May 2016 to June 2017, the French Collège des Pneumologues des Hôpitaux Généraux organized a large-scale prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study on this topic; 1502 patients with severe asthma were included.

RESULTS

The average number of substantive treatments was 2.5±1.1. Assessed by self-questionnaire in 1289 patients, overall adherence was 64.8%, in good agreement with the findings of the pneumologist in charge (p<0.0001). Control of asthma according to the GINA criteria was more successful in compliant patients (p<0.01). In univariate analysis, the most compliant participants were frequent exacerbator patients (p=0.02), those with nasal polyposis (p=0.01) and those receiving an anticholinergic agent (p<0.01), anti-IgE biotherapy (p<0.0001) or oral corticosteroids (p<0.01). The least compliant participants were younger (p<0.0001), active smokers (p<0.001), with shorter average disease duration (24.2±15.7 vs 29.1±18.7 years, p<0.0001) and a lower number of substantive asthma treatments (2.2±1 vs 2.6±1, p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, age, length of disease and anti-IgE treatment were the only factors affecting therapeutic compliance.

CONCLUSION

In this large-scale study of severe asthmatic patients, 64.8% were compliant according to the MMAS-4© self-administered questionnaire and appeared to be better monitored according to the criteria defined in our study. Overall, adherence was more satisfactory among older patients and those whose disease had been evolving over a long period of time or were receiving anti-IgE biotherapy.

[Compliance with biologic agents: Current situation]

Despite the fact that the prognosis of chronic inflammatory disorders is improved by biological agents, compliance with those therapeutics remains imperfect. Compliance corresponds to the measurable part of the follow-up of the medical prescription by the patient, whereas adherence is related to the acceptation of the treatment by the patient. The compliance rates of biologic agents are generally higher than those of conventional therapies. Compliance can be influenced by the real or experienced efficacity of the treatment, by patient-related factors or by the patient-physician relationship. An increase of compliance is associated with an improvement of adherence. To achieve this, the physician can use educational measures such as patient education, which allows the identification of poor adherence. Such programs have been shown to improve the patient's knowledge of the disease and treatment leading to better adherence and compliance.

[Strategies for prescription of inhaled corticosteroids in mild-to-moderate asthma]

Asthma is a common respiratory condition characterized by chronic inflammation of the airways. Most asthmatics have a mild-to-moderate form of the disease, but are still at risk of severe exacerbations and significantly impaired quality of life. This article reviews the strategies for prescription of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. The definition of asthma severity, the goals of asthma management and the adjustment of therapeutics are successively addressed. The major changes proposed by the GINA group in 2019 are also discussed.

[Physical activity and pulmonary rehabilitation in adults with asthma]

Physical activity is reduced in people with asthma compared to the general population, especially in situations where patients have uncontrolled asthma symptoms, persistent airflow obstruction and other long-term medical problems, in particular obesity and anxiety. Exertional dyspnea, which is of multifactorial origin, is the main cause of reduced physical activity reduction and draws patients into a vicious circle further impairing quality of life and asthma control. Both the resumption of a regular physical activity, integrated into daily life, adapted to patients' needs and wishes as well as physical and environmental possibilities for mild to moderate asthmatics, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for severe and/or uncontrolled asthmatics, improve control of asthma, dyspnea, exercise tolerance, quality of life, anxiety, depression and reduce exacerbations. A motivational interview to promote a regular programme of physical activity in mild to moderate asthma (steps 1 to 3) should be offered by all health professionals in the patient care pathway, within the more general framework of therapeutic education. The medical prescription of physical activities, listed in the Public Health Code for patients with long-term diseases, and pulmonary rehabilitation should be performed more often by specialists or the attending physician. Pulmonary rehabilitation addresses the needs of severe asthma patients (steps 4 and 5), and of any asthmatic patient with poorly controlled disease and/or requiring hospitalized for acute exacerbations, regardless of the level of airflow obstruction, and/or with associated comorbidities, and before prescribing biological therapies.

Adherence stages measured by patient-reported outcome instruments in adults with asthma: a scoping review

Objective: Individuals who are adherent to their asthma inhaled maintenance medication: (1) initiate their treatment (take the first dose); (2) implement it (take it as per prescribed dosing regimen); and persist with it (take it for the entire prescribing period). To avoid unnecessary hospitalizations and costs, patient adherence should be routinely assessed. To this end, we aimed to identify patient-reported outcome instruments (PROs) used for measurement of patient adherence to inhaled maintenance medication in asthmatic adults and to report on the adherence stage that these instruments measured. Data sources: We conducted a scoping review of six databases. Study selection: We searched for studies in which PROs were used to measure patient adherence to inhaled maintenance medication in asthmatic participants aged ≥18 years. We extracted and synthesized data in order to list the available PROs and to report the adherence stages that these instruments measured. Results: We included 186 studies (87 PROs). Among all 87 instruments, none were found to measure all three adherence stages. We found that 1 measured initiation, 2 evaluated initiation and implementation, 74 assessed implementation, 7 measured implementation and persistence. The most used instrument (n = 41 studies or 22%) was the Self-Reported Medication-Taking Scale, which was found to assess implementation only. Conclusion: Our results suggest that no single PRO exists to measure initiation, implementation and persistence with asthma inhaled maintenance medication. Results from this review could therefore guide the development or refinement of PROs that would aim to measure all three adherence stages.