Testicular cancer

Urologist led one-stop testicular clinic: the UK 'gold standard'

Prompt diagnosis and early treatment for testicular cancer is vital. To help with this a one-stop, urologist run, testicular clinic with testicular ultrasound scanning as an integral part of the clinic format was introduced to investigate patients in an efficient and timely manner. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficiency of running a one-stop testicular clinic. A prospectively collected electronic database of all patients attending a one-stop testicular clinic at a busy university hospital was interrogated over a 6-year period. Only new referral males, above the age of 15 years old were included. Case notes were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 1757 patients were found with a median age of 36. 6.3 % had a suspicious ultrasound scan and overall 5.6 % were found to have malignancy histologically. In addition a significant proportion of men with a history of testicular maldescent went on to develop testicular cancer (p < 0.01). Median time from referral to clinic and clinic to orchidectomy for suspected testicular cancers was 9 and 5 days respectively (95 % CI). Some of the benefits of a urologist run one-stop testicular clinic include: timely diagnosis and treatment, early reassurance with normal investigations, the discovery of clinically unsuspecting malignancy and the increase in teaching opportunities. These collective benefits must improve patient experience and benefit the department as a whole. A urologist led one-stop testicular clinic should be regarded as the gold standard.

Role of imaging in testicular cancer: current and future practice

The article provides a summary of the epidemiologic and clinical aspects of testicular malignancy. Current standard imaging and novel techniques are reviewed. Present data and clinical treatment trends have favored surveillance protocols over adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for low-stage testicular malignancy. This has resulted in increasing numbers of imaging studies and the potential for increased long-term exposure risks. Understanding imaging associated risks as well as strategies to minimize these risks is of increasing importance. The development, validation and incorporation of alternative lower risk highly efficacious and cost-effective imaging techniques is essential.

The role of imaging in staging and monitoring testicular cancer

The prognosis for testicular cancer is excellent, with a 5-year survival rate greater than 95%. Patients affected can therefore expect to be cured after treatment. Successful treatment requires assessment of the condition at the various stages of its management. Imaging plays a major role in initial analysis of the lymphatic extension and in looking for metastases. It is essential for evaluating the response to treatment and during follow-up after treatment. CT is the most commonly used imaging method in this context, but the role of PET is currently developing. The purpose of this paper is to review the role of the imaging methods commonly used in the management of testicular cancer.

Population based incidence and age distribution of spermatocytic seminoma

PURPOSE

Spermatocytic seminoma is a rare subtype of testicular germ cell tumor which has been reported to occur in elderly men. We report the first population based estimate of incidence, temporal trends and age distribution of this tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of primary testicular cancer identified by cancer registries in Australia between 1982 and 2002 were available for analysis. The International Classification of Diseases for Oncology code M-9063/3 was used to identify spermatocytic seminomas. Incidence trends were modeled using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

There were 58 cases of spermatocytic seminoma out of 9,658 cases of primary malignant testicular neoplasms identified by the cancer registries. This tumor comprised 1.1% of all seminoma and the age standardized incidence rate was 0.4 per million (95% CI 0.3-0.6). A temporal increase in incidence was found but not one reaching statistically significance. Age at diagnosis ranged from 19 to 92 years with a mean of 53.5 (SD 16.7) and a median of 54 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Spermatocytic seminoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis for testicular germ cell tumors presenting in young adults because this tumor occurs as often in men younger than 55 years as it does in older men. Although rare, the occurrence of this tumor is not as singular as the current literature suggests.