Intraoperative radiation therapy, opportunities for clinical practice normalization: MEDTING, a scientific platform

Intraoperative irradiation: precision medicine for quality cancer control promotion

Intraoperative irradiation was implemented 4 decades ago, pioneering the efforts to improve precision in local cancer therapy by combining real-time surgical exploration/resection with high single dose radiotherapy (Gunderson et al., Intraoperative irradiation: techniques and results, 2011). Clinical and technical developments have led to very precise radiation dose deposit. The ability to deliver a very precise dose of radiation is an essential element of contemporary multidisciplinary individualized oncology.

This issue of Radiation Oncology contains a collection of expert review articles and updates with relevant data regarding intraoperative radiotherapy. Technology, physics, biology of single dose and clinical results in a variety of cancer sites and histologies are described and analyzed. The state of the art for advanced cancer care through medical innovation opens a significant opportunity for individualize cancer management across a broad spectrum of clinical practice. The advantage for tailoring diagnostic and treatment decisions in an individualized fashion will translate into precise medical treatment.

Practical issues regarding angular and energy response in in vivo intraoperative electron radiotherapy dosimetry

AIM

To estimate angular response deviation of MOSFETs in the realm of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT), review their energy dependence, and propose unambiguous names for detector rotations.

BACKGROUND

MOSFETs have been used in IOERT. Movement of the detector, namely rotations, can spoil results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We propose yaw, pitch, and roll to name the three possible rotations in space, as these unequivocally name aircraft rotations. Reinforced mobile MOSFETs (model TN-502RDM-H) and an Elekta Precise linear accelerator were used. Two detectors were placed in air for the angular response study and the whole set of five detectors was calibrated as usual to evaluate energy dependence.

RESULTS

The maximum readout was obtained with a roll of 90° and 4 MeV. With regard to pitch movement, a substantial drop in readout was achieved at 90°. Significant overresponse was measured at 315° with 4 MeV and at 45° with 15 MeV. Energy response is not different for the following groups of energies: 4, 6, and 9 MeV; and 12 MeV, 15 MeV, and 18 MeV.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposal to name MOSFET rotations solves the problem of defining sensor orientations. Angular response could explain lower than expected results when the tip of the detector is lifted due to inadvertent movements. MOSFETs energy response is independent of several energies and differs by a maximum of 3.4% when dependent. This can limit dosimetry errors and makes it possible to calibrate the detectors only once for each group of energies, which saves time and optimizes lifespan of MOSFETs.

Intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons: fundamentals, results, and innovation

Rationale and objectives

To analyse the programme activity and clinical innovation and/or technology developed over a period of 17 years with regard to the introduction and the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a therapeutic component in a medical–surgical multidisciplinary cancer hospital.

Material and methods

To standardise and record this procedure, the Radiation Oncology service has an institutional programme and protocols that must be completed by the different specialists involved. For 17 years, IORT procedures were recorded on a specific database that includes 23 variables with information recorded on institutional protocols.

As part of the development and innovation activity, two technological tools were implemented (RADIANCE and MEDTING) in line with the standardisation of this modality in clinical practice.

Results

During the 17 years studied, 1,004 patients were treated through 1,036 IORT procedures. The state of the disease at the time of IORT was 77% primary and 23% recurrent. The origin and distribution of cancers were 62% gastrointestinal, 18% sarcomas, 5% pancreatic, 2% paediatric, 3% breast, 7% less common locations, and 2% others. The research and development projects have generated a patent on virtual planning (RADIANCE) and proof of concept to explore as a professional social network (MEDTING).

During 2012, there were 69 IORT procedures. There was defined treatment volume (target or target region) in all of them, and 43 were conducted by the virtual planning RADIANCE system. Eighteen have been registered on the platform MEDTING as clinical cases.

Conclusion

The IORT programme, developed in a university hospital with an academic tradition, and interdisciplinary surgical oncology, is a feasible care initiative, able to generate the necessary intense clinical activity for tending to the cancer patient. Moreover, it is a competitive source for research, development, and scientific innovation.