Evaluation of response after SBRT for liver tumors

Role of Functional MRI in Liver SBRT: Current Use and Future Directions

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for liver cancers whereby large doses of radiation can be delivered precisely to target lesions in 3-5 fractions. The target dose is limited by the dose that can be safely delivered to the non-tumour liver, which depends on the baseline liver functional reserve. Current liver SBRT guidelines assume uniform liver function in the non-tumour liver. However, the assumption of uniform liver function is false in liver disease due to the presence of cirrhosis, damage due to previous chemo- or ablative therapies or irradiation, and fatty liver disease. Anatomical information from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for SBRT planning. While its current use is limited to the identification of target location and size, functional MRI techniques also offer the ability to quantify and spatially map liver tissue microstructure and function. This review summarises and discusses the advantages offered by functional MRI methods for SBRT treatment planning and the potential for adaptive SBRT workflows.

Optimal application of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation treatment for different multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A4-B1: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, many hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A4-B1 cannot receive the curative treatments of liver transplantation, resection, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which are the recommended options according to liver cancer guidelines. Our aim is to study the feasibility of RFA and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a curative treatment for different multifocal HCCs in BCLC stage A4-B1 patients.

METHODS

From September 2014 to August 2019, 39 multifocal HCC lesions (median diameter: 16.6 mm) from 15 patients (median age: 73 years) were retrospectively selected. Among them, 23 were treated by RFA and the other 16 by SBRT because of predictable insufficiency and/or risk related to RFA performance. The indicators for evaluating this novel therapy were the tumor response, prognosis (recurrence and survival), and adverse effects (deterioration of laboratory test values and severe complications).

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 31.3 months (range: 15.1-71.9 months). The total patients with a one-year complete response, stable disease, or disease progression were 11, 1, and 3, respectively. In total, 8 and 2 patients had confronted intrahepatic or local recurrence, respectively. The one-year progression-free survival rate and local control rate were 80% (12/15 patients) and 97.4% (38/39 lesions), respectively. The median time to progression was 20.1 (2.8-45.1) months. The one- and two-year survival rates were 100 and 88.9%, respectively. In up to five months' observation, no patient showed severe complications. Seven, four, and two patients had slight changes in their white blood cells, platelet count, or albumin-bilirubin grade, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with BCLC stage A4-B1, RFA and SBRT treatment for different multifocal HCCs may be a potential option because of the favorable prognosis and safety. However, before its application in clinical practice, prospective, controlled, large-scale studies are needed to further confirm our conclusions.

Thermal Ablation versus Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy to Treat Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comparative Analysis from the Prospective Amsterdam CORE Registry

Thermal ablation and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are techniques to eradicate colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study compares the safety, efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes of these treatment methods. All prospectively registered patients (AmCORE registry) treated with thermal ablation or SABR alone for unresectable CRLM between 2007 and 2020 were analyzed using multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression. In total 199 patients were included for analysis: 144 (400 CRLM) thermal ablation; 55 (69 CRLM) SABR. SABR patients were characterized by older age (p = 0.006), extrahepatic disease at diagnosis (p = 0.004) and larger tumors (p < 0.001). Thermal ablation patients were more likely to have synchronous disease, higher clinical risk scores (p = 0.030) and higher numbers of CRLMs treated (p < 0.001). Mortality was zero and morbidity low in both groups: no serious adverse events were recorded following SABR (n = 0/55) and nine (n = 9/144 [6.3%]; all CTCAE grade 3) after thermal ablation. SABR was associated with an inferior overall survival (OS) (median OS 53.0 months vs. 27.4 months; HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.49; p = 0.003), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) per-tumor (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.52; p = 0.044) and local control per-patient (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.04; p = 0.001) and per-tumor (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.44-2.49; p < 0.001). In this study thermal ablation was superior to SABR with regard to OS, LTPFS and local control, albeit at the cost of a limited risk of serious adverse events. Further studies are required to assess whether the worse outcomes following SABR were the effect of true differences in ablative treatment or a result of residual confounding.

LI-RADS treatment response assessment of combination locoregional therapy for HCC

HCC incidence continues to increase worldwide and is most frequently discovered at an advanced stage when limited curative options are available. Combination locoregional therapies have emerged to improve patient survival and quality of life or downstage patients to curative options. The increasing options for locoregional therapy combinations require an understanding of the expected post-treatment imaging appearance in order to assess treatment response. This review aims to describe the synergy between TACE combined with thermal ablation and TACE combined with SBRT. We will also illustrate expected imaging findings that determine treatment efficacy based on the mechanism of tissue injury using the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm.

SBRT for HCC: Overview of technique and treatment response assessment

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging locoregional treatment (LRT) modality used in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The decision to treat HCC with LRT is evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting, and the specific LRT chosen depends on the treatment intent, such as bridge-to-transplant, down-staging to transplant, definitive/curative treatment, and/or palliation, as well as underlying patient clinical factors. Accurate assessment of treatment response is necessary in order to guide clinical management in these patients. Patients who undergo LRT need continuous imaging evaluation to assess treatment response and to evaluate for recurrence. Thus, an accurate understanding of expected post-SBRT imaging findings is critical to avoid misinterpreting normal post-treatment changes as local progression or viable tumor. SBRT-treated HCC demonstrates unique imaging findings that differ from HCC treated with other forms of LRT. In particular, SBRT-treated HCC can demonstrate persistent APHE and washout on short-term follow-up imaging. This brief review summarizes current evidence for the use of SBRT for HCC, including patient population, SBRT technique and procedure, tumor response assessment on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging with expected findings, and pitfalls in treatment response evaluation.

Feasibility of SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil - a prospective pilot study

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil. SBRT is an evolving treatment in HCC patients not candidates to other local therapies. Its adoption in clinical practice has been heterogeneous, with lack of data on its generalizability in the Brazilian population.

Materials and methods

We conducted a prospective pilot study involving HCC patients after failure or ineligibility for transarterial chemoembolization. Patients received SBRT 30 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions using an isotoxic prescription approach. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT02221778.

Results

From Nov 2014 through Aug 2019, 26 patients received SBRT with 40 Gy median dose. Underlying liver disease was hepatitis C, hepatitis B and alcohol-related in, respectively, 50%, 23% and 19% of patients. Median lesion size was 3.8 cm (range, 1.5-10 cm), and 46% had multiple lesions. Thirty-two percent had tumor vascular thrombosis; median pretreatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was 171.7 ng/mL (range, 4.2-5,494 ng/mL). 1y-local progression-free survival (PFS) was 86% (95% CI: 61% to 95%), with higher local control in doses ≥ 45Gy (p = 0.037; HR = 0.12). 1y-liver PFS, distant PFS and OS were, respectively, 52%, 77% and 79%. Objective response was seen in 89% of patients, with 3 months post-SBRT median AFP of 12 ng/mL (2.4-637 ng/mL). There were no grade 3 or 4 clinical toxicities. Grade 3 or 4 laboratory toxicities occurred in 27% of patients.

Conclusion

SBRT is feasible and safe in patients unresponsive or ineligible for TACE in Brazil. Our study suggests doses ≥ 45 Gy yields better local control.

Long-term outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for patient with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical outcome and predicting factors of local failures in patients with colorectal cancer treated for unresectable liver metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We restrospectively reviewed the medical records of 67 patients treated with the Cyberknife SBRT system for 99 hepatic metastases between January 2007 and December 2015 in our center. In total, 37.5 to 54.0Gy in 3 to 5 fractions were prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Local control (LC), intrahepatic progression incidence, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 47 months (IQR, 28-59 months). The median OS was 53 months, the 2-year OS and PFS rates were 81.4% and 54.0%. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 86.6% and 72.4%. In the multivariate analysis, the degree of differentiation was the only prognostic factor for LC (HR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.10-0.98, P=0.046). Margin expansion>5mm was not associated with a better LC (HR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.38-1.37, P=0.317). Performans Status≥2 (HR 3.27, 95% CI, 1.07-9.98, P=0.038), chemotherapy for metastases before SBRT (HR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.18-0.75, P=0.006) and regional lymph node at diagnosis (HR 2.19, 95% CI, 1.09-4.43, P=0.029) were independent prognostic factors for OS. We report 2 cases of grade≥3 toxicity (3.0%) - one grade 3 acute nausea and one grade 3 late gastric ulcer.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment that allow high LC for liver metastases from colorectal cancer during the first two years. A prescription dose of 45Gy in 3 fractions to the 80% isodose line with a risk adapted schedule to respect Organ At Risk constraints allows a low rate of toxicity.

Slice-stacking T2-weighted MRI for fast determination of internal target volume for liver tumor

Background

To investigate the feasibility of generating maximum intensity projection (MIP) images to determine internal target volume (ITV) using slice-stacking MRI (SS-MRI) technique.

Methods

Slice-stacking is a technique which applies a multi-slice MRI acquisition to generate a 3D MIP for ITV contouring, without reconstructing 4D-MRI. 4D digital extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom was used to generate MIP images with sequential 2D HASTE sequence, with different tumor diameters (10, 30 and 50 mm) and with simulated regular and irregular (patient) breathing motions. A reference MIP was generated using all acquisition images. Consecutive repetitions were then used to generate MIP to analyze the relationship between Dice's similarity coefficient (DSC) and the number of repetitions, and the relationship between the relative ITV volume difference and the number of repetitions. Images from XCAT phantom and from three hepatic carcinoma patients were collected in this study to demonstrate the feasibility of this technique.

Results

For both regular and irregular breathing motion, the average DSC of ITV is >0.94 and the average relative ITV volume difference is <10% (approximately 0.15 cm³) when using 5 repeated scanning images to reconstruct MIP for tumor diameter of 10 mm. As tumor diameter increases, the DSC of ITV is >0.97 and the relative ITV volume difference is <5% for regular breathing motion, and the DSC of ITV is >0.97 and the relative ITV volume difference is <5.5% for irregular breathing motion when using 5 repeated scanning images to reconstruct MIP. In patient image study, the mean relative ITV volume difference is <3% and the mean DSC is 0.99 when using 5 repeated scanning images to reconstruct MIP.

Conclusions

The number of scans required to generate tumor ITV for slice-stacking method (5-7 repetition) is 3-4 times less than that of 4D-MRI (15-20 repetitions). It is feasible to generate a fast clinically acceptable ITV using slice-stacking method with sequential 2D MR images.

MRI Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Local-Regional Therapy: A Comprehensive Review

Nearly 80% of cirrhotic patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not eligible for surgical resection and instead undergo local-regional treatment. After therapy for HCC, patients undergo imaging surveillance to assess treatment efficacy and identify potential sites of progressive tumor elsewhere within the liver. Accurate interpretation of posttreatment imaging is essential for guiding further management decisions, and radiologists must understand expected treatment-specific imaging findings for each of the local-regional therapies. Of interest, expected imaging findings seen after radiation-based therapies (transarterial radioembolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy) are different than those seen after thermal ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Given differences in expected posttreatment imaging findings, the current radiologic treatment response assessment algorithms used for HCC (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors classification, European Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria, and Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System Treatment Response Algorithm) must be applied cautiously for radiation-based therapies in which persistent arterial phase hyperenhancement in the early posttreatment period is common and expected. This article will review the concept of tumor response assessment for HCC, the forms of local-regional therapy for HCC, and the expected posttreatment findings for each form of therapy. Keywords: Abdomen/GI, Liver, MR-Imaging, Treatment Effects, Tumor Response © RSNA, 2020.

Local Tumor Control and Patient Outcome Using Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: iRECIST as a Potential Substitute for Traditional Criteria

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether, compared with traditional criteria, the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 for immune-based therapeutics (iRECIST) improves prediction of local tumor control and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-one HCC lesions (mean size, 3.1 cm) treated with SBRT in 41 patients (mean age, 67 years) were retrospectively included. Each patient underwent CT or MRI before SBRT and at least once after SBRT. Best overall response was categorized using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), iRECIST, World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Lesions were then classified as local tumor control (i.e., stable disease, partial response, or complete response) or local treatment failure (i.e., progressive disease) by each tumor response criteria. Proportions of local tumor control were compared using the McNemar exact test. The 1-year overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS. The median follow-up after SBRT was 21.0 months. The local tumor control rate was 94.1% (48/51) by iRECIST, 88.2% (45/51) by RECIST 1.1, 72.5% (37/51) by WHO criteria, 80.4% (41/51) by mRECIST, and 72.5% (37/51) by EASL criteria. The local tumor control rate was significantly higher according to iRECIST compared with WHO (p = 0.0010) and EASL (p = 0.0225) criteria. The 1-year survival rate for patients with local tumor control according to iRECIST (86.4%) was higher (although not statistically significant) compared with the 1-year survival rate for patients with local tumor control according to the other response criteria. CONCLUSION. iRECIST may provide more robust interpretation of HCC response after SBRT, yielding improved prediction of local tumor control and 1-year survival rates compared with traditional criteria.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A mini-review

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. This technique results in excellent local control rates with favorable toxicity profile despite being predominantly used in heavily pretreated patients or those unsuitable for other local therapies. SBRT may be used as a sole treatment or in combination with other local therapies as well as a bridging strategy for patient awaiting liver transplants. This brief review describes current practice of SBRT with respect to radiation technique, patient selection and treatment concepts. It summarizes available evidence from retro- and prospective studies evaluating SBRT alone, SBRT in combination with other treatments and SBRT compared to other local treatment approaches.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver oligometastases: predictive factors of local response by 18F-FDG-PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

To investigate metabolic parameters as predictive of local response after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver-oligometastases.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria of the present retrospective study were: (a) liver oligometastases with controlled primary tumor; (b) absence of progressive disease ≥6 months; (c) metastases ≤ 3; (d) evaluation of SBRT-response by means of 18-fludeoxyglucose-PET/CT for at least two subsequent evaluations; (e) Karnofsky performance status >80; (f) life-expectancy >6 months. The following metabolic parameters were defined semi-quantitatively for each metastases: (1) standardized uptake value (SUVmax; (2) SUV-mean; (3) metabolic tumor volume (MTV), tumor volume with a SUV ≥3, threshold 40%; (4) total lesion glycolysis (TLG), i.e. the product of SUV-mean and MTV. Local control was defined as absence of recurrence in the field of irradiation.

RESULTS

41 liver metastases were analyzed. Pre-SBRT, median SUV-max was 8.7 (range, 4.5-23.59), median SUV-mean was 4.6 (range, 3-7.5), median MTV was 5.7 cc (range, 0.9-80.6) and median total lesion glycolysis was 24.1 (range, 3.6-601.5). At statistical analysis, metastases with SUV-mean >5 (p 0.04; odds ratio 4.75, sensitivity = 50%, specificity = 82.6%, area under the curve 0.66) and SUV-max >12 (p 0.02; odds ratio 5.03, sensitivity = 69%, specificity = 70%, area under the curve = 0.69) showed higher rates of infield-failure compared to the remaining lesions.

CONCLUSION

According to current findings, pre-SBRT SUV-max and SUV-mean could be predictable of local response in liver oligometastases. Advances in knowledge: Present findings could support the hypothesis that fludeoxyglucose-PET/CT may be a powerful tool to predict tumor control. Specifically, current results might be helpful for clinicians in the decision-making process regarding liver oligometastatic patient selection as well as the individual therapy stratification distinguishing between slowly local progressing patients and rapidly progressing patients.

Direct dose correlation of MRI morphologic alterations of healthy liver tissue after robotic liver SBRT

PURPOSE

For assessing healthy liver reactions after robotic SBRT (stereotactic body radiotherapy), we investigated early morphologic alterations on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) with respect to patient and treatment plan parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MRI data at 6-17 weeks post-treatment from 22 patients with 42 liver metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy delivered in 3-5 fractions. T2- and T1-weighted MRI were registered to the treatment plan. Absolute doses were converted to EQD2 (Equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions) with α/β-ratios of 2 and 3 Gy for healthy, and 8 Gy for modelling pre-damaged liver tissue.

RESULTS

Sharply defined, centroid-shaped morphologic alterations were observed outside the high-dose volume surrounding the GTV. On T2-w MRI, hyperintensity at EQD2 isodoses of 113.3 ± 66.1 Gy₂, 97.5 ± 54.7 Gy₃, and 66.5 ± 32.0 Gy₈ significantly depended on PTV dimension (p = 0.02) and healthy liver EQD2 (p = 0.05). On T1-w non-contrast MRI, hypointensity at EQD2 isodoses of 113.3 ± 49.3 Gy₂, 97.4 ± 41.0 Gy₃, and 65.7 ± 24.2 Gy₈ significantly depended on prior chemotherapy (p = 0.01) and total liver volume (p = 0.05). On T1-w gadolinium-contrast delayed MRI, hypointensity at EQD2 isodoses of 90.6 ± 42.5 Gy₂, 79.3 ± 35.3 Gy₃, and 56.6 ± 20.9 Gy₈ significantly depended on total (p = 0.04) and healthy (p = 0.01) liver EQD2.

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-treatment changes in healthy liver tissue after robotic SBRT could spatially be correlated to respective isodoses. Median nominal doses of 10.1-11.3 Gy per fraction (EQD2 79-97 Gy₃) induce characteristic morphologic alterations surrounding the lesions, potentially allowing for dosimetric in-vivo accuracy assessments. Comparison to other techniques and investigations of the short- and long-term clinical impact require further research.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors: State of the art]

Thanks to the improvement in radiotherapy physics, biology, computing and imaging, patients presenting with liver tumors can be efficiently treated by radiation. Radiotherapy has been included in liver tumors treatment guidelines at all disease stages. Liver stereotactic radiotherapy has to be preferred to standard fractionated radiotherapy whenever possible, as potentially more efficient because of higher biological equivalent dose. Liver stereotactic radiotherapy planning and delivery require extensive experience and optimal treatment quality at every step, thus limiting its availability to specialized centres. Multicentre studies are difficult to develop due to a large technical heterogeneity. Respiratory management, image guidance and immobilization are considerations as important as machine type. The use of multimodal planning imaging is compulsory to achieve expected contouring quality. Treatment efficacy is difficult to assess following liver stereotactic radiotherapy, but local control is high and toxicity unusual. As a consequence, liver stereotactic radiotherapy is part of multimodal and multidisciplinary management of liver tumors.

Image guided SBRT for multiple liver metastases with ExacTrac® Adaptive Gating

AIM

To report the outcome and toxicity of sequential stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for multiple liver metastases in patients treated with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating.

BACKGROUND

In selected patients with a limited number of liver metastases, SBRT has been evaluated as a safe and effective treatment, with minimal toxicity and high rates of local control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2008 to October 2013, 21 patients with multiple (3-14) liver metastases (n = 101) were treated sequentially with SBRT at our institution. Maximum tumor diameter was 7.5 cm. Prior to treatment, internal markers were placed inside or near the tumor. CT or PET-CT simulation was used for the definition of gross tumor volume (GTV). Median planning target volume was 32.3 cc (3.6-139.3 cc). Treatment consisted of 3 fractions (12-20 Gy/fraction) or 5 fractions (10 Gy/fraction), prescribed to the 90-95% of the PTV volume. Daily intra-fraction image guidance was performed with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating. Regular follow-up included CT or PET-CT imaging.

RESULTS

After a median of 23.2 months, the estimated local control rate was 94.4%, 80.6%, 65% and 65% after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years; the median overall survival was 62 months (95% CI 49.12-74.87) and the actuarial survival reached at 60 months was 57.6%. The univariate data analysis revealed that only primary histology other than colorectal adenocarcinoma was shown as an independent significant prognostic factor for local control (p = 0.022). Number of treated metastases did not modify significantly the overall survival (p = 0.51). No toxicity higher than G3 (1 patient with chest wall pain) and no radiation-induced liver disease were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential SBRT with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating for multiple liver metastases can be considered an effective, safe therapeutic option, with a low treatment-related toxicity. Excellent rates of local control and survival were obtained.