Adaptive radiotherapy in patients receiving neoadjuvant radiation for soft tissue sarcoma

Management of tumor volume changes during preoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a new strategy of adaptive radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Using adaptive radiotherapy (ART), to determine objective clinical criteria that identify extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) patients requiring adaptation of their preoperative radiotherapy (RT) plan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 17 patients with a lower extremity ESTS treated between 2019 and 2021 with preoperative RT, using helicoidal intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) tomotherapy, before surgical resection. We collected clinical, tumor parameters and treatment data. Repositioning was ascertained by daily Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) imaging. Using the PreciseART technology we retrospectively manually delineated at least one MVCT for each patient per week and recorded volume and dosimetric parameters. A greater than 5% change between target volume and planned target volume (PTV) dosimetric coverage from the initial planning CT scan to at least one MVCT was defined as clinically significant.

RESULTS

All 17 patients experienced significant tumor volume changes during treatment; 7 tumors grew (41%) and 10 shrank (59%). Three patients (18%), all undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) with increased volume changes, experienced significant reductions in tumor dose coverage. Seven patients required a plan adaptation, as determined by practical criteria applied in our departmental practice. Among these patients, only one ultimately experienced a significant change in PTV coverage. Three patients had a PTV decrease of coverage. Among them, 2 did not receive plan adaptation according our criteria. None of the patients with decreased tumor volumes had reduced target volume coverage. Monitoring volume variations by estimating gross tumor volume (GTV) on MVCT, in addition to axial and sagittal linear tumor dimensions, appeared to be most effective for detecting reductions in PTV coverage throughout treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Variations in ESTS volume are evident during preoperative RT, but significant dosimetric variations are rare. Specific attention should be paid to grade 2-3 UPSs during the first 2 weeks of treatment. In the absence of dedicated software in routine clinical practice, monitoring of tumor volume changes by estimating GTV may represent a useful strategy for identifying patients whose treatment needs to be replanned.

Robust VMAT treatment planning for extremity soft tissue sarcomas

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a frequently employed and guideline-recommended radiotherapy (RT) modality for extremity soft tissue sarcomas (eSTS). Prior studies have demonstrated that significant tumor volume changes during treatment result in loss of target volume coverage with highly conformal techniques such as VMAT, but few solutions exist to these issues aside from adaptive replanning. Here, we describe a related but novel phenomenon in which relatively minor changes in surface volume contour (whether due to daily setup uncertainty, edema of peritumoral tissue, or progression or pseudo-progression of tumor volume itself) can result in unexpected subcutaneous hotspots. This phenomenon is of significant clinical concern given the known association between skin dose and major wound complications during preoperative RT for eSTS. By evaluating daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) images from thirteen eSTS patients treated with VMAT RT, we identify daily surface contour changes (range: 2 mm-15 mm, median: 8 mm) which are frequently below conventional adaptive replanning thresholds. When applied under experimental conditions, these external contour changes did not have major impacts on target volume coverage (range: 30.2%-91.2%, mean: 72.5%) but did result in unexpected hotspots of 125.8% on average (range: 110.0%-142.2%) in the subcutaneous tissues. To mitigate this issue, we develop a methodology for VMAT treatment planning using flash PTV and virtual bolus (VB) to produce robust treatment plans that are more resistant to target volume changes, surface contour changes, and setup uncertainties than conventional planning methods. With this methodology, robust plans were equivalent to standard plans at baseline, but, after incorporation of surface volume changes, both maintained target volume coverage (p < 0.001) and prevented development of subcutaneous hotspots (p < 0.001) better than standard plans. As such, this treatment planning methodology may facilitate development of robust VMAT treatment plans that minimize development of subcutaneous hotspots and preserve target volume coverage in the context of routine volumetric changes during preoperative RT.

Molecular targets for NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST) is a soft-tissue neurosarcoma. It can occur sporadically, after radiotherapy or in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). The hereditary disorder, NF1, is a common cancer predisposition syndrome. The main genetic feature is the mutation of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene that is inherited in an autosomal dominant, progressive manner. Mutations of the NF1 gene increase the activity of Ras signaling and cause the development of different types of tumors, including subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas. These can have further mutations that mediate the transformation into MPNST. Somatic mutations that have been observed are the loss of cell cycle regulators of the CDKN2A gene, and the inactivation of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), mainly embryonic ectoderm development (EED) or suppressor of zeste 12 homologue (SUZ12). Other molecular pathways that have been targeted for treatment are dual MAPK-mTOR targeting, p53 protein, and MEK-ERK pathway. To advance the therapies focused on delaying or inhibiting malignant tumor formation in NF1, we need to understand the implications of the molecular and genetic pathway that are involved in the transformation into MPNST.