1
|
Mitsunari K, Kurata H, Ito I, Harada J, Nakamura Y, Matsuo T, Ohba K, Mochizuki Y, Imamura R. Efficacy and Safety of Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:285-289. [PMID: 38320870 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is common among male renal transplant recipients and can present challenges for medical management and patient survival. It is imperative to have a comprehensive understanding of available treatment options in this population to determine the most effective and safe therapies. Brachytherapy, a safe and effective treatment for localized prostate cancer, has not been sufficiently studied in this patient population. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of brachytherapy in treating prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our brachytherapy database to identify patients with a previous history of renal transplantation who underwent seed implantation for localized prostate cancer. Long-term prostate-specific antigen control and treatment-related toxicity, including graft dysfunction and urinary and rectal complications, were assessed and compared with published outcomes. Results were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of seed implantation in this patient population. RESULTS We identified 2 patients with previous renal transplantation who underwent permanent seed implantation for localized prostate cancer. Follow-ups ranged from 53 to 57 months, and both patients remained free of prostate-specific antigen progression with normal graft function. No acute and late complications occurred. CONCLUSION Brachytherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for post-renal transplant prostate cancer. Given the paucity of reports on brachytherapy in this population, the findings of this study, despite a small sample size, contribute to the increasing body of evidence supporting the use of brachytherapy in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Mitsunari
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Kurata
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Itsuho Ito
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Junki Harada
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Nakamura
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Matsuo
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kojiro Ohba
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yasushi Mochizuki
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Imamura
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dat A, Wei G, Knight S, Ranasinghe W. The role of localised prostate cancer treatment in renal transplant patients: A systematic review. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:622-658. [PMID: 37818029 PMCID: PMC10560625 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To systematically review and critically appraise all treatment options for localised prostate cancer in renal transplant candidates and recipients. Method A systematic review was conducted adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, the Transplant Library and Trip database for studies published up to September 2022. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions for non-randomised studies tool. Results A total of 60 studies were identified describing 525 patients. The majority of studies were either retrospective non-randomised comparative or case series/reports of poor quality. The vast majority of studies were focussed on prostate cancer after renal transplantation. Overall, 410 (78%) patients underwent surgery, 93 (18%) patients underwent radiation therapy or brachytherapy, one patient underwent focal therapy (high-intensity frequency ultrasound) and 21 patients were placed on active surveillance. The mean age was 61 years old, the mean PSA level at diagnosis was 9.6 ng/mL and the mean follow-up time was 31 months. The majority of patients had low-risk disease with 261 patients having Gleason 6 prostate cancer (50%), followed by 220 Gleason 7 patients (42%). All prostate cancer mortality cases were in high-risk prostate cancer (≥Gleason 8). The cancer-specific survival results were similar between surgery and radiotherapy at 1 and 3 years. Conclusion Localised prostate cancer treatment in renal transplant patients should be risk stratified. Surgery and radiation treatment for localised prostate cancer in renal transplant patients appear equally efficacious. Given the limitations of this study, future research should concentrate on developing a multicentre RCT with long-term registry follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Dat
- Department of UrologyMonash HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Gavin Wei
- Department of UrologyMonash HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Simon Knight
- Department of Transplantation, Centre for Evidence in TransplantationJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hanusz K, Domański P, Strojec K, Zapała P, Zapała Ł, Radziszewski P. Prostate Cancer in Transplant Receivers-A Narrative Review on Oncological Outcomes. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2941. [PMID: 38001942 PMCID: PMC10669184 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11112941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a low tumor mutational burden (TMB) cancer with a poor response to immunotherapy. Nonetheless, immunotherapy can be useful, especially in metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Increased cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) density is correlated with a shorter overall survival (OS), an early biochemical relapse, and a generally poor PCa prognosis. An increased number of CCR4+ regulatory T cells (CCR4 + Tregs) relates to a higher Gleason score or earlier progression. The same therapeutic options are available for renal transplant recipients (RTRs) as for the population, with a comparable functional and oncological outcome. Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) is the most common method of radical treatment in RTRs. Brachytherapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) seem to be promising therapies. Further studies are needed to assess the need for prostatectomy in low-risk patients before transplantation. The rate of adverse pathological features in RTRs does not seem to differ from those observed in the non-transplant population and the achieved cancer control seems comparable. The association between PCa and transplantation is not entirely clear. Some researchers indicate a possible association between a more frequent occurrence of PCa and a worse prognosis in advanced or metastatic PCa. However, others claim that the risk and survival prognosis is comparable to the non-transplant population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Hanusz
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Domański
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kacper Strojec
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Zapała
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Łukasz Zapała
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Radziszewski
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jain A, Windsor A, Chou A, Roger S. Kidney Transplant Cortical Necrosis Observed During Pelvic Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:24-27. [PMID: 34547505 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
A 61 year-old female kidney transplant recipient developed radiologic and biopsy-confirmed cortical necrosis in her transplant with elevated serum creatinine levels during concurrent chemoradiation therapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Acute anatomic and pathologic changes within a transplanted kidney during chemoradiation therapy have not been described previously in the literature. Further research is required to ascertain the potential significance and long-term clinical consequences of such findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arunima Jain
- Department of Renal Medicine, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Apsara Windsor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Chou
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Roger
- Department of Renal Medicine, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Detti B, Stocchi G, Mariotti M, Sardaro A, Francolini G, Allegra AG, Roghi M, Maragna V, Teriaca MA, Livi L. Radiotherapy in prostate cancer after kidney transplant: review of the literature and report of 6 cases. TUMORI JOURNAL 2021; 108:371-375. [PMID: 34057383 DOI: 10.1177/03008916211013914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who received a kidney transplant (KT) are described in literature as a group with a higher incidence of malignant neoplasms compared to the general population. Cancer development after KT has become a major issue, as a remarkable percentage of patients are diagnosed with cancer. Treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) is a challenging issue that has been discussed by many authors over the years, but evidence is sparse and often includes conflicting reports. Among the therapeutic options for PCa in these patients, prostate irradiation represents a valuable alternative to surgery or other systemic therapies, as RTRs are often ineligible for these treatments. OBJECTIVE To report six cases treated at our institution between 1998 and 2017 and discuss the available literature. METHODS Patients' characteristics were reported along with biochemical status at diagnosis, type of immunosuppressive treatment, radiation therapy technique, and dose to transplanted kidney. RESULTS Overall, prostate irradiation was delivered respecting the dose constraints and patients showed good tolerance with no reports of acute or late transplanted kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS Our experience confirms that prostate radiotherapy for RTRs is feasible and effective and represents a valid option that should be considered by the multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Stocchi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Mariotti
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Unit and Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea G Allegra
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Manuele Roghi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Virginia Maragna
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria A Teriaca
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|