Risk factors of recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiation therapy for keloid: Comparison of long-term local control rate

Logistic regression analysis of risk factors influencing postoperative keloid scar recurrence

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors of postoperative keloid scar recurrence in patients using logistic regression analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted with the use of clinical data collected from 132 keloid scars patients undergoing keloidectomy under local anaesthesia between January 2020 and June 2023 at The First Affiliated Hospital of the WANNAN Medical College. The recurrence of keloid scars in the included patients was analyzed, and their clinical data were subjected to univariate analysis. Factors showing significant differences were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was generated based on the independent risk factors to explore the predictive performance of joint-factor prediction for postoperative recurrence of keloid scars, and a corresponding Nomogram was generated.

RESULTS

Out of the 132 patients, 38 experienced keloid scar recurrence, accounting for 28.79% of the total cases. Logistic regression analysis identified infection, family history of keloid scars, relatively large scar size and the absence of radiotherapy and local hormone therapy as independent risk factors influencing postoperative recurrence of keloid scars. The prediction for postoperative recurrence of keloid scars based on the joint independent risk factors yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.889, with a sensitivity, a specificity, and an accuracy of 78.72%, 86.84%, and 81.06%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Infection, family history of keloid scars, relatively large scar size, and the absence of radiotherapy and local hormone treatment have been identified as independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence of keloid scars in patients.

Risk factors for recurrence after keloid surgery with electron radiotherapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of postoperative electron radiotherapy (RT) on local control for keloids and to identify risk factors for recurrence. The clinical data of 82 patients treated at our institution from January 2015 to October 2019 were collected. The data included the general condition of the patients, clinical characteristics of the keloids, treatment plan, local control, and treatment side effects. A total of 82 patients (129 keloids) were included. The study included 23 men (28%) and 59 females (72%). The median patient age was 32 years (range, 18-67 years). Twenty-six recurrences were observed, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rates were 93%, 81%, and 73%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that age (P = .03), hypertension (P = .04), scar shape (P < .001), primary site (P = .02), maximum lesion diameter (P < .001), pain and itching (P = .005), local tension (P = .005), and infection (P < .001) were risk factors for local recurrence. Multivariable analysis revealed that maximum lesion diameter (P < .001), infection (P < .001), interval between surgery and RT (P = .02), and previous treatment (P = .02) were independent risk factors. Complete excision of keloids combined with electron RT is safe and seemingly effective. For keloids with a high risk of recurrence, more aggressive treatment should be chosen, and further prospective studies are needed to explore the optimal treatment.

Lesion Site Is the Key Prognostic Factor for Keloid Patients Receiving Surgery With Adjuvant Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Keloid is a benign tumor with high recurrence rate; accordingly, complete surgical excision with adjuvant radiotherapy is one of the most effective treatments. This study reviewed outcomes of keloid patients receiving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients received radiation dose with 15 Gy, with their first radiotherapy within 24 hours after surgical excision. The end points were recurrence rate and local recurrence-free interval (LRFI), defined clinically as palpable gross tumor over the treatment site and duration from the last day of radiotherapy to disease recurrence.

RESULTS

From May 2017 to July 2020, 32 patients with 40 keloid lesions were included. The mean age for these patients was 37.6 years, and the median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The overall recurrence rate was 52.5%, and the median LRFI was 9.7 months. Recurrence rates for males and females were 46.7% and 56% ( P = 0.567), respectively; for head and ear, chest, shoulder and upper extremities, and abdomen and back were 12.5%, 61.5%, 63.6%, and 62.5% ( P = 0.093); for lesions over 20 cm 2 and below 20 cm 2 were 62.5% and 50% ( P = 0.527); and for megavoltage electron beam and kilovoltage photon beam were 56.7% and 40% ( P = 0.361), respectively. Patients were further classified into 2 groups by lesion sites, which showed lower recurrence rate ( P = 0.011) and longer LRFI ( P = 0.028) with lesions over the head and ear than other sites.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that lesion site might be a prognostic factor for keloid recurrence. Adjuvant radiation dose escalation for high-recurrence risk areas (other than the head and ear) might be required.

A Nomogram with the Keloid Activity Assessment Scale for Predicting the Recurrence of Chest Keloid after Surgery and Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with chest keloids undergoing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy still have a high recurrence rate, which is a critical problem. The level of keloid activity has not been studied, and a nomogram model for predicting keloid recurrence has not been established in previous studies.

METHODS

A total of 145 patients with chest keloids who underwent surgery and radiotherapy between January 2015 and January 2019 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were included in our study. Demographic and clinical features and the score of KAAS were analyzed. We compared the area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) between KAAS and the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and established a nomogram model for predicting the risk of recurrence. We used bootstrap and calibration plots to evaluate the performance of the nomogram.

RESULTS

The KAAS can predict recurrence in patients with chest keloids after surgery and radiotherapy. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of KAAS and VSS were 0.858 and 0.711, respectively (p < 0.001). Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the KAAS was better than the VSS. Complications after treatment may be risk factors for keloid recurrence. We created a nomogram by using complications and KAAS. The AUC was 0.871 (95% CI 0.812-0.930). The ROC of the model's bootstrap was 0.865 and was well calibrated.

CONCLUSIONS

The KAAS can be used to predict the recurrence and we developed a nomogram for predicting the recurrence of chest keloids after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Risk factors associated with the progression from mild keloids to severe mild keloids

Background:

Keloids are benign fibrous growths that are caused by excessive tissue build-up. Severe keloids exert more significant effects on patients’ quality of life than do mild keloids. We aimed to identify factors associated with the progression from mild keloids to severe keloids, as distinct from those associated with the formation of keloids.

Methods:

In this retrospective case-control study, 251 patients diagnosed with keloids at West China Hospital between November 2018 and April 2021 were grouped according to the severity of lesions (mild [n = 162] or severe [n = 89]). We collected their basic characteristics, living habits, incomes, comorbidities, and keloid characteristics from Electronic Medical Records in the hospital and the patients’ interviews. Conditional multivariable regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors for the progression of keloids.

Results:

Eighty-nine patients (35.5%) were classified as having severe keloids. We found the distribution of severe keloids varied with sex, age, excessive scrubbing of keloids, family income, the comorbidity of rheumatism, disease duration, characteristics of the location, location in sites of high-stretch tension, the severity and frequency of pain, the severity of pruritus, and infection. Multivariable analysis revealed significant associations between severe keloids and infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.55; P = 0.005), excessive scrubbing of keloids (OR, 8.65; P = 0.001), low or middle family income (OR, 13.44; P = 0.021), comorbidity of rheumatism (OR, 18.97; P = 0.021), multiple keloids located at multiple sites (OR, 3.18; P = 0.033), and disease duration > 15 years (OR, 2.98; P = 0.046).

Conclusion:

Doctors should implement more active and thorough measures to minimize the progression of mild keloids in patients who have any of the following risk factors: infection, excessive scrubbing of keloids, low or middle family income, comorbidity of rheumatism, multiple keloids located at multiple sites, and disease duration > 15 years.

Treatment of Keloids Using Plasma Skin Regeneration Combined with Radiation Therapy Under the Evaluation of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale

Purpose

Keloids are caused by uncontrolled excessive proliferation of fibrous tissue. Multiple treatment strategies including steroid injection, surgical excision, laser therapy and radiation therapy have been reported. Few studies have evaluated the performance of plasma skin regeneration (PSR) in the treatment of keloid. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PSR combined with radiation therapy for keloids on different body parts.

Patients and Methods

A total of 71 patients with 98 keloids were enrolled in this study. Keloids <4 mm thick underwent single-dose PSR, while keloids ≥4 mm thick were administered compound betamethasone injection beforehand. Radiation therapy was administered after 24 hours and again 7 days later after PSR. The outcome was evaluated using the patient and observer scar assessment scale at 12 months post-treatment.

Results

Patient-reported average scores for all keloids significantly decreased from 35.05±9.94 to 21.84±7.04 (p < 0.05). Keloids on face and neck, chest, and back responded better than those on shoulders and limbs. The recurrence rate was observed to be 15.3% (15 out of 98). Adverse effects were mild.

Conclusion

PSR combined with radiation therapy is an effective and safe strategy to treat keloids. Location could be a factor that affects curative effects.

Tomotherapy as an Alternative Irradiative Treatment for Complicated Keloids

The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment of complicated keloids with helical tomotherapy (HT) and electron beam radiotherapy. From July 2018 to September 2018, 11 patients with 23 keloid lesions treated with HT were enrolled. Additionally, 11 patients with 20 lesions treated with electron beam radiotherapy in the same period were enrolled. Patients in both groups were treated within 24 h after surgical excision of the keloid lesion with 13.5 Gy in three consecutive daily fractions. The median follow-up period was 15 months. The local control rate was 91.3% and 80% in the HT group and the electron beam group, respectively. No acute adverse effects were observed in either group, but most patients exhibited pigmentation. No radiation-induced cancer occurred in these patients up to the time of this report. Pain and pruritus improved for all patients and more obviously for three patients with complicated keloids treated with HT. The measured surface dose was 103.7–112.5% and 92.8–97.6% of the prescribed dose in the HT group and the electron beam group, respectively. HT can be considered an alternative in cases where it is not feasible to use multiple electron fields, due to encouraging clinical outcomes.