The value of rapid on-site evaluation during EBUS-TBNA

Endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration: effectiveness and accuracy in non-small cell lung cancer staging

INTRODUCTION

Endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has a cardinal role in the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), providing an accurate nodal staging in a less invasive way than surgical biopsy. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the pre-operative NSCLC mediastinal staging, as well as to evaluate EBUS-TBNA specificity and sensibility in our cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of NSCLC patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by major pulmonary resection between January 2020 and December 2022. EBUS-TBNA was performed in patients with NSCLC (central T ≤ 3 cm, peripheral/central T > 3 cm), following the ESTS guidelines. The target nodes were selected on the basis of their radiologic/metabolic characteristics. Each procedure was conducted together with rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included (M/F = 17/8). At least three needle passages on each target lymph node were performed. No complications during or after the procedures occurred. We found a 100% correspondence between ROSE on the sampled nodes and postoperative pathologic findings. An upstaging occurred in three cases (12%) because of the involvement of stations 5 and 6 (not accessible via EBUS), while the only case of downstaging (N2 → N0, 4%) was probably due to intercurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In all cases, EBUS-TBNA has proved to achieve a diagnostic procedure on the target nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA is a safe and effective procedure that offers high sensitivity and specificity when performed together with ROSE, which improves the accuracy of sampling. Doubt on nodal stations 5 and 6 involvement should be settled by other techniques.

Assessment of Tissue Adequacy by EBUS in Conjunction with PET Scan and Operator's Experience

Mediastinal lymph node assessment is a crucial step in non-small cell lung cancer staging. Positron emission tomography (PET) has been the gold standard for the assessment of mediastinal lymphadenopathy, though it has limited specificity. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is quick, accurate, and a less invasive method for obtaining a diagnostic sample in contrast to mediastinoscopy. We performed a retrospective chart analysis of 171 patients to assess the adequacy of tissue obtained by EBUS for diagnosis and molecular profiling as well as the assessment of staging and lymph node (LN) stations diagnostic yield, in correlation to PET scan and the operator’s level of experience. A significantly increased tissue adequacy was observed based on the operators’ experience, with the highest adequacy noted in trained Interventional Pulmonologist (IP) (100%), followed by >5 years of experience (93.33%), and 88.89% adequacy with <5 years of experience (p = 0.0019). PET-CT scan 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in levels 1, 2, and 3 LN had a tissue adequacy of 76.67%, 54.64%, and 35.56%, respectively (p = 0.0009). EBUS bronchoscopy method could be used to achieve an accurate diagnosis, with IP-trained operators yielding the best results. There is no correlation with PET scan positivity, indicating that both PET and EBUS are complementary methods needed for staging.

Deep Learning Using Endobronchial-Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Image to Improve the Overall Diagnostic Yield of Sampling Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Lung cancer is the biggest cause of cancer-related death worldwide. An accurate nodal staging is critical for the determination of treatment strategy for lung cancer patients. Endobronchial-ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has revolutionized the field of pulmonology and is considered to be extremely sensitive, specific, and secure for lung cancer staging through rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), but manual visual inspection on the entire slide of EBUS smears is challenging, time consuming, and worse, subjective, on a large interobserver scale. To satisfy ROSE’s needs, a rapid, automated, and accurate diagnosis system using EBUS-TBNA whole-slide images (WSIs) is highly desired to improve diagnosis accuracy and speed, minimize workload and labor costs, and ensure reproducibility. We present a fast, efficient, and fully automatic deep-convolutional-neural-network-based system for advanced lung cancer staging on gigapixel EBUS-TBNA cytological WSIs. Each WSI was converted into a patch-based hierarchical structure and examined by the proposed deep convolutional neural network, generating the segmentation of metastatic lesions in EBUS-TBNA WSIs. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first research on fully automated enlarged mediastinal lymph node analysis using EBUS-TBNA cytological WSIs. We evaluated the robustness of the proposed framework on a dataset of 122 WSIs, and the proposed method achieved a high precision of 93.4%, sensitivity of 89.8%, DSC of 82.2%, and IoU of 83.2% for the first experiment (37.7% training and 62.3% testing) and a high precision of 91.8 ± 1.2, sensitivity of 96.3 ± 0.8, DSC of 94.0 ± 1.0, and IoU of 88.7 ± 1.8 for the second experiment using a three-fold cross-validation, respectively. Furthermore, the proposed method significantly outperformed the three state-of-the-art baseline models, including U-Net, SegNet, and FCN, in terms of precision, sensitivity, DSC, and Jaccard index, based on Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test (p<0.001). For a computational time comparison on a WSI, the proposed method was 2.5 times faster than U-Net, 2.3 times faster than SegNet, and 3.4 times faster than FCN, using a single GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, respectively. With its high precision and sensitivity, the proposed method demonstrated that it manifested the potential to reduce the workload of pathologists in their routine clinical practice.

Detailed procedure and clinical application overview of rapid on-site evaluation in diagnostic interventional pulmonology

Diagnostic interventional pulmonology is widely accepted as a minimally invasive, highly accurate procedure for diagnosing lung cancer, more drug-resistant pathogen infections of lower respiratory tract, and critical respiratory diseases. The efficiency of interventional diagnostics depends on quite a few factors, including size and the anatomic location of lymph nodes, number of biopsy sites and complications rate, characteristics of the lesion, and underlying disease. Specifically, the application of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) may avoid additional sampling without compromising diagnostic yield with a preliminary evaluation for adequate diagnostic material and thus reduce the complication rate. In this review article we aimed at elaborate the technical details, clinical roles, and technological progress of ROSE in diagnostic interventional pulmonology, highlighting the importance of ROSE in diagnostic interventional pulmonology. We finally pointed out that it will be a tendency for a pulmonologist, to undergo a short yet intensive training and perform ROSE in diagnostic interventional pulmonology.

Collection and Handling of Thoracic Small Biopsy and Cytology Specimens for Ancillary Studies: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the American College of Chest Physicians, Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Cytopathology, American Thoracic Society, Pulmonary Pathology Society, Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and Society of Thoracic Radiology

CONTEXT.—

The need for appropriate specimen use for ancillary testing has become more commonplace in the practice of pathology. This, coupled with improvements in technology, often provides less invasive methods of testing, but presents new challenges to appropriate specimen collection and handling of these small specimens, including thoracic small biopsy and cytology samples.

OBJECTIVE.—

To develop a clinical practice guideline including recommendations on how to obtain, handle, and process thoracic small biopsy and cytology tissue specimens for diagnostic testing and ancillary studies.

METHODS.—

The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. Core needle biopsy, touch preparation, fine-needle aspiration, and effusion specimens with thoracic diseases including malignancy, granulomatous process/sarcoidosis, and infection (eg, tuberculosis) were deemed within scope. Ancillary studies included immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, mutational analysis, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and microbiologic studies routinely performed in the clinical pathology laboratory. The use of rapid on-site evaluation was also covered.

RESULTS.—

Sixteen guideline statements were developed to assist clinicians and pathologists in collecting and processing thoracic small biopsy and cytology tissue samples.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Based on the systematic review and expert panel consensus, thoracic small specimens can be handled and processed to perform downstream testing (eg, molecular markers, immunohistochemical biomarkers), core needle and fine-needle techniques can provide appropriate cytologic and histologic specimens for ancillary studies, and rapid on-site cytologic evaluation remains helpful in appropriate triage, handling, and processing of specimens.

The Utility of Rapid On-Site Evaluation during Bronchoscopic Biopsy: A 2-Year Respiratory Endoscopy Central Experience

Background

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is commonly used to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy materials in fine-needle aspiration; however, the diagnostic performance of ROSE during fiber optic bronchoscopy (FOB) biopsy under direct vision is rarely reported. Here, we evaluated the role of ROSE during FOB biopsy of visible lesion in trachea or bronchi.

Methods

The role of ROSE was prospectively evaluated in consecutive bronchoscopy specimens obtained between January 2016 and January 2018. The agreement and accuracy between ROSE and final histopathological interpretation were assessed. The frequency and possible reasons for discrepancy between ROSE and definitive histopathology results were identified. Histological and cytological classification was performed according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the American Thoracic Society, and the European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) criteria of lung ADCs classification.

Results

The study enrolled 651 patients, of which 33 were excluded because of insufficient cells. Final diagnosis of malignancy was achieved in 462 cases (74.8%), whereas 156 cases (25.2%) were nonmalignant. ROSE and pathology were well correlated for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (Kappa = 0.718, p < 0.05), adenocarcinoma (AdC) (Kappa = 0.662; p < 0.05) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Kappa = 0.955; p < 0.05). In 24 cases diagnosed as malignant by ROSE and nonmalignant by pathology, the lesion tissues were surgically excised and re-analyzed, and the 24 cases were finally confirmed as malignant by pathology.

Conclusions

ROSE technique allows bronchoscopists to obtain viable and adequate material for the diagnosis of histopathology, and provides them with an onsite preliminary diagnosis especially in cases with inconclusive macroscopic appearance. ROSE and pathology should be used in combination to increase the accuracy of diagnosis.

Efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation for diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is gradually becoming an integral part of the modern Interventional Pulmonology, the clinical benefit of ROSE is still a matter of controversy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to clarify whether ROSE is effective in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes, synchronously, to assess circumstances under which ROSE makes more sense.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies comparing any outcome between ROSE and no-ROSE group in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. Statistical calculations were conducted using Review Manager, version 5.3, and Stata Release 12.0. Meta-analysis was completed using a random-effects model when I²≥50% or a fixed-effect otherwise. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I²-statistic test. Publication bias was assessed by the Begg's test.

Results

This Literature search yielded 27 studies altogether. The pooled risk difference of adequate rate was 0.12 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.07-0.16, I²=0%], the combined risk difference (RD) of diagnostic yield was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.09-0.18, I²=57%) while the pooled RD of sensitivity for malignancy was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14, I² =20%). Significant heterogeneity only existed in diagnostic yield (I²=57%, P=0.001). Further subgroup analysis documented a higher increase in diagnostic yield when sampling solid pulmonary lesions than sampling hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20, I²=0%) versus 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13, I²=10%) and when applied to patients with suspected/diagnosed lung cancer than unselected patients 0.12 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.18) versus 0.11 (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.28).

Conclusions

ROSE is a useful technology in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes, especially when sampling solid pulmonary lesions or applied to patients with suspected lung cancer.

Role of Bronchoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Thoracic Sarcoidosis

The diagnosis of sarcoidosis relies on clinical and radiological presentation, evidence of non-caseating granulomas in histopathology and exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous inflammation. Currently, a proper diagnosis, with a high level of confidence, is considered as key to the appropriate diagnosis and management of the disease. In this sense, this review aims to provide a brief overview on the role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of thoracic sarcoidosis, incorporating newer techniques to establish, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), transesophageal ultrasound-guided needle aspiration with the use of an echo bronchoscope (EUS-B-FNA) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC). Most of the literature reports the diagnostic superiority of endosonographic techniques, such as EBUS-TBNA alone or in combination with EUS-FNA, over conventional bronchoscopic modalities in diagnosing Scadding stages I and II of the disease. Moreover, TBLC may be considered a useful and safe diagnostic tool for thoracic sarcoidosis, overcoming some limitations of transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), avoiding more invasive modalities and being complementary to endosonographic procedures such as EBUS-TBNA.

[Value of C-ROSE During EBUS-TBNA to Obtain the Tissue Sample in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer]

背景与目的

在肺及纵隔占位性病变的患者中大部分临床考虑诊断为原发性肺癌，超声支气管镜引导下的经支气管针吸活检术(endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, EBUS-TBNA)是一种常用的获取病理组织明确诊断的手术。在EBUS-TBNA过程中，快速现场细胞学评价(cytological rapid on-site evaluation, C-ROSE)是一项有用的辅助技术。本研究探讨C-ROSE在EBUS-TBNA取样诊断肺癌中的价值。

方法

对141例经胸部计算机断层扫描(computed tomography, CT)发现存在纵隔和(或)肺门病灶(包括肿大的淋巴结/肿块)且临床高度疑诊原发性肺癌而行EBUS-TBNA患者进行回顾性分析，其中术中行C-ROSE者81例，未行C-ROSE者60例，分析两组患者的穿刺情况及并发症发生率，同时分析C-ROSE联合EBUS-TBNA取样对肺癌诊断的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。

结果

C-ROSE组与非C-ROSE组穿刺针数及穿刺部位数无统计学差异，穿刺合格率分别为98.77%和90.00%(P < 0.05)，诊断率分别为88.89%和75.00%(P < 0.05)，并发症发生率分别为1.23%和11.67%(P < 0.05)。C-ROSE联合EBUS-TBNA对肺癌诊断的敏感度为92.21%，特异度为100.00%，阳性预测值为100.00%，阴性预测值为40.00%。

结论

C-ROSE在疑诊肺癌行EBUS-TBNA中应用可以提高穿刺成功率及诊断率、减少并发症，值得推广。

Easily detectable cytomorphological features to evaluate during ROSE for rapid lung cancer diagnosis: from cytology to histology

In lung cancer patients, the only available diagnostic material often comes from biopsy or from cytological samples obtained by fine needle aspiration (FNA). There is a lack of easily detectable cytomorphological features for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) to orient lung cancer diagnosis towards a specific tumor histotype. We studied the cytological features evaluated on site to define tumor histotype and to establish the number of specimens to be taken. Cytological specimens from 273 consecutive patients were analyzed with ROSE: bronchoscopy with transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) had been performed in 72 patients and with endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-TBNA in 201. Cytomorphological features were correlated with the final diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy was measured. Analysis of the different cytomorphological parameters showed that the best sensitivity and specificity were obtained for adenocarcinoma by combining the presence of nucleoli and small/medium cell clusters, and for squamous cell carcinoma by considering the presence of necrosis ≥50% and large cell clusters. For small cell carcinoma, the best diagnostic accuracy was obtained by combining moderate necrosis (<50%) and the presence of single cells. Overall accuracy ranged from 90% to 97%. We showed that it was possible to establish the histotype of the most frequent lung cancers during ROSE using only a few easily identifiable cytomorphological parameters. An accurate diagnosis during ROSE could help endoscopists to decide how many tumor samples must be taken, e.g.a higher number of samples is needed for the biomolecular characterization of adenocarcinoma, whereas one sample may be sufficient for squamous cell carcinoma.