Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB non-small cell lung carcinoma: A survival analysis

Prognosis of early stage pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma with different treatments

BACKGROUND

The effects of surgical approach and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) of early stage pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAD) have not been thoroughly studied yet. This study intends to clarify whether AC provides clinical benefit to the early stage MAD patients and the survival difference between surgical approaches.

METHODS

All cases of stage I MAD were identified from the SEER database during the period of 2009-2014. The primary cohort was divided into AC and surgery (S) groups. Meanwhile, the patients with tumor ≤1 cm were divided into lobectomy and sublobar resection group. Clinical characteristics, treatments and survival data including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,816 patients were included in the final cohort. Referring to surgical procedure, 140 patients received lobectomy and 75 patients received sublobar resection. AC showed worse survival outcomes than surgery alone (OS: 71.2 vs. 93.4 months; CSS: 74.9 vs. 101.1 months). No significant difference was observed between lobectomy group and sublobar resection group (OS: 97.3 vs. 93.1 months; CSS: 103.7 vs. 101.3 months). Consistent results were also shown after the propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

Early stage of MAD has an ideal prognosis. AC may bring adverse effects which would lower OS and CSS of stage I MAD patients. No significant difference is observed in the comparison of prognosis between lobectomy and sublobar resection in tumor size ≤1 cm MAD patients.

Prognostic and predictive value of the novel classification of lung adenocarcinoma in patients with stage IB

PURPOSE

Controversy remains exist for the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) among stage IB lung adenocarcinoma patients. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the current lung adenocarcinoma classification system on benefit of ACT among patients with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 928 pathological stage IB invasive adenocarcinoma patients with R0 resection were included in this study. Based on the predominant growth pattern present in the tumor, invasive adenocarcinomas with mixed histologic components were classified into five subtypes: lepidic (LEP), acinar (ACN), papillary (PAP), micropapillary (MIP) and solid (SOL). These five histologic subtypes were collapsed into three groups (LEP, ACN/PAP and SOL/MIP). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to evaluate benefit from ACT in patients with different histologic patterns using the Kaplan-Meier approach and multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

For all stage IB invasive adenocarcinoma patients, SOL/MIP subgroup presented the worst prognosis, and LEP subgroup showed approximately 100 % 5-year survival. ACT was associated with a better DFS (HR, 0.70; 95 % CI 0.51-0.96, p = .026) for all stage IB patients. In SOL/MIP subgroup, patients could benefit from ACT for a significant improved DFS (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI 0.49-1.35; p = .030), but not for OS (HR, 0.39; 95 % CI 0.12-1.30, p = .111). In ACN/PAP subgroup, there was no significant benefit from ACT for both DFS (HR, 0.76; 95 % CI 0.54-1.08, p = .125) and OS (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI 0.49-1.35, p = .421).

CONCLUSIONS

SOL/MIP predominant pattern was predictive for ACT benefit for DFS among invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients in stage IB.

Analysis of the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic of stage I invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The correlations between histological, clinical features and prognosis of stage I invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) have not been thoroughly studied for its rare incidence. This study aimed to compare the prognosis among IMA with different percentage of mucinous component and the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on IMA patients.

METHODS

A total of 145 stage I IMA and 3536 invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma patients with R0 resection were included. Based on the percentage of mucinous pattern presented in tumor, IMA were classified into two subgroups: pure mucinous (>90 % invasive mucinous pattern) and mixed mucinous/nonmucinous (≥10 % of each histologic component). Invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinomas were classified into three subgroups: lepidic (LEP), acinar/papillary (ACN/PAP) and solid/micropapillary (SOL/MIP). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed and compared among IMA and invasive nonmucinous patients.

RESULTS

For IMA patients, DFS (p = 0.003) was worse for mixed mucinous/nonmucinous compared with pure mucinous subgroup, OS (p = 0.514) was not prognostically different between two groups. There were no significant difference for DFS (p = 0.428) and OS (p = 0.232) between IMA and invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. However, statistical significance were seen for DFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) between 5 major histological subgroups: LEP and pure IMA showed excellent prognosis, mixed mucinous/nonmucinous IMA and SOL/MIP subtypes presented the worst prognosis. No significant survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for IMA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed mucinous/nonmucinous IMA had a worse DFS compared with pure mucinous. Early stage IMA could not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.