Congenital thrombophilia in East-Asian venous thromboembolism population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Venous Thromboembolism: A Comparative Study of 55 Patients

BACKGROUND Inherited deficiencies in antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC), and protein S (PS) increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in severe VTE cases after mechanical thrombectomy are uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the use of DOACs combined with mechanical thrombectomy in 55 patients with VTE, including 11 patients with confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), 27 patients with DVT alone, and 17 with pulmonary thromboembolism alone, from a single center between January 2016 and December 2023. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients with symptomatic VTE confirmed by computed tomography underwent mechanical thrombectomy. Fourteen patients with reduced AT (n=4), PC (n=6), and PS (n=4) function were classified as group 1, while the remaining 41 without thrombophilia were classified as group 2. The outcomes, including recurrent VTE, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality, were compared between patients with and without thrombophilia. RESULTS DOAC use was similar between the groups. One patient in the thrombophilia group switched DOACs due to bleeding, while 7 in the non-thrombophilia group changed due to bleeding or recurrent VTE. Recurrent VTE was higher in the non-thrombophilia group (7.1% vs 17.1%; P=0.664), while bleeding events were more frequent in the thrombophilia group (35.7% vs 17.1%; P=0.259); however, neither difference was statistically significant. All-cause mortality was similar between groups (7.1% vs 6.7%; P=0.903). CONCLUSIONS The study found no difference in the efficacy and safety of DOACs between VTE patients with and without inherited thrombophilia undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

Genetic factors, risk prediction and AI application of thrombotic diseases

In thrombotic diseases, coagulation, anticoagulation, and fibrinolysis are three key physiological processes that interact to maintain blood in an appropriate state within blood vessels. When these processes become imbalanced, such as excessive coagulation or reduced anticoagulant function, it can lead to the formation of blood clots. Genetic factors play a significant role in the onset of thrombotic diseases and exhibit regional and ethnic variations. The decision of whether to initiate prophylactic anticoagulant therapy is a matter that clinicians must carefully consider, leading to the development of various thrombotic risk assessment scales in clinical practice. Given the considerable heterogeneity in clinical diagnosis and treatment, researchers are exploring the application of artificial intelligence in medicine, including disease prediction, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and patient management. This paper reviews the research progress on various genetic factors involved in thrombotic diseases, analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used thrombotic risk assessment scales and the characteristics of ideal scoring scales, and explores the application of artificial intelligence in the medical field, along with its future prospects.

Genetic risk stratification of inflammatory bowel disease-associated venous thromboembolism: An Asian perspective

The utilisation of polygenic scoring models may enhance the clinician's ability to risk stratify an inflammatory bowel disease patient's individual risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and guide the appropriate usage of VTE thromboprophylaxis, yet there is a need to validate such models in ethnically diverse populations.

Safety and efficacy of extended thrombophilia screening directed venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis in live liver donors: do we really need extended thrombophilia screening routinely?

Background and aims

The study aimed to determine the prevalence of hereditary thrombophilia, and stratify its severity among live liver donors in Pakistan. Also, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of thrombophilia profile testing directed venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis while balancing bleeding risk and the need for routine thrombophilia testing before live liver donation among living donor candidates.

Materials and methods

Protein S (PS), protein C (PC), anti-thrombin (AT) III, and anti-phospholipid antibody panel (APLA) levels were measured in 567 potential donor candidates. Donors were divided into normal, borderline and high-risk groups based on Caprini score. The safety endpoints were VTE occurrence, bleeding complications or mortality.

Results

Among 567 donors, 21 (3.7%) were deficient in protein C, and 14 (2.5%) were deficient in anti-thrombin-III. IgM and IgG. Anti-phospholipids antibodies were positive in 2/567 (0.4%) and 2/567 (0.4%), respectively. IgM and IgG lupus anticoagulant antibodies were positive in 3/567 (0.5%) and 3/567 (0.5%), respectively. VTE events, bleeding complications and postoperative living donors liver transplantation-related complications were comparable among the three donor groups (P>0.05). One donor in the normal donor group developed pulmonary embolism, but none of the donors in either borderline or high-risk group developed VTE. The mean length of ICU and total hospital stay were comparable. No donor mortality was observed in all donor groups.

Conclusions

Due to thrombophilia testing directed VTE prophylaxis, VTE events were comparable in normal, borderline and high-risk thrombophilia donor groups, but more evaluations are required to determine the lower safe levels for various thrombophilia parameters including PC, PS and AT-III before surgery among living donor candidates.

Clinical prediction tool to identify children at risk of pulmonary embolism

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of pediatric pulmonary embolism (PE) is often delayed due to non-specific symptoms, and clinical prediction tools designed for adults are unsuitable for children. This study aimed to create a PE predictive model and to evaluate the reported tools in the Thai pediatric population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-center retrospective study from 4 university hospitals included children ≤18 years of age undergoing computed tomography pulmonary angiogram from 2000 to 2020 with the suspicion of PE. Patients' clinical presentations and risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were compared between the PE-positive and PE-negative groups. Significant risk factors from univariate and multivariate logistic regression were included to create a clinical prediction tool. The performance of the model was demonstrated by sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), Hosmer Lemeshow test, ratio of observed and expected outcomes and bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Of the 104 patients included, 43 (41.3 %) were grouped as PE-positive and 61 (58.7 %) as PE-negative. Five parameters, including congenital heart disease/pulmonary surgery, known thrombophilia, previous VTE, nephrotic syndrome and chest pain showed significant differences between the two groups. Score ≥ 2 yielded a 74.4 % sensitivity and a 75.4 % specificity with an AUC of the model of 0.809. The model performance and validation results were within satisfactory ranges.

CONCLUSION

The study created a clinical prediction tool indicating the likelihood of PE among Thai children. A score ≥2 was suggestive of PE.