Recurrence of venous leg ulceration

Biomodulation induced by fluorescent light energy versus standard of care in venous leg ulcers: a retrospective study

Objective:

The recently completed EUREKA study confirmed the efficacy and safety profile of fluorescent light energy (FLE) in treating hard-to-heal wounds. To supplement the EUREKA prospective, observational, uncontrolled trial results, researchers selected one of the EUREKA clinical centres to conduct a retrospective analysis of matching wound care data for 46 venous leg ulcers (VLU) patients who had received standard wound care over a five-year period, compared with 10 EUREKA VLU subjects.

Method:

The study centre selected 46 patients with VLUs based on the matching criteria (wound age and size, patient's age and gender). They compared the healing rates of these matching VLUs with 10 VLU patients treated at the same centre during the EUREKA study.

Results:

The EUREKA patients had larger and significantly older wounds (p<0.05) and significantly more risk factors (p<0.05) than the matching wounds. However, they had better outcomes (EUREKA: 40% versus matching group: 7% for full wound closure by 16 weeks). No wound breakdown was observed at 16 weeks in the EUREKA group, compared with 25% in the matching group. No EUREKA patient developed infections requiring antibiotics, compared with 37% in the matching group. EUREKA wounds had a mean relative wound area regression (RWAR) of 32% at week six and 50% at week 16, compared with −3% at week six and −6% at week 16 for the matching group.

Conclusion:

These findings show that the system based on FLE was well-tolerated and efficacious, with better clinical outcome results compared with the wounds analysed in this retrospective matching study and treated with standard of care alone.

Reflection on the cause and avoidance of recurrent venous leg ulcers: An interpretive descriptive approach

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To gain insight into the experience of recurrent venous leg ulcers from the individual's perspective and provide knowledge on potential risks of recurrence not previously investigated.

BACKGROUND

Venous leg ulcers are a consequence of chronic venous disease and frequently recur. They are costly and can impact on physical and psychological health. Despite research suggesting the risk can be reduced through compression and lifestyle changes, recurrence rates are often high. This study provides an insight into individual's perceptions of the cause of their ulcers and how they try to avoid them.

DESIGN

A qualitative design guided by the Chronic Illness Trajectory Model and Social Cognitive Theory.

METHOD

A purposive sample of three males and four females were recruited from a community nursing clinic. Participants were ulcer free, had experienced at least two previous venous leg ulcers and could speak and comprehend English. An interpretive descriptive approach was taken using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes each containing three categories emerged: The Increasing Influence of the Recurring Wound on Mind and Body, Reflection on Past Experiences and Optimism in the Face of Adversity. Most participants reported traumatic injury and lower leg surgery triggered ulcer recurrence. Failure to replace compression stockings was also deemed a cause. Compression was reported essential, but some participants were unaware of the level they were wearing and how often it should be replaced. Other preventive activities included avoiding injury and securing immediate assistance if wounding occurred.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians need to be aware that lower leg surgery may trigger recurrent venous ulceration and that individuals require ongoing emotional, physical and financial support throughout the trajectory of venous disease. The continued use of old compression stockings should be avoided and recurrence prevented by adoption of evidence-based practice rather than reflection on past experiences.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This research raises the awareness of factors from the individual's perspective which can influence the recurrence of venous leg ulcers.

Wound dressings, does it matter and why?

Compression therapy and treating venous insufficiency is the standard of care for venous leg ulcers. The need for debridement on healing venous leg ulcers is still debated. Dressings are often used under compression bandages to promote faster healing and prevent adherence of the bandage to the ulcer. A wide range of dressings is available, including modern dressings with different kinds of biological activity. Microbial burden is believed to underlie delayed healing, but the exact role of microbiofilm in wound healing is uncertain. Before choosing a specific wound dressing, four main functions should be considered: (1) cleaning, (2) absorbing, (3) regulating or (4) the necessity of adding medication. There is no clear evidence to support the use of one dressing over another, as demonstrated by many Cochrane review studies. In addition, the prescriber should enquire about contact allergies that may also develop during wound treatment. It is shown that early intervention and early investment may reduce the cost of treatment. The choice of wound dressings should be guided by cost, ease of application and patient and physician preference and be part of the complete strategy. The role of the medical specialist is evident. Wound dressings matter as part of the optimal treatment in VLU patients.