[Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality and optimal reconstruction interval]

Bicaval versus standard technique in orthotopic heart transplant: assessment of atrial performance at magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography

Despite a more physiological morphology of atrial anastomosis in the bicaval technique with respect to standard biatrial anastomosis in orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), the impact on the long-term outcome is still not clear. In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate the morphology and function of the atria through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Moreover, we aimed to analyse the accuracy of TTE with respect to MRI. Cox regression analysis of 216 consecutive patients receiving OHT between August 1987 and January 2010 identified only recipient age at the time of transplant to be an independent predictor of mortality (P = 0.048, odds ratio = 1.04). After a mean follow-up of 96.6 ± 77.7 months, 108 patients were alive, of which 35 were found to be eligible for MRI assessment. In this analysis, left and right atrial volumes were found to be significantly larger in the standard group in comparison with the bicaval group (P = 0.001), and no significant difference between the two techniques was observed in left and right atrio-ventricular output. Moreover, a significantly reduced accuracy was observed (CCC < 0.3) when TTE results were compared with MRI assessment in evaluating atrial dimensions. Although left and right atrial volumes are significantly larger in the standard group in comparison with the bicaval group, we concluded that no significant difference in the atrial output and survival between the two techniques could be demonstrated.

Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using 320-detector rows dynamic volume CT

AIM

To investigate the optimal pattern of systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography using 320-detector rows dynamic volume CT (DVCT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective analysis was performed on the data from 77 patients who were admitted between December 2008 and July 2009 for DVCT. The images were reconstructed in 10% steps throughout the 10-100% of R-R interval. Data sets for the three major coronary arteries [right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending artery (LAD), and left circumflex artery (LCX)] were evaluated by two independent readers. The quality of the images from each examined artery was graded from 1 (no motion artefacts) to 4 (severe motion artefacts over the entire vessel). The optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows and the relationship between image quality and heart rate (HR) were analysed. The HR at which the optimal reconstruction window shifted from diastole to systole was predicted.

RESULTS

The average HR during imaging was 69.5±12.8 beats/min (range 46-102beats/min). HR was positively correlated with the proportion of systole (r=0.78, p<0.001). As HR increased, the optimal reconstruction windows shifted to later phases in both systole and diastole. Image quality for optimal systolic and diastolic reconstructions both deteriorated significantly with higher HRs (r=0.38, p<0.001; r=0.82, p<0.001). However, image quality in systolic reconstructions did not deteriorate as much as in diastolic reconstructions. The cut-off HRs at which optimal reconstruction intervals turned from diastole to systole was 90.8beats/min.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a low HR, the optimal coronary reconstruction window is in mid-late diastole. As the HR increases, systolic reconstruction often yields superior image quality compared with diastolic reconstruction.

Evaluation of CT coronary artery angiography with 320-row detector CT in a high-risk population

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy and radiation dose of 320-detector row dynamic volume CT (DVCT) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a high-risk population.

METHODS

60 patients with a high risk of CAD underwent DVCT without preceding heart rate control and also underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA), which served as the standard reference.

RESULTS

On a per segment analysis, overall sensitivity was 95.3%, specificity was 97.6%, positive predictive value was 90.6%, negative predictive value was 98.8% and Youden index was 0.93. In both heart rate subgroups, diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis was similar. The accuracy of the subgroup with an Agatston score ≥100 was lower than that for patients with an Agatston score <100. However, the difference between DVCT and ICA results was not significant (p=0.08). The mean estimated effective dose of CT was 12.5 ± 9.4 mSv. In those patients with heart rates less than 70 beats per minute (bpm), the mean radiation exposure of DVCT was 5.2 ± 0.9 mSv. The effective radiation dose was significantly lower than that of ICA (14.1 ± 5.9 mSv) (p<0.001). When the heart rate was >70 bpm, a significantly higher dose was delivered to patients with DVCT (22.6 ± 5.2 mSv, p<0.001) than with ICA (15.0 ± 5.3 mSv, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

DVCT reliably provides high diagnostic accuracy without heart rate/rhythm control. However, from a dosimetric point of view, it is recommended that heart rate should be controlled to <70 bpm to decrease radiation dose.