Efficacy and complications in the use of self-expanding colonic stents: an analysis of 15 years' experience

Biological behavior exploration of a paclitaxel-eluting poly-l-lactide-coated Mg–Zn–Y–Nd alloy intestinal stent in vivo

As a new type of intestinal stent, the MAO/PLLA/paclitaxel/Mg–Zn–Y–Nd alloy stent has shown good degradability, although its biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo has not been investigated in detail. In this study, its in vivo biocompatibility was evaluated by animal study. New Zealand white rabbits were implanted with degradable intestinal Mg–Zn–Y–Nd alloy stents that were exposed to different treatments. Stent degradation behavior was observed both macroscopically and using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Energy dispersion spectrum (EDS) and histological observations were performed to investigate stent biological safety. Macroscopic analysis showed that the MAO/PLLA/paclitaxel/Mg–Zn–Y–Nd stents could not be located 12 days after implantation. SEM observations showed that corrosion degree of the MAO/PLLA/paclitaxel/Mg–Zn–Y–Nd stents implanted in rabbits was significantly lower than that in the PLLA/Mg–Zn–Y–Nd stent group. Both histopathological testing and serological analysis of in vivo biocompatibility demonstrated that the MAO/PLLA/paclitaxel/Mg–Zn–Y–Nd alloy stents could significantly inhibit intestinal tissue proliferation compared to the PLLA/Mg–Zn–Y–Nd alloy stents, thus providing the basis for designing excellent biodegradable drug stents.

Mg–Zn–Y–Nd alloy stents coated with MAO/PLLA/paclitaxel coating were implanted into the New Zealand rabbits intestine to investigate the biocompatibility and degradation behavior.

Outcomes and complications of self-expanding metal stent placement for malignant colonic obstruction in a single-center study

Introduction

Approximately 20% of cases of colorectal cancer are accompanied by acute colonic obstruction. While emergency colonic surgery is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates, placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) has been suggested as an alternative method. The SEMS placement can serve as either a definitive treatment in palliative cases or a bridge to surgery.

Aim

To summarize the experience of our center in the treatment of malignant colonic obstruction using SEMS placement.

Material and methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent a SEMS placement for colorectal stricture in the study period. The procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance with colonoscopic assistance, and uncovered stents were used in all patients.

Results

The study population consisted of 28 patients treated with SEMS placement due to malignant colonic obstruction. The majority of procedures were performed with palliative intent. The overall technical success rate was 96.5%, and clinical success was achieved in all of the successfully placed SEMSs. One fatal complication due to colonic perforation occurred. In the bridge-to-surgery group, all patients experienced tumor resection with no stoma creation.

Conclusions

The SEMS placement is an optimal treatment in the vast majority of acute colonic obstruction cases. Due to the possibility of potentially fatal complications, SEMS procedures should be performed by proficient endoscopists.