Valoración radiológica del anticonceptivo permanente de inserción histeroscópica Essure

Results of the Insertion of Hysteroscopic Sterilization Devices in a Brazilian Public Hospital

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate the insertion of the hysteroscopic intratubal sterilization device for female sterilization concerning the technique and the feasibility.

METHODS

 Retrospective study with data collection of medical records of 904 patients who underwent device insertion between January and September 2016 in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) with data analysis and descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

 In 85.8% of the cases, the uterine cavity was normal, and the most commonly-described findings upon hysteroscopy were synechiae (9.5%). The procedure lasted an average of 3.56 minutes (range: 1 to 10 minutes), and the pain was considered inexistent or mild in 58,6% of the cases, mild or moderate in 32,8%, and severe or agonizing in less than 1% (0.8%) of the cases, based on a verbal scale ranging from 0 to 10. The rate of successful insertions was of 85.0%, and successful tubal placement was achieved in 99.5% of the cases. There were no severe complications related to the procedure, but transient vasovagal reactions occurred in 5 women (0.6%).

CONCLUSION

 Female sterilization performed by hysteroscopy is a safe, feasible, fast, and well-tolerated procedure. The rates of successful insertions and tubal placements were high. There were few and mild adverse effects during the procedure, and there were no severe complications on the short term.

Radiological assessment of the placement of Essure® in order to reduce hysterosalpingography: Pelvic X-ray versus combined pelvic X-ray and ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

Three months after hysteroscopic sterilisation with Essure^®, a confirmation test is required to evaluate the correct location of the inserts. The test may be conducted using a pelvic ultrasound (2D or 3D) or an abdominal X-ray. Should the location not look satisfactory on these tests, a follow-up hysterosalpingography (HSG) would be required. The objective of our study is to assess whether the Essure^® 3-month confirmation test using a single X-ray or a combination of X-ray and ultrasound could reduce the use of HSG.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study examined patients who underwent birth control Essure^® procedure between 2009 and 2015 in the Gynaecological Surgery Department at the Regional University Hospital Centre (CHRU) in Lille. We divided patients into two groups based on the imaging tests performed: single X-ray (2009-2010) versus X-ray and pelvic ultrasound (2014-2015). We then compared the results of the imaging tests and the use of HSG between the two groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients were tested, of which 60 (44.8%) using a single X-ray and 74 (55.2%) using a combination of X-ray and ultrasound. We note that the combined X-ray/ultrasound test reduces significantly the number of HSG performed (26.7% versus 12.2%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Compared to a single X-ray, the combination of X-ray and ultrasound enables to significantly limit the use of HSG.