Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for the evaluation of the white matter to differentiate between glioblastoma and brain metastases

Association between the Anatomical Location of Glioblastoma and Its Evaluation with Clinical Considerations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Glioblastoma is a primary malignant brain tumor; it is aggressive with a high degree of malignancy and unfavorable prognosis and is the most common type of malignant brain tumor. Glioblastomas can be located in the brain, cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord, originating from glial cells, particularly astrocytes. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CINAHL were researched up to January 2024. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction. Methodological quality was evaluated with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). The statistical mean, standard deviation, and difference of means calculated with the Student's t-test for presence between hemispheres and presence in the frontal and temporal lobes were analyzed. Results: A total of 123 studies met the established selection criteria, with a total of 6224 patients. In relation to the mean, GBM between hemispheres had a mean of 33.36 (SD 58.00) in the right hemisphere and a mean of 34.70 (SD 65.07) in the left hemisphere, due to the difference in averages between hemispheres. There were no statistically significant differences, p = 0.35. For the comparison between the presence of GBM in the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was a mean in the frontal lobe of 23.23 (SD 40.03), while in the temporal lobe, the mean was 22.05 (SD 43.50), and for the difference in means between the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was no statistically significant difference for the presence of GBM, p = 0.178. Conclusions: We believe that before a treatment, it will always be correct to know where the GBM is located and how it behaves clinically, in order to generate correct conservative or surgical treatment guidelines for each patient. We believe that more detailed studies are also needed to show why GBM is associated more with some regions than others, despite the brain structure being homologous to other regions in which GMB occurs less frequently, which is why knowing its predominant presence in brain regions is very important.

Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: Diagnosis, Post-Treatment Changes, and Advanced Sequences-An Updated Review

DWI is an imaging technique commonly used for the assessment of acute ischemia, inflammatory disorders, and CNS neoplasia. It has several benefits since it is a quick, easily replicable sequence that is widely used on many standard scanners. In addition to its normal clinical purpose, DWI offers crucial functional and physiological information regarding brain neoplasia and the surrounding milieu. A narrative review of the literature was conducted based on the PubMed database with the purpose of investigating the potential role of DWI in the neuro-oncology field. A total of 179 articles were included in the study.

Distinct tumor signatures using deep learning-based characterization of the peritumoral microenvironment in glioblastomas and brain metastases

Tumor types are classically distinguished based on biopsies of the tumor itself, as well as a radiological interpretation using diverse MRI modalities. In the current study, the overarching goal is to demonstrate that primary (glioblastomas) and secondary (brain metastases) malignancies can be differentiated based on the microstructure of the peritumoral region. This is achieved by exploiting the extracellular water differences between vasogenic edema and infiltrative tissue and training a convolutional neural network (CNN) on the Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-derived free water volume fraction. We obtained 85% accuracy in discriminating extracellular water differences between local patches in the peritumoral area of 66 glioblastomas and 40 metastatic patients in a cross-validation setting. On an independent test cohort consisting of 20 glioblastomas and 10 metastases, we got 93% accuracy in discriminating metastases from glioblastomas using majority voting on patches. This level of accuracy surpasses CNNs trained on other conventional DTI-based measures such as fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), that have been used in other studies. Additionally, the CNN captures the peritumoral heterogeneity better than conventional texture features, including Gabor and radiomic features. Our results demonstrate that the extracellular water content of the peritumoral tissue, as captured by the free water volume fraction, is best able to characterize the differences between infiltrative and vasogenic peritumoral regions, paving the way for its use in classifying and benchmarking peritumoral tissue with varying degrees of infiltration.

Differentiation among Glioblastomas, Primary Cerebral Lymphomas, and Solitary Brain Metastases Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-analysis

Previous studies showed a high diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in differentiation among glioblastomas, primary cerebral lymphomas (PCLs), and solitary brain metastases, whereas other studies reported a low or no diagnostic value of DWI and DTI in differentiation among the three types of brain malignant tumors. In order to enhance the strength of evidence, meta-analysis was conducted to summarize results of studies evaluating the diagnostic values of DWI or DTI in differentiation among the three types of brain malignant tumors. Articles evaluating the diagnostic values of DWI or DTI in differentiation among the three types of tumors and published before December 2019 were searched in databases (PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar). A summary of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated from the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) of each study using STATA 12.0 software and Meta-Disc Version 1.4. In addition, the summary receive-operating characteristic (SROC) curve was constructed. Ultimately, we included 19 diagnostic studies (including 735 glioblastomas patients, 31 PCLs patients, and 792 patients with solitary brain metastases). Regarding differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using DWI or DTI, the calculated pooled parameters were as follows: sensitivity, 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.89]; specificity, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92); PLR, 7.2 (95% CI: 4.6-11.3); NLR, 0.18 (95% CI: 0.12-0.27); and DOR, 41 (95% CI: 18-93). The analysis showed a significant heterogeneity (sensitivity, I² = 91.31%, p < 0.01; specificity, I² = 89.24%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, DWI and DTI showed a moderate diagnostic value for differentiating glioblastomas from solitary brain metastasis. Additionally, large-scale prospective studies are essential to explore differentiation between PCLs and solitary brain metastases using DWI or DTI.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Differentiating High-Grade Glioma from Solitary Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of high-grade glioma and solitary brain metastasis is clinically important because it affects the patient's outcome and alters patient management.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of DWI and DTI for differentiating high-grade glioma from solitary brain metastasis.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted up to November 10, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of DWI and DTI for differentiating high-grade glioma from solitary brain metastasis were selected.

DATA ANALYSIS

Summary sensitivity and specificity were established by hierarchic logistic regression modeling. Multiple subgroup analyses were also performed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fourteen studies with 1143 patients were included. The individual sensitivities and specificities of the 14 included studies showed a wide variation, ranging from 46.2% to 96.0% for sensitivity and 40.0% to 100.0% for specificity. The pooled sensitivity of both DWI and DTI was 79.8% (95% CI, 70.9%-86.4%), and the pooled specificity was 80.9% (95% CI, 75.1%-85.5%). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89). The multiple subgroup analyses also demonstrated similar diagnostic performances (sensitivities of 76.8%-84.7% and specificities of 79.7%-84.0%). There was some level of heterogeneity across the included studies (I² = 36%); however, it did not reach a level of concern.

LIMITATIONS

The included studies used various DWI and DTI parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

DWI and DTI demonstrated a moderate diagnostic performance for differentiation of high-grade glioma from solitary brain metastasis.