Follow-up in head and neck cancer. What the radiologist must know

[Value of PET imaging in head and neck cancer]

The combination of positron-emission tomography (PET) with cross-sectional imaging in particular is becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis of head and neck tumors because, in addition to pure anatomy, the metabolic activity of tissue can be visualized and assessed. The combination of PET and computed tomography (CT) is already an established procedure in head and neck tumor patients in some indications, e.g., for primary tumor detection in cancer of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome or also after completed primary radio(chemo)therapy for evaluation of response, especially also with regard to nodal status. In some cases, salvage neck dissection can thus be avoided in the case of PET-negative findings. In the context of primary diagnosis, PET/CT imaging can be used primarily to evaluate distant metastasis. According to current guidelines, PET-based imaging is not (yet) of value in determining the local extent at initial diagnosis. A challenge is the still limited reimbursement by health insurance companies, which currently allow only certain indications, and the still lack of nationwide coverage.

[Value of PET imaging in head and neck cancer]

The combination of positron-emission tomography (PET) with cross-sectional imaging in particular is becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis of head and neck tumors because, in addition to pure anatomy, the metabolic activity of tissue can be visualized and assessed. The combination of PET and computed tomography (CT) is already an established procedure in head and neck tumor patients in some indications, e.g., for primary tumor detection in cancer of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome or also after completed primary radio(chemo)therapy for evaluation of response, especially also with regard to nodal status. In some cases, salvage neck dissection can thus be avoided in the case of PET-negative findings. In the context of primary diagnosis, PET/CT imaging can be used primarily to evaluate distant metastasis. According to current guidelines, PET-based imaging is not (yet) of value in determining the local extent at initial diagnosis. A challenge is the still limited reimbursement by health insurance companies, which currently allow only certain indications, and the still lack of nationwide coverage.

[Oncologic follow-up in head and neck cancer patients]

Despite medical treatment according to evidence-based guidelines, approximately 25-30% of all head and neck tumor patients suffer a disease relapse, depending on tumor stage and entity. The primary goal of systematic follow-up examinations is early detection and treatment of recurrent tumors or metachronous secondary tumors, but it also serves to rule out distant metastasis. Secondary goals are the diagnosis and management of treatment-associated side effects to optimize quality of life. Because of an especially high relapse risk in the first 2 years after treatment, close-knit clinical controls are recommended, e.g., quarterly. Later on, the clinical control interval can be extended to 6 months. Cross-sectional diagnostic imaging of the primary tumor region is performed annually and when screening for possible distant metastases, or upon clinical suspicion of recurrence. After 5 years without tumor recurrence, the structured clinical follow-up is usually completed.