1
|
Esther Oyebade O, Oyinlola O, Asenjo Palma C. Difficult but achievable: medical social workers' experiences transiting older adults from hospital care to nursing home in Nigeria. SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE 2024; 63:370-384. [PMID: 38453172 DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2024.2324859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Very few literatures have focused on transition of older adults from hospitals to nursing homes in African region. As a first step, this study explored the experience of medical social worker when transiting older adult from the hospital to nursing home in southwestern region of Nigeria. A descriptive qualitative approach collected through a semi-structured interview among 16 medical social workers showed that there is limited availability of nursing home facilities in Nigeria. Additionally, bureaucratic and administrative hurdles often added to the complexities of facilitating seamless transitions into nursing care homes. Cultural beliefs and family dynamics exert a substantial influence on the decision-making process, making the task of medical social workers even more intricate. There is a need for a greater support from policymakers and healthcare authorities to address the challenges facing Nigerian medical social workers. Hence, to better understand and address these experiences, the healthcare system can better equip medical social workers to navigate the transitions effectively and ensure the well-being of older adults during this crucial phase of their lives is adequately supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oluwagbemiga Oyinlola
- School of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Medical Social Services Department, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lane J, Manceau LM, Massuard M, Couturier Y, Cossette B, Ricard J, Viscogliosi C, Déry V, Gauthier P. [Déterminants du succès d'une démarche provinciale d'usage optimal des antipsychotiques chez les résidents en soins de longue durée selon les acteurs clés impliqués dans l'implantation]. Can J Aging 2023; 42:102-114. [PMID: 35968903 DOI: 10.1017/s0714980822000320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Le Québec présente le taux de prescriptions d'antipsychotiques le plus élevé chez les personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus au Canada. La démarche « Optimiser les pratiques, les usages, les soins et les services - antipsychotiques » (OPUS-AP) vise à pallier cet enjeu. Étant donné ses premiers résultats prometteurs, notre étude visait à identifier les déterminants de son succès. Elle repose sur un devis d'étude de cas regroupant une analyse documentaire et 21 entrevues auprès d'acteurs clés impliqués dans l'implantation. Les résultats mettent en lumière cinq déterminants centraux : 1) une démarche intégrée, collaborative et probante; 2) des communications et des réseaux au service de la démarche; 3) un climat d'implantation favorable aux changements; 4) un engagement et une implication des parties prenantes; et 5) une stratégie d'application des connaissances intégrée et appuyée. Des défis et recommandations pour assurer la pérennisation et la mise à l'échelle d'OPUS-AP et inspirer des démarches similaires sont identifiés.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Lane
- Faculté d'éducation, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Luiza Maria Manceau
- Faculté d'éducation, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Marie Massuard
- Faculté d'éducation, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Yves Couturier
- Département de travail social, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Benoit Cossette
- Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Jacques Ricard
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, 300 Rue King Est, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1G 1B1, Canada
| | - Chantal Viscogliosi
- Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Véronique Déry
- Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Patricia Gauthier
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, 300 Rue King Est, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1G 1B1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vaismoradi M, Fredriksen Moe C, Vizcaya-Moreno F, Paal P. Ethical Tenets of PRN Medicines Management in Healthcare Settings: A Clinical Perspective. PHARMACY 2021; 9:174. [PMID: 34707079 PMCID: PMC8552074 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy9040174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prescription and administration of pro re nata (PRN) medications has remained a poorly discussed area of the international literature regarding ethical tenets influencing this type of medication practice. In this commentary, ethical tenets of PRN medicines management from the clinical perspective based on available international literature and published research have been discussed. Three categories were developed by the authors for summarising review findings as follows: 'benefiting the patient', 'making well-informed decision', and 'follow up assessment' as pre-intervention, through-intervention, and post-intervention aspects, respectively. PRN medicines management is mainly intertwined with the ethical tenets of beneficence, nonmaleficence, dignity, autonomy, justice, informed consent, and error disclosure. It is a dynamic process and needs close collaboration between healthcare professionals especially nurses and patients to prevent unethical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway;
| | | | - Flores Vizcaya-Moreno
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Piret Paal
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McArthur C, Hillier L, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD, Giangregorio L, Hirdes J, Papaioannou A. Developing a Fracture Risk Clinical Assessment Protocol for Long-Term Care: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021; 22:1726-1734.e8. [PMID: 32972869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a fracture risk Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP) based on long-term care (LTC) fracture prevention recommendations and an embedded fracture risk assessment tool. DESIGN A modified Delphi consensus approach including 2 survey rounds and a face-to-face meeting was implemented to reach consensus on matching of LTC fracture prevention guideline statements to Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) risk levels. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A national panel of recognized experts in osteoporosis, fractures, and long-term care, including an LTC resident and family members. METHODS Round 1 survey respondents (n = 24) were provided the LTC fracture prevention guidelines matched to FRS risk levels and were asked whether they agreed the guideline was appropriate for the risk level (yes, no, I don't know, I agree with some but not all of it) and to provide comments. In round 2, guideline statements that did not achieve consensus (≥80% agreement) were revised consistent with comments provided in round 1 and respondents were asked again if they agreed with the guideline statement. Statements that did not achieve consensus were to be discussed and resolved in an in-person meeting (n = 17). RESULTS In round 1 (75% response rate), consensus was achieved in 7/14 guideline statements. In round 2 (56% response rate), 5 statements were revised based on round 1 feedback and for 2 statements additional information was provided. Consensus was achieved in all but one statement related to the inappropriateness of pharmacologic therapy for residents with life expectancy less than 1 year. Following facilitated meeting discussions, consensus was obtained to revise the guideline statement to reflect that life expectancy was but one of several criteria that should be used to inform medication decisions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS An evidence-based fracture risk CAP was developed that will be embedded in international routine clinical assessment tools to guide fracture prevention in LTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin McArthur
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; GERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - George Ioannidis
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; GERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lora Giangregorio
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Hirdes
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; GERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Couturier Y, Lanneville D, Lane J, Bruneau MA, Morin M, Gilbert S, Boyer D, MacDonald T, Ben Gaied N, Cosette B. Implementation conditions leading to the scale-up of an innovation involving the optimal use of antipsychotics in long-term care centers: The Optimizing Practices, use, Care and Services-Antipsychotics (OPUS-AP) program. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 18:2484-2488. [PMID: 33863639 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antipsychotics are often used for the first-line management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia despite their limited efficacy and the risk of serious adverse drug events, compounded with disregard for guidelines recommending prioritizing non-pharmacological interventions. Some innovative interventions promote the deprescription of antipsychotics in long term care (LTC) settings. OBJECTIVE The objective of this article is to present the conditions leading to the scale-up of an innovative program on the appropriate use of antipsychotics in LTC centers. METHODS The Optimizing Practices, Use, Care and Services-Antipsychotics (OPUS-AP) program is a mixed-method project that aims to improve LTC residents' care through increased knowledge and competency among staff, resident-centered approaches, nonpharmacologic interventions, and by deprescribing antipsychotics when appropriate. This article consists of a qualitative study focused on exploring the implementation conditions of the OPUS-AP program. This study was carried out in an integrated health area of Québec. It consisted of 46 semi-structured interviews with staff members and managers involved in the implementation of OPUS-AP. The qualitative data analysis was inspired by a realistic evaluation approach, which shed light on the causal chain between context, mechanisms, and perceived effects. RESULTS This study identified certain conditions conducive to scaling up the OPUS-AP program: an integrated, collaborative and evidence-based approach; communications in support of the process; stakeholder engagement at the strategic, tactical and operational levels; an implementation climate conducive to change; and an integrated knowledge translation strategy. CONCLUSION Despite evidence of clinical efficacy, deprescribing programs require great deal of scaling up efforts. Hence, this study underscores the need to further examine conditions for scaling up medication usage programs in real life contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julie Lane
- University of Sherbrooke, Canada; RBC Centre of Academic Expertise in Mental Health, Canada.
| | | | - Michèle Morin
- Laval University, Canada; CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches, Canada.
| | | | - Diane Boyer
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de L'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (the French Official Name of the Institution), Canada.
| | | | | | - Benoît Cosette
- University of Sherbrooke, Canada; Research Center on Aging of CIUSSS de L'Estrie-CHUS, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoel RW, Giddings Connolly RM, Takahashi PY. Polypharmacy Management in Older Patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:242-256. [PMID: 33413822 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Medications to treat disease and extend life in our patients often amass in quantities, resulting in what has been termed "polypharmacy." This imprecise label usually describes the accumulation of 5, and often more, medications. Polypharmacy in advancing age frequently results in drug therapy problems related to interactions, drug toxicity, falls with injury, delirium, and nonadherence. Polypharmacy is associated with resulting increased hospitalizations and higher costs of care for individuals and health care systems. To reduce polypharmacy, we delineate a systematic, consultative approach to identify highest-risk medications and drug-therapy problems. We address strategic reductions (deprescribing) of medications in palliative care, long-term care, and ambulatory older adults. Best practices for reducing opioids, benzodiazepines, and other high-risk medications include education about risk and agreement by patients and their families, advocates, and care teams. Addressing deprescribing should be within the framework of patients' health status as their care and goals transition from longevity to a plan of maintaining alertness, comfort, and satisfaction of quality of life. A team approach to address polypharmacy and avoidance of high-risk therapy is optimal within long-term care. Patients with terminal illnesses or those moving toward a comfort-care emphasis benefit from medication adjustments that are recognized beneficially within each patient's care goals. In caring for older adults, the acknowledgement that complicated regimens and high-risk medications requires a care plan to reduce or prevent medication-related problems and costs that are associated with polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert William Hoel
- Division of Medication Therapy Management, Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | | | - Paul Y Takahashi
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A New Care Model Reduces Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Long-Term Care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 22:141-147. [PMID: 33221164 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Assess the impact of a new pharmaceutical care model on (1) polypharmacy and (2) potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). DESIGN Pragmatic quasi-experimental study with a control group. This multifaceted model enables pharmacists and nurses to increase their professional autonomy by enforcing laws designed to expand their scope of practice. It also involves a strategic reorganization of care, interdisciplinary training, and systematic medication reviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Two LTCFs exposed to the model (409 residents) were compared to 2 control LTCFs (282 residents) in Quebec, Canada. All individuals were aged 65 years or older and residing in included LTCFs. MEASURES Polypharmacy (≥10 medications) and PIM (2015 Beers criteria) were analyzed throughout 12 months between March 2017 and June 2018. Groups were compared before and after implementation using repeated measures mixed Poisson or logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS Over 12 months, for regular medications, polypharmacy decreased from 42% to 20% (exposed group) and from 50% to 41% (control group) [difference in differences (DID): 13%, P < .001]. Mean number of PIMs also decreased from 0.79 to 0.56 (exposed group) and from 1.08 to 0.90 (control group) (DID: 0.05, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Compared with usual care, this multifaceted model reduced the probability of receiving ≥10 medications and the mean number of PIMs. Greater professional autonomy, reorganization of care, training, and medication review can optimize pharmaceutical care. As the role of pharmacists is expanding in many countries, this model shows what could be achieved with increased professional autonomy of pharmacists and nurses in LTCFs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lefebvre MJ, Ng PCK, Desjarlais A, McCann D, Waldvogel B, Tonelli M, Garg AX, Wilson JA, Beaulieu M, Marin J, Orsulak C, Lloyd A, McIntyre C, Feldberg J, Bohm C, Battistella M. Development and Validation of Nine Deprescribing Algorithms for Patients on Hemodialysis to Decrease Polypharmacy. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120968674. [PMID: 33194213 PMCID: PMC7605037 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120968674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Polypharmacy is ubiquitous in patients on hemodialysis (HD), and increases risk of adverse events, medication interactions, nonadherence, and mortality. Appropriately applied deprescribing can potentially minimize polypharmacy risks. Existing guidelines are unsuitable for nephrology clinicians as they lack specific instructions on how to deprescribe and which safety parameters to monitor. Objective: To develop and validate deprescribing algorithms for nine medication classes to decrease polypharmacy in patients on HD. Design: Questionnaires and materials sent electronically. Participants: Nephrology practitioners across Canada (nephrologists, nurse practitioners, renal pharmacists). Methods: A literature search was performed to develop the initial algorithms via Lynn’s method for development of content-valid clinical tools. Content and face validity of the algorithms was evaluated over three interview rounds using Lynn’s method for determining content validity. Canadian nephrology clinicians each evaluated three algorithms (15 clinicians per round, 45 clinicians in total) by rating each algorithm component on a four-point Likert scale for relevance; face validity was rated on a five-point scale. After each round, content validity index of each component was calculated and revisions made based on feedback. If content validity was not achieved after three rounds, additional rounds were completed until content validity was achieved. Results: After three rounds of validation, six algorithms achieved content validity. After an additional round, the remaining three algorithms achieved content validity. The proportion of clinicians rating each face validity statement as “Agree” or “Strongly Agree” ranged from 84% to 95% (average of all five questions, across three rounds). Limitations: Algorithm development was guided by existing deprescribing protocols intended for the general population and the expert opinions of our study team, due to a lack of background literature on HD-specific deprescribing protocols. There is no universally accepted method for the validation of clinical decision-making tools. Conclusions: Nine medication-specific deprescribing algorithms for patients on HD were developed and validated by clinician review. Our algorithms are the first medication-specific, patient-centric deprescribing guidelines developed and validated for patients on HD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick C K Ng
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Dennis McCann
- Patient Partners, Can-SOLVE CKD Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Blair Waldvogel
- Patient Partners, Can-SOLVE CKD Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Amit X Garg
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, London, ON, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jo-Anne Wilson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.,Faculty of Health, College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Monica Beaulieu
- Division of Nephrology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Caitlin McIntyre
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jordanne Feldberg
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Clara Bohm
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Marisa Battistella
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vaismoradi M, Vizcaya Moreno F, Sletvold H, Jordan S. PRN Medicines Management for Psychotropic Medicines in Long-Term Care Settings: A Systematic Review. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7040157. [PMID: 31775262 PMCID: PMC6958522 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7040157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Many medications are prescribed and administered PRN (pro re nata, as needed). However, there are few integrative reviews to inform PRN psychotropic medication use in long-term care facilities and nursing or care homes. Accordingly, this integrative systematic review aimed to improve our understanding of PRN medicines management with a focus on psychotropic medications (antipsychotics, sedatives, anxiolytics, and hypnotics) in long-term care settings. Keywords relating to PRN in English, Norwegian, and Spanish were used, and articles published between 2009 and 2019 were retrieved. Based on the inclusion criteria, eight articles were used for data analysis and synthesis. This review offers a description of PRN prescription and administration of psychotropic medications in long-term care. Variations were observed in the management of PRN psychotropic medications based on residents’ underlying health conditions and needs, duration of use, and changes between medications and doses. Neither the reasons for PRN prescription and administration nor the steps taken to identify and manage any associated adverse reactions or adverse drug events were reported. Further initiatives are needed to improve PRN medicines management to explore factors that affect PRN prescription and administration and to develop appropriate PRN guidelines to prevent harm and improve the safety of people living in long-term care facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +47-75517813
| | | | - Hege Sletvold
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway;
| | - Sue Jordan
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK;
| |
Collapse
|