1
|
Harris JI, Dunlap S, Xanthos D, Pyne JM, Hermes E, Griffin BJ, Kondrath SR, Kim SY, Golden KB, Cooney NJ, Usset TJ. Implementing a Multi-Disciplinary, Evidence-Based Resilience Intervention for Moral Injury Syndrome: Systemic Barriers and Facilitators. Behav Sci (Basel) 2024; 14:281. [PMID: 38667079 PMCID: PMC11047717 DOI: 10.3390/bs14040281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Moral injury syndrome (MIS) is a mental health (MH) problem that substantially affects resilience; the presence of MIS reduces responsiveness to psychotherapy and increases suicide risk. Evidence-based treatment for MIS is available; however, it often goes untreated. This project uses principles of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to assess barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Building Spiritual Strength (BSS), a multi-disciplinary treatment for MIS. Interviews were conducted with chaplains and mental health providers who had completed BSS facilitator training at six sites in the VA. Data were analyzed using the Hamilton Rapid Turnaround method. Findings included multiple facilitators to the implementation of BSS, including its accessibility and appeal to VA chaplains; leadership by VA chaplains trained in the intervention; and effective collaboration between the chaplains and mental health providers. Barriers to the implementation of BSS included challenges in engaging mental health providers and incorporating them as group leaders, veterans' lack of familiarity with the group format of BSS, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results highlight the need for increased trust and collaboration between VA chaplains and mental health providers in the implementation of BSS and treatment of MIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Irene Harris
- VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, ME 04330, USA; (S.R.K.); (N.J.C.); (T.J.U.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA
| | - Shawn Dunlap
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA 01730, USA; (S.D.); (K.B.G.)
| | | | - Jeffrey M. Pyne
- Center for Mental Health Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR 72114, USA; (J.M.P.)
- Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Eric Hermes
- Veterans Affairs Northeast Program Evaluation Center, Orange, CT 06516, USA
| | - Brandon J. Griffin
- Center for Mental Health Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR 72114, USA; (J.M.P.)
- Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Susannah Robb Kondrath
- VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, ME 04330, USA; (S.R.K.); (N.J.C.); (T.J.U.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA
| | - Se Yun Kim
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA 01730, USA; (S.D.); (K.B.G.)
| | - Kristin B. Golden
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA 01730, USA; (S.D.); (K.B.G.)
| | - Nathaniel J. Cooney
- VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, ME 04330, USA; (S.R.K.); (N.J.C.); (T.J.U.)
| | - Timothy J. Usset
- VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, ME 04330, USA; (S.R.K.); (N.J.C.); (T.J.U.)
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Swindle T, Baloh J, Landes SJ, Lovelady NN, Vincenzo JL, Hamilton AB, Zielinski MJ, Teeter BS, Gorvine MM, Curran GM. Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) in the pre-implementation phase: key steps and activities. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1155693. [PMID: 37292120 PMCID: PMC10244502 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1155693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) involves researchers and local partners working collaboratively to support the uptake of an evidence-based intervention (EBI). To date, EBQI has not been consistently included in community-engaged dissemination and implementation literature. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the steps, activities, and outputs of EBQI in the pre-implementation phase. Methods The research team applied comparative case study methods to describe key steps, activities, and outputs of EBQI across seven projects. Our approach included: (1) specification of research questions, (2) selection of cases, (3) construction of a case codebook, (4) coding of cases using the codebook, and (5) comparison of cases. Results The cases selected included five distinct settings (e.g., correction facilities, community pharmacies), seven EBIs (e.g., nutrition promotion curriculum, cognitive processing therapy) and five unique lead authors. Case examples include both community-embedded and clinically-oriented projects. Key steps in the EBQI process included: (1) forming a local team of partners and experts, (2) prioritizing implementation determinants based on existing literature/data, (3) selecting strategies and/or adaptations in the context of key determinants, (4) specifying selected strategies/adaptations, and (5) refining strategies/adaptations. Examples of activities are included to illustrate how each step was achieved. Outputs included prioritized determinants, EBI adaptations, and implementation strategies. Conclusions A primary contribution of our comparative case study is the delineation of various steps and activities of EBQI, which may contribute to the replicability of the EBQI process across other implementation research projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taren Swindle
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Center for Implementation Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Jure Baloh
- Center for Implementation Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Sara J. Landes
- Center for Implementation Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Nakita N. Lovelady
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Jennifer L. Vincenzo
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR, United States
| | - Alison B. Hamilton
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Melissa J. Zielinski
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States
| | - Benjamin S. Teeter
- Center for Implementation Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Margaret M. Gorvine
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Geoffrey M. Curran
- Center for Implementation Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Curran GM, Jaynes HA, Hillman LA, Sangasubana N, Chewning BA, Kreling DH, Schommer JC, Murawski MM, Perkins SM, Snyder ME. Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:29. [PMID: 35287764 PMCID: PMC8919161 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00277-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Medication non-adherence is a significant public health problem. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer a rich data source to facilitate resolution of medication non-adherence. PatientToc™ is an electronic PRO data collection software originally implemented at primary care practices in California, United States (US). Currently, the use of standardized PRO data collection systems in US community pharmacies is limited. Thus, we are conducting a two-phase evaluation of the spread and scale of PatientToc™ to US Midwestern community pharmacies. This report focuses on the first phase of the evaluation. The objective of this phase was to prepare for implementation of PatientToc™ in community pharmacies by conducting a pre-implementation developmental formative evaluation to (1) identify potential barriers, facilitators, and actionable recommendations to PatientToc™ implementation and (2) create a draft implementation toolkit.
Methods
Data collection consisted of demographics, observations, audio-recorded contextual inquiries, and semi-structured interviews with staff (e.g., primary care providers, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians) and patients during 1-day site visits to a purposive sample of (1) primary care practices currently using PatientToc™ and (2) community pharmacies in Indiana, Wisconsin, and Minnesota interested in the future use of PatientToc™. Post-visit site observation debriefs were also audio-recorded. Verbatim transcripts of all recordings were coded using deductive/inductive approaches and intra-/inter-site summaries were produced identifying potential barriers, facilitators, and actionable recommendations mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs. A stakeholder advisory panel engaged in an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) implementation process. This included “member checking” and prioritizing findings, and feedback on the adapted PatientToc™ application, implementation strategies, and accompanying toolkit for community pharmacy implementation.
Results
Two primary care practices, nine pharmacies, and 89 individuals participated. Eight major themes (four barriers and four facilitators) and 14 recommendations were identified. Throughout the four EBQI sessions, the panel (1) confirmed findings; (2) designated high priority recommendations: (a) explain PatientToc™ and its benefits clearly and simply to patients, (b) ensure patients can complete questionnaires within 10 min, and (c) provide hands-on training/resources for pharmacy teams; and (3) provided feedback on the adapted PatientToc™ application and finalized toolkit items for initial community pharmacy implementation.
Conclusions
Adoption of electronically captured PROs in community pharmacies is warranted. The implementation strategies systematically developed in this study can serve as a model for implementation of technology-driven health information patient care services, in the understudied context of community pharmacies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Adeoye‐Olatunde OA, Olenik NL. Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole L. Olenik
- Department of Pharmacy Practice Purdue University College of Pharmacy Indianapolis Indiana USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Qudah B, Thakur T, Chewning B. Factors influencing patient participation in medication counseling at the community pharmacy: A systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 17:1863-1876. [PMID: 33766505 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Findings document that patient participation in pharmacy encounters is associated with favorable outcomes. However, there is a need to understand factors that may enhance or hinder patient engagement and pharmacist counseling behaviors during their medication discussions. This review aims to: (1) identify barriers and facilitators for patient engagement in pharmacy consultations, (2) explore the relationship between patient factors (such as demographics and communication behavior) and subsequent pharmacist counseling behavior. METHODS A systematic review of literature using PRISMA guidelines examined studies published in English addressing influences on patient participation and the relationship between patient factors and pharmacist counseling behavior. Four databases were used - PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Findings were framed thematically within the constructs of Street's Linguistic Model of Patient Participation in Care (LM). FINDINGS Fifty studies from 1983 to 2019, including 37 using self-reported data, were identified. Patient involvement in patient-pharmacist communication was influenced by enabling factors such as patient knowledge, communication skills, and pharmacy environment. Predisposing factors for participation ranged from patients' beliefs and past experiences to demographic characteristics such as gender and age. Pharmacists' participative behavior with patients was positively associated with patients' engagement and perceived patient cues in the conversation. CONCLUSION This systematic review identified predictors of patients' engagement in pharmacy encounters drawing on LM framework. Various predisposing factors, enabling factors, and pharmacist' responses impacted patients' willingness to actively participate in medication counseling at community pharmacies. Equally important, studies documented considerable impact by patients on pharmacists' counseling behavior. Pharmacy encounters should no longer be viewed as controlled simply by pharmacists' expertise and agendas. Patient characteristics and factors such as patient question-asking and expectations also appear to be associated with and influence patient-pharmacist interpersonal communication. Additional research needs to address the identified facilitators and barriers to enhance patient participation and pharmacist counseling behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonyan Qudah
- Department of Social and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
| | - Tanvee Thakur
- Research Triangle Institute, 3005 Boardwalk Drive, Suite 105, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Betty Chewning
- Department of Social and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gernant SA, Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Murawski MM, Jaynes H, Chewning B, Knox LM, Martinez III M, Schommer JC, Snyder ME. Experiences Applying Technology to Overcome Common Challenges in Pharmacy Practice-Based Research in the United States. PHARMACY 2020; 8:E93. [PMID: 32486241 PMCID: PMC7356027 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy8020093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the importance of pharmacy practice-based research in generating knowledge that results in better outcomes for patients, health systems and society alike, common challenges to PPBR persist. Herein, we authors describe PPBR challenges our research teams have encountered, and our experiences using technology-driven solutions to overcome such challenges. Notably, limited financial resources reduce the time available for clinicians and researchers to participate in study activities; therefore, resource allocation must be optimized. We authors have also encountered primary data collection challenges due to unique data needs and data access/ownership issues. Moreover, we have experienced a wide geographic dispersion of study practices and collaborating researchers; a lack of trained, on-site research personnel; and the identification and enrollment of participants meeting study eligibility criteria. To address these PPBR challenges, we authors have begun to turn to technology-driven solutions, as described here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Gernant
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, 69 North Eagleville Rd., Storrs, CT 06226, USA
| | - Omolola A. Adeoye-Olatunde
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (O.A.A.-O.); (H.J.); (M.E.S.)
| | - Matthew M. Murawski
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; (M.M.M.); (M.M.III)
| | - Heather Jaynes
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (O.A.A.-O.); (H.J.); (M.E.S.)
| | - Betty Chewning
- Social and Administrative Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53705, USA;
| | - Lyndee M. Knox
- LA Net Community Health Resource Network Collaboratory, 800 East Ocean Blvd, Suite 104, Long Beach, CA 90802, USA;
| | - Moises Martinez III
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; (M.M.M.); (M.M.III)
| | - Jon C. Schommer
- College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Margie E. Snyder
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (O.A.A.-O.); (H.J.); (M.E.S.)
| |
Collapse
|