Longitudinal medication reconciliation at hospital admission, discharge and post-discharge

Practice-enhancing publications about the medication-use process in 2021

PURPOSE

This article identifies, prioritizes, and summarizes published literature on the medication-use process (MUP) from calendar year 2021 that can impact health-system pharmacy daily practice. The MUP is the foundational system that provides the framework for safe medication utilization within the healthcare environment. The MUP is defined in this article as having the following components: prescribing/transcribing, dispensing, administration, and monitoring, and monitoring/medication reconciliation. Articles evaluating at least one step of the MUP were assessed for their usefulness toward practice improvement.

SUMMARY

A PubMed search was conducted in January 2022 for articles published in calendar year 2021 using targeted Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords, and searches of the table of contents of selected pharmacy journals were conducted, providing a total of 7,178 articles. A thorough review identified 79 potentially practice-enhancing articles: 15 for prescribing/transcribing, 17 for dispensing, 4 for administration, 21 for monitoring, and 22 for monitoring/medication reconciliation. Ranking of the articles for importance by peers led to the selection of key articles from each category. The highest-ranked articles are briefly summarized, with a mention of their importance within health-system pharmacy. The other articles are listed for further review and evaluation.

CONCLUSION

It is important to routinely review the published literature and to incorporate significant findings into daily practice. This article assists in identifying and summarizing the most impactful publications. Health-system pharmacists have an active role in improving the MUP in their institution, and awareness of the significant published studies can assist in changing practice at the institutional level.

Cultures of support and resilience are associated with certified pharmacy technicians embracing new roles

BACKGROUND

Various technological, economic, and regulatory factors are creating opportunities for pharmacy technicians to take on additional responsibilities. Technicians in the broader sense have indicated a preference for expanded scope of duties; however, it is not known what drives technicians' greater inclinations to accept these new roles.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the association of various work-related factors, such as co-worker support, pharmacist-leadership style, future uncertainty, their own organizational commitment, and personal characteristics of technicians, including their resilience, on pharmacy technicians' willingness to take on emerging responsibilities in pharmacy.

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire survey was disseminated through email to a national, randomized sample of 3000 technicians certified through the National Healthcareer Association (NHA). The questionnaire solicited data on willingness to participate in either of 13 emerging responsibilities as well as resilience, perceived transformative leadership behaviors of supervising pharmacists, future uncertainty, coworker support, organizational commitment, and various personal and practice-related variables. Following the use of principal component analyses for item purification and summation of various scale responses, inferential analyses were conducted via independent sample t-tests, one way analyses of variance, and Pearson's product moment correlation, as appropriate.

RESULTS

From 2906 surveys delivered, 878 were returned, with 745 of them providing completed responses on willingness to participate in emerging responsibilities. Willingness on most items/responsibilities was highly rated, with many means being at least 4 on a 5-point scale, though some were lower and perhaps a reflection of less exposure to these by way of their personal experience orpractice setting. Technicians' resilience, their coworker support, organizational commitment, and perceived transformative behaviors undertaken by their supervising pharmacists were all highly associated with willingness to engage.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacists, pharmacy technician peers, and organizations can contribute to a culture that is supportive for pharmacy technicians and may serve to encourage commitment, resilience, and willingness to embrace new, or emerging responsibilities.

The impact of clinical pharmacist-physician communication on reducing drug-related problems: a mixed study design in a tertiary teaching Hospital in Xinjiang, China

BACKGROUND

The incidence of drug-related problems (DRPs) has caused serious health hazards and economic burdens among polymedicine patients. Effective communication between clinical pharmacists and physicians has a significant impact on reducing DRPs, but the evidence is poor. This study aimed to explore the impact of communication between clinical pharmacists and physicians on reducing DRPs.

METHODS

A semistructured interview was conducted to explore the communication mode between clinical pharmacists and physicians based on the interprofessional approach of the shared decision-making model and relational coordination theory. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was used to explore the effects of communication intervention on reducing DRPs. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the influencing factors of communication.

RESULTS

The mode of communication is driven by clinical pharmacists between clinical pharmacists and physicians and selectively based on different DRP types. Normally, the communication contents only cover two (33.8%) types of DRP contents or fewer (35.1%). The communication time averaged 5.8 minutes. The communication way is predominantly face-to-face (91.3%), but telephone or other online means (such as WeChat) may be preferred for urgent tasks or long physical distances. Among the 367 participants, 44 patients had DRPs. The RCT results indicated a significant difference in DRP incidence between the control group and the intervention group after the communication intervention (p = 0.02), and the incidence of DRPs in the intervention group was significantly reduced (15.6% vs. 0.07%). Regression analysis showed that communication time had a negative impact on DRP incidence (OR = 13.22, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The communication mode based on the interprofessional approach of the shared decision-making between clinical pharmacists and physicians in medication decision-making could significantly reduce the incidence of DRPs, and the length of communication time is a significant factor. The longer the communication time is, the fewer DRPs that occur.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xinjiang Shihezi University Hospital (kj2020-087-03) and registered in the China clinical trial registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn , number ChiCTR2000035321 date: 08/08/2020).

Hospital admission medication reconciliation in high-risk prescription opioid users

BACKGROUND

No studies have assessed the clinical significance of medication reconciliation in surgical patients using high-risk extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioid medications.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed differences in the perioperative use of opioid analgesics in patients who underwent medication reconciliation upon hospital admission compared to patients who did not and identified predictors of perioperative use of opioids.

METHODS

Retrospective observational quasi-experimental study including adult non-cancer patients who underwent elective surgery at UCSF Medical Center in the period January 2017 through December 2019 and received at least one opioid analgesic during surgical hospitalization. The primary study outcome was perioperative use of opioids measured in daily oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary outcomes were predictors of perioperative use of opioids after adjusting for baseline differences between groups.

RESULTS

We identified 402 patients. Of them, 59.5% were female. The mean patient age was 58.5 years. Most patients underwent neurological or orthopedic surgery (each 40.8%). Over 94.3% of our patients underwent medication reconciliation upon hospital admission, with 78.4% completed by a pharmacy staff. Medication reconciliation evidenced that 5.5% patients were not taking the ER/LA opioids on their medication history list. Inactive ER/LA opioids were discontinued during hospitalization. None of the patients with inactive ER/LA opioids had those opioids restarted at hospital discharge. In addition, patients (26.9%) were successfully converted from ER/LA to SA opioids. After adjusting for patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, surgical procedure type and post-operative pain, opioid formulation conversion was the main predictor of perioperative use of opioids per hospitalization day. Switching patients from ER/LA to SA opioids reduced the mean daily use of OME by 66.03 units (p < 0.02) without adversely impacting postoperative pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication reconciliation upon hospital admission reduced unnecessary exposure to opioids in hospitalized surgical patients.

Implementation of Medication Reconciliation conducted by hospital pharmacists: A case study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

BACKGROUND

Medication reconciliation (MR) implementation in hospital care transitions has proved to be a challenge for health professionals and managers. It points to the need to conduct Implementation Research with a view to understanding the tasks of the real world and knowing how they impact this process. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study aims to analyze the factors that influenced the MR implementation process conducted by pharmacists at a hospital setting.

METHODS

A qualitative case study was carried out in the cardiology and gastroenterology units of a teaching hospital in Brazil, involving participant observation and semi-structured interviews with physicians, pharmacists, nurses, nutritionists and a social worker. The CFIR was used to guide data collection and thematic analysis. The constructs were classified according to their influence and strength.

RESULTS

Sixteen health professionals involved directly or indirectly with MR implementation participated in the study. Based on the analysis of the participants' quotes and of the field diary, 18 constructs of the CFIR were identified as influencing MR implementation. The constructs that most strongly influenced MR implementation concerned "Inner Setting", "Characteristics of Individuals" and "Characteristics of Intervention". The participating professionals showed little knowledge of MR and had different points of view on its scope, weakly relating MR to patient safety. The tools used to conduct MR were adapted according to the hospital's needs, thus facilitating its implementation. However, MR proved to be complex and require clinical knowledge and aligned teamwork to identify and resolve undocumented medication discrepancies, being as well intertwined with culture and organizational communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The results point to implementation failures and highlight that MR is a complex intervention, requiring specific knowledge from the multidisciplinary team and alignment with other existing workflows. The barriers and facilitators identified may serve to design and test implementation improvement strategies.

Patterns and Predictors of Medication Change after Discharge from Hospital: An Observational Study in Older Adults with Neurological Disorders

BACKGROUND

Medication is often changed after inpatient treatment, which affects the course of the disease, health behavior and adherence. Thus, it is important to understand patterns of medication changes after discharge from hospital.

METHODS

Inpatients at the Department of Neurology received a comprehensive assessment during their stay, including adherence, depression, cognition, health and sociodemographic variables. A month after being discharged, patients were contacted to enquire about post-discharge medication changes.

RESULTS

910 older adults aged 70 ± 8.6 years participated, of which 204 (22.4%) reported medication changes. The majority of changes were initiated by physicians (n = 112, 56.3%) and only 25 (12.6%) patients reported adjusting medication themselves. Reasons for medication changes differed between patients and doctors (p < 0.001), with side effects or missing effects cited frequently. Sociodemographic and patient-related factors did not significantly predict medication changes.

CONCLUSION

Patients reported less post-discharge medication changes than expected, and contrary to previous literature on nonadherence, only a fraction of those changes were performed by patients themselves. Socioeconomic and clinical parameters regarding personality, mood and cognition were poorly associated with post-discharge medication changes. Instead, individual health-related factors play a role, with patient factors only indirectly influencing physicians' decisions.

Medication Reconciliation at hospital admission and discharge: Evaluation of fidelity and process outcomes in a real-world setting

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to assess the fidelity of Medication Reconciliation (MR) delivered by the pharmacist at hospital admission and discharge, and the process outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective study conducted in cardiology and cardiovascular surgery unit of a university hospital between September 2019 and January 2020. Independent observers collected data to measure MR fidelity, related to coverage, sources of information used to collect medication history and presence of outstanding and resolved Undocumented Discrepancies (UD). Process outcomes included medication errors and their potential to cause harm, identified by the pharmacist during the formal MR process.

RESULTS

Of the eligible patients, 122 (69.7%) had their medications reconciled in a timely manner at hospital admission and 50 (43.8%) at discharge. The pharmacist consulted 2.76 (±0.8) sources of information to build the medication history, on average. At least one outstanding UD was found in 101 (82.8%) patients at admission and in 41 (82.0%), at discharge. The average number of outstanding UD per patient at admission and discharge was 3.0 (±2.6) and 2.4 (±1.9), respectively. The UD communicated to the physician by the pharmacist during the formal MR process, involved mainly omission errors and were classified as requiring monitoring or potentially necessary intervention. In the univariate analysis, the number of drugs pre-admission and admission, the reason for admission and non-elective readmission in 30 days were associated with the presence of medication errors at admission.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a high number of UD, suggesting flaws in the implementation of MR and highlight the importance of quality measurement.