Six months functional response to early psychosis intervention program best predicts outcome after three years

Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Deficits in social and occupational function are widely reported in psychosis, yet no one measure of function is currently agreed upon as a gold standard in psychosis research. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of functioning measures to determine what measures were associated with largest effect sizes when measuring between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Literature searches were conducted based on PsycINFO and PubMed to identify studies for inclusion. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational and intervention studies of early psychosis (≤5 years since diagnosis) that included social and occupational functioning as an outcome measure were considered. A series of meta-analyses were conducted to determine effect size differences for between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were carried out to account for variability in study and participant characteristics. One hundred and sixteen studies were included, 46 studies provided data (N = 13 261) relevant to our meta-analysis. Smallest effect sizes for changes in function over time and in response to treatment were observed for global measures, while more specific measures of social and occupational function showed the largest effect sizes. Differences in effect sizes between functioning measures remained significant after variability in study and participant characteristics were accounted for. Findings suggest that more specific measures of social function are better able to detect changes in function over time and in response to treatment.

The differential impact of duration of untreated psychosis on functioning and quality of life: A threshold analysis

AIM

Reduction of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) remains a key goal of early intervention programs. While a significant body of literature suggests that a short DUP has a positive impact on outcome, little is known regarding the threshold above which various dimensions of outcome are impaired. In this study, we explore the DUP threshold that best discriminates subgroups with poorer outcome regarding global functioning and quality of life after 3 years of treatment.

METHOD

A total of 432 patients were followed-up prospectively over 3 years. Several hypothetical cut-off points for DUP were tested in order to maximize differences in effect size for quality of life and general functioning.

RESULTS

While a DUP cut-off of 86 weeks defined two subpopulations with a difference of greatest effect size in quality of life after 3 years, it is already at a cut-off of 3 weeks of DUP that two subpopulations with a difference in global functioning of the greatest effect size was reached.

CONCLUSION

DUP seems to have a differential impact on the various components of outcome, and in particular on quality of life and global functioning. Our data suggest that aiming at very short DUP is justified, but that DUP over 3 weeks are still compatible with good quality of life after 3 years of treatment.