Distribution and frequency of clinical criteria and rating scales for diagnosis and assessment of catatonia in different study types

A network analysis of catatonia symptoms across diagnoses

BACKGROUND

Catatonia, as a transdiagnostic construct, manifests across various psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions. Understanding how symptom variations impact the catatonia construct and differ across primary diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, unipolar depression, and neurological/metabolic/immunological condition) is essential to refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This study aims to compare the symptom networks and centrality measures of these diagnoses.

METHODS

We conducted a network analysis using Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) data from 118 patients, examining centrality measures and network comparisons across the four primary diagnostic groups.

RESULTS

In the general catatonia network, the three most central symptoms identified were Excitement (1.462), Perseveration (1.456), and Impulsivity (1.332). While the overall structure of the catatonia networks did not show significant differences between diagnoses in terms of symptom connections and centrality, variations in centrality measures were observed among the different networks.

CONCLUSIONS

The study reinforces the notion of catatonia as an independent syndrome relatively to psychiatric or non-psychiatric diagnoses. However, the variation in centrality of symptoms across different primary diagnoses provides critical insights that could aid clinicians in tailoring diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Future research should further explore these relationships and develop more refined approaches to managing catatonia.

Expanding the phenotype of NEDAMSS with a psychiatric perspective: analysis of a new case, and a systematic review of the literature

Pathogenic variants in the IRF2BPL gene are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders with varying degrees of regression, loss of speech and epilepsy. The phenotype is also known as Neurodevelopmental Disorder with regression, Abnormal Movements, loss of Speech, and Seizures (NEDAMSS). The motor symptoms of this disorder share significant phenotypical characteristics with catatonia, a severe neuropsychiatric psychomotor syndrome. The objective of this article is to expand the knowledge on the presentation of NEDAMSS with a focus on psychiatric symptoms including catatonia. A systematic review of 32 case presentations of NEDAMSS, and a novel case report of a patient with NEDAMSS, exhibiting multiple psychiatric symptoms, including catatonia are presented. Psychiatric symptoms and disorders including affective disorders, psychotic symptoms, catatonia, and developmental disorders are reported in one third of the reviewed cases. Reported effects of pharmacological treatment on motor symptoms of NEDAMSS are very limited. Our case presents improvement in motor symptoms originally attributed to NEDAMSS, after treatment with Lorazepam following diagnosis with catatonia. Patients with NEDAMSS may present with both neurological and psychiatric symptoms. The clinical presentation of NEDAMSS motor symptoms and catatonia have similarities and thus poses significant challenges to the diagnostic process, with risk of incorrect or delayed treatment. The limited experience and the complex phenotype of NEDAMSS complicates pharmacological treatment and encourages caution, especially with the use of antipsychotic drugs in the presence of possible catatonic symptoms.

Catatonia

Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by motor, affective and cognitive-behavioural signs, which lasts from hours to days. Intensive research over the past two decades has led to catatonia being recognized as an independent diagnosis in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) since 2022. Catatonia is found in 5-18% of inpatients on psychiatric units and 3.3% of inpatients on medical units. However, in an unknown number of patients, catatonia remains unrecognized and these patients are at risk of life-threatening complications. Hence, recognizing the symptoms of catatonia early is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment to achieve a favourable outcome. Benzodiazepines such as lorazepam and diazepam, electroconvulsive therapy, and N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists such as amantadine and memantine, are the cornerstones of catatonia therapy. In addition, dopamine-modulating second-generation antipsychotics (for example, clozapine and aripiprazole) are effective in some patient populations. Early and appropriate treatment combined with new screening assessments has the potential to reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with catatonia in psychiatric and non-psychiatric settings.

Historical postmortem studies on catatonia: Close reading and analysis of Kahlbaum's cases and scientific texts between 1800 and 1900

In the 19th century, postmortem brain examination played a central role in the search for the neurobiological origin of psychiatric and neurological disorders. During that time, psychiatrists, neurologists, and neuropathologists examined autopsied brains from catatonic patients and postulated that catatonia is an organic brain disease. In line with this development, human postmortem studies of the 19th century became increasingly important in the conception of catatonia and might be seen as precursors of modern neuroscience. In this report, we closely examined autopsy reports of eleven catatonia patients of Karl Ludwig Kahlbaum. Further, we performed a close reading and analysis of previously (systematically) identified historical German and English texts between 1800 and 1900 for autopsy reports of catatonia patients. Two main findings emerged: (i) Kahlbaum's most important finding in catatonia patients was the opacity of the arachnoid; (ii) historical human postmortem studies of catatonia patients postulated a number of neuroanatomical abnormalities such as cerebral enlargement or atrophy, anemia, inflammation, suppuration, serous effusion, or dropsy as well as alterations of brain blood vessels such as rupture, distension or ossification in the pathogenesis of catatonia. However, the exact localization has often been missing or inaccurate, probably due to the lack of standardized subdivision/nomenclature of the respective brain areas. Nevertheless, Kahlbaum's 11 autopsy reports and the identified neuropathological studies between 1800 and 1900 made important discoveries, which still have the potential to inform and bolster modern neuroscientific research in catatonia.

[German version of the Northoff scale for subjective experience in catatonia (NSSC-dv) : A validated instrument for examination of the subjective experience in catatonia]

Patients with catatonia often show serious motor, affective and behavioral symptoms, behind which the subjective experience often remains hidden. Therefore, this study disseminates our own systematic empirical investigation of the subjective experience of catatonia patients to a German-speaking audience of clinicians and researchers. Based on current evidence and the clinical experience of the authors, the self-report questionnaire Northoff Scale for Subjective Experience in Catatonia (NSSC) was modified, extended and validated and now consists of 26 items capturing the subjective experience of catatonia in its clinical diversity. A total of 46 patients with catatonia according to the International Classification of Diseases (11th revision, ICD-11) were asked about their subjective experience during the acute phase of the disease using the NSSC. The NSSC showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). The NSSC total score was significantly associated with the Northoff Catatonia Rating Scale (NCRS; r = 0.46; p < 0.05), the total score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; r = 0.30; p < 0.05), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS; r = 0.33; p < 0.05), and Trait Anxiety (STAI; r = 0.64; p < 0.01), supporting its validity. Preliminary validation of the NSSC revealed good psychometric properties. The NSSC is a useful instrument for routine clinical use to assess the subjective experience of patients with catatonia in order to provide tailored psychotherapeutic interventions.

Microstructural white matter biomarkers of symptom severity and therapy outcome in catatonia: Rationale, study design and preliminary clinical data of the whiteCAT study

The number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies on neuronal correlates of catatonia has dramatically increased in the last 10 years, but conclusive findings on white matter (WM) tracts alterations underlying catatonic symptoms are still lacking. Therefore, we conduct an interdisciplinary longitudinal MRI study (whiteCAT) with two main objectives: First, we aim to enroll 100 psychiatric patients with and 50 psychiatric patients without catatonia according to ICD-11 who will undergo a deep phenotyping approach with an extensive battery of demographic, psychopathological, psychometric, neuropsychological, instrumental and diffusion MRI assessments at baseline and 12 weeks follow-up. So far, 28 catatonia patients and 40 patients with schizophrenia or other primary psychotic disorders or mood disorders without catatonia have been studied cross-sectionally. 49 out of 68 patients have completed longitudinal assessment, so far. Second, we seek to develop and implement a new method for semi-automatic fiber tract delineation using active learning. By training supportive machine learning algorithms on the fly that are custom tailored to the respective analysis pipeline used to obtain the tractogram as well as the WM tract of interest, we plan to streamline and speed up this tedious and error-prone task while at the same time increasing reproducibility and robustness of the extraction process. The goal is to develop robust neuroimaging biomarkers of symptom severity and therapy outcome based on WM tracts underlying catatonia. If our MRI study is successful, it will be the largest longitudinal study to date that has investigated WM tracts in catatonia patients.

Extension, translation and preliminary validation of the Northoff Scale for Subjective Experience in Catatonia (NSSC)

BACKGROUND

In the last two decades, much neuroscientific research has been done on the pathomechanisms of catatonia. However, catatonic symptoms have mainly been assessed with clinical rating scales based on observer ratings. Although catatonia is often associated with strong affective reactions, the subjective domain of catatonia has simply been neglected in scientific research.

METHODS

The main objective of this study was to modify, extend and translate the original German version of the Northoff Scale for Subjective Experience in Catatonia (NSSC) and to examine its preliminary validity and reliability. Data were collected from 28 patients diagnosed with catatonia associated with another mental disorder (6A40) according to ICD-11. Descriptive statistics, correlation coefficients, internal consistency and principal component analysis were employed to address preliminary validity and reliability of the NSSC.

RESULTS

NSSC showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). NSSC total scores were significantly associated with Northoff Catatonia Rating Scale (r = 0.50, p < .01) and Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (r = 0.41, p < .05) thus supporting its concurrent validity. There was no significant association between NSSC total score and Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale total (r = 0.26, p = .09), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (r = 0.29, p = .07) and GAF (r = 0.03, p = .43) scores.

CONCLUSION

The extended version of the NSSC consists of 26 items and was developed to assess the subjective experience of catatonia patients. Preliminary validation of the NSSC revealed good psychometric properties. NSSC is a useful tool for everyday clinical work to assess the subjective experience of catatonia patients.