Spatial response surface modelling in the presence of data paucity for the evaluation of potential human health risk due to the contamination of potable water resources

Use of surrogate indicators for the evaluation of potential health risks due to poor urban water quality: A Bayesian Network approach

Urban water pollution poses risks of waterborne infectious diseases. Therefore, in order to improve urban liveability, effective pollution mitigation strategies are required underpinned by predictions generated using water quality models. However, the lack of reliability in current modelling practices detrimentally impacts planning and management decision making. This research study adopted a novel approach in the form of Bayesian Networks to model urban water quality to better investigate the factors that influence risks to human health. The application of Bayesian Networks was found to enhance the integration of quantitative and qualitative spatially distributed data for analysing the influence of environmental and anthropogenic factors using three surrogate indicators of human health risk, namely, turbidity, total nitrogen and fats/oils. Expert knowledge was found to be of critical importance in assessing the interdependent relationships between health risk indicators and influential factors. The spatial variability maps of health risk indicators developed enabled the initial identification of high risk areas in which flooding was found to be the most significant influential factor in relation to human health risk. Surprisingly, population density was found to be less significant in influencing health risk indicators. These high risk areas in turn can be subjected to more in-depth investigations instead of the entire region, saving time and resources. It was evident that decision making in relation to the design of pollution mitigation strategies needs to account for the impact of landscape characteristics on water quality, which can be related to risk to human health.

Evaluating a Bayesian modelling approach (INLA-SPDE) for environmental mapping

Understanding the uncertainty in spatial modelling of environmental variables is important because it provides the end-users with the reliability of the maps. Over the past decades, Bayesian statistics has been successfully used. However, the conventional simulation-based Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches are often computationally intensive. In this study, the performance of a novel Bayesian inference approach called Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation with Stochastic Partial Differential Equation (INLA-SPDE) was evaluated using independent calibration and validation datasets of various skewed and non-skewed soil properties and was compared with a linear mixed model estimated by residual maximum likelihood (REML-LMM). It was found that INLA-SPDE was equivalent to REML-LMM in terms of the model performance and was similarly robust with sparse datasets (i.e. 40-60 samples). In comparison, INLA-SPDE was able to estimate the posterior marginal distributions of the model parameters without extensive simulations. It was concluded that INLA-SPDE had the potential to map the spatial distribution of environmental variables along with their posterior marginal distributions for environmental management. Some drawbacks were identified with INLA-SPDE, including artefacts of model response due to the use of triangle meshes and a longer computational time when dealing with non-Gaussian likelihood families.