Characterization of ambient-generated exposure to fine particles using sulfate as a tracer in the Chinese megacity of Guangzhou

Validity of using ambient concentrations as surrogate exposures at the individual level for fine particle and black carbon: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Exposure measurement error is an important source of bias in epidemiological studies. We assessed the validity of employing ambient (outdoor) measurements as proxies of personal exposures at individual levels focusing on fine particles (PM_2.5) and black carbon (BC)/elemental carbon (EC) on a global scale. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched databases (ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase, and Ovid BIOSIS) to retrieve observational studies in English language published from 1 January 2006 until 5 May 2021. Correlation coefficients (r) between paired ambient (outdoor) concentration and personal exposure for PM_2.5 or BC/EC were standardized as effect size. We used random-effects meta-analyses to pool the correlation coefficients and investigated the causes of heterogeneity and publication bias. Furthermore, we employed subgroup and meta-regression analyses to evaluate the modification of pooled estimates by potential mediators. This systematic review identified thirty-two observational studies involving 1744 subjects from ten countries, with 28 studies for PM_2.5 and 11 studies for BC/EC. Personal PM_2.5 exposure is more strongly correlated with ambient (outdoor) concentrations (0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.68) than personal BC/EC exposure (0.49, 95% CI: 0.38-0.59), with significant differences in ṝ (0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.25; p < 0.05). The results demonstrated that the health status of participants was a significant modifier of pooled correlations. In addition, the personal to ambient (P/A) ratio for PM_2.5 and average ambient BC/EC levels were potential effect moderators of the pooled ṝ. The funnel plots and Egger's regression test indicated inevident publication bias. The pooled estimates were robust through sensitivity analyses. The results support the growing consensus that the validity coefficient of proxy measures should be addressed when interpreting results from epidemiological studies to better understand how strong health outcomes are affected by different levels of PM_2.5 and their components.

Chemical characterization and source identification of PM2.5 in Luoyang after the clean air actions

Luoyang is a typical heavy industrial city in China, with a coal-dominated energy structure and serious air pollution. Following the implementation of the clean air actions, the physicochemical characteristics and sources of PM_2.5 have changed. A comprehensive study of PM_2.5 was conducted from October 16, 2019 to January 23, 2020 to evaluate the effectiveness of previous control measures and further to provide theory basis for more effective policies in the future. Results showed that the aerosol pollution in Luoyang in autumn and winter is still serious with the average concentration of 91.1 μg/m³, although a large reduction (46.9%) since 2014. With the contribution of nitrate increased from 12.5% to 25.1% and sulfate decreased from 16.7% to 11.2%, aerosol pollution has changed from sulfate-dominate to nitrate-dominate. High NO₃^-/SO₄^2- ratio and the increasing of NO₃^-/SO₄^2- ratio with the aggravation of pollution indicating vehicle exhaust playing an increasingly important role in PM_2.5 pollution in Luoyang, especially in the haze processes. Secondary inorganic ions contributed significantly to the enhancement of PM_2.5 during the pollution period. The high value of Cl^-/Na⁺ and EC concentration indicate coal combustion in Luoyang is still serious. The top three contributor sources were secondary inorganic aerosols (33.3%), coal combustion (13.6%), and industrial emissions (13.4%). Close-range transport from the western and northeastern directions were more important factors in air pollution in Luoyang during the sampling period. It is necessary to strengthen the control of coal combustion and reduce vehicle emissions in future policies.

A review and analysis of personal and ambient PM2.5 measurements: Implications for epidemiology studies

BACKGROUND

In epidemiology studies, ambient measurements of PM_2.5 are often used as surrogates for personal exposures. However, it is unclear the degree to which ambient PM_2.5 reflects personal exposures.

OBJECTIVE

In order to examine potential sources of bias in epidemiology studies, we conducted a review and meta-analysis of studies to determine the extent to which short-term measurements of ambient PM_2.5 levels are related to short-term measurements of personal PM_2.5 levels.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search of studies reporting both personal and ambient measurements of PM_2.5 published in the last 10 years (2009-2019) and incorporated studies published prior to 2009 from reviews.

RESULTS

Seventy-one studies were identified. Based on 17 studies reporting slopes, a meta-analysis revealed an overall slope of 0.56 μg/m³ (95% CI: [0.39, 0.73]) personal PM_2.5 per μg/m³ increase in ambient PM_2.5. Slopes for summer months were higher (slope = 0.73, 95% CI: [0.64, 0.81]) than for winter (slope = 0.46, 95% CI: [0.36, 0.57]). Based on 44 studies reporting correlations, we calculated an overall personal-ambient PM_2.5 correlation of 0.63 (95% CI: [0.55, 0.71]). Correlations were stronger in studies conducted in Canada (r = 0.86, 95% CI: [0.67, 0.94]) compared to the USA (r = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.49, 0.70]) and China (r = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.46, 0.71]). Correlations also were stronger in urban areas (r = 0.53, 95% CI: [0.43, 0.62]) vs. suburban areas (r = 0.36, 95% CI: [0.21, 0.49]).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results suggest a large degree of variability in the personal-ambient PM_2.5 association and the potential for exposure misclassification and measurement error in PM_2.5 epidemiology studies.

Indoor, outdoor, and personal exposure to PM2.5 and their bioreactivity among healthy residents of Hong Kong

Direct evidence about associations between fine particles (PM_2.5) components and the corresponding PM_2.5 bioreactivity at the individual level is limited. We conducted a panel study with repeated personal measurements involving 56 healthy residents in Hong Kong. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels were measured from these subjects. Out of 56 subjects, 27 (48.2%) participated in concurrent outdoor, indoor, and personal PM_2.5 monitoring. Organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), particle bound-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and phthalates were analyzed. Alteration in cell viability, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and 8-isoprostane by 50 μg/mL PM_2.5 extracts was determined in A549 cells in vitro. Moderate heterogeneities were shown in PM_2.5 exposures and the corresponding PM_2.5 bioreactivity across different sample types. Associations between the analyzed components and PM_2.5 bioreactivity were assessed using the multiple regression models. Toxicological results revealed that indoor and personal exposure to OC as well as PAH compounds and their derivatives (e.g., Alkyl-PAHs, Oxy-PAHs) induced cell viability reduction and increase in levels of LDH, IL-6, and 8-isoprostane. Overall, OC in personal exposure played a dominant role in PM_2.5-induced bioreactivity. Subsequently, we examined the associations of FeNO with IL-6 and 8-isoprostane levels using mixed-effects models. The results showed that per interquartile change in IL-6 and 8-isoprostane were associated with a 6.4% (p < 0.01) and 11.1% (p < 0.01) increase in FeNO levels, respectively. Our study explored the toxicological properties of chemical components in PM_2.5 exposure, which suggested that residential indoors and personal OC and PAHs should be of great concern for human health. These findings indicated that further studies in inflammation and oxidative stress-related illnesses due to particle exposure would benefit from the assessment of in vitro PM_2.5 bioreactivity.

Estimation of personal exposure to fine particles (PM2.5) of ambient origin for healthy adults in Hong Kong

Personal exposure and ambient fine particles (PM_2.5) measurements for 13 adult subjects (ages 19-57) were conducted in Hong Kong between April 2014 and June 2015. Six to 21 personal samples (mean = 19) per subject were obtained throughout the study period. Samples were analyzed for mass by gravimetric analysis, and 19 elements (from Na to Pb) were analyzed using X-Ray Fluorescence. Higher subject-specific correlations between personal and ambient sulfur (r_s = 0.92; p < 0.001) were found as compared to PM_2.5 mass (r_s = 0.79; p < 0.001) and other elements (0.06 < r_s < 0.86). Personal vs. ambient sulfur regression yielded an average exposure factor (F_pex) of 0.73 ± 0.02, supporting the use of sulfur as a surrogate to estimate personal exposure to PM_2.5 of ambient origin (E_a). E_a accounted for 41-82% and 57-73% of total personal PM_2.5 exposures (P) by season and by subject, respectively. The importance of both E_a and non-ambient exposures (E_na, 11.2 ± 5.6 μg/m³; 32.5 ± 10.9%) are noted. Mixed-effects models were applied to estimate the relationships between ambient PM_2.5 concentrations and their corresponding exposure variables (E_a, P). Higher correlations for E_a (0.90; p < 0.001) than for P (0.58; p < 0.01) were found. A calibration coefficient < 1 suggests an attenuation of 22% (ranging 16-28%) of the true effect estimates when using average ambient concentrations at central monitoring stations as surrogates for E_a. Stationary ambient data can be used to assess population exposure only if PM exposure is dominated by E_a.

Determinants of personal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in adult subjects in Hong Kong

Personal monitoring for fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) was conducted for adults (48 subjects, 18-63years of age) in Hong Kong during the summer and winter of 2014-2015. All filters were analyzed for PM_2.5 mass and constituents (including carbonaceous aerosols, water-soluble ions, and elements). We found that season (p=0.02) and occupation (p<0.001) were significant factors affecting the strength of the personal-ambient PM_2.5 associations. We applied mixed-effects models to investigate the determinants of personal exposure to PM_2.5 mass and constituents, along with within- and between-individual variance components. Ambient PM_2.5 was the dominant predictor of (R²=0.12-0.59, p<0.01) and the largest contributor (>37.3%) to personal exposures for PM_2.5 mass and most components. For all subjects, a one-unit (2.72μg/m³) increase in ambient PM_2.5 was associated with a 0.75μg/m³ (95% CI: 0.59-0.94μg/m³) increase in personal PM_2.5 exposure. The adjusted mixed-effects models included information extracted from individual's activity diaries as covariates. The results showed that season, occupation, time indoors at home, in transit, and cleaning were significant determinants for PM_2.5 components in personal exposure (R²_β=0.06-0.63, p<0.05), contributing to 3.0-70.4% of the variability. For one-hour extra time spent at home, in transit, and cleaning an average increase of 1.7-3.6% (ammonium, sulfate, nitrate, sulfur), 2.7-12.3% (elemental carbon, ammonium, titanium, iron), and 8.7-19.4% (ammonium, magnesium ions, vanadium) in components of personal PM_2.5 were observed, respectively. In this research, the within-individual variance component dominated the total variability for all investigated exposure data except PM_2.5 and EC. Results from this study indicate that performing long-term personal monitoring is needed for examining the associations of mass and constituents of personal PM_2.5 with health outcomes in epidemiological studies by describing the impacts of individual-specific data on personal exposures.