Simulating emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene after soil fumigation under field conditions

Two-dimensional analytical solution for VOC vapor migration through layered soil laterally away from the edge of contaminant source

A two-dimensional analytical solution is developed to simulate vapor migration in layered soil laterally away from the edge of contaminant source and has advantages in considering the vapor concentration profile in a functional form near the source edge. The analytical solution is validated against existing analytical solution, numerical model and experimental results. It has also proved to be an alternative screening tool to evaluate the vapor intrusion (VI) risk by compared with existing VI assessment tools. The influence of the characteristics of contaminant source and soil layer on the VI risk are investigated. The existence of capillary fringe effectively reduces VI risk. Among all the single-layer-soil cases, the lateral inclusion zone for sand is the widest due to the thinnest capillary fringe and the lowest effective diffusivity ratio between soil and capillary fringe. For layered soil, the lower effective diffusivity layer overlying the higher one enhances the horizontal diffusion and extends the lateral inclusion zone. The width of lateral inclusion zone increases logarithmically with increasing source concentration while it increases linearly with increasing source depth. Based on the calculation results, a simplified formula is proposed to preliminarily estimate the width of lateral inclusion zone for the typical single-layer-soil cases considering the capillary fringe.

Modeling variation in 1,3-dichloropropene emissions due to soil conditions and applicator practices

The fumigant 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) is widely used for control of soil-borne pests and pathogens, but post-application emissions may lead to off-site transport and possible human exposure. The fraction of applied material emitted into the atmosphere and the magnitude of peak emissions are two quantities used by regulators to protect public health and are typically based on field estimates. However, the current body of field studies covers only a narrow subset of the broad range of application practices and soil conditions under which applications are performed and is subject to an unknown level of estimation error. Here we use the HYDRUS model to estimate cumulative and peak emissions of 1,3-D for 17 application methods used in California. The simulations are parameterized with soils data from 16 fields sampled immediately prior to fumigation in order to establish a representative distribution of initial soil conditions. The results demonstrate a wide range in cumulative emissions, with mean losses of initial applied mass between 10 and 58% over two weeks depending on application method. Emissions are highly variable in response to soil conditions, with coefficients of variation ranging from 16 to 54% for cumulative flux and 26 to 67% for peak three-hour flux depending on application method. The simulated distributions show similarities to the available field study estimates in terms of the mean and spread of distributions, particularly in the case of cumulative emissions, indicating that the modeling approach could be a useful tool to support regulatory decision-making in cases where field data is limited.