Management and implications of using nitrification inhibitors to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from urine patches on grazed pasture soils - A review

Global impact of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers on vegetable productivity and reactive nitrogen losses

Vegetables are the most consumed non-staple food globally, and their production is crucial for dietary diversity and public health. Use of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) in vegetable production could improve vegetable yield and quality while reducing reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses. However, different management and environmental factors has significantly distinctive impacts on the effectiveness of EEFs. In this study, a worldwide meta-analysis based on the data collected from 144 studies was performed to assess the impacts of EEF (nitrification inhibitor [NI] and polymer-coated urea [PCU]) application on vegetable yield, nitrogen (N) uptake, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), vegetable quality and Nr losses (nitrous oxide [N2O] emissions, ammonia [NH3] volatilization, and nitrate [NO3-] leaching). The effects of the applied EEFs on vegetable yields and N2O emissions were assessed with different management practices (cultivation system, vegetable type and N application rate) and environmental conditions (climatic conditions and soil properties). Compared to conventional fertilizers, EEFs significantly improved vegetable yield (7.5-8.1 %) and quality (vitamin C increased by 10.7-13.6 %, soluble sugar increased by 9.3-10.9 %, and nitrate content reduced by 17.2-25.1 %). Meanwhile, the application of EEFs demonstrated a great potential for Nr loss reduction (N2O emissions reduced by 40.5 %, NO3- leaching reduced by 45.8 %) without compromising vegetable yield. The NI was most effective in reducing N2O emissions (40.5 %), but it significantly increased NH3 volatilization (32.4 %). While PCU not only significantly reduced N2O emissions (24.4 %) and NO3- leaching (28.7 %), but also significantly reduced NH3 volatilization (74.5 %). And N application rate, soil pH, and soil organic carbon (SOC) were the main factors affecting the yield and environmental effects of EEFs. Moreover, the yield-enhancing effect of NI and PCU were better at low soil N availability and SOC, respectively. Thus, it is important to adopt the appropriate EEF application strategy targeting specific environmental conditions and implement it at the optimal N application rate.

Biological and chemical nitrification inhibitors exhibited different effects on soil gross N nitrification rate and N2O production: a 15N microcosm study

Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) are considered as an effective strategy for reducing nitrification rate and related environmental nitrogen (N) loss. However, whether plant-derived biological NIs had an advantage over chemical NIs in simultaneously inhibiting nitrification rate and N2O production remains unclear. Here, we conducted an aerobic 15N microcosmic incubation experiment to compare the effects of a biological NI (methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate, MHPP) with three chemical NIs, 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine (nitrapyrin), dicyandiamide (DCD), and 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) on (i) gross N mineralization and nitrification rate and (ii) the relative importance of nitrification and denitrification in N2O emission in a calcareous soil. The results showed that DMPP significantly inhibited m_gross rate (P < 0.05), whereas DCD, nitrapyrin, and MHPP only numerically inhibited it. Gross N nitrification (n_gross) rates were inhibited by 9.48% in the DCD treatment to 51.5% in the nitrapyrin treatment. Chemical NIs primarily affected the amoA gene abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), whereas biological NIs affected the amoA gene abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and AOB. AOB's community composition was more susceptible to NIs than AOA, and NIs mainly targeted Nitrosospira clusters of AOB. Chemical NIs of DCD, DMPP, and nitrapyrin proportionally reduced N2O production from nitrification and denitrification. However, the biological NI MHPP stimulated short-term N2O emission and increased the proportion of N2O from denitrification. Our findings showed that the influence of NIs on gross N mineralization rate (m_gross) was dependent on the NI type. MHPP exhibited a moderate n_gross inhibitory capacity compared with the three chemical NIs. The mechanisms of chemical and biological NIs inhibiting n_gross can be partly attributed to changes in the abundance and community of ammonia oxidizers. A more comprehensive evaluation is needed to determine whether biological NIs have advantages over chemical NIs in inhibiting greenhouse gas emissions.

Soil microbiome feedback to climate change and options for mitigation

Microbes are a critical component of soil ecosystems, performing crucial functions in biogeochemical cycling, carbon sequestration, and plant health. However, it remains uncertain how their community structure, functioning, and resultant nutrient cycling, including net GHG fluxes, would respond to climate change at different scales. Here, we review global and regional climate change effects on soil microbial community structure and functioning, as well as the climate-microbe feedback and plant-microbe interactions. We also synthesize recent studies on climate change impacts on terrestrial nutrient cycles and GHG fluxes across different climate-sensitive ecosystems. It is generally assumed that climate change factors (e.g., elevated CO₂ and temperature) will have varying impacts on the microbial community structure (e.g., fungi-to-bacteria ratio) and their contribution toward nutrient turnover, with potential interactions that may either enhance or mitigate each other's effects. Such climate change responses, however, are difficult to generalize, even within an ecosystem, since they are subjected to not only a strong regional influence of current ambient environmental and edaphic conditions, historical exposure to fluctuations, and time horizon but also to methodological choices (e.g., network construction). Finally, the potential of chemical intrusions and emerging tools, such as genetically engineered plants and microbes, as mitigation strategies against global change impacts, particularly for agroecosystems, is presented. In a rapidly evolving field, this review identifies the knowledge gaps complicating assessments and predictions of microbial climate responses and hindering the development of effective mitigation strategies.

Effects of water regimes on soil N2O, CH4 and CO2 emissions following addition of dicyandiamide and N fertilizer

Water regimes strongly impact soil C and N cycling and the associated greenhouse gases (GHGs, i.e., CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O). Therefore, a study was conducted to examine the impacts of flooding-drying of soil along with application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer and nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) on GHGs emissions. This study comprised four experimental treatments, including (i) control (CK), (ii) dicyandiamide, 20 mg kg^-1 (DCD), (iii) nitrogen fertilizer, 300 mg kg^-1 (N) and (iv) DCD + N. All experimental treatments were kept under flooded condition at the onset of the experiment, and then converted to 60% water filled pore space (WFPS). At flooding stage, N₂O emissions were lower as compared to 60% WFPS. The highest cumulative N₂O emission was 0.98 mg N₂O-N kg^-1 in N treated soil due to high substrates of mineral N contents, but lowest (0.009 mg N₂O-N kg^-1) in the DCD treatment. The highest cumulative CH₄ emissions (80.54 mg CH₄-C kg^-1) were observed in the N treatment, while uptake of CH₄ was observed in the DCD treatment. As flooded condition converted to 60% WFPS, CO₂ emissions gradually increased in all experimental treatments, but the maximum cumulative CO₂ emission was 477.44 mg kg^-1 in the DCD + N treatment. The maximum dissolved organic carbon (DOC) contents were observed in N and DCD + N treatments with the values of 57.12 and 58.92 mg kg^-1, respectively. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) contents were higher at flooding while lower at transition phase, and increased at the initiation of 60% WFPS stage. However, MBC contents declined at the later stage of 60% WFPS. The maximum MBC contents were 202.12 and 192.41 mg kg^-1 in N and DCD + N treatments, respectively. Results demonstrated that water regimes exerted a dramatic impact on C and N dynamics, subsequently GHGs, which were highly controlled by DCD at both flooding and 60% WFPS conditions.

CH4 and N2O Emissions From Cattle Excreta: A Review of Main Drivers and Mitigation Strategies in Grazing Systems

Cattle production systems are an important source of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted to the atmosphere. Animal manure and managed soils are the most important sources of emissions from livestock after enteric methane. It is estimated that the N2O and CH4 produced in grasslands and manure management systems can contribute up to 25% of the emissions generated at the farm level, and therefore it is important to identify strategies to reduce the fluxes of these gases, especially in grazing systems where mitigation strategies have received less attention. This review describes the main factors that affect the emission of GHG from manure in bovine systems and the main strategies for their mitigation with emphasis on grazing production systems. The emissions of N2O and CH4 are highly variable and depend on multiple factors, which makes it difficult to use strategies that mitigate both gases simultaneously. We found that strategies such as the optimization of the diet, the implementation of silvopastoral systems and other practices with the capacity to improve soil quality and cover, and the use of nitrogen fixing plants are among the practices with more potential to reduce emissions from manure and at the same time contribute to increase carbon capture and improve food production. These strategies can be implemented to reduce the emissions of both gases and, depending on the method used and the production system, the reductions can reach up to 50% of CH4 or N2O emissions from manure according to different studies. However, many research gaps should be addressed in order to obtain such reductions at a larger scale.