Integrated effects of microbial decomposing inoculant on greenhouse gas emissions, grain yield and economic profit from paddy fields under different water regimes

Amendment of straw with decomposing inoculants benefits the ecosystem carbon budget and carbon footprint in a subtropical wheat cropping field

The incorporation of straw with decomposing inoculants into soils has been widely recommended to sustain agricultural productivity. However, comprehensive analyses assessing the effects of straw combined with decomposing inoculants on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, net primary production (NPP), the net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB), and the carbon footprint (CF) in farmland ecosystems are scant. Here, we carried out a 2-year field study in a wheat cropping system with six treatments: rice straw (S), a straw-decomposing Bacillus subtilis inoculant (K), a straw-decomposing Aspergillus oryzae inoculant (Q), a combination of straw and Bacillus subtilis inoculant (SK), a combination of straw and Aspergillus oryzae inoculant (SQ), and a control with no rice straw or decomposing inoculant (Control). We found that all the treatments resulted in a positive NECB ranging between 838 and 5065 kg C ha-1. Relative to the Control, the S treatment increased CO2 emissions by 16%, while considerably enhancing the NECB by 349%. This difference might be attributed to the straw C input and an increase in plant productivity (NPP, 30%). More importantly, in comparison to that in S, the NECB in SK and SQ significantly increased by 27-35% due to the positive response of NPP to the decomposing inoculants. Although the combination of straw and decomposing inoculants yielded a 3% increase in indirect GHG emissions, it also exhibited the lowest CF (0.18 kg CO2-eq kg-1 of grain). This result was attributed to the synergistic effects of straw and decomposing inoculants, which reduced direct N2O emissions and increased wheat productivity. Overall, the findings of the present study suggested that the combined amendment of straw and decomposing inoculants is an environmentally sustainable management practice in wheat cropping systems that can generate win-win scenarios through improvements in soil C stock, crop productivity, and GHG mitigation.

Effect of agricultural management practices on rice yield and greenhouse gas emissions in the rice-wheat rotation system in China

Agricultural management practices (AMPs) have the potential to significantly enhance crop yield, albeit with the possible side effect of escalating greenhouse gas emissions. Few studies have undertaken a comprehensive quantification of the impact of AMPs on crop production and soil GHG, particularly in identifying the optimal AMPs for rice cultivation within rice-wheat rotation system. Here, we combined data analysis and keyword search methods on 1433 individual experimental observations from 172 studies on diverse soil types in the subtropical monsoon climate zone of China to assess the impact of AMPs on rice yield, CH4 and N2O emissions, total greenhouse gas emissions (TGHGE). We focused on four key AMPs: mineral N fertilizer management (including ordinary N fertilizer and slow-/controlled-release fertilizer (SCRF)), organic material management (incorporating organic fertilizer, biochar amendment, and straw return), water-saving irrigation, and no-tillage. Our result showed the rice yield ranged from 2525 to 31,196 kg ha-1, and mineral N fertilizer and organic material management boosted rice yield by 2.84-16.19 % and 2.47-8.52 %, respectively. In terms of N2O emissions, biochar amendment resulted in a decrease of 13.05 %, while ordinary N fertilizer, organic fertilizer, and water-saving irrigation led to increases of 63.16 %, 136.66 %, and 37.41 %, respectively. The implementation of SCRF, water-saving irrigation, and no-tillage significantly curtailed CH4 (6.83 %-35.91 %) and TGHGE (6.22 %-20.59 %). Conversely, organic fertilizer and straw return significantly escalated CH4 emissions by 102.20 % and 33.64 % and TGHGE by 85.03 % and 32.40 %. Rice yield and GHG emissions are mainly influenced by variables such as soil bulk density, pH, soil organic carbon, soil texture, mean annual temperature, and total nitrogen. Our study demonstrates that the application of SCRF, water-saving irrigation, and no-tillage can effectively reduce GHG without compromising yield. These practices are particularly effective under climatic and soil conditions of rice-wheat rotation systems in China, thereby contributing to the sustainable rice farming.

A global meta-analysis of yield-scaled N2 O emissions and its mitigation efforts for maize, wheat, and rice

Maintaining or even increasing crop yields while reducing nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions is necessary to reconcile food security and climate change, while the metric of yield-scaled N2 O emission (i.e., N2 O emissions per unit of crop yield) is at present poorly understood. Here we conducted a global meta-analysis with more than 6000 observations to explore the variation patterns and controlling factors of yield-scaled N2 O emissions for maize, wheat and rice and associated potential mitigation options. Our results showed that the average yield-scaled N2 O emissions across all available data followed the order wheat (322 g N Mg-1 , with the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 301-346) > maize (211 g N Mg-1 , CI: 198-225) > rice (153 g N Mg-1 , CI: 144-163). Yield-scaled N2 O emissions for individual crops were generally higher in tropical or subtropical zones than in temperate zones, and also showed a trend towards lower intensities from low to high latitudes. This global variation was better explained by climatic and edaphic factors than by N fertilizer management, while their combined effect predicted more than 70% of the variance. Furthermore, our analysis showed a significant decrease in yield-scaled N2 O emissions with increasing N use efficiency or in N2 O emissions for production systems with cereal yields >10 Mg ha-1 (maize), 6.6 Mg ha-1 (wheat) or 6.8 Mg ha-1 (rice), respectively. This highlights that N use efficiency indicators can be used as valuable proxies for reconciling trade-offs between crop production and N2 O mitigation. For all three major staple crops, reducing N fertilization by up to 30%, optimizing the timing and placement of fertilizer application or using enhanced-efficiency N fertilizers significantly reduced yield-scaled N2 O emissions at similar or even higher cereal yields. Our data-driven assessment provides some key guidance for developing effective and targeted mitigation and adaptation strategies for the sustainable intensification of cereal production.

Mitigation of soil N2O emissions by decomposed straw based on changes in dissolved organic matter and denitrifying bacteria

The return of decomposed straw represents a less explored potential option for reducing N2O emissions. However, the mechanisms underlying the effects of decomposed straw return on soil N2O mitigation are still not fully clear. Therefore, we used a helium atmosphere robotized continuous flow incubation system to compare the soil N2O and N2 emissions from four treatments: CK (control: no straw), WS (wheat straw), IWS (wheat straw decomposed with Irpex lacteus), and PWS (wheat straw decomposed with Phanerochaete chrysosporium). All the treatments have been fertilized with the same amount of KNO3. Furthermore, we also analyzed i) the chemodiversity of soil dissolved organic matter (DOM), ii) the nirS, nirK, and nosZ gene copies and relative abundances of denitrifying bacterial communities (DBCs), and iii) the specific linkages between N2O emissions and DOM and DBC. The results showed that the WS, IWS and PWS treatments increased N2O emissions compared to the CK treatment. However, applying decomposed straw to soil, especially straw treated with P. chrysosporium, effectively decreased the soil N2O and increased N2 emissions compared to WS and IWS. Moreover, the IWS and PWS treatments increased the CHO composition, but they decreased the CHON and CHOS compositions of heteroatomic compounds of DOM compared with the WS and CK treatments. Furthermore, the WS, IWS and PWS treatments all significantly increased the nirS and nosZ gene copies compared with the CK treatment. Additionally, compared with the other treatments, the PWS treatment significantly shaped the DBC and led to a higher relative abundance of Pseudomonas with nirS and nosZ genes. Meanwhile, Network analysis showed that the mitigation of N2O was closely related to particular DOM molecules, and specific DBC taxa. These results highlight the potential for decomposed straw amendments to mitigate of soil N2O emissions not only by changing soil DOM but also mediating the soil DBC.

Zeolite application increases grain yield and mitigates greenhouse gas emissions under alternate wetting and drying rice system

Clinoptilolite zeolite (Z) has been widely used for reducing nutrient loss and improving crop productivity. However, the impacts of zeolite addition on CH₄ and N₂O emissions in rice fields under various irrigation regimes are still unclear. Therefore, a three-year field experiment using a split-plot design evaluated the effects of zeolite addition and irrigation regimes on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, grain yield, water productivity and net ecosystem economic profit (NEEP) in a paddy field. The field experiment included two irrigation regimes (CF: continuous flooding irrigation; AWD: alternate wetting and drying irrigation) as the main plots, and three zeolite additions (0, 5 and 10 t ha^-1) as the subplots. The results indicated that AWD regime decreased seasonal cumulative CH₄ emissions by 54%-71% while increasing seasonal cumulative N₂O emissions by 14%-353% across the three years, compared with CF regime. Consequently, the yield-scaled global warming potential under AWD regime decreased by 10%-60% while grain yield, water productivity and NEEP improving by 4.9%-7.9%, 19%-27% and 12%-14%, respectively, related to CF regime. Furthermore, 5 t ha^-1 zeolite addition mitigated seasonal cumulative CH₄ emissions by an average of 36%, but did not significantly affect N₂O emissions compared with non-zeolite treatment. In addition, zeolite addition at 5 and 10 t ha^-1 significantly increased grain yield, water productivity and NEEP by 11%-21%, 13%-20% and 13%-24%, respectively, related to non-zeolite treatment across the three years. Therefore, zeolite addition at 5 t ha^-1 coupled with AWD regime could be an eco-economic strategy to mitigate GHG emissions and water use while producing optimal grain yield with high NEEP in rice fields.

Productivity and global warming potential of direct seeding and transplanting in double‐season rice of central China

Labor and water scarcity requires crop establishment of double-season rice to be shifted from traditional transplanting to direct seeding. Owing to the limited thermal time, only ultrashort-duration cultivars of about 95 d can be used for direct-seeded, double-season rice (DDR) in central China. However, whether the shift in crop establishment of double-season rice can reduce greenhouse gas emissions without yield penalty remains unclear. Field experiments were conducted in Hubei province, central China with three treatments of crop establishment in the early and late seasons of 2017 and 2018. Treatments included DDR with ultrashort-duration cultivars (DDR_U), transplanted double-season rice with ultrashort-duration cultivars (TDR_U), or with widely grown cultivars which have short duration of about 110 d (TDR_S). It was found that crop growth duration of DDR_U was 6-20 days shorter than that of TDR_U and TDR_S, respectively. Ultrashort-duration cultivars under DDR_U achieved 15.1 t ha^-1 of annual yield that was 9.4% higher than TDR_U, and only 3.2% lower than TDR_S. DDR_U reduced the annual cumulative CH₄ emission by 32.0-46.1%, but had no difference in N₂O emission in comparison with TDR_U and TDR_S. The highest CO₂ emission was TDR_S followed by DDR_U, and then TDR_U. As a result, shifting from TDR_U and TDR_S to DDR_U decreased global warming potential and yield-scaled greenhouse gas intensity by 28.9-53.2% and 20.7-63.8%, respectively. These findings suggest that DDR can be a promising alternative to labor- and water-intensive TDR in central China that offers important advantages in mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas emissions without sacrificing grain yield.