Selection of green remediation alternatives for chemical industrial sites: An integrated life cycle assessment and fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach

Qualitative and quantitative simulation of best management practices (BMPs) for contaminated megasite remediation using the SiteWise™ tool

Remediation activities, particularly in megasites, may induce substantial secondary environmental impacts that must be addressed for green and sustainable remediation (GSR) practices. Only limited studies are available quantitatively assessing the environmental footprint and environmental benefits of implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) in megasite remediation. This study used the SiteWise™ tool, a quantitative environmental footprint assessment for scenario simulation and benefit quantification of BMPs, on a contaminated megasite in Hebei Province, China. We observed a considerable environmental footprint and energy from the remediation. Taking the final implementation alternative (Alt 1) as an example, which is characterized by combining multiple remediation techniques, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reached 113,474 t, the energy used was 2,082,841 million metric British thermal units (MMBTU), and other air pollutant emissions (NOx, SOx, and PM10) amounted to 856 t. Further BMP analyses highlighted the benefits of substituting the conventional solidification/stabilization agent with willow woodchip-based biochar, which could reduce GHG emissions by 50,806 t and energy used by 926,648 MMBTU. The overall environmental benefits of implementing all applicable BMPs in the remediation were significant, with a 66.85%, 50.15%, and 56.05% reduction in GHG emissions, energy used, and other air pollutants, respectively. Our study provides insights into quantifying the environmental footprint and exploring emission reduction pathways for contaminated megasite remediation. It also offers a feasible path for quantifying the environmental benefits of BMPs, promoting the development of GSR of contaminated sites.

Environmental impact assessment of the electrokinetic adsorption barriers to remove different herbicides from agricultural soils

In this study, the sustainability of the electrokinetic remediation soil flushing (EKSFs) process integrated without and with adsorption barriers (EKABs) have been evaluated for the treatment of four soils contaminated with Atrazine, Oxyfluorfen, Chlorosulfuron and 2,4-D. To this purpose, the environmental effects of both procedures (EKSFs and EKABs) have been determined through a life cycle assessment (LCA). SimaPro 9.3.0.3 was used as software tool and Ecoinvent 3.3 as data base to carry out the inventory of the equipment of each remediation setup based on experimental measurements. The environmental burden was quantified using the AWARE, USEtox, IPPC, and ReCiPe methods into 3 Endpoint impact categories (and damage to human health, ecosystem and resources) and 7 Midpoints impact categories (water footprint, global warming potential, ozone depletion, human toxicity (cancer and human non-cancer), freshwater ecotoxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity). In general terms, the energy applied to treatment (using the Spanish energy mix) was the parameter with the greatest influence on the carbon footprint, ozone layer depletion and water footprint accounting for around 70 % of the overall impact contribution. On the other hand, from the point of view of human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity of soil treatments with 32 mg kg-1 of the different pesticides, the EKSF treatment is recommended for soils with Chlorosulfuron. In this case, the carbon footprint and water footprint reached values around 0.36 kg of CO2 and 114 L of water per kg of dry soil, respectively. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was performed assuming different scenarios.

Recent developments and prospects of sustainable remediation treatments for major contaminants in soil: A review

Rapid industrialisation and urbanisation are contributing to the entry of emerging contaminants into the environment, posing a significant threat to soil health and quality. Therefore, several remediation technologies have been investigated and tested at a field scale to address the issue. However, these remediation technologies face challenges related to cost-effectiveness, environmental concerns, secondary pollution due to the generation of by-products, long-term pollution leaching risks, and social acceptance. Overcoming these constraints necessitates the implementation of sustainable remediation methodologies that prioritise approaches with minimal environmental ramifications and the most substantial net social and economic advantages. Hence, this review delves into diverse contaminants that threaten soil health and quality. Moreover, it outlines the research imperatives for advancing innovative remediation techniques and effective management strategies to tackle this concern. The review discusses a remediation treatment train approach that encourages resource recovery, strengthens the circular economy, and employs a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework to assess the environmental impacts of different remediation strategies. Additionally, the study explores mechanisms to integrate sustainability principles into soil remediation practices. It underscores the necessity for a comprehensive and systematic approach that takes into account the economic, social, and environmental consequences of remediation methodologies in the development of sustainable solutions.