Are open-source hydrodynamic models efficient in quantifying flood risks over mountainous terrains? An exhaustive analysis over the Hindu-Kush-Himalayan region

Compound risks of floods and droughts over multi-hazard catchments: Revealing association through hydrodynamic-cum-statistical modelling and novel bivariate risk classifier

Floods and droughts are signature phases of the same hydrological cycle. Despite their profound impacts on the socio-economic structures and population globally, limited research efforts have encapsulated the resultant compound risks from them. Comprehending both water extremes presents a formidable challenge due to the relatively short-term occurrence of floods versus the prolonged impacts of droughts. The present study, for the first time in the context of global disaster risk reduction, develops a comprehensive framework driven by a novel concept of Bivariate Risk Classifier (BRC) that can readily integrate the marginal and compound impacts/hazards of floods and droughts. The study employs an exhaustive hydrodynamic-driven approach through LISFLOOD-FP and statistical modelling in terms of the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), to derive compound flood and drought hazards. A series of extensive calibration and validation tests ensures minimal false alarms and inaccuracies in the simulated outputs. In the latter phase, populations and regions that are vulnerable to compound risks are identified. This study notices a high degree of synchronization of the exposed population to compound hazards that are otherwise associated with either floods or droughts. The efficient demonstration of the proposed framework over a highly disaster-sensitive catchment in India promises its further application to global multi-hazard catchments. The findings from this study call for an integrated approach directed towards targeted, adaptive disaster risk management and resilient infrastructure planning for regions facing concurrent flood and drought impacts.

Can geomorphic flood descriptors coupled with machine learning models enhance in quantifying flood risks over data-scarce catchments? Development of a hybrid framework for Ganga basin (India)

Quantifying flood risks through a cascade of hydraulic-cum-hydrodynamic modelling is data-intensive and computationally demanding- a major constraint for economically struggling and data-scarce low and middle-income nations. Under such circumstances, geomorphic flood descriptors (GFDs), that encompass the hidden characteristics of flood propensity may assist in developing a nuanced understanding of flood risk management. In line with this, the present study proposes a novel framework for estimating flood hazard and population exposure by leveraging GFDs and Machine Learning (ML) models over severely flood-prone Ganga basin. The study incorporates SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values in flood hazard modeling to justify the degree of influence of each GFD on the simulated floodplain maps. A set of 15 relevant GFDs derived from high-resolution CartoDEM are forced to five state-of-the-art ML models; AdaBoost, Random Forest, GBDT, XGBoost, and CatBoost, for predicting flood extents and depths. To enumerate the performance of ML models, a set of twelve statistical metrics are considered. Our result indicates a superior performance of XGBoost (κ = 0.72 and KGE = 82%) over other ML models in flood extent and flood depth prediction, resulting in about 47% of the population exposure to high-flood risks. The SHAP summary plots reveal a pre-dominance of Height Above Nearest Drainage during flood depth prediction. The study contributes significantly in comprehending our understanding of catchment characteristics and its influence in the process of sustainable disaster risk reduction. The results obtained from the study provide valuable recommendations for efficient flood management and mitigation strategies, especially over global data-scarce flood-prone basins.

Exploring the fidelity of satellite precipitation products in capturing flood risks: A novel framework incorporating hazard and vulnerability dimensions over a sensitive coastal multi-hazard catchment

Complexities involved in flood risks over global coastal multi-hazard catchments are a severe concern for vulnerable communities, infrastructure, and the environment. Data scarcity in these regions often hinders our holistic understanding of flood risks, especially when socio-economic and physical vulnerabilities are involved. The extent to which Satellite Precipitation Products (SPPs), which are looked upon as alternatives to ground-based observations, can influence flood risk dynamics remains unexplored. In an attempt to answer the most riveted questions in flood management literature, this study, for the first time, explores the suitability of two competent SPPs, i.e., CHIRPS v2.0 and PERSIANN-CDR, in multi-hazard flood risk mapping. The proposed framework is demonstrated over the sensitive flood-prone deltaic stretches of the Lower Mahanadi River Basin (India). A computationally efficient MIKE+ 1D2D hydrodynamic model is developed to account for the wave propagation of concurrent flood drivers and generate high-resolution flood hazard maps for three disastrous historical flood events (July 2019, September 2020, and August 2022). To understand the hidden characteristics of vulnerability, a comprehensive set of 24 physical and socio-economic indicators is considered in a Shannon-entropy and TOPSIS framework. The variations in flood risk from both SPPs at the finest administrative scale are represented using the novel concept of Bivariate Choropleth, which portrays the marginal and compound contributions of hazard and vulnerability. A superlative performance of CHIRPS v2.0 over PERSIANN-CDR was observed in capturing hydro-climatological behaviors. CHIRPS v2.0-derived flood hazards were found analogous to the SAR-derived maps for all the three events. >70 % of villages display large disparities in flood risk, thereby affirming the role of appropriate SPPs towards efficient flood management. The observations from the study add vital information to the existing flood management policies, especially over resource-constrained regions in low and middle-income nations.

Spatiotemporal assessment of the nexus between urban sprawl and land surface temperature as microclimatic effect: implications for urban planning

Rapid urbanisation has led to significant environmental and climatic changes worldwide, especially in urban heat islands where increased land surface temperature (LST) poses a major challenge to sustainable urban living. In the city of Abha in southwestern Saudi Arabia, a region experiencing rapid urban growth, the impact of such expansion on LST and the resulting microclimatic changes are still poorly understood. This study aims to explore the dynamics of urban sprawl and its direct impact on LST to provide important insights for urban planning and climate change mitigation strategies. Using the random forest (RF) algorithm optimised for land use and land cover (LULC) mapping, LULC models were derived that had an overall accuracy of 87.70%, 86.27% and 93.53% for 1990, 2000 and 2020, respectively. The mono-window algorithm facilitated the derivation of LST, while Markovian transition matrices and spatial linear regression models assessed LULC dynamics and LST trends. Notably, built-up areas grew from 69.40 km2 in 1990 to 338.74 km2 in 2020, while LST in urban areas showed a pronounced warming trend, with temperatures increasing from an average of 43.71 °C in 1990 to 50.46 °C in 2020. Six landscape fragmentation indices were then calculated for urban areas over three decades. The results show that the Largest Patch Index (LPI) increases from 22.78 in 1990 to 65.24 in 2020, and the number of patches (NP) escalates from 2,531 in 1990 to an impressive 10,710 in 2020. Further regression analyses highlighted the morphological changes in the cities and attributed almost 97% of the LST variability to these urban patch dynamics. In addition, water bodies showed a cooling trend with a temperature decrease from 33.76 °C in 2000 to 29.69 °C in 2020, suggesting an anthropogenic influence. The conclusion emphasises the urgent need for sustainable urban planning to counteract the warming trends associated with urban sprawl and promote climate resilience.

A synergistic approach towards understanding flood risks over coastal multi-hazard environments: Appraisal of bivariate flood risk mapping through flood hazard, and socio-economic-cum-physical vulnerability dimensions

The dynamics of flood risk over Coastal Multi-hazard Catchments (CMC) exhibit bizarre characteristics. In these regions, flood hazards are governed by a complex interaction of multiple flood-inducing sources; varying in magnitudes, origin, and direction of propagation. Our conventional understanding of vulnerability may be obscure within these catchments. This can be attributable to the heterogeneous nature of various physical and socio-economic entities. The study proposes a comprehensive framework to quantify bivariate flood risks over a severely flood-prone region in India. The study considers flood hazards, along with vulnerabilities transpiring from (a) physical, (b) socio-economic, and (c) composite (combination of both) groups of indicators. To overcome data scarcity prevalent in CMCs, CHIRPS v2.0, a high-resolution Satellite Precipitation Product, along with other ancillary datasets, are forced to 1D2D coupled MIKE+ hydrodynamic model to simulate flood hazards. A set of 24 indicators are considered within the Shannon Entropy-cum-TOPSIS framework to derive three types of vulnerability. The marginal and compound contributions of hazard and each vulnerability type are represented through a novel concept of bivariate flood risk classifier at the village scale. We notice high and very-high flood hazards over the coastline and floodplains. An equitable influence of socio-economic vulnerability and hazards is reflected, as they cover 41 % of villages together under varied degrees of flood risks. The impacts of hazards are underscored in the presence of physical vulnerability, as the latter contributes to risks in about 72 % of villages. Composite vulnerability prevails its impact over 53 % of villages, dominating its influence on flood risks over hazards. The study delivers vital information to the global flood management community on the prudent selection of indicators, as their influence is markedly noticed on the overall flood risks. The diversified characteristics of flood risk inspire a rationalized implementation of structural and non-structural options in resource-constrained conditions.