Carbon sequestration and storage capacity of Chinese fir at different stand ages

Mixed plantations do not necessarily provide higher ecosystem multifunctionality than monoculture plantations

Forest stand transformation is a crucial strategy for enhancing the productivity and stability of planted forest ecosystems and maximizing their ecosystem functions. However, understanding forest ecosystem multifunctionality responses to various stand transformation methods remains limited. In this study, we assessed ecosystem multifunctionality, encompassing nutrient cycling, carbon stocks, water regulation, decomposition, wood production, and symbiosis, under different stand transformation methods (Chinese fir monoculture, mixed conifer and broad-leaf, broad-leaf mixed, and secondary forests). We also identified key factors contributing to variations in ecosystem multifunctionality. The results showed that Chinese fir plantations were more conducive to carbon stock creation, while broad-leaved mixed plantations excelled in water regulation. Secondary forests exhibited higher ecosystem multifunctionality than other plantation types, with Chinese fir plantations displaying the highest multifunctionality, significantly surpassing mixed coniferous and broad-leaved plantations. Our findings further revealed that soil nutrients and plant diversity have significant impacts on ecosystem multifunctionality. In summary, stand transformation profoundly influences ecosystem multifunctionality, and mixed plantations do not necessarily provide higher ecosystem multifunctionality than monoculture plantations.

Impact of livestock grazing management on carbon stocks: a case study in sparse elm woodlands of semi-arid lands

Livestock grazing is a widespread practice in human activities worldwide. However, the effects of livestock grazing management on vegetation carbon storage have not been thoroughly evaluated. In this study, we used the system dynamic approach to simulate the effects of different livestock grazing management strategies on carbon stock in sparse elm woodlands. The livestock grazing management strategies included rotational grazing every 5 years (RG5), prohibited grazing (PG), seasonal prohibited grazing (SPG), and continuous grazing (CG). We evaluated the carbon sequestration rate in vegetation using logistical models. The results showed that the carbon stock of elm trees in sparse woodlands was 5-15 M g ha-1. The values of the carbon sequestration rate were 0.15, 0.13, 0.13, and 0.09 Mg C ha-1 year-1 in RG5, PG, CG, and SPG management, respectively. This indicates that rotational grazing management might be the optimal choice for improving vegetation carbon accumulation in sparse woodlands. This study contributes to decision-making on how to choose livestock grazing management to maintain higher carbon storage.