Approach to the Morbilliform Eruption in the Hematopoietic Transplant Patient

Inpatient Management of Mucocutaneous GVHD

Purpose of Review

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an immune mediated disorder affecting 30 - 70% of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), and is a major cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality (NRM) [1]. Dermatologists play a critical role in acute and chronic GVHD, as skin involvement is common and often the earliest involved site of disease [2].

Recent Findings

GVHD shares clinical and histopathological features with a variety of other skin diseases, requiring thorough consideration of differential diagnoses in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients with lesions suggestive of cutaneous GVHD. Treatment considerations for GVHD are influenced by factors such as disease classification, overall grading, organ involvement, associated symptoms, and immunological anti-tumor effect. Several treatments are available and may be indicated as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy to allow faster withdrawal or tapering of immunosuppression. While corticosteroids are often first line therapy, oral ruxolitinib has been recently approved for treatment of steroid-refractory aGHVD, and oral ibrutinib has been approved for steroid-refractory cGHVD.

Summary

This article provides current clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations relevant to the hospitalist for both acute and chronic mucocutaneous GVHD. Optimal inpatient management of these diseases requires an interdisciplinary team.

A clinical and histological comparison between acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease and other maculopapular eruptions following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Prompt management of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may prevent its morbidity and mortality. Maculopapular (MP) eruption is a presenting sign of acute GVHD, but differentiation from other causes of MP rash is challenging.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among patients developing MP eruptions after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We compared the clinical and histopathological differences between an acute cutaneous GVHD (group 1) and other MP eruptions (group 2). We also determined the clinical prognostic indicators linked to acute GVHD severity, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 95 patients identified, 75 met the classification criteria for acute GVHD, and 25 had other MP eruptions. Palm and/or sole involvement was more frequently found (51.4% vs. 12%, odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 7 [2.1, 23.7], P < 0.01 and 41.4% vs. 0%, OR 37.2 [2.2, 635], P < 0.01, respectively) in group 1 than in group 2. Comparing the histological features between the two groups, necrotic keratinocytes in basal and spinous layers (92.9% vs. 22.2%, OR 27 [3.5, 594.7], P < 0.01) and (85.7% vs. 33.3%, OR 9.3 [1.4, 60.8], P = 0.02, respectively), diffuse basal vacuolization (42.9% vs. 0%, OR 14.5 [0.7, 298.2], P = 0.04), lymphocyte satellitosis (71.4% vs. 0%, OR 44.3 [2.1, 936.8], P < 0.01), and subepidermal clefts (42.9% vs. 0%, OR 14.5 [0.7, 298.2], P = 0.04) were significantly more apparent in group 1. Among extracutaneous presentations, diarrhea alone and/or accompanied by hyperbilirubinemia (47.1% vs. 16%, OR 4.3 [1.4, 13.1], P = 0.03 and 27.1% vs. 0%, OR 19.3 [1.1, 332.8], P < 0.01, respectively) and newly developed transaminitis (37.1% vs. 12%, OR 3.3 [1.1, 12.6], P = 0.02) suggested the diagnosis of acute GVHD. Mucosal involvement and/or blister formation correlated with severe acute GVHD (OR 26.6 [5.4, 130.4], P < 0.01). Skin and systemic GVHD severity correlated with time to rash resolution (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively), length of hospital stays (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and mortality (OR 4.87 [1.4, 17.4], P = 0.02 and OR 4.6 [1.3, 16.5], P = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may be beneficial tools for establishing the diagnosis of acute GVHD.

Dermatologic Conditions of the Early Post-Transplant Period in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are used to treat a variety of conditions, including hematologic malignancies, bone marrow failure syndromes, and immunodeficiencies. Over 60,000 HSCTs are performed annually worldwide, and the numbers continue to increase. Indeed, as new conditioning regimens develop, more and more individuals, including those of older age, will be eligible for transplants. Nevertheless, although HSCTs are clearly a life-saving and necessary treatment for thousands of patients per year, there is still substantial morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure. Of note, skin eruptions in the post-HSCT period are frequent and often significantly reduce quality of life in recipients. Moreover, these cutaneous findings sometimes herald an underlying systemic condition, presenting possible opportunities for timelier intervention. Dermatologists therefore play a vital role in distinguishing life-threatening conditions from benign issues and prompting recognition of critical complications earlier in their course. This article aims to review the major dermatologic conditions occurring in the early post-HSCT period.

Skin GVHD Mimicking Betadine Rash in a Post Allogeneic Transplant Patient

A 32-years-old male developed exfoliating skin lesions in bilateral axillae and groins on D-42 post matched sibling allogeneic transplant. These lesions masqueraded betadine burns with a positive history of betadine application in the affected regions. He gradually developed lesions involving other parts of the body with Glucksberg grade-IV acute GVHD (skin-stage: IV/gut-stage: III). He succumbed to his illness. We present this case to highlight the rare initial presentation of skin GVHD involving localized body regions with sparing of rest of the body and mimicking betadine burns.

Cutaneous graft versus host disease in pediatric multivisceral transplantation

Multivisceral transplantation (MvTx) is the concurrent transplantation of the stomach, pancreaticoduodenal complex, and intestine, with or without the liver. Its use is increasing worldwide as it has been considered as a therapy for patients with functional disturbance of several organs. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) has been a relevant clinical problem in MvTx ever since the procedure was first performed, but little has been reported about its specific cutaneous features. Our study included all pediatric patients with clinical and histopathologic evidence of cutaneous GvHD who received MvTx between October 1999 and December 2010 in University Hospital La Paz. Seventeen children underwent MvTx at our center during this period of time. Five patients developed cutaneous GvHD (29.4%). The median onset was 45.2 days after transplantation. Acute cutaneous GvHD, consisting of symmetrical maculopapular exanthema with prominent acral erythema and accentuated lesions on the face and pinnae, was clinically suspected and pathologically confirmed in four patients (80%). Three children (60%) experienced disease progression to a formation and a positive Nikolsky sign. Only one girl (20%) showed lichenoid GvHD. The first therapeutic approach was steroids and tacrolimus adjustment; many other drugs were used in refractory cases. Three of the five patients (60%) died with concomitant GvHD, the immediate cause of death being another comorbid disease. Knowledge of the features of cutaneous GvHD in MvTx allows clinicians early recognition and prompt therapeutic intervention that may prevent progression to higher-grade disease and improve outcomes for these patients.

Cutaneous simulants of infectious disease

Many cutaneous conditions can mimic infection. If these lesions are not accurately recognized, they may be treated with antimicrobial agents, which adds cost, potential risk, and inconvenience to the patient and the healthcare system. The presenting signs and symptoms of many ulcerating, pustular, morbilliform, bullous, neoplastic, granulomatous, autoimmune, and neutrophilic conditions, as well as clinical vasculitis, cellulitis, folliculitis, and panniculitis, have been mistaken for infection. This review emphasizes the clinical presentation, physical exam, and diagnostic workup of many of these conditions to assist the clinician in ascertaining the correct diagnosis. In addition, general treatment options are provided for each disease category.