A prospective open-labeled trial with levetiracetam in pediatric epilepsy syndromes: Continuous spikes and waves during sleep is definitely a target

Questions and Controversies in Neonatal Seizures

Neonatal seizures are relatively common, but their diagnosis and management remain challenging. We reviewed the scientific literature on neonatal seizures from July 1973 to November 2023. Several parameters were considered, including pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, electroencephalographic findings and treatment. Recent classification system of seizures and epilepsies in the newborn, as well as treatment recommendations of neonatal seizures, have been proposed. Nonetheless, the approach to neonatal seizures varies among clinicians and centres, including detection, investigation, treatment and follow-up of patients. There are still many issues on the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal seizures, including the meaning or relevance of some electroencephalographic findings, the precise estimation of the seizure burden, the limited efficacy and side effects risk of antiseizure medications, and the best measures to establish the outcome.

Current Pharmacologic Strategies for Treatment of Intractable Epilepsy in Children

Epileptic encephalopathy (EE) is a devastating pediatric disease that features medically resistant seizures, which can contribute to global developmental delays. Despite technological advancements in genetics, the neurobiological mechanisms of EEs are not fully understood, leaving few therapeutic options for affected patients. In this review, we introduce the most common EEs in pediatrics (i.e., Ohtahara syndrome, Dravet syndrome, and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome) and their molecular mechanisms that cause excitation/inhibition imbalances. We then discuss some of the essential molecules that are frequently dysregulated in EEs. Specifically, we explore voltage-gated ion channels, synaptic transmission-related proteins, and ligand-gated ion channels in association with the pathophysiology of Ohtahara syndrome, Dravet syndrome, and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Finally, we review currently available antiepileptic drugs used to treat seizures in patients with EEs. Since these patients often fail to achieve seizure relief even with the combination therapy, further extensive research efforts to explore the involved molecular mechanisms will be required to develop new drugs for patients with intractable epilepsy.

Safety considerations selecting antiseizure medications for the treatment of individuals with Dravet syndrome

Introduction: Management of individuals with Dravet Syndrome has evolved significantly over the past 10 years. Progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology, the long-term outcome and possible consequences of inappropriate therapies, new drugs have been approved by the regulatory authorities and patients and families expressed their needs beyond seizures' control.Areas covered: The authors aimed at providing an overview of the main antiseizure medications used in Dravet syndrome with a particular focus on safety considerations. As the highly active phase of seizures takes place before the age of 5 years, the characteristics of antiseizure medications in infancy and childhood have also been considered due to their impact on antiseizure medication safety.Expert opinion: Recent treatments, evaluated via randomized clinical trials, are promising in terms of efficacy and safety in individuals with DS. However, the balance between expected benefits and risks taken must be accurately assessed on an individual basis. There is a lack of data to understand the needs of patients and families, a major point particularly in this population, where the evaluation of efficacy and safety beyond seizures is difficult due to cognitive delay and behavioral disorders and where this evaluation is coming almost exclusively from caregivers.

Pharmacological treatment for continuous spike-wave during slow wave sleep syndrome and Landau-Kleffner Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Continuous spike-wave during slow wave sleep syndrome (CSWS) and Landau-Kleffner syndrome (LKS) are two epileptic encephalopathies that present with neurocognitive regression, aphasia, and clinical seizures, typically presenting in children around five years of age. The pathophysiology of these conditions is not completely understood. Some studies suggest a common origin for both. No systematic reviews have assessed the efficacy of pharmacological interventions for these conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefit and adverse effects of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of CSWS and LKS.

SEARCH METHODS

On 8 September 2020, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to September 04, 2020). We applied no language restrictions. CRS Web includes randomised or quasi-randomised, controlled trials from CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, and cluster-randomised trials comparing antiepileptic drugs alone, or with steroids or intravenous immunoglobulins, or both versus other antiepileptic drugs, or placebo, or no treatment, administered to children with CSWS and LKS. We planned to compare treatments for the two conditions separately.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies identified by the search strategy for inclusion. The primary outcomes considered in this review were neuropsychological-neurolinguistic functions.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 18 references. Two review authors independently assessed all references. We did not find any completed studies to include. We identified one ongoing trial, which was terminated because of lack of enrolment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence from trials to support or refute the use of pharmacological treatment for continuous spike-wave during slow wave sleep syndrome or Landau-Kleffner syndrome. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to inform practice.

Treatment strategies for encephalopathy related to status epilepticus during slow sleep, a narrative review of the literature

Encephalopathy related to Status Epilepticus during slow Sleep (ESES) is an age-dependent syndrome characterized by the appearance of neuropsychological and behavioral disorders associated with extreme activation of epileptic activity during sleep. The major goal of therapy in ESES is to prevent neuropsychological deficits. Effective therapy to reduce seizures and resolve the EEG pattern of status epilepticus during sleep (SES) may be crucial to improve long-term prognosis. However, whether to improve neurodevelopmental deficits by suppressing or eliminating SES remains unknown. The purpose of this article is to review current therapeutic options in ESES, in order to provide better alternatives. Treatment options consist of antiepileptic drugs, steroids, immunoglobulins, the ketogenic diet, and surgery. Maybe therapy targeted mechanisms can be developed with deep insight into the etiology of ESES.

Current Treatment Strategies and Future Treatment Options for Dravet Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dravet syndrome is a rare but severe genetic epilepsy that has unique treatment challenges. This is a review of current and future potential treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment for Dravet syndrome should encompass many aspects of the syndrome such as gait, behavior, and nutrition, as well as focus on seizure control. Many sodium channel blockers should be avoided as they are likely to exacerbate seizures. Current options for treatment include valproic acid, clobazam, stiripentol, and ketogenic diet. Testing is underway for several new treatment options with unique mechanisms of action and therapeutic targets, including the serotonin system and genetic modulation. Accurate and early diagnosis of Dravet syndrome will lead to avoidance of medications that may exacerbate seizures. Additionally, a multi-disciplinary approach and careful planning for management of episodes of status epilepticus may lead to improved outcomes. Ongoing research for novel approaches to treatment creates optimism for future improvement in outcomes.

Comparative effectiveness of add-on therapy with newer-generation antiepileptic drugs in Bulgarian patients with refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to perform an open, prospective study on various aspects of comparative effectiveness of newer-generation antiepileptic drugs as add-on therapy in Bulgarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

The study was performed with the participation of 1259 patients with epilepsy who attended the Clinic of Neurology at the University Hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria for regular visits and completed diaries about seizure frequency, severity, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Oxcarbazepine was used in 82 patients, topiramate in 120 patients, lamotrigine in 73 patients, levetiracetam in 135 patients, pregabalin in 47 patients, tiagabine in 43 patients, gabapentin in 18 patients, lacosamide in 12 patients, and retigabine in 6 patients. During the first 24 months of study, improvement of seizure severity and frequency was most frequent in patients on treatment with pregabalin and levetiracetam and rarest in those on treatment with oxcarbazepine. The retention rate of patients on pregabalin and tiagabine was significantly lower compared to the retention rate of patients on most of the other antiepileptic drugs. The frequency of adverse events was higher in patients on treatment with tiagabine and pregabalin.

CONCLUSION

Despite some similar characteristics of newer-generation antiepileptic drugs' effectiveness, levetiracetam stands out with better dynamic improvement of seizure severity and frequency and satisfactory tolerability; typical for pregabalin is a very good dynamic improvement of seizure severity and frequency mainly in patients with focal seizures, but a lower tolerability, and the main advantage of oxcarbazepine is a good tolerability, efficacy, however, is less satisfactory.

Treatment-resistant Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: therapeutic trends, challenges and future directions

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a severe, childhood-onset electroclinical syndrome comprised of multiple seizure types, intellectual and behavioral disturbances and characteristic findings on electroencephalogram of slow spike and wave complexes and paroxysmal fast frequency activity. Profound morbidity often accompanies a common and severe seizure type, the drop attack. Seizures often remain refractory, or initial treatment efficacy fades. Few individuals are seizure free despite the development of multiple generations of antiseizure medications over decades and high-level evidence on several choices. Approved medications such as lamotrigine, topiramate, rufinamide, felbamate and clobazam have demonstrated efficacy in reducing seizure burden. Cannabidiol has emerged as a promising investigational therapy with vast social interest yet lacks a standard, approved formulation. Palliative surgical procedures, such as vagal nerve stimulation and corpus callosotomy may provide reduction in total seizures and drop attacks. Emerging evidence suggests that complete callosotomy provides greater improvement in seizures without additional side effects. Etiologies such as dysplasia or hypothalamic hamartoma may be amenable for focal resection and thus offer potential to reverse this devastating epileptic encephalopathy.

Pharmacotherapy for Dravet Syndrome

Dravet syndrome (DS) is an intractable pediatric epilepsy syndrome, starting in early childhood. This disorder typically manifests with febrile status epilepticus, and progresses to a multifocal epilepsy with febrile and non-febrile seizures with encephalopathy. Most cases are due to a mutation in the SCN1A gene. This article reviews treatments for DS, with an emphasis on pharmacotherapy. While many medications are used in treating the seizures associated with DS, these patients typically have medically refractory epilepsy, and polytherapy is often required. First-line agents include valproate and clobazam, although there are supportive data for topiramate, levetiracetam, stiripentol and the ketogenic diet. Other agents such as fenfluramine are promising therapies for Dravet syndrome. Sodium channel-blocking anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine and lamotrigine are generally contraindicated in this syndrome. Nonpharmacologic therapies (such as neurostimulation or surgery) are understudied in DS. Because DS is a global encephalopathy, pharmacologic treatment of non-epileptic manifestations of the disease is often necessary. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is often encountered in patients with DS, and psychostimulants can be helpful for this indication. Other psychoactive drugs are less studied in this context. Extrapyramidal and gait disorders are often encountered in DS as well. While DS is a severe epileptic encephalopathy with a high (up to 15 %) mortality rate in childhood, careful pharmacologic management can improve these patients' clinical picture and quality of life.

Safety of Levetiracetam in Paediatrics: A Systematic Review

Objective

To identify adverse events (AEs) associated with Levetiracetam (LEV) in children.

Methods

Databases EMBASE (1974-February 2015) and Medline (1946-February 2015) were searched for articles in which paediatric patients (≤18 years) received LEV treatment for epilepsy. All studies with reports on safety were included. Studies involving adults, mixed age population (i.e. children and adults) in which the paediatric subpopulation was not sufficiently described, were excluded. A meta-analysis of the RCTs was carried out and association between the commonly reported AEs or treatment discontinuation and the type of regimen (polytherapy or monotherapy) was determined using Chi² analysis.

Results

Sixty seven articles involving 3,174 paediatric patients were identified. A total of 1,913 AEs were reported across studies. The most common AEs were behavioural problems and somnolence, which accounted for 10.9% and 8.4% of all AEs in prospective studies. 21 prospective studies involving 1120 children stated the number of children experiencing AEs. 47% of these children experienced AEs. Significantly more children experienced AEs with polytherapy (64%) than monotherapy (22%) (p<0.001). Levetiracetam was discontinued in 4.5% of all children on polytherapy and 0.9% on monotherapy (p<0.001), the majority were due to behavioural problems.

Conclusion

Behavioural problems and somnolence were the most prevalent adverse events to LEV and the most common causes of treatment discontinuation. Children on polytherapy have a greater risk of adverse events than those receiving monotherapy.

Unbalanced Peptidergic Inhibition in Superficial Neocortex Underlies Spike and Wave Seizure Activity

Slow spike and wave discharges (0.5-4 Hz) are a feature of many epilepsies. They are linked to pathology of the thalamocortical axis and a thalamic mechanism has been elegantly described. Here we present evidence for a separate generator in local circuits of associational areas of neocortex manifest from a background, sleep-associated delta rhythm in rat. Loss of tonic neuromodulatory excitation, mediated by nicotinic acetylcholine or serotonin (5HT3A) receptors, of 5HT3-immunopositive interneurons caused an increase in amplitude and slowing of the delta rhythm until each period became the "wave" component of the spike and wave discharge. As with the normal delta rhythm, the wave of a spike and wave discharge originated in cortical layer 5. In contrast, the "spike" component of the spike and wave discharge originated from a relative failure of fast inhibition in layers 2/3-switching pyramidal cell action potential outputs from single, sparse spiking during delta rhythms to brief, intense burst spiking, phase-locked to the field spike. The mechanisms underlying this loss of superficial layer fast inhibition, and a concomitant increase in slow inhibition, appeared to be precipitated by a loss of neuropeptide Y (NPY)-mediated local circuit inhibition and a subsequent increase in vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-mediated disinhibition. Blockade of NPY Y1 receptors was sufficient to generate spike and wave discharges, whereas blockade of VIP receptors almost completely abolished this form of epileptiform activity. These data suggest that aberrant, activity-dependent neuropeptide corelease can have catastrophic effects on neocortical dynamics.

Vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a European long-term study up to 24 months in 347 children

OBJECTIVE

To gain insight into the long-term impact of vagus nerve stimulation (with VNS Therapy) in children with drug-resistant epilepsy, we conducted the largest retrospective multicenter study to date over an extended follow-up period of up to 24 months.

METHODS

The primary objective was to assess change in seizure frequency of the predominant seizure type (defined as the most disabling seizure) following VNS device implantation. Treating physicians collected data from patient records from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The analysis population included 347 children (aged 6 months to 17.9 years at the time of implant). At 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation, 32.5%, 37.6%, and 43.8%, respectively, of patients had ≥ 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency of the predominant seizure type. The responder rate was higher in a subgroup of patients who had no change in antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during the study. Favorable results were also evident for all secondary outcome measures including changes in seizure duration, ictal severity, postictal severity, quality of life, clinical global impression of improvement, and safety. Post hoc analyses demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between VNS total charge delivered per day and an increase in response rate. VNS Therapy is indicated as adjunctive therapy in children with focal, structural epilepsies, who for any reason are not good candidates for surgical treatment following the trial of two or more AEDs. Children with predominantly generalized seizures from genetic, structural epilepsies, like Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, could also benefit from VNS Therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results demonstrate that adjunctive VNS Therapy in children with drug-resistant epilepsy reduces seizure frequency and is well tolerated over a 2-year follow-up period. No new safety issues were identified. A post hoc analysis revealed a dose-response correlation for VNS in patients with epilepsy.

Efficacy of levetiracetam in electrical status epilepticus during sleep of children: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Electrical status epilepticus during sleep is characterized by epilepsy, a specific electroencephalographic pattern, and neuropsychological impairment. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in treating children with electrical status epilepticus during sleep.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, open-label study enrolled 73 children (mean age: 8 years) affected by electrical status epilepticus during sleep. The efficacy was rated according to the seizure frequency and electroencephalography response.

RESULTS

After a mean treatment period of 19 months (range: 6 to 24 months), 33 (63.5%) of 52 patients became seizure-free or had experienced remarkable reduction in seizures. The electrical status epilepticus of 41 (56.2%) of 73 patients disappeared off their electroencephalography. The electroencephalography efficacy of levetiracetam treatment was noted in the monotherapy (61.9%) and add-on (53.9%) groups. The clinical (67.7%) and electroencephalography (64.3%) response rates of the idiopathic group were better than those of the symptomatic group (57.1% and 45.2%, respectively). No patient discontinued the trial because of intolerability of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam is effective in individuals with electrical status epilepticus during sleep with tolerable side effects.

Efficacy and safety of add-on levetiracetam in refractory childhood epilepsy

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in refractory epileptic children.

METHODS

The study group included 61 outpatients (7 generalized, 48 localization-related, 3 undetermined, 3 unclassified) aged between 16 months and 18 years. LEV was given twice daily at a total dose of 10 mg/kg/day. The final mean dose was 50.7 mg/kg/day. The mean number of prior anti-epileptic drugs was 5.2. The entire treatment period was more than 6 months after LEV administration.

RESULTS

Fifteen children (24.6%) became seizure-free for 6 months after starting LEV, and 18 (29.5%) had a seizure reduction of more than 50% for the entire 6 months. The response rate was 33/61 (54.1%). Responders included 2/3 of patients (66.7%) with epilepsy with continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep and 13/19 (68.4%) with frontal lobe epilepsy. The effective dosage of LEV in the responders demonstrated a wide range (mean, 46.1 mg/kg/day; range, 19.4-59.1 mg/kg/day), and showed bimodal distribution. Adverse events occurred in only two patients who did not require LEV discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

LEV represents an important addition to the treatments available for refractory epileptic children.

A revisited strategy for antiepileptic drug development in children: designing an initial exploratory step

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in refractory paediatric epilepsy usually involve the two main types of epilepsy shared by children and adults, focal epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Most other epilepsy syndromes, specifically paediatric, are excluded from drug development. In order to identify among them the candidate(s) for dedicated RCTs with a new drug, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) recently recommended proceeding in two steps: (1) an exploratory (prospective-observational) trial (POT) including a large variety of paediatric epilepsy syndromes and (2) a subsequent RCT in each of those that disclose a signal for possible efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to address the three following issues that have not been addressed by the EMA: (1) to determine a minimal threshold for this signal; (2) to establish a list of epilepsies to evaluate; and (3) to estimate the number of patients to include in such POTs.

METHODS

We extensively reviewed the POTs (including various syndromes) and RCTs reported in paediatric patients with uncontrolled epilepsy using MEDLINE (from 1990 to 2011) and the Cochrane library. We determined the threshold as the lowest percentage of responders observed in a POT with a positive corresponding RCT. The syndromes that reached this threshold in a POT were those to evaluate in an RCT. The minimal number of patients to include for each syndrome for a POT with a new antiepileptic drug was estimated in order to reach at least this threshold of responders with a 95 % confidence interval.

RESULTS

We found the minimal responder threshold to be 25 %. We identified eight epilepsy types/syndromes reaching this threshold and estimated for each of them the minimal sample needed: refractory focal epilepsy (n = 40), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 32), infantile spasms (n = 50), Dravet syndrome (n = 32), childhood absence epilepsy (n = 12), other symptomatic generalized epilepsy (n = 38), epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spikes and waves during sleep (n = 7) and epilepsy with myoclonic-astatic seizures (n = 4) [the two last samples may be underestimated due to the lack of RCTs in these conditions].

CONCLUSION

Among the eight epilepsy types/syndromes that we recommend to systematically include in exploratory trials using the POT procedure, we assume that, for the minimal sample given above, a responder threshold of 25 % will provide a reliable efficacy signal, to be confirmed by a dedicated RCT. This strategy should avoid missing new therapeutic possibilities for children with epilepsy and reduce the off-label use of drugs in paediatric neurology.

Treatment strategies

There has been important progress in the identification of antiepileptic compounds and their indications in children over the past 15 years: their number has doubled and specific pediatric trials are being performed to document their effect according to seizures and syndromes as well as their tolerability in pediatrics. The improved understanding of pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions has helped to optimize treatment. Specific issues specific of infants have also been studied although new antiepileptic drugs are still dramatically lacking for this age group. Before reaching a syndromic diagnosis, the choice of a first- line agent goes to compounds with the largest range of efficacy and least identified risks. Subsequent choices are mainly based on the epilepsy syndrome and seizure type in addition to good clinical practice to determine dose, adverse effect profile, risk of aggravating seizures and drug interactions, clinician's experience, cultural habits, and availability of drugs. If there are several options, preference is given to the compound that exhibits the best risk/benefit ratio, or the most rapid titration when seizure frequency is the major issue. For new antiepileptic compounds, price is often a limiting factor in countries with poor insurance coverage. Third generation anti-epileptic drugs are emerging which also seem to be promising.

Safety and efficacy of levetiracetam for the treatment of partial onset seizures in children from one month of age

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder in the pediatric population, affecting up to one percent of children, and for which the mainstay of treatment is anticonvulsant medication. Despite the frequent use of anticonvulsant drugs, remarkably little is known about the safety and efficacy of most of these medications in the pediatric epilepsy population. Of 34 anticonvulsants currently approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), only 13 have been approved for use in children. Although infants and young children are disproportionately affected by epilepsy, there are currently only three anticonvulsant medications that have been specifically evaluated and approved for use in children younger than 2 years of age. In 2012, the FDA approved levetiracetam as an adjunctive treatment for partial onset seizures in infants and children from one month of age. Here we review the available data on levetiracetam in the pediatric epilepsy population. We first discuss the pharmacological profile of levetiracetam, including its mechanism of action, formulations and dosing, and pharmacokinetics in children. We then review the available efficacy, safety, and tolerability data in children from one month of age with partial onset seizures. We conclude that the current data leading to the approval of levetiracetam for use in infants and children with partial onset seizures is encouraging, although more work needs to be done before definitive conclusions can be drawn about the efficacy of levetiracetam across different pediatric age groups.

Update on the management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a severe childhood epilepsy disorder characterized by encephalopathy and multiple, often intractable, seizure types. The drop attack is the most frequently recognizable seizure type in this patient population, and is also the most dangerous physically, thus severely limiting quality of life. The diagnosis is confirmed by electroencephalography, for which the classic pattern is a slow 2.5 Hz generalized spike-and-wave. Newer pharmacologic treatments include rufinimide and clobazam. However, antiepileptic drugs are often exhausted in pursuit of seizure control requiring nonpharmacologic interventions. These include dietary therapies, vagus nerve stimulation, and epilepsy surgery, including corpus callosotomy and focal curative resection. Although large lobar resections are often required, very localized, discrete resections may be possible, as in symptomatic Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (specifically, hypothalamic hamartoma). We review the history of the disease and current management options.

Stiripentol: an example of antiepileptic drug development in childhood epilepsies

The efficacy of stiripentol (STP) in Dravet Syndrome (DS) was discovered first in an exploratory study in pediatric pharmacoresistant epilepsies. This efficacy signal, used as a proof of concept, led to - two independent multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in DS patients: STICLO-France and STICLO-Italy. In adjunction to valproate and clobazam, STP demonstrated marked efficacy and these trials became the basis for the registration of STP as an orphan drug for DS. Although STP had previously shown antiepileptic activity, since it inhibits cytochromes P450, the increased plasma levels of clobazam (CLB), norclobazam (NCLB), and NCLB/CLB ratio reported in STICLO studies brought into question the activity of STP per se. Recent pharmacological studies demonstrated that (i) STP is a direct allosteric modulator of the GABA receptors at a site distinct from benzodiazepines; (ii) STP and CLB/NCLB act independently at GABA(A) receptors; (iii) their combination increases the maximum response beyond that of either drug alone. All these effects are independent of considerations of changes in metabolism. Some responders in STICLO studies failed to display any increase of plasmatic concentrations of NCLB/CLB ratio as STP could not inhibit CYP2C19 because of its inhibition by progabide or due to an inactivating CYP polymorphism. The responder rate proved to be in the same range whether the NCLB/CLB ratio increased or not. These analyses confirmed that the effects of STP cannot result from a simple pharmacokinetic interaction. We propose that the success of STP should serve as a model for AED development in rare pediatric epileptic syndromes.

Epileptic Encephalopathies with Status Epilepticus during Sleep: New Techniques for Understanding Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options

Encephalopathy with status epilepticus during sleep (ESES) is an epileptic encephalopathy, as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Task Force on Classification and Terminology, that is, a condition in which the epileptic processes themselves are believed to contribute to the disturbance in cerebral function. Clinical manifestations of ESES are heterogeneous: apart from different seizure types, they consist in combinations of cognitive, motor, and behavioural disturbances associated with a peculiar electroencephalographic pattern of paroxysmal activity significantly activated during slow sleep, which culminates in a picture of continuous spikes and waves during sleep (CSWS). The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this condition are still incompletely understood. Establishing a clear-cut correlation between EEG abnormalities and clinical data, though interesting, is very complex. Computer-assisted EEG analyses especially if combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) and metabolic neuroimaging have recently emerged as useful approaches to better understand the pathophysiological processes underlying ESES. Treatment of ESES is not just limited to seizures control but it should be focused on controlling neuropsychological outcome through an improvement of the continuous epileptiform activity. General agreement on treatment guidelines is still lacking. Implementation of new techniques might allow a better understanding of the pathophysiology of ESES and could enhance therapeutics options.

The effect of levetiracetam on focal nocturnal epileptiform activity during sleep--a placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study

Electric Status Epilepticus during Sleep (ESES) occurs in children with and without epilepsy. It may be related to disturbances as autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and acquired aphasia (Landau-Kleffner syndrome). Antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment has been reported in small studies without placebo control. This study was designed to assess AED effect in a placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study. Levetiracetam (LEV) was chosen based on clinical evidence. Eighteen patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean spike index at baseline was 56, falling to a mean of 37 at the end of the LEV treatment period. Assessed with a 2-way ANOVA, there is a significant treatment effect (p<0.0002). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study for any AED in patients with ESES. The effect of LEV is comparable with its effect in treatment of epileptic seizures.

Sulthiame add-on therapy in children with focal epilepsies associated with encephalopathy related to electrical status epilepticus during slow sleep (ESES)

PURPOSE

In children with symptomatic or idiopathic focal epilepsies, their disease may evolve into an epileptic encephalopathy related to continuous spike and wave during slow sleep (CSWS) or electrical status epilepticus during slow sleep (ESES). ESES syndrome implies serious risks of neuropsychologic impairment, and its treatment has frequently been disappointing. The aim of this study is to present our experience using sulthiame as add-on treatment in 53 patients with ESES syndrome that was refractory to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

Neurologic examinations, cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and repeated prolonged sleep electroencephalography (EEG) studies were performed in all cases. Data about school achievements and or neuropsychological evaluations were obtained repeatedly during the follow-up of 1.5-16 years. Sulthiame was added in doses ranging between 5 and 30 mg/kg/day.

KEY FINDINGS

Since add-on of sulthiame, 10 of 28 patients in the symptomatic group became seizure free: 4 patients with normal EEG studies and 6 with residual spikes. Nine of 28 patients showed a significant reduction in number of seizures and presented spikes but no ESES on EEG. The other nine cases showed neither clinical nor EEG improvement. A striking result was that 3 of 11 children with unilateral polymicrogyria and ESES syndrome became seizure free, and in another six a significant improvement in frequency of seizures and in EEG abnormalities seemed to be related to the add-on of sulthiame. Twenty-one of the 25 patients in the idiopathic group became seizure free and without ESES in <3 months after add on of sulthiame. In two of the patients the changes were seen in a few days.

SIGNIFICANCE

We understand that sulthiame may be effective as add-on treatment in children with ESES syndrome.