Reoperation after failed resective epilepsy surgery

SEEG-based reevaluation of epileptogenic networks and the predictive role for reoperation in MTLE patients with surgical failure

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 20%-30% of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) patients got unfavorable seizure control after surgery, and there was a discrepancy about the reasons for the surgical failure. The functional connectivity (FC) patterns obtained from stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) reveal information about the dynamics of the epileptic brain and the added value of extracting information that was not identifiable in the SEEG data using FC analysis. This study aims to find out the patterns of the potential epileptogenic network of failure patients and the electrophysiological predictors of reoperation.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2019, the MTLE patients with surgical failure were reviewed, and all patients underwent SEEG-guided reoperation. The epileptogenic network was quantified by calculating FC indicators, including phase slope index (PSI), mutual information (MI) strength, imaginary coherence (icoh), and Granger causality.

RESULTS

Ten patients with 13 seizures were included in the analysis, and 7 of them achieved a favorable outcome after the SEEG-guided reoperation. The surgical zone (SZ) with a favorable prognosis showed greater outward information flow than the non-SZ, whereas the SZ with an unfavorable prognosis showed greater inward information flow. The recurrent patients with favorable prognosis had strong connectivity between the posterior hippocampus, temporal neocortex, and insula, whereas the patients with unfavorable prognosis showed strong functional connectivity between the insula and temporal-parietal-occipital junction. The power spectrum of patients with favorable prognosis was significantly lower than that of patients with unfavorable prognosis, especially showing a more oscillation power of low frequency.

SIGNIFICANCE

The SEEG-guided reoperation could achieve favorable seizure control outcomes for recurrent patients. The FCs were a potential indicator to help construct the temporal epileptic network and predictor for the reoperative prognosis in the recurrent patients.

Successful stereoelectroencephalography re-evaluation in epilepsy patients after failed initial subdural grid evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy surgery success is dependent on accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone. Despite the use of invasive EEG using subdural grids and strips, surgical failures can occur. In this series, we explore the utility of a second evaluation with stereoelectroencephalography in patients whose initial invasive evaluation with subdural grid electrodes was unsuccessful in localizing seizure origin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent subdural grid evaluation (SDE) at our center and identified patients who underwent a re-evaluation with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG).

RESULTS

We identified three patients who had both subdural and SEEG electrodes in the region of the identified epileptogenic zone in whom the initial SDE evaluation failed to make the patients seizure-free. Two of these patients underwent a second resection and became seizure-free.

SIGNIFICANCE

Stereoelectroencephalography can be useful in the re-evaluation and re-operation of patients who previously had surgical failure using SDE.

Seizure-free outcome and safety of repeated epilepsy surgery for persistent or recurrent seizures

OBJECTIVE

Reoperation may be an option for select patients with unsatisfactory seizure control after their first epilepsy surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the seizure-free outcome and safety of repeated epilepsy surgery in our tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with focal refractory epilepsy, who underwent repeated epilepsy surgeries and had a minimum follow-up time of 12 months after reoperation, were included. Systematic reevaluation, including comprehensive neuroimaging and noninvasive (n = 38) and invasive (n = 25, 66%) video-electroencephalography monitoring, was performed. Multimodal 3D resection maps were created for individual patients to allow personalized reoperation.

RESULTS

The median time between the first operation and reoperation was 74 months (range 5-324 months). The median age at reoperation was 34 years (range 1-74 years), and the median follow-up was 38 months (range 13-142 months). Repeat MRI after the first epilepsy surgery showed an epileptogenic lesion in 24 patients (63%). The reoperation was temporal in 18 patients (47%), extratemporal in 9 (24%), and multilobar in 11 (29%). The reoperation was left hemispheric in 24 patients (63%), close to eloquent cortex in 19 (50%), and distant from the initial resection in 8 (21%). Following reoperation, 27 patients (71%) became seizure free (Engel class I), while 11 (29%) continued to have seizures. There were trends toward better outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy and for unilobar resections adjacent to the initial surgery, but there was no difference between MRI lesional and nonlesional patients. In all subgroups, Engel class I outcome was at least 50%. Perioperative complications occurred in 4 patients (11%), with no fatalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation for refractory focal epilepsy is an effective and safe option in patients with persistent or recurrent seizures after initial epilepsy surgery. A thorough presurgical reevaluation is essential for favorable outcome.

Localizing epileptogenic network from SEEG using non-linear correlation, mutual information and graph theory analysis

The key challenge in epilepsy surgery is precise localization and removal of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) from the brain. Localization of the epileptogenic network by visual analysis of intracranial EEG is extremely difficult. In this retrospective study, we used interictal connectivity and graph theory analysis on intracranial EEG to better delineate the epileptogenic zone. Patients who underwent surgery for drug-refractory mesial temporal and neocortical epilepsy were included. Computational measures, such as h2 nonlinear correlation and mutual information, were used to estimate the interdependency of intracranial EEGs. We observed that the Out-Degree, Out-Strength, and Betweenness centrality (graph properties) were the best predictors of EZ. From the results, we also found that graph properties with a normalized value above 0.75 were found to be a useful measure to localize the EZ with a sensitivity of 87.88 and a specificity of 87.13. Our results also validate that frequently occurring types of interictal fast discharges (IFD) with connectivity measures and graph properties can better localize the EZ. We foresee graph theory analysis of interictal intracranial EEG data can help precise localization of EZ for cortical resection as well as in minimally invasive radiofrequency ablation of epileptogenic hubs. Further, prospective validation is required for clinical use.

Lesional Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Does the “Uncommon” Differ from the Common?

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the subgroup consisting of uncommon pathological entities presenting with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

Methodology Twenty-four consecutively operated patients of lesional temporal lobe epilepsy were included in the study. Eleven cases were identified that had pathologies implicated as “uncommon” in previously done studies on the pathology of TLE. A subgroup analysis consisting of these uncommon lesions was done for clinical presentation and seizure outcome. The seizure outcome was assessed in terms of Engel and International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification.

Results Nine different pathological entities were identified within the study group. The mean age at surgery was 18.6 years (range 2–30 years). The mean duration of epilepsy was 48.3 months and the average duration of follow-up was 39.2months. All patients had seizures as the only complaint except three. Three patients had focal-aware seizures, two had focal motor onset, and the rest all had focal-unaware seizures. Seven patients were seizure free and the average age at diagnosis for these patients was 15.4 years (range 2–24 years.). The duration of seizure in the postoperative seizure-free group was 29.7 months and it was 81 months for the other group. All the patients with persistent postoperative seizures had focal-unaware seizures preoperatively.

Conclusion Despite the small and heterogeneous nature of this subgroup of uncommon lesions causing temporal lobe epilepsy, the clinical presentation, prognostic factors, and seizure outcome are similar to the cohort of common pathologies, including mesial temporal sclerosis.

Insular Involvement in Cases of Epilepsy Surgery Failure

Background: Epilepsy surgery failure is not uncommon, with several explanations having been proposed. In this series, we detail cases of epilepsy surgery failure subsequently attributed to insular involvement. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients investigated at the epilepsy monitoring units of two Canadian tertiary care centers (2004–2020). Included patients were adults who had undergone epilepsy surgeries with recurrence of seizures post-operatively and who were subsequently determined to have an insular epileptogenic focus. Clinical, electrophysiological, neuroimaging, and surgical data were synthesized. Results: We present 14 patients who demonstrated insular epileptic activity post-surgery-failure as detected by intracranial EEG, MEG, or seizure improvement after insular resection. Seven patients had manifestations evoking possible insular involvement prior to their first surgery. Most patients (8/14) had initial surgeries targeting the temporal lobe. Seizure recurrence ranged from the immediate post-operative period to one year. The main modality used to determine insular involvement was MEG (8/14). Nine patients underwent re-operations that included insular resection; seven achieved a favorable post-operative outcome (Engel I or II). Conclusions: Our series suggests that lowering the threshold for suspecting insular epilepsy may be necessary to improve epilepsy surgery outcomes. Detecting insular epilepsy post-surgery-failure may allow for re-operations which may lead to good outcomes.

Surgery procedures in temporal lobe epilepsies

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common cause of refractory epilepsy amenable for surgical treatment and seizure control. Surgery for TLE is a safe and effective strategy. The seizure-free rate after surgical resection in patients with mesial or neocortical TLE is about 70%. Resective surgery has an advantage over stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of seizure outcomes for mesial TLE patients. Both techniques have similar results for safety, cognitive outcomes, and associated costs. Stereotactic radiosurgery should therefore be seen as an alternative to open surgery for patients with contraindications for or with reluctance to undergo open surgery. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has also shown promising results as a curative technique in mesial TLE but needs to be more deeply evaluated. Brain-responsive stimulation represents a palliative treatment option for patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior mesial temporal lobe resection. Overall, despite the expansion of innovative techniques in recent years, resective surgery remains the reference treatment for TLE and should be proposed as the first-line surgical modality. In the future, ultrasound therapies could become a credible therapeutic option for refractory TLE patients.

Predictors of Seizure Outcome after Repeat Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery: Reasons for Failure, Sex, Electrophysiology, and Temporal Lobe Surgery

Considering that seizure freedom is one of the most important goals in the treatment of epilepsy, repeat epilepsy surgery could be considered for patients who continue to experience drug-resistant seizures after epilepsy surgery. However, the chance of seizure freedom is reported to be below 50% after reoperation for failed epilepsy surgery. This study aimed to elucidate the predictive factors for seizure outcomes after repeat pediatric epilepsy surgery. In all, 39 pediatric patients who underwent repeat curative epilepsy surgery between 2008 and 2020 at our institution were retrospectively studied. The relationship between preoperative clinical factors and postoperative seizure freedom at the last follow-up was statistically evaluated. The mean age at the first surgery was 5.5 years (0-16). The etiology of epilepsy was malformation of cortical development in 33 patients. The average time to seizure recurrence after the first surgery was 6.4 months (range, 0-26 months). In all, 16 patients (41.0%) achieved seizure freedom after the second surgery. Seven patients underwent a third surgery, and three (42.9%) achieved seizure freedom. Overall, 19 patients achieved seizure freedom after repeat epilepsy surgery (48.7%). Female sex, surgical failure due to technical limitations, congruent electroencephalography (EEG) findings, lesional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Rt-sided surgery were predictive of seizure freedom, and surgery limited to the temporal lobe was predictive of residual seizures, as determined in the multivariate analysis. The reoperation of failed epilepsy surgery is challenging. Consideration of the above predictive factors can be helpful in deciding whether to reoperate on pediatric patients whose initial surgical intervention failed.

Vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric patients with failed epilepsy surgery

Adequate control of pharmacoresistant epilepsy continues to be a challenge. Multiple studies have reported the benefits of epilepsy surgery and vagus nerve stimulation for children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Little is known about the role of vagus nerve stimulation for children with failed epilepsy surgeries. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of vagus nerve stimulation on seizure frequency reduction for children with failed epilepsy surgeries. We retrospectively reviewed 85 children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy who underwent vagus nerve stimulation. Six of these patients underwent epilepsy surgery before vagus nerve stimulation (group I) and 79 patients received only vagus nerve stimulation (group II). We recorded seizure frequency at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after vagus nerve stimulator implantation. Both groups had reduced seizure frequencies at the 3-, 12-, 24- and 36-month follow-up (p = 0.044 for group I trends and 0.008 for group II trends). Vagus nerve stimulator implantations significantly improve seizure frequency for children with or without previous epilepsy surgery at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months. These findings suggest that vagus nerve stimulation should be considered an alternative therapy for pediatric patients with previous failed surgeries.

Specific Oscillatory Power Changes and Their Efficacy for Determining Laterality in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Magnetoencephalographic Study

Appropriate determination of the epileptic focus and its laterality are important for the diagnosis of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). The aims of this study are to establish a specific oscillatory distribution and laterality of the oscillatory power in unilateral MTLE with frequency analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG), and to confirm their potential to carry significant information for determining lateralization of the epileptic focus. Thirty-five patients with MTLE [left (LtMTLE), 16; right (RtMTLE), 19] and 102 healthy control volunteers (CTR) were enrolled. Cortical oscillatory powers were compared among the groups by contrasting the source images using a one-way ANOVA model for each frequency band. Further, to compare the lateralization of regional oscillatory powers between LtMTLEs and RtMTLEs, the laterality index (LI) was calculated for four brain regions (frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital) in each frequency band, which were compared between patient groups (LtMTLE, RtMTLE, and CTR), and used for machine learning prediction of the groups with support vector machine (SVM) with linear kernel function. Significant oscillatory power differences between MTLE and CTR were found in certain areas. In the theta to high-frequency oscillation bands, there were marked increases in the parietal lobe, especially on the left side, in LtMTLE. In the theta, alpha, and high-gamma bands, there were marked increases in the parietal lobe, especially on the right side in RtMTLE. Compared with CTR, LIs were significantly higher in 24/28 regions in LtMTLE, but lower in 4/28 regions and higher in 10/28 regions in RtMTLE. LI at the temporal lobe in the theta band was significantly higher in LtMTLE and significantly lower in RtMTLE. Comparing LtMTLE and RtMTLE, there were significant LI differences in most regions and frequencies (21/28 regions). In all frequency bands, there were significant differences between LtMTLE and RtMTLE in the temporal and parietal lobes. The leave-one-out cross-validation of the linear-SVM showed the classification accuracy to be over 91%, where the model had high specificity over 96% and mild sensitivity ~68–75%. Using MEG frequency analysis, the characteristics of the oscillatory power distribution in the MTLE were demonstrated. Compared with CTR, LIs shifted to the side of the epileptic focus in the temporal lobe in the theta band. The machine learning approach also confirmed that LIs have significant predictive ability in the lateralization of the epileptic focus. These results provide useful additional information for determining the laterality of the focus.

Risk Factors for Seizure Worsening After Epilepsy Surgery in Children and Adults: A Population-Based Register Study

BACKGROUND

Increased seizure frequency and new-onset tonic-clonic seizures (TCS) have been reported after epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze potential risk factors for these outcomes in a large cohort.

METHODS

We studied prospectively collected data in the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Register on increased seizure frequency and new-onset TCS after epilepsy surgery 1990-2015.

RESULTS

Two-year seizure outcome was available for 1407 procedures, and data on seizure types for 1372. Increased seizure frequency at follow-up compared to baseline occurred in 56 cases (4.0%) and new-onset TCS in 53 (3.9%; 6.6% of the patients without preoperative TCS). Increased frequency was more common in reoperations compared to first surgeries (7.9% vs 3.1%; P = .001) and so too for new-onset TCS (6.7% vs 3.2%; P = .017). For first surgeries, binary logistic regression was used to analyze predictors for each outcome. In univariable analysis, significant predictors for increased seizure frequency were lower age of onset, lower age at surgery, shorter epilepsy duration, preoperative neurological deficit, intellectual disability, high preoperative seizure frequency, and extratemporal procedures. For new-onset TCS, significant predictors were preoperative deficit, intellectual disability, and nonresective procedures. In multivariable analysis, independent predictors for increased seizure frequency were lower age at surgery (odds ratio (OR) 0.70 per increasing 10-yr interval, 95% CI 0.53-0.93), type of surgery (OR 0.42 for temporal lobe resections compared to other procedures, 95% CI 0.19-0.92), and for new-onset TCS preoperative neurological deficit (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.32-5.01).

CONCLUSION

Seizure worsening is rare but should be discussed when counseling patients. The identified risk factors may assist informed decision-making before surgery.

Advantages of magnetoencephalography, neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI in epilepsy surgery re-operations

Objective: Management of patients after failed epilepsy surgery is still challenging. Advanced diagnostic and intraoperative tools including magneto-encephalography (MEG) as well as neuronavigation and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iopMRI) may contribute to a better postoperative seizure outcome in this patient group.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients after reoperation of failed epilepsy surgery for medically refractory epilepsy at the University of Erlangen between 1988 and 2017. Inclusion criteria for patients were available MEG, neuronavigation and iopMRI data. The Engel scale was used to categorize seizure outcome.Results: We report on 27 consecutive patients (13 female/14 male mean age at first surgery 29.4 years) who had operative revision of the first resection after failed epilepsy surgery. An improved seizure outcome postoperatively was observed in 78% of patients (p < 0.001) with 55% seizure free (Engel I) patients after a mean follow-up time of 4.9 years. In detail, 80% of lesional cases were seizure free compared to 59% of MRI negative patients. Localizing MEG spike activity in the vicinity of the first resection cavity was present in 12 of 27 patients (44%) corresponding to 83% (10/12) of MEG localizing spike patients having advanced seizure outcome after operative revision.Conclusion: Re-operation after failed surgery in refractory epilepsy may lead to a better seizure outcome in the majority of patients. Preoperative MEG may support the decision for surgery and may facilitate targeting epileptogenic tissue for re-resection by employing navigation and iopMR imaging.

[Redo surgery in children with epilepsy]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the causes of ineffective operations and the results of redo surgery in children with recurrent epileptic seizures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The results of redo surgery were analyzed in 41 (10.6%) out of 387 children with drug resistant epilepsy treated surgically at the Russian Polenov Neurosurgical Institute for the period from 1994 to 2014. Patients with recurrent epilepsy after temporal resection (n=20), extratemporal resection (n=7), multifocal resection (n=6), callosotomy and stereotaxic destruction (n=8) were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Seizure-free period ranged from early postoperative period to 4 years. According to MRI data, lesions were not completely resected during primary surgery in 23 (56.1%) children. The causes of inefficiency of primary operations were inaccurate identification of epileptic focus in 15 (36.6%) patients; incomplete resection of epileptogenic and / or epileptic foci or incomplete disconnection of paroxysmal activity distribution pathways in 14 (34.1%) cases; epileptic foci de novo in 8 (19.5%) cases; inadequate surgical strategy in 4 (9.8%) patients. Redo surgery usually implied an extended previous resection in 34 (82.9%) patients. Engel I outcome after 3 years was achieved in 41.1% of patients, after 5 years - 38.3%, after 10 years - 36.4%.

CONCLUSION

Redo surgery is quite effective and minimally traumatic. Therefore, patients with recurrent epileptic seizures should be considered as candidates for repeated operations if previous interventions turned out to be ineffective.

Aggressive cytoreduction and multiple subpial cortical transections may obtain good surgical outcomes in refractory epilepsy with multiple epileptic foci

Backgrounds

Epilepsy surgery is the most efficacious therapeutic modality for patients with medical refractory epilepsy, especially resective surgery. However, the variable etiologies and multiple epileptic foci are usually associated with the outcomes. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that combination of different intervention procedures might be an alternative option for patients of refractory epilepsy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed pre-operative and post-surgical outcomes in 30 patients who received epilepsy surgery between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH), Linkou, according to Engel's classification.

Results

Twenty-six of the 30 patients (86.7%) had good outcomes, sum of class I and class II after epilepsy surgery. The good outcome rate of our complicated group was 80.0% (12/15), compared to 93.3% (14/15) in the simple group, but no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.569). Four patients whose epileptic foci involved eloquent area and received multiple subpial cortical transection, and good outcome rate was 75% (3/4). At last, six patients had previously failed epilepsy surgery and received a reoperation, with a good outcome rate of 83.3% (5/6).

Conclusion

After complete pre-surgical evaluation and combined interventional procedures, the patients with refractory epilepsy had satisfactory outcomes and few neurological complications. Moreover, re-operation can improve the outcome in some patients who previously failed epilepsy surgery.

Long-term outcomes of reoperations in epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To analyze longitudinal seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery, including reoperations, in patients with intractable focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Clinicoradiological characteristics of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery from 1995 to 2016 with follow-up of ≥1 year were reviewed. In patients undergoing reoperations, the latest resection was considered the index surgery. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom (Engel I) at last follow-up. Potentially significant outcome variables were first identified using univariate analyses and then fit in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 898 patients fulfilling study criteria, 110 had reoperations; 92 had one resection prior to the index surgery and 18 patients had two or more prior resective surgeries. Two years after the index surgery, 69% of patients with no prior surgeries had an Engel score of I, as opposed to only 42% of those with one prior surgery, and 33% of those with two or more prior resections (P < .001). Among surgical outcome predictors, the number of prior epilepsy surgeries, female sex, lesional initial magnetic resonance imaging, no prior history of generalization, and pathology correlated with better seizure outcomes on univariate analysis. However, only sex (P = .011), history of generalization (P = .016), and number of prior surgeries (P = .002) remained statistically significant in the multivariate model.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although long-term seizure control is possible in patients with failed prior epilepsy surgery, the chances of success diminish with every subsequent resection. Outcome is additionally determined by inherent biological markers (sex and secondary generalization tendency), rather than traditional outcome predictors, supporting a hypothesis of "surgical refractoriness."

Measure thrice, cut twice: On the benefit of reoperation for failed pediatric epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether clinical outcomes are improved after repeat surgery for medically refractory epilepsy in children.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who received repeat resective surgery for ongoing seizures from 2000-2017. From a total of 251 consecutive individual epilepsy surgical patients for focal resection, 53 patients met study inclusion criteria and had adequate follow-up documented.

RESULTS

Median age of seizure-onset was 2.0-years-old (IQR 0.3-5.5 years). The median age at first epilepsy surgery was 6.3-years-old (IQR 2.9-9.2 years) and at second epilepsy surgery was 8.4-years-old (IQR 4.7-12.6 years). Overall, 53 % (n = 28) of this series achieved Engel Class I (seizure freedom); with improved seizure control (Engel Class I-II) in 83 % (n = 44) of the cohort. 64 % (n = 34) had one reoperation; 26 % (n = 14) had two; and 9% (n = 5) had three. Pathology: 58 % (n = 31) had focal cortical dysplasia; 13 % (n = 10) tumor; 9% (n = 5) encephalitis; 6% (n = 3) gliosis; 4% (n = 2) mesial temporal sclerosis; and 2% (n = 1) hemimegalencephaly. Tumor pathology was associated with increased chance (p = 0.01) for seizure freedom (90 % of tumor patients had Engel Class I outcome). MTS had worse outcome with both patients having ongoing seizures (Engel II-IV). There were 6 patients who developed post-operative hemiparesis; one was unplanned but resolved.

SIGNIFICANCE

Reoperation for pediatric epilepsy surgery can lead to seizure freedom in many cases and improved seizure control in most cases. Reoperation for brain tumor pathology is associated with a high rate of seizure freedom.

Dealing with the storm: An overview of seizure precipitants and spontaneous seizure worsening in drug-resistant epilepsy

In drug-resistant epilepsy, periods of seizure stability may alternate with abrupt worsening, with frequent seizures limiting the individual's independence and physical, social, and psychological well-being. Here, we review the literature focusing on different clinical scenarios related to seizure aggravation in people with drug-resistant epilepsy. The role of antiseizure medication (ASM) changes is examined, especially focusing on paradoxical seizure aggravation after increased treatment. The external provocative factors that unbalance the brittle equilibrium of seizure control are reviewed, distinguishing between unspecific triggering factors, specific precipitants, and 'reflex' mechanisms. The chance of intervening surgical or medical conditions, including somatic comorbidities and epilepsy surgery failure, causing increased seizures is discussed. Spontaneous exacerbation is also explored, emphasizing recent findings on subject-specific circadian and ultradian rhythms. Awareness of external precipitants and understanding the subject-specific spontaneous epilepsy course may allow individuals to modify their lifestyles. It also allows clinicians to counsel appropriately and to institute suitable medical treatment to avoid sudden loss of seizure control.

Epilepsy in adults

Epilepsy is one of the most common serious brain conditions, affecting over 70 million people worldwide. Its incidence has a bimodal distribution with the highest risk in infants and older age groups. Progress in genomic technology is exposing the complex genetic architecture of the common types of epilepsy, and is driving a paradigm shift. Epilepsy is a symptom complex with multiple risk factors and a strong genetic predisposition rather than a condition with a single expression and cause. These advances have resulted in the new classification of epileptic seizures and epilepsies. A detailed clinical history and a reliable eyewitness account of a seizure are the cornerstones of the diagnosis. Ancillary investigations can help to determine cause and prognosis. Advances in brain imaging are helping to identify the structural and functional causes and consequences of the epilepsies. Comorbidities are increasingly recognised as important aetiological and prognostic markers. Antiseizure medication might suppress seizures in up to two-thirds of all individuals but do not alter long-term prognosis. Epilepsy surgery is the most effective way to achieve long-term seizure freedom in selected individuals with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but it is probably not used enough. With improved understanding of the gradual development of epilepsy, epigenetic determinants, and pharmacogenomics comes the hope for better, disease-modifying, or even curative, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies. Other developments are clinical implementation of seizure detection devices and new neuromodulation techniques, including responsive neural stimulation.

The role of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in reevaluation of epilepsy surgery failures

Management of patients after initial epilepsy surgical failure is challenging. In this study, we report our experience in using the stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) method in the reevaluation of patients after initial epilepsy surgical failure. We selected 28 patients examined through SEEG in our department for drug-resistant focal epilepsy following initial epilepsy surgical failure. For each patient, the residual seizure onset zone (rSOZ) as defined by SEEG was classified as either contiguous if the seizure onset zone (SOZ) was focal and close to the surgical cavity (same lobe) or noncontiguous in cases where the SOZ included site(s) distant from the surgical cavity. The rSOZ was defined according to visual analysis of SEEG traces completed by an estimation of the epileptogenicity index (EI). A second surgical procedure was performed in 12 patients (45%). A favorable outcome (Engel class I or II) was obtained in 9/12 patients (6 in Engel class I, 50%). The proportion of patients that had reoperation was higher in the contiguous group (80%) than in the noncontiguous group (22%) (p=0.02). A rSOZ localized in close relation to the initial surgical resection zone (contiguous group) was found in 10 patients (35%). Among them, 8 have since undergone reoperation, and a good outcome (Engel class I) was achieved in 5/8 (63%). A rSOZ involving a distant region from the first surgery was observed in 18 patients (65%) (noncontiguous group). Among them, only 4 have undergone reoperation, leading to a failure in 2 (Engel class III or IV) and a good outcome in 2 (IA). Ten patients had a first standard temporal lobectomy, and in 50% of these cases, the insula was involved in the rSOZ. Stereoelectroencephalography offers a unique way to evaluate the rSOZ at the individual level and thus guide further surgical decision-making. The best results are observed in patients having a focal rSOZ close to the site of the surgical resection in the first surgery.

Rates and predictors of success and failure in repeat epilepsy surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Medically refractory epilepsy is a debilitating disorder that is particularly challenging to treat in patients who have already failed a surgical resection. Evidence regarding outcomes of further epilepsy surgery is limited to small case series and reviews. Therefore, our group performed the first quantitative meta-analysis of the literature from the past 30 years to assess for rates and predictors of successful reoperations.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for studies reporting outcomes of repeat epilepsy surgery. Studies were excluded if they reported fewer than five eligible patients or had average follow-ups < 1 year, and patients were excluded from analysis if they received a nonresective intervention. Outcomes were stratified by each variable of interest, and quantitative meta-analysis was performed to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-two patients who received repeat resective epilepsy surgery from 36 studies were included. Engel I outcome was observed in 47% (n = 369) of patients. Significant predictors of seizure freedom included congruent over noncongruent electrophysiology data (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.6-8.2), lesional over nonlesional epilepsy (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.9-5.3), and surgical limitations over disease-related factors associated with failure of the first surgery (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.3-5.3). Among patients with at least one of these predictors, seizure freedom was achieved in 58%. Conversely, the use of invasive monitoring was associated with worse outcome (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9). Temporal lobe over extratemporal/multilobe resection (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.8-3.0) and abnormal over normal preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.6-5.4) showed nonsignificant trends toward seizure freedom.

SIGNIFICANCE

This analysis supports considering further resection in patients with intractable epilepsy who continue to have debilitating seizures after an initial surgery, especially in the context of factors predictive of a favorable outcome.

Additional resective surgery after the failure of initial surgery in patients with intractable epilepsy

Objectives There are three conceivable reasons for the failure of resective surgery for intractable epilepsy: incomplete resection of the epileptogenic zone including or overlapping with eloquent area (group A); incorrect determination of the epileptogenic zone prior to the first surgery (group B); and the development of a new epileptic focus after the first surgery (group C). We examined the relationship between the reason for failure of initial surgery and patient outcomes after repeated surgical resection. Methods The study included 18 patients (5.1%) underwent additional surgery after failure of the initial operation. Post-operative outcomes, complications and other clinical data were collected by retrospective chart review. Results Four patients (22.2%) were assigned to group A, 13 (72.2%) were assigned to group B, and 1 patient was assigned to group C (5.6%). Six patients (40.0%) were seizure-free for 2 or more years after additional surgery. In group B, 11 patients underwent additional resection of the cortex adjacent to the previously resected area and 2 underwent re-operation involving a site distant from the previously resected area; notably, the latter 2 patients did not achieve seizure-free status post-surgery. After the first operation, only one patient (group A) experienced transient paresis; after additional surgery, 10 of 18 patients (56%; 3 group A, 6 group B, and 1 group C) experienced various complications. Discussion Although additional resective surgery provided freedom from seizures in about 40% of the patients, it is important to weigh a high risk of complications against possible benefits when considering additional surgery.

Failed epilepsy surgery: is this the end?

Resective epilepsy surgery can lead to sustained seizure control in 70-80% of patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery, indicating that up to 30% of patients still have recurrent seizures after surgery. Definitions of failed epilepsy surgery vary amongst studies. This review focuses on seizure outcome predictors after reoperation, possible mechanisms of failure and best management for this difficult patient population.

[Stereotactic laser thermocoagulation in epilepsy surgery]

In common with other stereotactic procedures, stereotactic laser thermocoagulation (SLT) promises gentle destruction of pathological tissue, which might become especially relevant for epilepsy surgery in the future. Compared to standard resection, no large craniotomy is necessary, cortical damage during access to deep-seated lesions can be avoided and interventions close to eloquent brain areas become possible. We describe the history and rationale of laser neurosurgery as well as the two available SLT systems (Visualase® and NeuroBlate®; CE marks pending). Both systems are coupled with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR thermometry, thereby increasing patient safety. We report the published clinical experiences with SLT in epilepsy surgery (altogether approximately 200 cases) with respect to complications, brain structural alterations, seizure outcome, neuropsychological findings and treatment costs. The rate of seizure-free patients seems to be slightly lower than for resection surgery. Due to the inadequate quality of studies, the neuropsychological superiority of SLT has not yet been unambiguously demonstrated.

Re-review of MRI with post-processing in nonlesional patients in whom epilepsy surgery has failed

Management of MRI-negative patients with intractable focal epilepsy after failed surgery is particularly challenging. In this study, we aim to investigate whether MRI post-processing could identify relevant targets for the re-evaluation of MRI-negative patients who failed the initial resective surgery. We examined a consecutive series of 56 MRI-negative patients who underwent resective surgery and had recurring seizures at 1-year follow-up. T1-weighted volumetric sequence from the pre-surgical MRI was used for voxel-based MRI post-processing which was implemented in a morphometric analysis program (MAP). MAP was positive in 15 of the 56 patients included in this study. In 5 patients, the MAP+ regions were fully resected. In 10 patients, the MAP+ regions were not or partially resected: two out of the 10 patients had a second surgery including the unresected MAP+ region, and both became seizure-free; the remaining 8 patients did not undergo further surgery, but the unresected MAP+ regions were concordant with more than one noninvasive modality in 7. In the 8 patients who had unresected MAP+ regions and intracranial-EEG before the previous surgery, the unresected MAP+ regions were concordant with ictal onset in 6. Our data suggest that scrutiny of the presurgical MRI guided by MRI post-processing may reveal relevant targets for reoperation in nonlesional epilepsies. MAP findings, when concordant with the patient's other noninvasive data, should be considered when planning invasive evaluation/reoperation for this most challenging group of patients.

A second chance--reoperation in patients with failed surgery for intractable epilepsy: long-term outcome, neuropsychology and complications

OBJECT

Resective surgery is a safe and effective treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. If surgery has failed reoperation after careful re-evaluation may be a reasonable option. This study was to summarise the risks and benefits of reoperation in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single centre study comprising clinical data, long-term seizure outcome, neuropsychological outcome and postoperative complications of patients, who had undergone a second resective epilepsy surgery from 1989 to 2009.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients with median follow-up of 10.3 years were included into the study. Fifty-one patients (77%) had surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy, the remaining 15 cases for extra-temporal lobe epilepsies. The most frequent histological findings were tumours (n=33, 50%), followed by dysplasia, gliosis (n=11, each) and hippocampus sclerosis (n=9). The main reasons for seizure recurrence were incomplete resection (59.1%) of the putative epileptogenic lesion. After reoperation 46 patients (69.7%) were completely seizure-free International League Against Epilepsy 1 (ILAE 1) at the last available follow-up. The neuropsychological evaluation demonstrated that repeated losses in the same cognitive domain, that is, successive changes from better to worse performance categories, were rare and that those losses after first surgery were followed by improvement rather than decline. However, reoperations lead to an increased rate of permanent neurological deficits (9%), overall surgical complications (9%) and visual field deficits (67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation after failed resective epilepsy surgery led to approximately 70% long-time seizure freedom and reasonable neuropsychological outcome. There is an increased risk of permanent postoperative neurological deficits, which should be taken into consideration when counselling for reoperation.

Resection of cerebral gangliogliomas causing drug-resistant epilepsy: short- and long-term outcomes using intraoperative MRI and neuronavigation

OBJECT Cerebral gangliogliomas (GGs) are highly associated with intractable epilepsy. Incomplete resection due to proximity to eloquent brain regions or misinterpretation of the resection amount is a strong negative predictor for local tumor recurrence and persisting seizures. A potential method for dealing with this obstacle could be the application of intraoperative high-field MRI (iopMRI) combined with neuronavigation. METHODS Sixty-nine patients (31 female, 38 male; median age 28.5 ± 15.4 years) suffering from cerebral GGs were included in this retrospective study. Five patients received surgery twice in the observation period. In 48 of the 69 patients, 1.5-T iopMRI combined with neuronavigational guidance was used. Lesions close to eloquent brain areas were resected with the implementation of preoperative diffusion tensor imaging tractography and blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI (15 patients). RESULTS Overall, complete resection was accomplished in 60 of 69 surgical procedures (87%). Two patients underwent biopsy only, and in 7 patients, subtotal resection was accomplished because of proximity to critical brain areas. Excluding the 2 biopsies, complete resection using neuronavigation/iopMRI was documented in 33 of 46 cases (72%) by intraoperative imaging. Remnant tumor mass was identified intraoperatively in 13 of 46 patients (28%). After intraoperative second-look surgery, the authors improved the total resection rate by 9 patients (up to 91% [42 of 46]). Of 21 patients undergoing conventional surgery, 14 (67%) had complete resection without the use of iopMRI. Regarding epilepsy outcome, 42 of 60 patients with seizures (70%) became completely seizure free (Engel Class IA) after a median follow-up time of 55.5 ± 36.2 months. Neurological deficits were found temporarily in 1 (1.4%) patient and permanently in 4 (5.8%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Using iopMRI combined with neuronavigation in cerebral GG surgery, the authors raised the rate of complete resection in this series by 19%. Given the fact that total resection is a strong predictor of long-term seizure control, this technique may contribute to improved seizure outcome and reduced neurological morbidity.

Long-term outcomes in patients after epilepsy surgery failure

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients who were classified as Engel IV one year after resective epilepsy surgery. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment options and to examine the reasons that the patients did not undergo resective reoperation.

METHODS

Our study was designed as a retrospective open-label investigation of the long-term outcomes of 34 patients (12% of all surgically treated patients) who were classified as Engel IV one year after epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up visit (average of 7.6 ± 4.2 years after surgery), 12 of the 34 examined patients (35.3%) were still classified as Engel IV; 22 of the 34 patients (64.7%) were improved (Engel I-III). Of the 34 patients, 8 (23.5%) achieved an excellent outcome, classified as Engel I, 3 patients (8.8%) were classified as Engel II, and 11 patients (32.4%) as Engel III. The seizure outcome in the patients classified as Engel I was achieved by resective reoperation in 4; by a change in antiepileptic medication in 3 patients; and by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 1 patient. The seizure outcome of Engel II was achieved by a change in antiepileptic medication in all 3 patients. Of the 34 patients, a total of 6 (17.6%) underwent resective reoperation only. The major reasons for this were the absence of a plausible hypothesis for invasive re-evaluation, the risk of postoperative deficit, and multifocal epilepsy in the rest of patients.

CONCLUSION

Although the reoperation rate was relatively low in our series, we can achieve better or even excellent seizure outcomes using other procedures in patients for whom resective surgery initially failed.

A Molecular Approach to Epilepsy Management: from Current Therapeutic Methods to Preconditioning Efforts

Epilepsy is the most common and chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent unprovoked seizures. The key aim in treating patients with epilepsy is the suppression of seizures. An understanding of focal changes that are involved in epileptogenesis may therefore provide novel approaches for optimal treatment of the seizure. Although the actual pathogenesis of epilepsy is still uncertain, recently growing lines of evidence declare that microglia and astrocyte activation, oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondria dysfunction, and damage of blood-brain barrier (BBB) are involved in its pathogenesis. Impaired GABAergic function in the brain is probably the most accepted hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Clinical neuroimaging of patients and experimental modeling have demonstrated that seizures may induce neuronal apoptosis. Apoptosis signaling pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of several types of epilepsy such as temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The quality of life of patients is seriously affected by treatment-related problems and also by unpredictability of epileptic seizures. Moreover, the available antiepileptic drugs (AED) are not significantly effective to prevent epileptogenesis. Thus, novel therapies that are proficient to control seizure in people who are suffering from epilepsy are needed. The preconditioning method promises to serve as an alternative therapeutic approach because this strategy has demonstrated the capability to curtail epileptogenesis. For this reason, understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying brain tolerance induced by preconditioning is crucial to delineate new neuroprotective ways against seizure damage and epileptogenesis. In this review, we summarize the work to date on the pathogenesis of epilepsy and discuss recent therapeutic strategies in the treatment of epilepsy. We will highlight that novel therapy targeting such as preconditioning process holds great promise. In addition, we will also highlight the role of gene reprogramming and mitochondrial biogenesis in the preconditioning-mediated neuroprotective events.