Menstrual cycle corrupts reliable and valid assessment of language dominance: Consequences for presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy

'That Time of the Month' - Investigating the Influence of the Menstrual Cycle and Oral Contraceptives on the Brain Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The stereotypic and oversimplified relationship between female sex hormones and undesirable behavior dates to the earliest days of human society, as already the ancient Greek word for the uterus, "hystera" indicated an aversive connection. Remaining and evolving throughout the centuries, transcending across cultures and various aspects of everyday life, its perception was only recently reframed. Contemporarily, the complex interaction of hormonal phases (i. e., the menstrual cycle), hormonal medication (i. e., oral contraceptives), women's psychological well-being, and behavior is the subject of multifaceted and more reflected discussions. A driving force of this ongoing paradigm shift was the introduction of this highly interesting and important topic into the realm of scientific research. This refers to neuroscientific research as it enables a multimodal approach combining aspects of physiology, medicine, and psychology. Here a growing body of literature points towards significant alterations of both brain function, such as lateralization of cognitive functions, and structure, such as gray matter concentrations, due to fluctuations and changes in hormonal levels. This especially concerns female sex hormones. However, the more research is conducted within this field, the less reliable these observations and derived insights appear. This may be due to two particular factors: measurement inconsistencies and diverse hormonal phases accompanied by interindividual differences. The first factor refers to the prominent unreliability of one of the primarily utilized neuroscientific research instruments: functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This unreliability is seemingly present in paradigms and analyses, and their interplay, and is additionally affected by the second factor. In more detail, hormonal phases and levels further influence neuroscientific results obtained through fMRI as outcomes vary drastically across different cycle phases and medication. This resulting vast uncertainty thus tremendously hinders the further advancement of our understanding of how female sex hormones might alter brain structure and function and, ultimately, behavior.This review summarizes parts of the current state of research and outlines the essential requirements to further investigate and understand the female brain's underlying physiological and anatomical features.

Hemispheric differences in the duration of focal onset seizures

OBJECTIVE

To assess hemispheric differences in the duration of focal onset seizures and its association with clinical and demographic factors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients with drug-resistant unifocal epilepsy, who underwent intracranial EEG recording between 01/2006 and 06/2016. Seizure duration was determined based on the subdural and/or stereo-EEG (sEEG) recordings. Hemispheric differences in seizure duration were statistically evaluated with regard to clinical and demographic data.

RESULTS

In total, 69 patients and 654 focal onset seizures were included. The duration of seizures with left-hemispheric onset (n = 297) was by trend longer (91.88 ± 93.92 s) than of right-hemispheric seizures (n = 357; 71.03 ± 68.53 s; p = .193). Significant hemispheric differences in seizures duration were found in temporal lobe seizures (n = 225; p = .013), especially those with automotor manifestation (n = 156; p = .045). A prolonged duration was also found for left-hemispheric onset seizures with secondary generalized commencing during waking state (n = 225; p = .034), but not during sleep. A similar hemispheric difference in seizure duration was found in female patients (p = .040), but not in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemispheric differences in seizure duration were revealed with significantly longer durations in case of left-hemispheric seizure onset. The observed differences in seizure duration might result from brain asymmetry and add new aspects to the understanding of seizure propagation and termination.

Evaluating the performance of the visual half field paradigm as a screening tool to detect right hemispheric language dominance

Language is among the most studied functional asymmetries, yet little is known about right hemispheric language dominance. Because of its low prevalence, including a big sample of individuals with this variant of brain organization implies testing large groups, which may not be feasible when using expensive techniques. One solution involves screening a large sample using a cost-efficient method and next inviting only those participants flagged as potentially right dominant for follow-up investigation. The behavioural visual half field paradigm has previously been validated and successfully applied in this manner. We report a large-scale visual half field screening performed in 315 left-handers to detect such individuals for subsequent MRI scanning. Of 38 cases selected as probably right language dominant based on a left visual half field advantage (>20 ms), 22 (58%) were confirmed by language fMRI to be rightward lateralized. This study also explored means to improve the predictive performance of the visual half field task. While we found its performance depended strongly on the chosen cut-off, overall, reaction time criteria resulted in higher true positive rates, while those based on accuracy led to superior positive predictive values. The most optimal strategy, however, may involve combining criteria considering both accuracy and reaction time.

Cognitive disorders in epilepsy II: Clinical targets, indications and selection of test instruments

This is the second of two narrative reviews on cognitive disorders in epilepsy (companion manuscript: Cognitive disorders in epilepsy I: Clinical experience, real-world evidence and recommendations). Its focus is on the clinical targets, indications, and the selection of neuropsychological test instruments. Cognitive assessment has become an essential tool for the diagnosis and outcome control in the clinical management of epilepsy. The diagnostics of basic and higher brain functions can provide valuable information on lateralized and localized brain dysfunctions associated with epilepsy, its underlying pathologies and treatment. In addition to the detection or verification of deficits, neuropsychology reveals the patient's cognitive strengths and, thus, information about the patient reserve capacities for functional restitution and compensation. Neuropsychology is an integral part of diagnostic evaluations mainly in the context of epilepsy surgery to avoid new or additional damage to preexisting neurocognitive impairments. In addition and increasingly, neuropsychology is being used as a tool for monitoring of the disease and its underlying pathologies, and it is suited for the quality and outcome control of pharmacological or other non-invasive medical intervention. This narrative review summarizes the present state of neuropsychological assessments in epilepsy, reveals diagnostic gaps, and shows the great need for education, homogenization, translation and standardization of instruments.

Visual and Auditory fMRI Paradigms for Presurgical Language Mapping: Convergent Validity and Relationship to Individual Variables

Functional MRI (fMRI) has emerged as a safe alternative to invasive procedures for determining hemispheric language dominance prior to neurosurgery. Despite this, there are currently no standardized fMRI protocols that have been explored in healthy controls to determine the influence of individual patient variables on the results, which poses challenges in clinical interpretation of ambiguous findings in patient populations. In addition, most fMRI protocols are not suitable for individuals with visual or intellectual disabilities (IQ<70). In the current study, 61 healthy adults (ages: 18-74 years) completed two fMRI paradigms for language mapping. One paradigm used visually based stimuli and has shown good face validity to date in our center. The second paradigm used auditory stimuli presented at slowed speed and was designed for individuals with visual or cognitive dysfunction but has not yet been used clinically. The paradigms demonstrated 97% agreement in classifying individuals as left-hemisphere, right-hemisphere, and bilaterally dominant. Cases that were classified differently showed bilateral dominance in response to either paradigm. Dominance classification rates for right- and left-handed individuals were largely in keeping with published data. Within the left-handed group, IQ and education were positively correlated with laterality indices generated by both paradigms (r values range: 0.44-0.95, p<0.01), suggesting that individuals with higher IQ and formal education were more likely to be classified as left-hemisphere dominant in the current sample. This study will help improve clinical interpretation of language fMRI maps by identifying factors that might impact results (like IQ). It also offers an alternative paradigm to make this procedure more accessible to a broader range of patients. Future studies will replicate results with a sample of patients with epilepsy across a broad range of intellectual abilities.

Hemispheric language lateralization in presurgical patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: Improving the retest reliability of functional transcranial Doppler sonography

Since its introduction, functional transcranial Doppler sonography (fTCD) has been extensively applied in research and clinical settings and has now become part of the routine presurgical work-up of patients with epilepsy. Because of its importance in planning neurosurgical interventions and predicting possible cognitive risks, the reproducibility of fTCD in determining hemispheric language lateralization (HLL) has to be ensured. In the present study, fTCD was performed twice in 33 initially lateralized patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) as part of their presurgical work-up, using a standard word generation paradigm. Initially, the standard analysis, including only the statistical examination of fTCD data, was applied, and a rather poor retest reliability of r = 0.41 was obtained (p = 0.017). Because of doubts concerning appropriate task performance in some patients, subsequently, a two-step data analysis was introduced, including an additional qualitative evaluation of fTCD data regarding (1) instruction-compliant task performance, (2) sufficient quality of the baseline phase, and (3) adequate increase in cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) during the activation phase. Attributable to a more valid interpretation of fTCD data after the application of the qualitative step, the reproducibility of HLL significantly improved (p = 0.007) to a high retest reliability of r = 0.84 (p < 0.000). In clinical settings, psychological and situational factors seem to strongly influence the reproducibility of fTCD determining HLL. Accordingly, we highly recommend the complementation of the standard statistical examination of fTCD data by an additional qualitative evaluation (two-step data analysis), as this extra security is particularly desirable because of its direct implications for the further evaluation of neurosurgical interventions. This article is part of the Special Issue "Individualized Epilepsy Management: Medicines, Surgery and Beyond".