Systematic review of the efficacy in seizure control and safety of neuronavigation in epilepsy surgery: The need for well-designed prospective studies

Bony Surface-Matching Registration of Neuronavigation with Sectioned 3-Dimensional Skull in Prone Position

BACKGROUND

Neuronavigation has become an essential system for brain tumor resections. It is sometimes difficult to obtain accurate registration of the neuronavigation with the patient in the prone position. Bony surface-matching registration should be more precise than skin surface-matching registration; however, it is difficult to establish bony registration with limited exposed bone. We created a new bony surface-matching method to a sectioned 3-dimensional (3D) virtual skull in a neuronavigation system and registered with a sectioned 3D skull. In this study, the bony surface-matching with sectioned 3D registration is applied to provide precise registration for brain tumor resection in the prone position.

METHODS

From May 2023 to April 2024, 17 patients who underwent brain tumor resection in the prone position were enrolled. The navigation system StealthStation S8 (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was used. Bony surface-matching registration with a whole 3D skull in a neuronavigation system was performed. Next, a sectioned 3D skull was made according to the surgical location to compare with the whole 3D skull registration. A phantom model was also used to validate the whole and sectioned 3D skull registration.

RESULTS

Whole 3D skull registration was successful for only 2 patients (11.8%). However, sectioned 3D skull registration was successful for 16 patients (94.1%). The examinations with a phantom skull model also showed superiority of sectioned 3D skull registration to whole 3D skull registration.

CONCLUSIONS

Sectioned 3D skull registration was superior to whole 3D skull registration. The sectioned 3D skull method could provide accurate registration with limited exposed bone.

Hidden Error in Optical Stereotactic Navigation Systems and Strategy to Maximize Accuracy

BACKGROUND

Optical neuronavigation has been established as a reliable and effective adjunct to many neurosurgical procedures. Operations such as asleep deep brain stimulation (aDBS) benefit from the potential increase in accuracy that these systems offer. Built into these technologies is a degree of tolerated error that may exceed the presumed accuracy resulting in suboptimal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify an underlying source of error in neuronavigation and determine strategies to maximize accuracy.

METHODS

A Medtronic Stealth system (Stealth Station 7 hardware, S8 software, version 3.1.1) was used to simulate an aDBS procedure with the Medtronic Nexframe system. Multiple configurations and orientations of the Nexframe-Nexprobe system components were examined to determine potential sources of, and to quantify navigational error, in the optical navigation system. Virtual entry point and target variations were recorded and analyzed. Finally, off-plan error was recorded with the AxiEM system and visual observation on a phantom head.

RESULTS

The most significant source of error was found to be the orientation of the reference marker plate configurations to the camera system, with the presentation of the markers perpendicular to the camera line of site being the most accurate position. Entry point errors ranged between 0.134 ± 0.048 and 1.271 ± 0.0986 mm in a complex, reproducible pattern dependent on the orientation of the Nexprobe reference plate. Target errors ranged between 0.311 ± 0.094 and 2.159 ± 0.190 mm with a similarly complex, repeatable pattern. Representative configurations were tested for physical error at target with errors ranging from 1.2 mm to 1.4 mm. Throughout data acquisition, no orientation was indicated as outside the acceptable tolerance by the Stealth software.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of optical neuronavigation is expected to increase in frequency and variety of indications. Successful implementation of this technology depends on understanding the tolerances built into the system. In situations that depend on extremely high precision, surgeons should familiarize themselves with potential sources of error so that systems may be optimized beyond the manufacturer's built-in tolerances. We recommend that surgeons align the navigation reference plate and any optical instrument's reference plate spheres in the plane perpendicular to the line of site of the camera to maximize accuracy.

Neuronavigation-assisted surgical treatments for medically refractory epilepsy: Single-hospital experience with 4 surgical approaches

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment should be considered for patients with medically refractory epilepsy, and neuronavigation may benefit and reduce the technical difficulties during surgery. In this study, we aimed to report our single-hospital experience of incorporating neuronavigation for treating patients with medically refractory epilepsy using 4 types of surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed as medically refractory epilepsy and received neuronavigation-assisted surgery were included in this retrospective analysis. The type of surgery was decided by the surgery committee after careful evaluation and discussion, including temporo-parietal-occipital (TPO) disconnection, anterior subtotal callosal section, functional hemispherectomy and resection of the epileptogenic zone(s). Postoperative seizure outcome at the last visit was evaluated using Engel classification.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients with medically refractory epilepsy who were treated surgically under the assistance of neuronavigation were included. The majority type of surgery was resection of epileptic zone, n = 104 (60.12%). An excellent seizure outcome, Engel Class I was found in 50.86% of the patients, followed by 23.12% patients with a good outcome of Engel Class II.

CONCLUSION

Overall more than half of the patients could have excellent seizure outcome of Engel Class I, the postoperative complications were manageable. These results indicated that the applicability of neuronavigation, and the use of neuronavigation provides good efficacy and safety for all kinds of surgical procedures for patients with medically refractory epilepsy.

Insular Cortex Surgery for the Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy

Focal epilepsy originating from the insular cortex is rare. One reason is the small amount of cortical tissue compared with other lobes of the brain. However, the incidence of insular epilepsy might be underestimated because of diagnostic difficulties. The semiology and the surface EEG are often not meaningful or even misleading, and elaborated imaging might be necessary. The close connections of the insular cortex with other potentially epileptogenic areas, such as the temporal lobe or frontal/central cortex, is increasingly recognized as possible reason for failure of epilepsy surgery for temporal or extratemporal seizures. Therefore, some centers consider invasive EEG recording of the insular cortex not only in case of insular epilepsy but also in other focal epilepsies with nonconclusive results from the presurgical work-up. The surgical approach to and resection of insular cortex is challenging because of its deep location and proximity to highly eloquent brain structures. Over the last decades, technical adjuncts like navigation tools, electrophysiological monitoring and intraoperative imaging have improved the outcome after surgery. Nevertheless, there is still a considerable rate of postoperative transient or permanent deficits, in some cases as unavoidable and calculated deficits. In most of the recent series, seizure outcome was favorable and comparable with extratemporal epilepsy surgery or even better. Up to now, the data volume concerning long-term follow-up is limited. This review focusses on the surgical challenges of resections to treat insular epilepsy, on prognostic factors concerning seizure outcome, on postoperative deficits and complications. Moreover, less invasive surgical techniques to treat epilepsy in this highly eloquent area are summarized.