Video ambulatory EEG: A good alternative to inpatient video telemetry?

Subcutaneous electroencephalography monitoring for people with epilepsy and intellectual disability: co-production workshops

BACKGROUND

Nearly 25% of people with intellectual disability (PwID) have epilepsy compared to 1% of the UK general population. PwID are commonly excluded from research, eventually affecting their care. Understanding seizures in PwID is particularly challenging because of reliance on subjective external observation and poor objective validation. Remote electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring could capture objective data, but particular challenges and implementation strategies for this population need to be understood.

AIM

This co-production aimed to explore the accessibility and potential impact of a remote, long-term EEG tool (UnEEG 24/7 SubQ) for PwID and epilepsy.

METHOD

We conducted six, 2-hour long workshops; three with people with mild intellectual disability and three with families/carers of people with moderate-profound intellectual disability. Brief presentations, easy read information and model demonstrations were used to explain the problem and device. A semi-structured guide developed by a communication specialist and art-based techniques facilitated discussion with PwID. For family/carers, active listening was employed. All conversations were recorded and transcribed. Artificial intelligence-based coding and thematic analysis (ATLAS.ti and ChatGPT) were synthesised with manual theming to generate insights.

RESULTS

Co-production included four PwID, five family members and seven care professionals. Three main themes were identified: (1) perceived benefits for improving seizure understanding, informing care and reducing family and carer responsibility to accurately identify seizures; (2) the device was feasible for some PwID but not all; and (3) appropriate person-centred communication is essential for all stakeholders to reduce concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

The workshops identified key benefits and implementing barriers to SubQ in PwID.

Effect evaluation of outpatient long-term video EEGs for people with seizure disorders - study protocol of the ALVEEG project: a randomized controlled trial in Germany

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy and other seizure disorders account for a high disease burden in Germany. As a timely diagnosis and accurate treatment are crucial, improving the management of these disorders is important. Outside of Germany, outpatient long-term video EEGs (ALVEEGs) have demonstrated the potential to support the diagnosis and management of epilepsy and other seizure disorders. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of ALVEEGs as a new diagnostic pathway in eastern parts of Germany to diagnose epilepsy and other seizure disorders and to assess if ALVEEGs are equally effective as the current inpatient-monitoring gold standard, which is currently only available at a limited number of specialized centers in Germany.

METHODS

ALVEEG is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled equivalence trial, involving five epilepsy centers in the eastern states of Germany. Patients will be randomized into either intervention (IG) or control group (CG), using a permuted block randomization. The sample size targeted is 688 patients, continuously recruited over the trial. The IG will complete an ALVEEG in a home setting, including getting access to a smartphone app to document seizure activity. The CG will receive care as usual, i.e., inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring. The primary outcome is the proportion of clinical questions being solved in the IG compared to the CG. Secondary outcomes include hospital stays, time until video EEG, time until diagnosis and result discussion, patients' health status, quality of life and health competence, and number and form of epilepsy-related events and epileptiform activity. Alongside the trial, a process implementation and health economic evaluation will be conducted.

DISCUSSION

The extensive evaluation of this study, including an implementation and health economic evaluation, will provide valuable information for health policy decision-makers to optimize future delivery of neurological care to patients affected by epilepsy and other seizure disorders and on the uptake of ALVEEG into standard care in Germany.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00032220), date registered: December 11, 2023.

Early discontinuation of ambulatory vEEG among individuals with intellectual disabilities: A retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective chart review aims to quantify the rate of patients with intellectual disability (ID) accessing an Australian ambulatory EEG service, and understand the clinical implications of discontinuing studies prematurely.

METHODS

Electronic records of referrals, patient monitoring notes, and EEG reports were accessed retrospectively. Each referral was assessed to determine whether the patient had an ID. For each study where patients were discharged prematurely, the outcomes of their EEG report were assessed and compared between the ID and non-ID groups. Exploratory analysis was performed assessing the effects of age, the percentage of the requested monitoring undertaken, and outcome rates as a function of monitoring duration.

RESULTS

There were significantly more patients in the ID group with early disconnection than the non-ID group (Chi squared test, p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in the rates of clinical outcomes between the ID and non-ID groups amongst patients who disconnected early.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rates of early disconnection are higher in those with ID, study outcomes are largely similar between patients with and without ID in this retrospective analysis of an ambulatory EEG service.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ambulatory EEG is a viable modality of EEG monitoring for patients with ID.

Diagnostic utility of prolonged ambulatory video-electroencephalography monitoring

OBJECTIVES

Ambulatory video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) represents a low-cost, convenient and accessible alternative to inpatient video-EEG monitoring, however few studies have examined their diagnostic yield. In this large-scale retrospective study conducted in Australia, we evaluated the efficacy of prolonged ambulatory video-EEG recordings in capturing diagnostic events and resolving the referring question.

METHODS

Sequential adult and paediatric ambulatory video-EEG reports from April 2020 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Data collection included patient demographics, clinical information, and details of events and EEG abnormalities. Clinical utility was assessed by examining i) time to first diagnostic event, and ii) ability to resolve the referring questions - seizure localisation, quantification, classification, and differentiation (differentiating seizures from non-epileptic events).

RESULTS

Of the 600 reports analysed, 49 % captured at least one event, and 45 % captured interictal abnormalities (epileptiform or non-epileptiform). Seizures, probable psychogenic events (mostly non-convulsive), and other non-epileptic events occurred in 13 %, 23 % and 21 % of recordings respectively, with overlap. Unreported events were captured in 53 (9 %) recordings, and unreported seizures represented more than half of all seizures captured (51 %, 392/773). Nine percent of events were missing clinical, video or electrographic data. A diagnostic event occurred in 244 (41 %) recordings, of which 14 % were captured between the fifth and eighth day of recording. Reported event frequency ≥ 1/week was the only significant predictor of diagnostic event capture. In recordings with both seizures and psychogenic events, unrecognized seizures were frequent, and seizures may be missed if recording is terminated early. The referring question was resolved in 85 % of reports with at least one event, and 53 % of all reports. Specifically, this represented 46 % of reports (235/512) for differentiation of events, and 75 % of reports (27/36) for classification of seizures.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory video-EEG recordings are of high diagnostic value in capturing clinically relevant events and resolving the referring clinical questions.

The unforeseen future: Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on home video-EEG telemetry

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had widespread impact on health care systems globally-particularly services arranged around elective admission and attendance such as epilepsy monitoring units and home video-EEG telemetry (HVET). Here, we review the ongoing impacts of the pandemic on HVET services among several different providers who used different initial models of HVET. We discuss the features of HVET that led to success in providing continued diagnostic services to patients with epilepsy and related disorders and through retrospective audit of our services demonstrate the high diagnostic yield of HVET. We reflect on this unforeseen future and its implications for other diagnostic techniques and approaches.

Impact of ambulatory EEG in the management of patients with epilepsy in resource-limited Latin American populations

Objective

Ambulatory electroencephalography (AEEG) monitoring allows for prolonged recordings in normal environments, such as patients' homes, and is recognized as a cost-effective alternative to inpatient long-term video-EEG primarily in resource-limited countries. We aim to describe the impact of AEEG on the assessment of patients with suspected or confirmed epilepsy in two independent Latin-American populations with limited resources.

Methods

We included 63 patients who had undergone an AEEG due to confirmed/suspected epilepsy. Clinical (demographic, current antiseizure medication and indication) and electroencephalographic (duration of the study, result, and impact on clinical decision-making) were reviewed and compared.

Results

The main indication for an AEEG was the differentiation of seizures from non-epileptic events with 57% of patients. It was categorized as positive in 36 patients and did have an impact on the clinical decision-making process in 57% of patients. AEEG captured clinical events in 35 patients (20 epileptic and 15 non-epileptic).

Conclusions

AEEG proves to be a valuable tool in resource-limited settings for assessing suspected or confirmed epilepsy cases, with a significant impact on clinical decisions.

Significance

Our study provides valuable insights into the use of AEEG in under-resourced regions, shedding light on the challenges and potential benefits of this tool in clinical practice.

At home EEG monitoring technologies for people with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Conducting electroencephalography in people with intellectual disabilities (PwID) can be challenging, but the high proportion of PwID who experience seizures make it an essential part of their care. To reduce hospital-based monitoring, interventions are being developed to enable high-quality EEG data to be collected at home. This scoping review aims to summarise the current state of remote EEG monitoring research, potential benefits and limitations of the interventions, and inclusion of PwID in this research.

METHODS

The review was structured using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews and the PICOS framework. Studies that evaluated a remote EEG monitoring intervention in adults with epilepsy were retrieved from the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. A descriptive analysis provided an overview of the study and intervention characteristics, key results, strengths, and limitations.

RESULTS

34,127 studies were retrieved and 23 were included. Five types of remote EEG monitoring were identified. Common benefits included producing useful results of comparable quality to inpatient monitoring and patient experience. A common limitation was the challenge of capturing all seizures with a small number of localised electrodes. No randomised controlled trials were included, few studies reported sensitivity and specificity, and only three considered PwID.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the studies demonstrated the feasibility of remote EEG interventions for out-of-hospital monitoring and their potential to improve data collection and quality of care for patients. Further research is needed on the effectiveness, benefits, and limitations of remote EEG monitoring compared to in-patient monitoring, especially for PwID.

Rates of event capture of home video EEG

OBJECTIVE

Recording electrographic and behavioral information during epileptic and other paroxysmal events is important during video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. This study was undertaken to measure the event capture rate of an home service operating across Australia using a shoulder-worn EEG device and telescopic pole-mounted camera.

METHODS

Neurologist reports were accessed retrospectively. Studies with confirmed events were identified and assessed for event capture by recording modality, whether events were reported or discovered, and physiological state.

RESULTS

6,265 studies were identified, of which 2,788 (44.50%) had events. A total of 15,691 events were captured, of which 77.89% were reported. The EEG amplifier was active for 99.83% of events. The patient was in view of the camera for 94.90% of events. 84.89% of studies had all events on camera, and 2.65% had zero events on camera (mean = 93.66%, median = 100.00%). 84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep.

CONCLUSIONS

Event capture was similar to previously reported rates from home studies, with higher capture rates on video. Most patients have all events captured on camera.

SIGNIFICANCE

Home monitoring is capable of high rates of event capture, and the use of wide-angle cameras allows for all events to be captured in the majority of studies.

The utility of mobile telephone-recorded videos as adjuncts to the diagnosis of seizures and paroxysmal events in children with suspected epileptic seizures

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is often diagnosed through clinical description, but inter-observer interpretations can be diverse and misleading.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of smartphone videos in the diagnosis of paediatric epilepsy.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed for evidence to support the use of smartphone videos, inclusive of advantages, ethical practice and potential disadvantages. An existing adult-based quality of video (QOV) scoring tool was adapted for use in children. A pilot study used convenience sampling of videos from 25 patients, which were reviewed to assess the viability of the adapted QOV tool against the subsequent diagnosis for the patients with videos. The referral mechanism of the videos was reviewed for the source and consent processes followed.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were identified. Methodologies varied; only three focused on videos of children, and QOV was formally scored in three. Studies found that smartphone videos of good quality assisted the differentiation of epilepsy from non-epileptic events, especially with accompanying history and with more experienced clinicians. The ethics and risks of circulation of smartphone videos were briefly considered in a minority of the reports. The pilot study found that the adapted QOV tool correlated with videos of moderate and high quality and subsequent diagnostic closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Data relating to the role of smartphone video of events in children is lacking, especially from low- and middle-income settings. Guidelines for caregivers to acquire good-quality videos are not part of routine practice. The ethical implications of transfer of sensitive material have not been adequately addressed for this group. Prospective multicentre studies are needed to formally assess the viability of the adapted QOV tool for paediatric videos.

Ambulantes Langzeit-Video-EEG als neuer diagnostischer Ansatz in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Machbarkeitsstudie

Das Langzeit-Video-EEG als Goldstandarddiagnostik bei Epilepsie und anderen Anfallsleiden ist in Deutschland derzeit nur in wenigen spezialisierten Zentren zur stationären Überwachung verfügbar. Diese begrenzten Überwachungskapazitäten und der damit verbundene hohe Zeit- und Arbeitsaufwand führen bundesweit zu einer erheblichen Wartezeit für diese wichtige Diagnostik. Neue, tragbare Sensortechnologien und automatisierte Datenanalysemethoden schaffen Möglichkeiten für Video-EEG-Langzeituntersuchungen nach dem Goldstandard im ambulanten Bereich, die dazu beitragen können, diese Barriere zu überwinden. Hier berichten wir über die Ergebnisse einer Machbarkeitsstudie an einem Zentrum, in der das ambulante Langzeit-Video-EEG (ALVEEG) als diagnostischer Weg in Deutschland eingeführt wurde. In dem neuen Diagnostikpfad soll der Einsatz innovativer, tragbarer Video-EEG-Monitoringsysteme zusammen mit einer durch künstliche Intelligenz unterstützten Datenanalyse den von Anfallsleiden betroffenen Patienten einen schnelleren, effizienteren und sektorübergreifenden Zugang zu einer Goldstandarddiagnostik in der häuslichen Umgebung ermöglichen. Die Diagnostik wurde von Patienten und Klinikern gut angenommen und könnte eine ergänzende Option zur stationären Überwachung darstellen, um die derzeitigen Engpässe in Diagnostik und Versorgung zu beseitigen.

Future Opportunities for Research in Rescue Treatments

Clinical studies of rescue medications for seizure clusters are limited and are designed to satisfy regulatory requirements, which may not fully consider the needs of the diverse patient population that experiences seizure clusters or utilize rescue medication. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine the factors that contribute to, or may influence the quality of, seizure cluster research with a goal of improving clinical practice. We address five areas of unmet needs and provide advice for how they could enhance future trials of seizure cluster treatments. The topics addressed in this article are: (1) unaddressed end points to pursue in future studies, (2) roles for devices to enhance rescue medication clinical development programs, (3) tools to study seizure cluster prediction and prevention, (4) the value of other designs for seizure cluster studies, and (5) unique challenges of future trial paradigms for seizure clusters. By focusing on novel end points and technologies with value to patients, caregivers, and clinicians, data obtained from future studies can benefit the diverse patient population that experiences seizure clusters, providing more effective, appropriate care as well as alleviating demands on health care resources.

Video Ambulatory EEG in Children: A Quality Improvement Study

PURPOSE

We implemented a video ambulatory EEG (VA-EEG) Program as an alternative to inpatient video EEG monitoring for some patients given potential benefits related to quicker access, greater convenience, and lower cost. To evaluate the newly initiated program, we performed a quality improvement study to assess whether VA-EEG yielded studies with interpretable EEG and video quality that generated clinically beneficial data.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective quality improvement study. We surveyed ordering clinicians, electroencephalographers, and caregivers regarding consecutive children who underwent clinically indicated VA-EEG. The primary outcome was the percentage of VA-EEG studies in which the ordering clinician reported that the study had answered the question of interest.

RESULTS

We evaluated 74 consecutive children selected to undergo clinically indicated VA-EEG by their clinicians and caregivers. Ordering clinicians reported that 77% of studies answered the question of interest. Electroencephalographers reported that the quality of the EEG and video was excellent or adequate in 100% and 92% of patients, respectively. Additionally, 84% of caregivers reported preferring VA-EEG if EEG data were needed in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Video ambulatory EEG may be an effective diagnostic modality among children selected by clinicians and caregivers to undergo long-term EEG monitoring. Given it is effective as well as convenient, accessible, and lower cost than inpatient EEG monitoring, all of which align with our institution's quality goals, we intend to expand our VA-EEG Program.

Ambulatory EEG: Crossing the divide during a pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic forced temporary closure of epilepsy monitoring units across the globe due to potential hospital-based contagion. As COVID-19 exposures and deaths continues to surge in the United States and around the world, other types of long-term EEG monitoring have risen to fill the gap and minimize hospital exposure. AEEG has high yield compared to standard EEG. Prolonged audio-visual video-EEG capability can record events and epileptiform activity with quality like inpatient video-EEG monitoring. Technological advances in AEEG using miniaturized hardware and wireless secure transmission have evolved to small portable devices that are perfect for people forced to stay at home during the pandemic. Application of seizure detection algorithms and Cloud-based storage with real-time access provides connectivity to AEEG interpreters during prolonged "shut-down". In this article we highlight the benefits of AEEG as an alternative to diagnostic inpatient VEM during the paradigm shift to mobile heath forced by the Coronavirus.

Chronic electroencephalography in epilepsy with a responsive neurostimulation device: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Implanted neurostimulation devices are gaining traction as therapeutic options for people with certain forms of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Some of these devices enable chronic electroencephalography (cEEG), which offers views of the dynamics of brain activity in epilepsy over unprecedented time horizons.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on clinical insights and basic neuroscience discoveries enabled by analyses of cEEG from an exemplar device, the NeuroPace RNS® System. Applications of RNS cEEG covered here include counting and lateralizing seizures, quantifying medication response, characterizing spells, forecasting seizures, and exploring mechanisms of cognition. Limitations of the RNS System are discussed in the context of next-generation devices in development.

EXPERT OPINION

The wide temporal lens of cEEG helps capture the dynamism of epilepsy, revealing phenomena that cannot be appreciated with short duration recordings. The RNS System is a vanguard device whose diagnostic utility rivals its therapeutic benefits, but emerging minimally invasive devices, including those with subscalp recording electrodes, promise to be more applicable within a broad population of people with epilepsy. Epileptology is on the precipice of a paradigm shift in which cEEG is a standard part of diagnostic evaluations and clinical management is predicated on quantitative observations integrated over long timescales.

How much time is enough? Establishing an optimal duration of recording for ambulatory video EEG

OBJECTIVE

Ambulatory video EEG allows for extended recording of EEG in the comfort of a patient's home. However, the optimal duration of recording to capture clinical events is yet to be established. The current study uses retrospective analyses to identify an optimal recording duration for at-home video EEG.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed utilizing an anonymized database of ambulatory video EEG recordings performed between March and September 2020 with a national in-home EEG provider. Only completed assessments with neurologists' reads of raw data were reviewed, resulting in 3644 unique studies divided into three age cohorts: pediatrics (n = 941), adult (n = 2020), and geriatric (n = 683). Cohorts were characterized by assessment yield and time to first typical clinical event, as well as subsequent typical events over duration of recording.

RESULTS

Frequency distributions reveal over half of first events are captured within 12 hours, but longer recording durations capture a much wider majority of both first typical events, as well as the mean number of subsequent events (5 clinical events). In 72 hours, over 97% of first events were observed in adult and geriatric patients, as well as over 95% of the mean number of subsequent events. In children, time to first event was significantly earlier than either adult or geriatric samples, with 98% of first events, and 92.8% of the mean number of subsequent events being observed in 48 hours.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results from a large-scale, national dataset of patients using in-home EEG monitoring suggests recording at least 48 hours in duration for children, and at least 72 hours in duration for adult and geriatric samples, is optimal to maximize the likelihood of observing typical clinical events to facilitate diagnosis.

The Yield of Ambulatory EEG-Video Monitoring

INTRODUCTION

The availability of ambulatory EEG-video monitoring gives an alternative to traditional inpatient EEG-video, but its yield and diagnostic value are not well known. This study evaluates the yield of ambulatory EEG-video for the diagnosis of epilepsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the ambulatory EEG-video monitoring data from 200 consecutive and unselected patients aged 12 years and older performed by a single company (RSC Diagnostic Services) between January 2018 and May 2018. Studies were processed by two senior certified long-term monitoring EEG technologists and interpreted by neurologists.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients, 130 (65%) were women, mean age was 45 years. Mean duration of studies were 76.6 hours (range 23-175 hours). There were 110 studies (55%) with events recorded and 101 (92%) were captured on video. Epileptic events accounted for 17.8% (18/101) of the events captured and 9% (18/200) of our total cohort. Nonepileptic diagnosis accounted for 38% of the total number of patients in study (76/200).

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory EEG-video monitoring may be a useful alternative to inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit, particularly with high clinical suspicion for nonepileptic events.

Long-term Home Video EEG for Recording Clinical Events

SUMMARY

Around 50 years after the first EEG acquisition by Hans Berger, its use in ambulatory setting was demonstrated. Ever since, ambulatory EEG has been widely available and routinely used in the United States (and to a lesser extent in Europe) for diagnosis and management of patients with epilepsy. This technology alone cannot help with semiological characterization, and absence of video is one of its main drawbacks. Addition of video to ambulatory EEG potentially improves diagnostic yield and opens new aspects of utility for better characterization of patient's events, including differential diagnosis, classification, and quantification of seizure burden. Studies evaluating quality of ambulatory video EEG (aVEEG) suggest good quality recordings are feasible. In the utilization of aVEEG, to maximize yield, it is important to consider pretest probability. Having clear pretest questions and a strong index of suspicion for focal, generalized convulsive or non-epileptic seizures further increases the usefulness of aVEEG. In this article, which is part of the topical issue "Ambulatory EEG," the authors compare long-term home aVEEG to inpatient video EEG monitoring, discuss aVEEG's use in diagnosis and follow-up of patients, and present the authors' own experience of the utility of aVEEG in a teaching hospital setting.

Home video EEG telemetry

Long-term electroencephalogram monitoring is often used to help distinguish epileptic from dissociative (non-epileptic) seizures. Home video telemetry now offers many of the benefits in diagnosis previously available only with inpatient video telemetry, which is usually regarded as the 'gold standard'. Here, we describe recent developments in home video telemetry and how we undertake this procedure in our unit.

Ambulatory EEG Monitoring, Reviewing, and Interpreting

SUMMARY

This section of this volume of the Journal of Neurophysiology's review of ambulatory EEG (aEEG) is an overview of the uses of the technique, the clinicians who most often use it, and why they use it. It looks at the use of aEEG from the perspectives of the "generalist" and the "specialist" and discusses where they have similar interests and where their interest may diverge. It compares the use of aEEG to the more classic inpatient-based epilepsy monitoring unit service and compares the advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches (aEEG vs. epilepsy monitoring unit). This section then reviews how aEEGs are clinically interpreted based on a best practices approach and how aEEGs can be modified to address recording problems that, until recently, have been approached only in an epilepsy monitoring unit environment. Finally, this section addresses the qualifications necessary for the proper interpretation and reporting of aEEG studies. At the end of this section, there are five case examples using aEEG techniques that demonstrate various aspects covered in this section. These case reports demonstrate not only the utility of aEEG but also show how aEEG recordings can be integrated into the care of complex clinical situations that are frequently encountered not only by the practicing generalists but also by epilepsy specialists who practices out of a comprehensive epilepsy program.

Under-sampling in epilepsy: Limitations of conventional EEG

The cyclical structure of epilepsy was recently (re)-discovered through years-long intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) obtained with implanted devices. In this review, we discuss how new revelations from chronic EEG relate to the practice and interpretation of conventional EEG. We argue for an electrographic definition of seizures and highlight the caveats of counting epileptiform discharges in EEG recordings of short duration. Limitations of conventional EEG have practical implications with regard to titrating anti-seizure medications and allowing patients to drive, and we propose that chronic monitoring of brain activity could greatly improve epilepsy care. An impending paradigm shift in epilepsy will involve using next-generation devices for chronic EEG to leverage known biomarkers of disease state.

Epilepsy-Work-Up and Management in Children

Pediatric epilepsy is a highly variable condition due to age-related expression of syndromes that require specific diagnosis, evaluations, and treatments. Children with epilepsy differ from their adult counterparts in many important ways, mostly related to the age-related expression of specific epilepsy syndromes. This results in many important considerations related to the epilepsy diagnosis, classification, evaluations to determine an etiology, as well as treatment guidelines. A good understanding of these factors will help to establish an accurate epilepsy diagnosis, which in turn will guide appropriate testing and treatment decisions. In this way, patients will have improved seizure outcomes, and families will be educated appropriately and provided with the most accurate prognostic information available. The purpose of this article is to review the diagnosis, work-up, and management of pediatric epilepsy.

[Sleep and wake disorders in epilepsy]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize published data on the prevalence, characteristics and diagnostic criteria of sleep disorders in epilepsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of published articles was performed in Medline (Pubmed), Scopus, Web of Science and e-library databases.

RESULTS

Epidemiologic, clinical and diagnostic aspects of excessive daytime sleepiness, obstructive sleep apnea and central apnea, restless leg syndrome and parasomnias related to slow-wave and REM-sleep in patients with epilepsy were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to gain an insight into the complex associations of sleep disorders in epilepsy to optimize diagnostic and treatment approaches and to improve the quality of life in that patient population.

A new era in electroencephalographic monitoring? Subscalp devices for ultra-long-term recordings

Inaccurate subjective seizure counting poses treatment and diagnostic challenges and thus suboptimal quality in epilepsy management. The limitations of existing hospital- and home-based monitoring solutions are motivating the development of minimally invasive, subscalp, implantable electroencephalography (EEG) systems with accompanying cloud-based software. This new generation of ultra-long-term brain monitoring systems is setting expectations for a sea change in the field of clinical epilepsy. From definitive diagnoses and reliable seizure logs to treatment optimization and presurgical seizure foci localization, the clinical need for continuous monitoring of brain electrophysiological activity in epilepsy patients is evident. This paper presents the converging solutions developed independently by researchers and organizations working at the forefront of next generation EEG monitoring. The immediate value of these devices is discussed as well as the potential drivers and hurdles to adoption. Additionally, this paper discusses what the expected value of ultra-long-term EEG data might be in the future with respect to alarms for especially focal seizures, seizure forecasting, and treatment personalization.

The clinical value of long - term electroencephalogram (EEG) in seizure - free populations: implications from a cross-sectional study

Backgroud

This study aimed to explore the clinical value of long - term electroencephalogram (LTM EEG) in seizure-free individuals taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for more than 2 years. We try to look for clinical factors associated with epileptiform activity on LTM EEG in seizure free patients. We hope that the detection of epileptiform activity by the LTM EEG recording can develop the better treatment strategy.

Methods

The LTM EEG recordings of 770 individuals with a definite diagnosis of epilepsy were assessed. Two hundred sixty-two individuals accorded with the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. We collect the demographic and clinical information and LTM EEG data of these 262 individuals. We analysed the data by one-way analysis of variance and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

We found that more epileptiform activity were found with LTM EEG recording than regular EEG recording in seizure-free individuals. We found several clinical factors could be associated with epileptiform activity on LTM EEG in seizure free patients by a one-way analysis: symptomatic or cryptogenic epilepsy [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.6], history of cerebral trauma (HR = 7.5), and abnormal imaging findings (HR = 3.1). The following factors suggested a correlation between history of cerebral trauma (HR = 2.4) and history of cerebral surgery (HR = 3.4) with epileptiform activity on LTM EEG presentation by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

The study indicated a correlation of a number of factors with abnormal LTM EEG presentation: symptomatic or cryptogenic epilepsy, history of cerebral trauma, history of cerebral surgery, and abnormal imaging findings. The LTM EEG recording may help find epileptiform activity in high risk seizure-free individuals. The individuals need be reevaluated the therapeutic strateagies, and increase the hope to reach real seizure-free.

Benefits of additional cardiologic examination in patients admitted for differential diagnosis to the Epilepsy Center Bethel

Additional cardiologic examination for syncope is used for patients admitted for diagnostic reasons in the Epilepsy Center Bethel if, after epileptologic examination, the etiology of seizures remains uncertain and a cardiologic etiology is suspected. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed all patient data from the diagnostic department between 02/2011 and 07/2015 to evaluate the benefits to patients of additional cardiologic examination for syncope. 78 out of 1567 patients underwent additional cardiologic examination for syncope. Syncope was confirmed in 50 cases (25 neurocardiogenic, 4 orthostatic hypotension, 6 rhythmogenic, 2 others, 13 unknown). The previous diagnosis of epilepsy made before admission to the Epilepsy Center Bethel was rejected in 25 out of 30 cases. Loop recorders were implanted in 26 patients. In 8 out of 26 cases the loop recorder helped to provide a definite diagnosis of a cardiac arrhythmia (n = 6) or to rule out a cardiac cause (n = 2). In conclusion, patients benefit from a close cooperation between epileptology and cardiology.

Gauging seizure risk

The current paradigm for treatment of epilepsy begins with trials of antiepileptic drugs, followed by evaluation for resective brain surgery in drug-resistant patients. If surgery is not possible or fails to control seizures, some patients benefit from implanted neurostimulation devices. In addition to their therapeutic benefit, some of these devices have diagnostic capability enabling recordings of brain activity with unprecedented chronicity. Two recent studies using different devices for chronic EEG (i.e., over months to years) yielded convergent findings of daily and multiday cycles of brain activity that help explain seizure timing. Knowledge of these patient-specific cycles can be leveraged to gauge and forecast seizure risk, empowering patients to adopt risk-stratified treatment strategies and behavioral modifications. We review evidence that epilepsy is a cyclical disorder, and we argue that implanted monitoring devices should be offered earlier in the treatment paradigm. Chronic EEG would allow pharmacologic treatments tailored to days of high seizure risk-here termed chronotherapy-and would help characterize long timescale seizure dynamics to improve subsequent surgical planning. Coupled with neuromodulation, the proposed approach could improve quality of life for patients and decrease the number ultimately requiring resective surgery. We outline challenges for chronic monitoring and seizure forecasting that demand close collaboration among engineers, neurosurgeons, and neurologists.

High similarity between EEG from subcutaneous and proximate scalp electrodes in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

Subcutaneous recording using electroencephalography (EEG) has the potential to enable ultra-long-term epilepsy monitoring in real-life conditions because it allows the patient increased mobility and discreteness. This study is the first to compare physiological and epileptiform EEG signals from subcutaneous and scalp EEG recordings in epilepsy patients. Four patients with probable or definite temporal lobe epilepsy were monitored with simultaneous scalp and subcutaneous EEG recordings. EEG recordings were compared by correlation and time-frequency analysis across an array of clinically relevant waveforms and patterns. We found high similarity between the subcutaneous EEG channels and nearby temporal scalp channels for most investigated electroencephalographic events. In particular, the temporal dynamics of one typical temporal lobe seizure in one patient were similar in scalp and subcutaneous recordings in regard to frequency distribution and morphology. Signal similarity is strongly related to the distance between the subcutaneous and scalp electrodes. On the basis of these limited data, we conclude that subcutaneous EEG recordings are very similar to scalp recordings in both time and time-frequency domains, if the distance between them is small. As many electroencephalographic events are local/regional, the positioning of the subcutaneous electrodes should be considered carefully to reflect the relevant clinical question. The impact of implantation depth of the subcutaneous electrode on recording quality should be investigated further.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first publication comparing the detection of clinically relevant, pathological EEG features from a subcutaneous recording system designed for out-patient ultra-long-term use to gold standard scalp EEG recordings. Our study shows that subcutaneous channels are very similar to comparable scalp channels, but also point out some issues yet to be resolved.

No Further Yield of Ambulatory EEG for Epileptiform Discharges Beyond 13 Hours

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed at evaluating the value added by 24-hour ambulatory EEG (AEEG) by comparing the presence of epileptiform discharges (EDs) between the first 30 minutes of recording versus the following 23.5 hours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of AEEGs of subjects divided into two groups, epilepsy and undiagnosed episodes of loss of consciousness, was conducted. AEEGs were divided into early EEG (E-EEG) (first 30 minutes) and extended EEG (remaining 23.5 hours). Extended EEGs were further divided into segments (S): 31st minute to 8th hour (SI), 9th to 16th hours (SII) and 17th to 24th hours (SIII). Each consecutive segment was reviewed to identify new EDs not seen previously.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven AEEGs were included, the median age being 36.3 years, the range being 18.7 to 78.6 years. There were 38 (66.6%) females. The collective yield of AEEG for detecting EDs was 19/57 (33.4%). The yield of E-EEG of new EDs was 5/57 (9%). During extended EEG, the distribution of EDs was as follows: SI, 12/55 (21.8%); SII, 2/43 (4.6%); and SIII 0/41 (0%). The yield, however, did not increase beyond the 13th hour. In undiagnosed episodes of loss of consciousness group (11), yield was 0/11 in all segments.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) There was no value added for yield of EDs by extending the EEG recording beyond 13 hours in epilepsy group. (2) The probability of capturing EDs is negligible if the clinical history does not clearly support the diagnosis of seizure or epilepsy.